| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2024-07-16 | |||
| 16:05:46 | elodilles | o:) | |
| 16:06:04 | bauzas | sorry, I was on PTO so I wasn't able to help :) | |
| 16:06:13 | bauzas | anyway, moving on | |
| 16:06:15 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:06:15 | sean-k-mooney | its fine it got done in the end | |
| 16:06:22 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:06:28 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal | |
| 16:06:34 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:06:41 | bauzas | all greens | |
| 16:06:49 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:06:56 | bauzas | #info Please try to provide meaningful comment when you recheck | |
| 16:07:08 | bauzas | so, how is the current CI ? | |
| 16:07:38 | sean-k-mooney | better then it was. we merged the zswap changes and that seams to help stablise things | |
| 16:07:57 | sean-k-mooney | i have a patch up for review to slightly increase the ram of the default falvor | |
| 16:08:07 | sean-k-mooney | im hoping that will reduce or remove the kernel panics | |
| 16:08:11 | bauzas | ok | |
| 16:08:20 | sean-k-mooney | so we will want to monitor those once that merges | |
| 16:09:09 | bauzas | I could look at opensearch | |
| 16:10:04 | sean-k-mooney | we could do that yes alhtough im hopign it will become obvious or not if its enouch | |
| 16:10:10 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack/+/924094 is the patch in question | |
| 16:10:46 | sean-k-mooney | downstream we obseved a crash that we have not seen since we changed form 128 to 256 mb upstream i only went to 192 | |
| 16:11:42 | sean-k-mooney | so lets see how thing go for the next week | |
| 16:12:03 | tkajinam | that makes very clear sense | |
| 16:12:19 | bauzas | okay, I see that it's close to be merged | |
| 16:13:10 | sean-k-mooney | yep i also did a DNM to nova https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924142 | |
| 16:13:20 | sean-k-mooney | just to run our full set of jobs and it was green | |
| 16:14:48 | bauzas | for the guest panics, I'll ask opensearch about something like " ---[ end Kernel panic " | |
| 16:15:11 | bauzas | anyway, we'll see | |
| 16:15:21 | bauzas | moving on ? | |
| 16:15:42 | bauzas | looks so | |
| 16:15:48 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:15:55 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/dalmatian/schedule.html | |
| 16:16:00 | bauzas | #info Dalmatian-3 in 6 weeks | |
| 16:16:05 | bauzas | #info Spec approval freeze planned on Thursday | |
| 16:16:17 | bauzas | so that will be my review priority until Thursday | |
| 16:17:28 | bauzas | after Thursday EOD, we won't accept any other specs for Dalmatian, but you can then ask them for Epoxy once we merge https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/924227 | |
| 16:17:53 | bauzas | anything about the spec freeze ? | |
| 16:18:27 | tkajinam | I'm willing to move SEV-ES support forward this cycle so am looking for further feedback to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/907702 :-) | |
| 16:19:28 | fwiesel | I'd like raise attention then to my lazy-metadata-loading spec: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/922201 | |
| 16:19:30 | sean-k-mooney | i can try and review that before thrusday | |
| 16:19:32 | bauzas | tkajinam: ack, I'll review | |
| 16:19:45 | bauzas | ditto for fwiesel | |
| 16:20:09 | bauzas | moving on so | |
| 16:20:18 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:20:24 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-dalmatian-status | |
| 16:20:45 | bauzas | #action bauzas to update the above etherpad and Launchpad by tomorrow morning | |
| 16:20:55 | bauzas | I need to exactly look at what we already accepted | |
| 16:21:17 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:21:22 | bauzas | elodilles: heya | |
| 16:21:26 | elodilles | o7 | |
| 16:21:27 | elodilles | #info stable gates should be in OK state | |
| 16:21:30 | elodilles | #info nova stable versions were released a week ago: 29.1.0 (2024.1 Caracal), 28.2.0 (2023.2 Bobcat), 27.4.0 (Antelope) | |
| 16:21:40 | elodilles | but i guess we will need new releases after some time as new fixes landed after the release | |
| 16:22:02 | elodilles | either feel free to propose the release patch or ping me | |
| 16:22:26 | elodilles | and that's all from me for stable for now | |
| 16:22:33 | bauzas | okay, we'll see | |
| 16:22:48 | bauzas | and indeed we will need to create new releases due to the cve fixes | |
| 16:23:05 | sean-k-mooney | does already shipped btu the regression fixes are pending | |
| 16:23:12 | bauzas | we'll just see when it's needed | |
| 16:23:23 | bauzas | yeah that | |
| 16:23:57 | tkajinam | once a new release with follow-up fixes is created then we can start the discussion to oslo'nize the implementation | |
| 16:24:14 | sean-k-mooney | release are fortunetly relitively cheap | |
| 16:24:25 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: yepp | |
| 16:24:27 | sean-k-mooney | also yes that | |
| 16:24:32 | bauzas | given all the distros already fixed their cves, this is not that urgent, but I'd still want to get those stable versions quickly | |
| 16:24:44 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: i mean it semi urgent | |
| 16:24:51 | sean-k-mooney | we broke all useage of isos in nova | |
| 16:24:54 | bauzas | semi-urgent indeeed | |
| 16:25:08 | bauzas | I'm not telling about the backports | |
| 16:25:18 | bauzas | but about the stable releases | |
| 16:25:33 | sean-k-mooney | yep we broke all useage of iso on the sable branches too | |
| 16:25:43 | sean-k-mooney | they are now fixed but not released | |
| 16:25:47 | gibi | :) | |
| 16:26:04 | sean-k-mooney | but we can likely od that in the next weeek or so | |
| 16:26:25 | sean-k-mooney | i think the last patch to stable/2023.1 landed friday | |
| 16:26:36 | bauzas | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:26:43 | fwiesel | #info No updates | |
| 16:26:44 | bauzas | fwiesel: want to say anything ? | |
| 16:26:49 | bauzas | cool with me | |
| 16:26:55 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:27:02 | bauzas | anything from me, anything anyone ? | |
| 16:27:16 | tkajinam | I have one thing | |
| 16:27:51 | tkajinam | I have a few items pending on os-traits change. I wonder if I can ask for an early release (probably right after spec freeze) so that I can start pushing patches early | |
| 16:28:04 | tkajinam | See https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/os-traits+status:open | |
| 16:28:39 | elodilles | +1 for early release o:) | |
| 16:28:58 | bauzas | that's always a good idea (to release os-traits release way earlier than milestone-3) | |
| 16:29:06 | bauzas | ditto with os-vif if required | |
| 16:29:41 | tkajinam | ok, that's nice. :-) | |
| 16:30:08 | bauzas | once the spec is approved, I don't see any reason to hold a os-traits patch | |
| 16:30:36 | bauzas | tkajinam: accordingly, please ping me if you want once your both specs are validated | |
| 16:30:47 | sean-k-mooney | i dont see why not | |
| 16:31:10 | bauzas | I just can't remember the state of both specs :) | |
| 16:31:22 | bauzas | so I'll first look whether they're accepted or not | |
| 16:31:54 | tkajinam | the SEV-ES work still needs spec approval but the other two have specs approved | |
| 16:32:14 | tkajinam | I'll update the status after the meeting | |
| 16:32:46 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 16:32:59 | bauzas | (yeah I remembered about the firmware one) | |
| 16:33:15 | sean-k-mooney | im not sure if we need the es trait | |
| 16:33:27 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/os-traits master: Add a new trait for stateless firmware support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/908885 | |
| 16:33:32 | sean-k-mooney | didnt we say we would use a seperate resouce class for that | |