| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-07-13 | |||
| 12:35:25 | sean-k-mooney | so we want to be abel to suprpot existing users | |
| 12:37:12 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: this affect a very specific subset of deployemtn because it depens on teh qemu+librados/ceph clinet release in use. and you have to have encypted volumes as well. | |
| 12:37:37 | sean-k-mooney | anyway lets get some ci results adn see if the backprot even works | |
| 12:38:43 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: we could also backport swaping the ceph jobs to debian 12 but chaning the disto seams more invasive to me | |
| 12:39:07 | sean-k-mooney | althouhg it would only be on 2025.1 | |
| 12:39:25 | sean-k-mooney | 2025.2+ already were using debian for ceph | |
| 12:40:52 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph/+/997035 we can proably dicusss that in the qa channel seperatly | |
| 12:44:00 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: thanks for the explanation. i've commented on the patch my concern o:) | |
| 12:45:47 | sean-k-mooney | we could set it to the same value in the backport and tweak it in the job or as you said just exclude the test form the relevent jobs | |
| 12:48:36 | elodilles | i'm not fully against backporting the patch as is, if stable cores agree to do so o:) but maybe the above options are less invasive ^^^ | |
| 13:12:50 | opendevreview | Joan Gilabert proposed openstack/nova master: Add libvirt driver MDEV ARQ support for Cyborg https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/995840 | |
| 13:33:48 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: doc: Update cursive repository path https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996880 | |
| 15:27:29 | gmaan | gibi: thanks for placement release, I had to do same workaround of testing nova cross jobs with placement master when enforce_scope removal caused the issue. I tired to release it but then dropped the idea to let it releases during its own time. | |
| 15:27:46 | gmaan | gibi: on 2160224, I will check today bug and the change. | |
| 15:35:37 | opendevreview | Joan Gilabert proposed openstack/nova master: Report OWNER_NOVA trait on resource providers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994299 | |
| 15:35:37 | opendevreview | Joan Gilabert proposed openstack/nova master: Add libvirt driver MDEV ARQ support for Cyborg https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/995840 | |
| 15:35:56 | gibi | gmaan: thanks! | |
| 15:36:07 | gibi | it turned out that releasing a beta was easy | |
| 15:39:01 | gibi | FYI nova meeting starts in 20 mintes here. (I will be your guide today) | |
| 16:00:49 | gibi | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:00:49 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Mon Jul 13 16:00:49 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gibi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:00:49 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:00:49 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:00:59 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:01:01 | tkajinam | o/ | |
| 16:01:03 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:02:00 | gibi | lets wait a bit to see if others show up | |
| 16:02:17 | gibi | I know that Uggla and bauzas are off today | |
| 16:03:26 | gibi | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:03:32 | gibi | any bugs to talk about? | |
| 16:04:08 | gibi | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:04:21 | gibi | anything worth mentioning about the gate? | |
| 16:04:31 | tkajinam | nothing I'm aware of, though we might need to be careful about gate status for a while after mass m-2 releases of libraries | |
| 16:04:40 | gibi | good heads up | |
| 16:05:08 | tkajinam | removal of enforce_scope is one of the upcoming big changes. | |
| 16:05:41 | gibi | we also landed major functional test changes to support threading, the threading job is non voting at the moment and hopefully the change does not affect the eventlet job | |
| 16:06:03 | gibi | but if you see strange things in functional test then let me know | |
| 16:06:10 | elodilles | oh, btw, there was a cross-nova job failure in oslo.concurrency release | |
| 16:06:11 | sean-k-mooney | o/ | |
