| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-07-13 | |||
| 15:35:37 | opendevreview | Joan Gilabert proposed openstack/nova master: Report OWNER_NOVA trait on resource providers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994299 | |
| 15:35:37 | opendevreview | Joan Gilabert proposed openstack/nova master: Add libvirt driver MDEV ARQ support for Cyborg https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/995840 | |
| 15:35:56 | gibi | gmaan: thanks! | |
| 15:36:07 | gibi | it turned out that releasing a beta was easy | |
| 15:39:01 | gibi | FYI nova meeting starts in 20 mintes here. (I will be your guide today) | |
| 16:00:49 | gibi | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:00:49 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Mon Jul 13 16:00:49 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is gibi. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:00:49 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:00:49 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:00:59 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:01:01 | tkajinam | o/ | |
| 16:01:03 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:02:00 | gibi | lets wait a bit to see if others show up | |
| 16:02:17 | gibi | I know that Uggla and bauzas are off today | |
| 16:03:26 | gibi | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:03:32 | gibi | any bugs to talk about? | |
| 16:04:08 | gibi | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:04:21 | gibi | anything worth mentioning about the gate? | |
| 16:04:31 | tkajinam | nothing I'm aware of, though we might need to be careful about gate status for a while after mass m-2 releases of libraries | |
| 16:04:40 | gibi | good heads up | |
| 16:05:08 | tkajinam | removal of enforce_scope is one of the upcoming big changes. | |
| 16:05:41 | gibi | we also landed major functional test changes to support threading, the threading job is non voting at the moment and hopefully the change does not affect the eventlet job | |
| 16:06:03 | gibi | but if you see strange things in functional test then let me know | |
| 16:06:10 | elodilles | oh, btw, there was a cross-nova job failure in oslo.concurrency release | |
| 16:06:11 | sean-k-mooney | o/ | |
| 16:06:21 | gibi | elodilles: do you have a link? | |
| 16:06:33 | elodilles | this is the patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/requirements/+/996809 | |
| 16:06:46 | elodilles | and this is the job: https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/9c3d2302c2dc453092804e0db538deb3 | |
| 16:07:03 | elodilles | i've already pinged the oslo team | |
| 16:07:08 | elodilles | on IRC | |
| 16:07:19 | gibi | the failing test called test_concurrent_server_delete so I feel relavance here :) | |
| 16:07:28 | sean-k-mooney | hum | |
| 16:07:30 | elodilles | just popped into my mind now that tkajinam mentioned the mass m-2 releases o:) | |
| 16:07:31 | gibi | anyhow I can take a deper look tomorrow | |
| 16:08:09 | tkajinam | I wasn't aware of any functional changes we recently merged into oslo.concurrecy so that looks a bit strange | |
| 16:08:34 | tkajinam | ping me in case you need hands from oslo side (and I'm aware of some discussions about slow futurist between gibi and sean-k-mooney but am not following it fully) | |
| 16:08:39 | sean-k-mooney | that test hevially depens on lock machanics | |
| 16:08:55 | gibi | tkajinam: thanks. | |
| 16:09:09 | gibi | anyhow moving on, we can handle that async | |
| 16:09:12 | gibi | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:09:15 | tkajinam | yup | |
| 16:09:33 | gibi | so other than the m-2 lib releases anything else about the release schedule? | |
| 16:10:04 | elodilles | nothing else from me | |
| 16:10:31 | gibi | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:10:42 | gibi | any important patch is stuck? | |
| 16:11:28 | gibi | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:11:34 | gibi | elodilles, your turn | |
| 16:11:41 | elodilles | thanks o/ | |
| 16:11:42 | elodilles | so | |
| 16:11:45 | elodilles | #info placement stable/2025.1 is blocked - workaround: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/992299 | |
| 16:11:57 | elodilles | #info nova stable/2025.1 branch is unstable due to nova-ceph-multistore job | |
| 16:12:04 | elodilles | this is new now ^^^ :/ | |
| 16:12:17 | elodilles | see details here: | |
| 16:12:24 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:12:42 | elodilles | there is a bug fix backport from sean-k-mooney | |
| 16:12:54 | elodilles | and i've commented on it | |
| 16:13:05 | elodilles | need nova stable core's opinion about the way forward | |
| 16:13:11 | sean-k-mooney | it passed on 2025.1 by the way but there are 3 paths forward | |
| 16:13:23 | elodilles | yepp | |
| 16:13:37 | elodilles | and that's all from me | |
| 16:13:52 | elodilles | back to you gibi | |
| 16:14:11 | sean-k-mooney | just a short tldr, we can backport melwitt's adress space confituraiton patch | |
| 16:14:19 | gibi | https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bug/2116852%22 | |
| 16:14:22 | gibi | this one I assume | |
| 16:14:31 | sean-k-mooney | we can change stablle 2025.1 ceph jobs to use debian 12 | |
| 16:14:38 | sean-k-mooney | or we can tweak the regex | |
| 16:15:01 | sean-k-mooney | and if we do backprot then we have a chocie of the defautl config value | |
| 16:15:03 | sean-k-mooney | but yes | |
| 16:15:05 | sean-k-mooney | its that bug | |
| 16:15:18 | gibi | OK | |
| 16:15:25 | fwiesel | o/ | |
| 16:15:28 | melwitt | why not let 1G be default on stable and tweak the job for stable to use 2G? that would seem more standard to me as to what real life operator would do | |
| 16:15:30 | gibi | so I see elodilles had some backportability concrens and sean-k-mooney replied | |
| 16:15:49 | sean-k-mooney | i dont really ahve a stong opion on what approch we take | |
| 16:15:52 | elodilles | melwitt: that's another good option, imo, too | |
| 16:15:58 | sean-k-mooney | i just create the backport to confirm they actully work | |
| 16:16:10 | gibi | I'm fine with melwitt's proposal if that helps accepting the backport on stalbe | |
| 16:16:13 | gibi | stable | |
| 16:16:24 | melwitt | yes thanks for doing that sean-k-mooney | |
| 16:16:25 | elodilles | +1 | |
| 16:16:28 | melwitt | (I'm replying on gerrit also) | |
| 16:16:32 | gibi | cool | |
| 16:16:41 | gibi | I think we can continue this on the review | |
| 16:16:49 | melwitt | ++ | |
| 16:16:52 | sean-k-mooney | mechaniclaly would you like me to update them or will melwitt do it | |
| 16:16:52 | elodilles | +1 | |
| 16:16:55 | sean-k-mooney | but ya we can move on | |
| 16:17:26 | sean-k-mooney | we can decied that after the meeting | |
| 16:17:30 | gibi | OK | |
| 16:17:33 | gibi | any other stable business? | |
| 16:18:11 | gibi | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:18:18 | gibi | fwiesel: any news? | |
| 16:18:28 | fwiesel | Added some gating as changes in tempest and devstack caused some regressions. | |
| 16:18:46 | fwiesel | But we are still not back to the old working state. | |
| 16:19:05 | fwiesel | Still Debugging what else needs to get fixed. | |
| 16:19:14 | fwiesel | That's from my side | |
| 16:19:34 | gibi | thanks. do you need help? | |
| 16:19:57 | fwiesel | gibi: thanks, but I'm fine | |
| 16:20:10 | gibi | cool | |
| 16:20:12 | gibi | #topic Kamil's news about eventlet removal | |