| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-07-13 | |||
| 16:06:10 | elodilles | oh, btw, there was a cross-nova job failure in oslo.concurrency release | |
| 16:06:11 | sean-k-mooney | o/ | |
| 16:06:21 | gibi | elodilles: do you have a link? | |
| 16:06:33 | elodilles | this is the patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/996809 | |
| 16:06:46 | elodilles | and this is the job: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/9c3d2302c2dc453092804e0db538deb3 | |
| 16:07:03 | elodilles | i've already pinged the oslo team | |
| 16:07:08 | elodilles | on IRC | |
| 16:07:19 | gibi | the failing test called test_concurrent_server_delete so I feel relavance here :) | |
| 16:07:28 | sean-k-mooney | hum | |
| 16:07:30 | elodilles | just popped into my mind now that tkajinam mentioned the mass m-2 releases o:) | |
| 16:07:31 | gibi | anyhow I can take a deper look tomorrow | |
| 16:08:09 | tkajinam | I wasn't aware of any functional changes we recently merged into oslo.concurrecy so that looks a bit strange | |
| 16:08:34 | tkajinam | ping me in case you need hands from oslo side (and I'm aware of some discussions about slow futurist between gibi and sean-k-mooney but am not following it fully) | |
| 16:08:39 | sean-k-mooney | that test hevially depens on lock machanics | |
| 16:08:55 | gibi | tkajinam: thanks. | |
| 16:09:09 | gibi | anyhow moving on, we can handle that async | |
| 16:09:12 | gibi | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:09:15 | tkajinam | yup | |
| 16:09:33 | gibi | so other than the m-2 lib releases anything else about the release schedule? | |
| 16:10:04 | elodilles | nothing else from me | |
| 16:10:31 | gibi | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:10:42 | gibi | any important patch is stuck? | |
| 16:11:28 | gibi | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:11:34 | gibi | elodilles, your turn | |
| 16:11:41 | elodilles | thanks o/ | |
| 16:11:42 | elodilles | so | |
| 16:11:45 | elodilles | #info placement stable/2025.1 is blocked - workaround: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/992299 | |
| 16:11:57 | elodilles | #info nova stable/2025.1 branch is unstable due to nova-ceph-multistore job | |
| 16:12:04 | elodilles | this is new now ^^^ :/ | |
| 16:12:17 | elodilles | see details here: | |
| 16:12:24 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:12:42 | elodilles | there is a bug fix backport from sean-k-mooney | |
| 16:12:54 | elodilles | and i've commented on it | |
| 16:13:05 | elodilles | need nova stable core's opinion about the way forward | |
| 16:13:11 | sean-k-mooney | it passed on 2025.1 by the way but there are 3 paths forward | |
| 16:13:23 | elodilles | yepp | |
| 16:13:37 | elodilles | and that's all from me | |
| 16:13:52 | elodilles | back to you gibi | |
| 16:14:11 | sean-k-mooney | just a short tldr, we can backport melwitt's adress space confituraiton patch | |
| 16:14:19 | gibi | https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/2116852%22 | |
| 16:14:22 | gibi | this one I assume | |
| 16:14:31 | sean-k-mooney | we can change stablle 2025.1 ceph jobs to use debian 12 | |
| 16:14:38 | sean-k-mooney | or we can tweak the regex | |
| 16:15:01 | sean-k-mooney | and if we do backprot then we have a chocie of the defautl config value | |
| 16:15:03 | sean-k-mooney | but yes | |
| 16:15:05 | sean-k-mooney | its that bug | |
| 16:15:18 | gibi | OK | |
| 16:15:25 | fwiesel | o/ | |
| 16:15:28 | melwitt | why not let 1G be default on stable and tweak the job for stable to use 2G? that would seem more standard to me as to what real life operator would do | |
| 16:15:30 | gibi | so I see elodilles had some backportability concrens and sean-k-mooney replied | |
| 16:15:49 | sean-k-mooney | i dont really ahve a stong opion on what approch we take | |