| 16:06:21 | gibi | elodilles: do you have a link? | |
| 16:06:33 | elodilles | this is the patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/996809 | |
| 16:06:46 | elodilles | and this is the job: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/9c3d2302c2dc453092804e0db538deb3 | |
| 16:07:03 | elodilles | i've already pinged the oslo team | |
| 16:07:08 | elodilles | on IRC | |
| 16:07:19 | gibi | the failing test called test_concurrent_server_delete so I feel relavance here :) | |
| 16:07:28 | sean-k-mooney | hum | |
| 16:07:30 | elodilles | just popped into my mind now that tkajinam mentioned the mass m-2 releases o:) | |
| 16:07:31 | gibi | anyhow I can take a deper look tomorrow | |
| 16:08:09 | tkajinam | I wasn't aware of any functional changes we recently merged into oslo.concurrecy so that looks a bit strange | |
| 16:08:34 | tkajinam | ping me in case you need hands from oslo side (and I'm aware of some discussions about slow futurist between gibi and sean-k-mooney but am not following it fully) | |
| 16:08:39 | sean-k-mooney | that test hevially depens on lock machanics | |
| 16:08:55 | gibi | tkajinam: thanks. | |
| 16:09:09 | gibi | anyhow moving on, we can handle that async | |
| 16:09:12 | gibi | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:09:15 | tkajinam | yup | |
| 16:09:33 | gibi | so other than the m-2 lib releases anything else about the release schedule? | |
| 16:10:04 | elodilles | nothing else from me | |
| 16:10:31 | gibi | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:10:42 | gibi | any important patch is stuck? | |
| 16:11:28 | gibi | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:11:34 | gibi | elodilles, your turn | |
| 16:11:41 | elodilles | thanks o/ | |
| 16:11:42 | elodilles | so | |
| 16:11:45 | elodilles | #info placement stable/2025.1 is blocked - workaround: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/992299 | |
| 16:11:57 | elodilles | #info nova stable/2025.1 branch is unstable due to nova-ceph-multistore job | |
| 16:12:04 | elodilles | this is new now ^^^ :/ | |
| 16:12:17 | elodilles | see details here: | |
| 16:12:24 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:12:42 | elodilles | there is a bug fix backport from sean-k-mooney | |
| 16:12:54 | elodilles | and i've commented on it | |
| 16:13:05 | elodilles | need nova stable core's opinion about the way forward | |
| 16:13:11 | sean-k-mooney | it passed on 2025.1 by the way but there are 3 paths forward | |
| 16:13:23 | elodilles | yepp | |
| 16:13:37 | elodilles | and that's all from me | |
| 16:13:52 | elodilles | back to you gibi | |
| 16:14:11 | sean-k-mooney | just a short tldr, we can backport melwitt's adress space confituraiton patch | |
| 16:14:19 | gibi | https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/2116852%22 | |
| 16:14:22 | gibi | this one I assume | |
| 16:14:31 | sean-k-mooney | we can change stablle 2025.1 ceph jobs to use debian 12 | |
| 16:14:38 | sean-k-mooney | or we can tweak the regex | |
| 16:15:01 | sean-k-mooney | and if we do backprot then we have a chocie of the defautl config value | |
| 16:15:03 | sean-k-mooney | but yes | |
| 16:15:05 | sean-k-mooney | its that bug | |
| 16:15:18 | gibi | OK | |
| 16:15:25 | fwiesel | o/ | |
| 16:15:28 | melwitt | why not let 1G be default on stable and tweak the job for stable to use 2G? that would seem more standard to me as to what real life operator would do | |
| 16:15:30 | gibi | so I see elodilles had some backportability concrens and sean-k-mooney replied | |
| 16:15:49 | sean-k-mooney | i dont really ahve a stong opion on what approch we take | |
| 16:15:52 | elodilles | melwitt: that's another good option, imo, too | |
| 16:15:58 | sean-k-mooney | i just create the backport to confirm they actully work | |
| 16:16:10 | gibi | I'm fine with melwitt's proposal if that helps accepting the backport on stalbe | |
| 16:16:13 | gibi | stable | |
| 16:16:24 | melwitt | yes thanks for doing that sean-k-mooney | |
| 16:16:25 | elodilles | +1 | |
| 16:16:28 | melwitt | (I'm replying on gerrit also) | |
| 16:16:32 | gibi | cool | |
| 16:16:41 | gibi | I think we can continue this on the review | |
| 16:16:49 | melwitt | ++ | |
| 16:16:52 | sean-k-mooney | mechaniclaly would you like me to update them or will melwitt do it | |
| 16:16:52 | elodilles | +1 | |