| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-03-30 | |||
| 16:11:29 | Uggla | #info Nova deadlines are set in the above schedule | |
| 16:11:35 | Uggla | #info PTG etherpad for 2026.2 is available: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.2-ptg | |
| 16:11:42 | Uggla | #info This is a "work in progress document", but you can enter you topics at the bottom of the document | |
| 16:12:00 | Uggla | #info Gazpacho should release this week. | |
| 16:12:12 | Uggla | #info we will discuss Hibiscus release planning at the PTG. | |
| 16:12:26 | Uggla | #info Gazpacho Openstack Infra live this week, Thursday 2nd april 14:00 UTC | |
| 16:12:27 | gibi | there is a tentative plan at https://releases.openstack.org/hibiscus/schedule.html | |
| 16:13:16 | Uggla | yeah gibi is right, there is a "draft" plan that we will adjust at the PTG. | |
| 16:13:43 | Uggla | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:13:51 | Uggla | #link New file for Hibiscus https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.2-status | |
| 16:14:01 | Uggla | #info I have updated Launchpad and the above doc. Please ping me if you spot something missing. | |
| 16:14:11 | Uggla | #info Starting: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.2-status#L16 interesting bugs to review. | |
| 16:14:49 | Uggla | I have reviewed topic:"bp/generalize-sev-code", gibi any chance you review it again ? | |
| 16:15:24 | gibi | Uggla: on my list among other things | |
| 16:15:51 | Uggla | gibi ok no pb | |
| 16:16:12 | Uggla | tkajinam, thanks for your answer on the ML for AMD-SNP. | |
| 16:16:43 | tkajinam | Uggla, np | |
| 16:17:30 | Uggla | Do you think you can have a draft spec to discuss at PTG ? And then give the hand for refinement and implementation to someone else ? | |
| 16:17:50 | tkajinam | yeah I can | |
| 16:17:59 | tkajinam | I also had a chat with some folks from LY regarding sev-snp and they told me that they already created their own implementation. | |
| 16:18:29 | tkajinam | I guess they are also preparing spec in their side. I'll check it with them in case they are ready to submit their version | |
| 16:18:41 | Uggla | super cool, thanks. And interesting to know that people for LY corp already have something. | |
| 16:18:56 | Uggla | Any chance to have a joined spec ? | |
| 16:18:59 | tkajinam | masahito, just fyi ^^^ | |
| 16:19:07 | tkajinam | yeah I think that's better | |
| 16:20:33 | gibi | just to my limited brain capacity, so this means tkajinam will help with the spec (joint or not) but we need somebody who takes over and implements it | |
| 16:20:41 | gibi | is it a correct understanding? | |
| 16:20:53 | Uggla | gibi, yes | |
| 16:20:56 | gibi | OK | |
| 16:21:25 | Uggla | Anton will work on the TDX implementation though. | |
| 16:22:25 | gibi | I feel that even with the refactoring we have a chance that the TDX and the SNP work will merge conflict, do we have some mitigation planned, or we just use the first come first server rule? | |
| 16:22:47 | Uggla | Noob question regarding HW, what is supporting AMD-SNP ? Special AMD CPUs ? | |
| 16:22:57 | sean-k-mooney | on the topic of the PTG we likely need to schdule a cyborg cross project session but i have not formulated a specific adgenda yet. | |
| 16:23:04 | tkajinam | Technically I can provide a draft code but I may not have enough time to set up test environment for it. (due to my focus shifting away from these confidential computing things atm) | |
| 16:23:15 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: not specificly specil but ranter a specific genreation | |
| 16:23:16 | tkajinam | Uggla, yeah you need specific generation of EPYC processor which supports SEV-SNP | |
| 16:23:34 | sean-k-mooney | as in i think you need 3rd generation EPYC or later | |
| 16:23:41 | tkajinam | and relatively new kernel + qemu + libvirt, which actually supports host features to use SEV-SNP | |
| 16:23:42 | tkajinam | yeah | |
| 16:24:15 | sean-k-mooney | i woudl need to check but i think we have access interenaly to at least 1 AMD host that supprot SNP | |
| 16:24:16 | Uggla | ok gonna check what is required in term of HW, to know if we have host supporting it. | |
| 16:25:06 | tkajinam | gibi, I agree these two can cause conflict but I guess the conflict can be easily resolved because we don't expect object change. | |
| 16:25:13 | Uggla | gibi, regarding the merge conflic, I expect a lot from the refactoring to limit them. | |
| 16:25:23 | gibi | OK | |
| 16:25:41 | Uggla | but we will see. | |
