| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2024-07-16 | |||
| 15:02:26 | elodilles | and as far as i understood, now i only had to touch the create_cow_image function, and no need for to change anything in create_image function (nova/virt/libvirt/utils.py) | |
| 15:03:23 | elodilles | as create_cow_image functions handles only the case when there is a backing_file | |
| 15:08:32 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: a very light reivew, it looks correct but havented dnoe anything more then compare the 2023.1 patch to the yoga version | |
| 15:09:42 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: ACK, thanks, i know that this is unmaintained, so i appreciate it! o:) | |
| 15:10:10 | sean-k-mooney | the ci results are relivily clean too | |
| 15:10:46 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Propose config option to control behavior of unset unified limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/923807 | |
| 15:10:49 | elodilles | yepp, hence i dared to ask o:) | |
| 15:11:44 | sean-k-mooney | this obviously still has the iso regression | |
| 15:12:48 | sean-k-mooney | and im not sure if you have alredy fixed the ami format | |
| 15:13:53 | sean-k-mooney | ok the ami regression is adressed in the backport of a previous file as it was in master | |
| 15:13:55 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924082/1/nova/virt/images.py#163 | |
| 15:14:30 | sean-k-mooney | so the main regression is the breakgae of iso supprot form rescue, volumes and boot form iso | |
| 15:19:32 | elodilles | so you say something is still missing? | |
| 15:22:40 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: not for the cve mitigation but the cve broke seveeral features | |
| 15:22:57 | sean-k-mooney | the one you are missing is the fixes for ISO files | |
| 15:23:32 | sean-k-mooney | elodilles: this series https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22format-inspector%22 | |
| 15:26:02 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: oh, that, those are still on my TODO to backport o:) ACK | |
| 15:26:10 | elodilles | thx o/ | |
| 15:27:05 | sean-k-mooney | we backported them downstream to our trian equivelent branch with very little issues | |
| 15:27:25 | sean-k-mooney | all of thhis code is basically new so there is almost no opertunity for there to be a conflict | |
| 15:29:03 | elodilles | oh, good to hear that :] | |
| 16:00:02 | bauzas | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:00:02 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Jul 16 16:00:02 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:00:02 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:00:02 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:00:12 | fwiesel | o/ | |
| 16:00:14 | tkajinam | o/ | |
| 16:00:19 | bauzas | hey everyone, welcome back, it was long overdue | |
| 16:00:39 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:01:21 | bauzas | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting | |
| 16:01:42 | auniyal | o/ | |
| 16:02:24 | bauzas | I guess we can softly start | |
| 16:02:42 | bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:02:49 | bauzas | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:02:59 | bauzas | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:03:14 | bauzas | do people want to discuss about some specific bugs, like some now public ones :) | |
| 16:04:04 | sean-k-mooney | i think you can take that as a no | |
| 16:04:51 | bauzas | thanks btw. dansmith and sean-k-mooney for https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2059809 | |
| 16:05:27 | bauzas | moving on | |
| 16:05:28 | gibi | o./ | |
| 16:05:30 | sean-k-mooney | *for fixing https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2059809 :) elodilles did a lot fo the hevay lifting on the backports as did gibi | |
| 16:05:45 | bauzas | :) | |
| 16:05:46 | elodilles | o:) | |
| 16:06:04 | bauzas | sorry, I was on PTO so I wasn't able to help :) | |
| 16:06:13 | bauzas | anyway, moving on | |
| 16:06:15 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:06:15 | sean-k-mooney | its fine it got done in the end | |
| 16:06:22 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:06:28 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal | |
| 16:06:34 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:06:41 | bauzas | all greens | |
| 16:06:49 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:06:56 | bauzas | #info Please try to provide meaningful comment when you recheck | |
| 16:07:08 | bauzas | so, how is the current CI ? | |
| 16:07:38 | sean-k-mooney | better then it was. we merged the zswap changes and that seams to help stablise things | |
| 16:07:57 | sean-k-mooney | i have a patch up for review to slightly increase the ram of the default falvor | |
| 16:08:07 | sean-k-mooney | im hoping that will reduce or remove the kernel panics | |
| 16:08:11 | bauzas | ok | |
| 16:08:20 | sean-k-mooney | so we will want to monitor those once that merges | |
| 16:09:09 | bauzas | I could look at opensearch | |
| 16:10:04 | sean-k-mooney | we could do that yes alhtough im hopign it will become obvious or not if its enouch | |
| 16:10:10 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/924094 is the patch in question | |
| 16:10:46 | sean-k-mooney | downstream we obseved a crash that we have not seen since we changed form 128 to 256 mb upstream i only went to 192 | |
| 16:11:42 | sean-k-mooney | so lets see how thing go for the next week | |
| 16:12:03 | tkajinam | that makes very clear sense | |
| 16:12:19 | bauzas | okay, I see that it's close to be merged | |
| 16:13:10 | sean-k-mooney | yep i also did a DNM to nova https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924142 | |
| 16:13:20 | sean-k-mooney | just to run our full set of jobs and it was green | |
| 16:14:48 | bauzas | for the guest panics, I'll ask opensearch about something like " ---[ end Kernel panic " | |
| 16:15:11 | bauzas | anyway, we'll see | |
| 16:15:21 | bauzas | moving on ? | |
| 16:15:42 | bauzas | looks so | |
| 16:15:48 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:15:55 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/dalmatian/schedule.html | |
| 16:16:00 | bauzas | #info Dalmatian-3 in 6 weeks | |
| 16:16:05 | bauzas | #info Spec approval freeze planned on Thursday | |
| 16:16:17 | bauzas | so that will be my review priority until Thursday | |
| 16:17:28 | bauzas | after Thursday EOD, we won't accept any other specs for Dalmatian, but you can then ask them for Epoxy once we merge https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/924227 | |
| 16:17:53 | bauzas | anything about the spec freeze ? | |
| 16:18:27 | tkajinam | I'm willing to move SEV-ES support forward this cycle so am looking for further feedback to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/907702 :-) | |
| 16:19:28 | fwiesel | I'd like raise attention then to my lazy-metadata-loading spec: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/922201 | |
| 16:19:30 | sean-k-mooney | i can try and review that before thrusday | |
| 16:19:32 | bauzas | tkajinam: ack, I'll review | |
| 16:19:45 | bauzas | ditto for fwiesel | |
| 16:20:09 | bauzas | moving on so | |
| 16:20:18 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:20:24 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-dalmatian-status | |
| 16:20:45 | bauzas | #action bauzas to update the above etherpad and Launchpad by tomorrow morning | |
| 16:20:55 | bauzas | I need to exactly look at what we already accepted | |
| 16:21:17 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:21:22 | bauzas | elodilles: heya | |
| 16:21:26 | elodilles | o7 | |
| 16:21:27 | elodilles | #info stable gates should be in OK state | |
| 16:21:30 | elodilles | #info nova stable versions were released a week ago: 29.1.0 (2024.1 Caracal), 28.2.0 (2023.2 Bobcat), 27.4.0 (Antelope) | |
| 16:21:40 | elodilles | but i guess we will need new releases after some time as new fixes landed after the release | |
| 16:22:02 | elodilles | either feel free to propose the release patch or ping me | |
| 16:22:26 | elodilles | and that's all from me for stable for now | |
| 16:22:33 | bauzas | okay, we'll see | |
| 16:22:48 | bauzas | and indeed we will need to create new releases due to the cve fixes | |
| 16:23:05 | sean-k-mooney | does already shipped btu the regression fixes are pending | |