| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-03-30 | |||
| 16:33:36 | fwiesel | I'll be on PTO on next Monday, so I can report back on the Monday after that | |
| 16:33:46 | gibi | fwiesel: OK, have a good PTO | |
| 16:33:58 | fwiesel | But I am optimistic, I can validate the fix this week. | |
| 16:34:04 | fwiesel | That's it from my side. | |
| 16:34:20 | Uggla | spoil, we might not have a meeting next week | |
| 16:35:07 | Uggla | thx fwiesel | |
| 16:35:13 | Uggla | #topic Gibi's news about eventlet removal | |
| 16:35:15 | bauzas | I'm all in for punting the meeting next week | |
| 16:35:51 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:36:04 | gibi | top of what we discussed in the gate section I have one additional new | |
| 16:36:05 | gibi | s | |
| 16:36:40 | gibi | I saw novncproxy working in native threading mode with sambork's patch. so good progress there | |
| 16:36:52 | Uggla | \o/ | |
| 16:36:59 | Uggla | thx sambork | |
| 16:37:15 | gibi | I left a bunch of comments in the patch but we are moving in the right direction I belive | |
| 16:37:43 | gibi | that is all from me | |
| 16:37:56 | Uggla | thx gibi | |
| 16:38:14 | Uggla | #topic Nova using openstack sdk for neutron | |
| 16:38:34 | Uggla | layos is not anymore available, so pasting what he said earlier: | |
| 16:38:51 | Uggla | "from my side I worked/working on the patch for migrating security-groups to SDK, so some progress with it :-)" | |
| 16:39:20 | sean-k-mooney | oh not aviabel to attend the meeting not "not avaible to contineu the work" | |
| 16:40:04 | Uggla | ? | |
| 16:40:06 | sean-k-mooney | for a series like that we proably dont want this to be all or nothing. so it might be worth seeing fi we can land some of the eaierl patches. which that said i have not looked at it in at least a release | |
| 16:40:26 | sean-k-mooney | "layos is not anymore available," | |
| 16:40:36 | Uggla | I mean for this meeting | |
| 16:40:39 | sean-k-mooney | ya | |
| 16:41:01 | sean-k-mooney | i tought you were annouching they would not have tiem to work on it this cycle. that was my misuderstandign | |
| 16:41:35 | elodilles | nope :) Lajos will continue to work on this but had to leave for the day ;) | |
| 16:41:52 | Uggla | sorry for the misunderstanding. Layos will continue working on the patches. | |
| 16:42:42 | Uggla | shame on me I have to look at these patches too, but I have not done it again. | |
| 16:43:21 | Uggla | ok next topic | |
| 16:43:28 | Uggla | #topic Bug scrubbing | |
| 16:43:37 | Uggla | #info up to 199 (stable) | |
| 16:43:57 | Uggla | #info I managed to keep it stable last week. | |
| 16:44:05 | Uggla | #link: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:44:11 | Uggla | #link: https://truc.uggla.fr/ to follow the trend. | |
| 16:45:00 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/osc-placement stable/2024.2: [CI][stable-only] Workaround for missing pkg_resources https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/979691 | |
| 16:45:29 | Uggla | I'am a bit late on the schedule, but I will try to schedule a bug squashing session wednesday around 16:30 UTC. I'will keep you posted on the ML. | |
| 16:46:29 | Uggla | So I'd like people who has bug in the rooster to join if they need to discuss about triaging a bug. | |
| 16:46:34 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/osc-placement stable/2025.1: [CI][stable-only] Fix docs job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/979692 | |
| 16:47:39 | Uggla | that's all for this topic today, please look at the ML for further information. | |
| 16:48:00 | Uggla | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:48:12 | Uggla | Uggla: Suggest no meeting next week. 6th April is a public holiday in most European countries. | |
| 16:48:33 | Uggla | I saw bauzas agree too earlier | |
| 16:48:40 | Uggla | Someone against that ? | |
| 16:48:42 | gibi | +1 from me too | |
| 16:48:52 | bauzas | restating my +1 | |
| 16:49:02 | sean-k-mooney | yep +1 | |
| 16:49:11 | bauzas | (and I will also be on PTO the day after) | |
| 16:49:21 | gmaan | +1 | |
| 16:49:27 | Uggla | bauzas, me the whole week so.... | |