| 16:15:52 | elodilles | melwitt: that's another good option, imo, too | |
| 16:15:58 | sean-k-mooney | i just create the backport to confirm they actully work | |
| 16:16:10 | gibi | I'm fine with melwitt's proposal if that helps accepting the backport on stalbe | |
| 16:16:13 | gibi | stable | |
| 16:16:24 | melwitt | yes thanks for doing that sean-k-mooney | |
| 16:16:25 | elodilles | +1 | |
| 16:16:28 | melwitt | (I'm replying on gerrit also) | |
| 16:16:32 | gibi | cool | |
| 16:16:41 | gibi | I think we can continue this on the review | |
| 16:16:49 | melwitt | ++ | |
| 16:16:52 | sean-k-mooney | mechaniclaly would you like me to update them or will melwitt do it | |
| 16:16:52 | elodilles | +1 | |
| 16:16:55 | sean-k-mooney | but ya we can move on | |
| 16:17:26 | sean-k-mooney | we can decied that after the meeting | |
| 16:17:30 | gibi | OK | |
| 16:17:33 | gibi | any other stable business? | |
| 16:18:11 | gibi | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:18:18 | gibi | fwiesel: any news? | |
| 16:18:28 | fwiesel | Added some gating as changes in tempest and devstack caused some regressions. | |
| 16:18:46 | fwiesel | But we are still not back to the old working state. | |
| 16:19:05 | fwiesel | Still Debugging what else needs to get fixed. | |
| 16:19:14 | fwiesel | That's from my side | |
| 16:19:34 | gibi | thanks. do you need help? | |
| 16:19:57 | fwiesel | gibi: thanks, but I'm fine | |
| 16:20:10 | gibi | cool | |
| 16:20:12 | gibi | #topic Kamil's news about eventlet removal | |
| 16:20:17 | gibi | I'm filling in | |
| 16:20:32 | gibi | so we landed the functional test changes to support threading mode | |
| 16:20:50 | gibi | the job is still non voting. we have couple of follow ups to stabilize and speed it up | |
| 16:20:56 | gibi | then we will make it voting | |
| 16:21:15 | gmaan | ++ | |
| 16:21:17 | gibi | but the tox -e functional-py313-threading target is already usable if needed | |
| 16:22:24 | gibi | there are two patches that is reviewable https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996793 | |
| 16:22:41 | gibi | (and ^^ its parent) | |
| 16:23:05 | gmaan | will check today | |
| 16:23:23 | gibi | Kamil started working on futurist enhancements on Executors to support some of our advanced use cases. This might need coordianation with sean-k-mooney effort of fixing the slow shutdown bug in futurist | |
| 16:23:56 | sean-k-mooney | ack, i did a bunch of general performacne improment in followups | |
| 16:24:11 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: I'm aware and I will take a look at them during the week | |
| 16:24:12 | sean-k-mooney | in comparison to the stdlib thread pool futurists is slow | |
| 16:24:31 | sean-k-mooney | and the dynamic one has some pathalogicl behvior with small short lived tasks | |
| 16:24:33 | gibi | Kamil's work https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/futurist/+/975508 Sean's work https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/futurist/+/975508 | |
| 16:25:25 | sean-k-mooney | im goign to bring the 2 bugfixes to the front and leave the larger effincy feature to the end of my work | |
| 16:25:26 | gmaan | sean-k-mooney: this series? #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/futurist/+/996817/1 | |
| 16:25:40 | gmaan | can you add a single topic/hashtag, I will add those in my list | |
| 16:25:42 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/futurist/+/996574/1 | |
| 16:25:46 | sean-k-mooney | that was the end of the serise | |
| 16:26:04 | sean-k-mooney | gmaan: ya i can git-reivew nolonger does that by default | |
| 16:26:06 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: make sense pulling the bugfixes in front, thanks | |
| 16:26:29 | gibi | that is my eventlet update. Anything else on eventlet? | |