Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2024-07-16
16:19:45 bauzas ditto for fwiesel
16:20:09 bauzas moving on so
16:20:18 bauzas #topic Review priorities
16:20:24 bauzas #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-dalmatian-status
16:20:45 bauzas #action bauzas to update the above etherpad and Launchpad by tomorrow morning
16:20:55 bauzas I need to exactly look at what we already accepted
16:21:17 bauzas #topic Stable Branches
16:21:22 bauzas elodilles: heya
16:21:26 elodilles o7
16:21:27 elodilles #info stable gates should be in OK state
16:21:30 elodilles #info nova stable versions were released a week ago: 29.1.0 (2024.1 Caracal), 28.2.0 (2023.2 Bobcat), 27.4.0 (Antelope)
16:21:40 elodilles but i guess we will need new releases after some time as new fixes landed after the release
16:22:02 elodilles either feel free to propose the release patch or ping me
16:22:26 elodilles and that's all from me for stable for now
16:22:33 bauzas okay, we'll see
16:22:48 bauzas and indeed we will need to create new releases due to the cve fixes
16:23:05 sean-k-mooney does already shipped btu the regression fixes are pending
16:23:12 bauzas we'll just see when it's needed
16:23:23 bauzas yeah that
16:23:57 tkajinam once a new release with follow-up fixes is created then we can start the discussion to oslo'nize the implementation
16:24:14 sean-k-mooney release are fortunetly relitively cheap
16:24:25 elodilles sean-k-mooney: yepp
16:24:27 sean-k-mooney also yes that
16:24:32 bauzas given all the distros already fixed their cves, this is not that urgent, but I'd still want to get those stable versions quickly
16:24:44 sean-k-mooney bauzas: i mean it semi urgent
16:24:51 sean-k-mooney we broke all useage of isos in nova
16:24:54 bauzas semi-urgent indeeed
16:25:08 bauzas I'm not telling about the backports
16:25:18 bauzas but about the stable releases
16:25:33 sean-k-mooney yep we broke all useage of iso on the sable branches too
16:25:43 sean-k-mooney they are now fixed but not released
16:25:47 gibi :)
16:26:04 sean-k-mooney but we can likely od that in the next weeek or so
16:26:25 sean-k-mooney i think the last patch to stable/2023.1 landed friday
16:26:36 bauzas #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights
16:26:43 fwiesel #info No updates
16:26:44 bauzas fwiesel: want to say anything ?
16:26:49 bauzas cool with me
16:26:55 bauzas #topic Open discussion
16:27:02 bauzas anything from me, anything anyone ?
16:27:16 tkajinam I have one thing
16:27:51 tkajinam I have a few items pending on os-traits change. I wonder if I can ask for an early release (probably right after spec freeze) so that I can start pushing patches early
16:28:04 tkajinam See https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/os-traits+status:open
16:28:39 elodilles +1 for early release o:)
16:28:58 bauzas that's always a good idea (to release os-traits release way earlier than milestone-3)
16:29:06 bauzas ditto with os-vif if required
16:29:41 tkajinam ok, that's nice. :-)
16:30:08 bauzas once the spec is approved, I don't see any reason to hold a os-traits patch
16:30:36 bauzas tkajinam: accordingly, please ping me if you want once your both specs are validated
16:30:47 sean-k-mooney i dont see why not
16:31:10 bauzas I just can't remember the state of both specs :)
16:31:22 bauzas so I'll first look whether they're accepted or not
16:31:54 tkajinam the SEV-ES work still needs spec approval but the other two have specs approved
16:32:14 tkajinam I'll update the status after the meeting
16:32:46 bauzas thanks
16:32:59 bauzas (yeah I remembered about the firmware one)
16:33:15 sean-k-mooney im not sure if we need the es trait
16:33:27 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/os-traits master: Add a new trait for stateless firmware support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/908885
16:33:32 sean-k-mooney didnt we say we would use a seperate resouce class for that
16:33:45 bauzas for SEV-ES ?
16:33:50 sean-k-mooney yep
16:34:03 sean-k-mooney oh no we didnt
16:34:10 sean-k-mooney its the same resouce class
16:34:12 tkajinam sean-k-mooney, we agreed using trait, not resource class to distinguish SEV and SEV-ES, IIUC
16:34:13 sean-k-mooney just with a triat
16:34:18 sean-k-mooney it been a while since i looked
16:34:19 tkajinam yes
16:34:25 sean-k-mooney ya ok
16:34:54 bauzas yeah https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-dalmatian-ptg#L498
16:35:04 bauzas (I was looking at the etherpad)
16:35:24 bauzas we didn't wanted to differentiate all the SEV supports
16:35:37 bauzas s/supports/types
16:35:46 bauzas anything else to discuss ?
16:36:07 sean-k-mooney not on this topic at least not form me
16:36:39 tkajinam nothing else from me
16:41:13 bauzas sorry, I looked at other stuff
16:41:19 bauzas thanks folks
16:41:23 bauzas #endmeeting
16:41:23 opendevmeet Meeting ended Tue Jul 16 16:41:23 2024 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:41:23 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-07-16-16.00.html
16:41:23 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-07-16-16.00.txt
16:41:23 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-07-16-16.00.log.html
16:41:33 fwiesel thank you too, bye
16:41:35 elodilles thanks o/
16:42:10 tkajinam thanks !
16:43:01 tkajinam bauzas, if you have a moment, could you approve https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/libvirt-stateless-firmware ? its spec was already merged https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/908297
16:43:10 tkajinam I remember we discussed the missing bp link which was fixed by https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/920612
16:43:26 bauzas tkajinam: as I said, I'll update Launchpad for all approved specs
16:43:49 bauzas I was on PTO last 10 days, so I'll both check the open specs but also the new merged ones
16:44:11 bauzas (and then update the status etherpad for adding series of the accepted specs)
16:44:13 tkajinam ah, ok. I'll recheck it after that "batch update"
16:48:28 opendevreview Merged openstack/os-traits master: Add traits for TPM models https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/909107
19:07:15 melwitt thanks sean-k-mooney and bauzas for the spec reviews 🙏
#openstack-nova - 2024-07-17
02:03:37 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: nova-manage: Add flavor scanning to migrate_to_unified_limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924110
05:04:40 ykarel y
05:06:38 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add config option [quota]strict_unified_limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924025
05:29:30 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add config option [quota]strict_unified_limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924025
07:46:11 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Add config option [quota]strict_unified_limits https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924025
09:46:45 bauzas hmmm, looks like we have a problem with the promote job https://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/2024.2/approved/
09:46:48 bauzas frickler: ^

Earlier   Later