| 16:49:38 | bauzas | Easter egghunt ! | |
| 16:49:56 | Uggla | I will probably announced that on the ML too. | |
| 16:50:13 | bauzas | please so | |
| 16:50:17 | elodilles | +1 | |
| 16:50:19 | sean-k-mooney | if you want a nova one did you know our service heartbeat message is 1.21Giawatts | |
| 16:50:25 | Uggla | egghunt and CHOCALATE !!!! | |
| 16:50:33 | sean-k-mooney | i.e. back to the future refnces | |
| 16:51:23 | sean-k-mooney | https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/cfd5474c6438ad7cdb553357a37df5f2150d37ed/nova/conductor/api.py#L67 | |
| 16:51:52 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney, reading in my head for finding april fool. :) | |
| 16:52:30 | sean-k-mooney | well more a software "easter egg" | |
| 16:52:55 | Uggla | yep. | |
| 16:54:06 | Uggla | We are almost at the top of the hour. Does someone want to discuss something else. | |
| 16:54:40 | gibi | - | |
| 16:54:54 | sean-k-mooney | not really | |
| 16:56:02 | Uggla | ok so time to close. | |
| 16:56:09 | womax_ | Hi, I finally had time to come back and update a spec for tempURL usage in nova (came here to talk about it a few months ago). Would like to know if I could have some review to it, or as ptg are coming it would have to wait for them | |
| 16:56:28 | womax_ | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/975883 | |
| 16:56:56 | Uggla | womax_ please add a topic the ptg doc, I will find a slot to discuss it | |
| 16:57:16 | womax_ | ok thx, where do i find the doc? | |
| 16:57:16 | Uggla | https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.2-ptg | |
| 16:58:05 | sean-k-mooney | womax_: skiming it im not sure why nova need to change exactly | |
| 16:58:39 | sean-k-mooney | if i cant tell that after 90s of lookign at the spec it means you need to motivate the problem statemenadn user case better in the spec | |
| 16:58:41 | womax_ | sean-k-mooney need to make a few modifications to use the feature it is implemented in glance | |
| 16:58:59 | sean-k-mooney | but why | |
| 16:59:09 | sean-k-mooney | nova does not need ot use every glance fature that is added | |
| 16:59:27 | sean-k-mooney | you need to explin in the spec what benift this ahs to users and adminstiartor of nova | |
| 16:59:38 | womax_ | oh ok in this sense | |
| 16:59:57 | womax_ | to be short, dessaturate glance traffic by bypassing it when download image | |
| 17:00:09 | womax_ | I'll add it | |
| 17:00:36 | sean-k-mooney | yep so in the specific case that we are using swift/s3 or ceph rados gateway | |
| 17:00:47 | womax_ | yes | |
| 17:01:00 | sean-k-mooney | if glacne implenmt that feature we coudl use a direct temp url to download the iamge instead of streaming via glance | |
| 17:01:08 | womax_ | yes exactly | |
| 17:01:09 | sean-k-mooney | but it woudl be good to explain that up front | |
| 17:01:40 | sean-k-mooney | anyway we are at time but it woudl also be good to capture how nova woudl knwo to use this in the spec | |
| 17:02:00 | sean-k-mooney | i.e. if we have a glance multi store env how do we know which stores supprot it and which do nto | |
| 17:02:13 | sean-k-mooney | ectra so that the nova spec is mostly self contaiened | |
| 17:02:24 | Uggla | yep we need to close. | |
| 17:02:35 | womax_ | ok i'll think more about it | |
| 17:02:40 | Uggla | Discussion can be done later outside of the meeting. | |
| 17:02:41 | womax_ | and we can discuss later | |
| 17:03:14 | Uggla | Thanks for joining this meeting. Have a nice day/evening and see you in 2 weeks. | |
| 17:03:22 | Uggla | #endmeeting | |
| 17:03:22 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Mon Mar 30 17:03:22 2026 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 17:03:22 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-03-30-16.00.html | |
| 17:03:22 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-03-30-16.00.txt | |
| 17:03:22 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-03-30-16.00.log.html | |
| 17:03:47 | elodilles | thanks o/ | |
| 17:04:36 | sean-k-mooney | womax_: have you recived much feedback on the glance spec. is it a new proposal on that side? | |