| 16:26:33 | Uggla | I think we are done with that topic. | |
| 16:27:25 | Uggla | And yes sean-k-mooney, we can work together to have a cross session with cyborg. | |
| 16:28:11 | Uggla | FYI, I will be on PTO next week, but back 1 week before PTG to prepare it. | |
| 16:28:37 | Uggla | ok moving on to next topic | |
| 16:28:45 | Uggla | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:28:59 | elodilles | thx | |
| 16:29:11 | elodilles | actually the situation is the same as last week | |
| 16:29:17 | elodilles | #info nova stable gates should be OK | |
| 16:29:23 | elodilles | #info placement and osc-placement have blocked stable gates, fixes need stable cores review (see: https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:pin-setuptools-81-docs and https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:pin-setuptools-81-via-virtualenv-pkg-resources ) | |
| 16:29:38 | elodilles | i'd appreciate stable core reviews on these ^^^ | |
| 16:29:46 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:29:58 | elodilles | details are here ^^^ | |
| 16:30:08 | elodilles | and that's all from me | |
| 16:30:45 | Uggla | thx elodilles maybe I will have a look but can't +2. | |
| 16:31:35 | Uggla | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:31:45 | Uggla | fwiesel, something from your side ? | |
| 16:31:48 | sean-k-mooney | if we are ok wiht proxying elod i can +2w later if nowone else review but im reviing them now | |
| 16:32:01 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney thx | |
| 16:32:08 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney Uggla : thanks both of you o/ | |
| 16:32:19 | fwiesel | Hi, I am digging into the issues with the hanging image upload. | |
| 16:32:33 | fwiesel | I hope, I have a solution: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/oslo.vmware/+/982614 But I want to verify it first. | |
| 16:32:40 | gibi | fwiesel: thanks | |
| 16:33:00 | gibi | I will keep an eye on our WIP | |
| 16:33:06 | fwiesel | It takes more time, because a couple of other problems happened. (Such as expired certificates) | |
| 16:33:36 | fwiesel | I'll be on PTO on next Monday, so I can report back on the Monday after that | |
| 16:33:46 | gibi | fwiesel: OK, have a good PTO | |
| 16:33:58 | fwiesel | But I am optimistic, I can validate the fix this week. | |
| 16:34:04 | fwiesel | That's it from my side. | |
| 16:34:20 | Uggla | spoil, we might not have a meeting next week | |
| 16:35:07 | Uggla | thx fwiesel | |
| 16:35:13 | Uggla | #topic Gibi's news about eventlet removal | |
| 16:35:15 | bauzas | I'm all in for punting the meeting next week | |
| 16:35:51 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:36:04 | gibi | top of what we discussed in the gate section I have one additional new | |
| 16:36:05 | gibi | s | |
| 16:36:40 | gibi | I saw novncproxy working in native threading mode with sambork's patch. so good progress there | |
| 16:36:52 | Uggla | \o/ | |
| 16:36:59 | Uggla | thx sambork | |
| 16:37:15 | gibi | I left a bunch of comments in the patch but we are moving in the right direction I belive | |
| 16:37:43 | gibi | that is all from me | |
| 16:37:56 | Uggla | thx gibi | |
| 16:38:14 | Uggla | #topic Nova using openstack sdk for neutron | |
| 16:38:34 | Uggla | layos is not anymore available, so pasting what he said earlier: | |
| 16:38:51 | Uggla | "from my side I worked/working on the patch for migrating security-groups to SDK, so some progress with it :-)" | |
| 16:39:20 | sean-k-mooney | oh not aviabel to attend the meeting not "not avaible to contineu the work" | |
| 16:40:04 | Uggla | ? | |
| 16:40:06 | sean-k-mooney | for a series like that we proably dont want this to be all or nothing. so it might be worth seeing fi we can land some of the eaierl patches. which that said i have not looked at it in at least a release | |
| 16:40:26 | sean-k-mooney | "layos is not anymore available," | |
| 16:40:36 | Uggla | I mean for this meeting | |
| 16:40:39 | sean-k-mooney | ya | |
| 16:41:01 | sean-k-mooney | i tought you were annouching they would not have tiem to work on it this cycle. that was my misuderstandign | |
| 16:41:35 | elodilles | nope :) Lajos will continue to work on this but had to leave for the day ;) | |
| 16:41:52 | Uggla | sorry for the misunderstanding. Layos will continue working on the patches. | |
| 16:42:42 | Uggla | shame on me I have to look at these patches too, but I have not done it again. | |
| 16:43:21 | Uggla | ok next topic | |