| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2023-01-31 | |||
| 16:50:23 | bauzas | can we end the meeting then ? | |
| 16:50:55 | Uggla | ok 4 me. | |
| 16:51:08 | gibi | nothing else from me | |
| 16:51:57 | bauzas | then | |
| 16:51:59 | bauzas | thanks all | |
| 16:52:04 | bauzas | #endmeeting | |
| 16:52:04 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Jan 31 16:52:04 2023 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:52:04 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-01-31-16.00.html | |
| 16:52:04 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-01-31-16.00.txt | |
| 16:52:04 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2023/nova.2023-01-31-16.00.log.html | |
| 16:55:40 | elodilles | thanks o/ | |
| 16:56:15 | kashyap | sean-k-mooney: Running the stable/xena locally gives me this yak to shave - https://paste.opendev.org/show/bsRpOt3yk8k6LUw5D9P0/ | |
| 16:57:50 | elodilles | kashyap: maybe i'm wrong but this can be fixed by updating/installing explicitly setuptools? | |
| 16:58:07 | kashyap | Probably; I'm on Fedora 36 | |
| 16:58:25 | kashyap | elodilles: I'm trying to see if this erroneous failure of stable/xena related to my backport or not (it doesn't seem so) | |
| 16:58:28 | kashyap | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/796a6b05d72c4bbd87a3375028d43a1f | |
| 16:58:39 | kashyap | This one: nova.tests.unit.virt.libvirt.test_driver.LibvirtConnTestCase.test_check_can_live_migrate_dest_numa_lm [0.046959s] | |
| 16:58:43 | kashyap | (And that's the backport - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851205) | |
| 16:59:22 | sean-k-mooney | oh thats a known issue | |
| 16:59:51 | elodilles | yes, a known one and fixed in upstream gate i think | |
| 16:59:55 | sean-k-mooney | use_2to3 was remvoed in a setuptools verison | |
| 17:00:29 | kashyap | elodilles: Ah, thx. gibi also pointed that there's a rename, hence the fail: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871975 | |
| 17:00:32 | kashyap | Thanks, gibi! | |
| 17:00:35 | sean-k-mooney | https://github.com/gibizer/openstack-tox-docker/blob/main/ussuri/Dockerfile | |
| 17:00:38 | gibi | I thiunk the yoga container from here https://github.com/gibizer/openstack-tox-docker work on xena too | |
| 17:00:52 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: yes it does | |
| 17:01:10 | sean-k-mooney | kashyap: we swapped form the unmaintained suds_junko repo to a differnt one | |
| 17:01:26 | sean-k-mooney | but that is not your issue | |
| 17:01:53 | sean-k-mooney | you will need to clamp your pip/virtualevn and tox version | |
| 17:03:49 | elodilles | yepp. in upstream xena has newer versions (ubuntu) that's why we needed this up till ussuri ( https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/810461 ) | |
| 17:04:22 | elodilles | so i guess, in fedora this is needed in xena as well | |
| 17:16:15 | opendevreview | Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui proposed openstack/nova master: api: extend evacuate instance to support target state https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/858384 | |
| 17:16:45 | sahid | addressed minor comments from Rajesh Tailor, thank you ! | |
| 18:32:32 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: gibi bauzas: Things like this https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/872204 are incredibly difficult to make "work" in the functional tests because of all the ways and patterns we start and restart multiple fake computes | |
| 18:33:23 | bauzas | gdam shit | |
| 18:33:40 | dansmith | how terrible would it be if we just always mock out those host consistency checks in functionals and rely on unit testing to cover them, and the tempest jobs to really cover the regular happy path(s) ? | |
| 18:34:13 | dansmith | because the levels of stupid mocking to get even some of them to pass are probably worse and more complex than just not ever running those in the functionals | |
| 18:35:34 | bauzas | dansmith: I need to look at your failures but unfortunately I need to quit today (EOB) | |
| 18:36:28 | dansmith | bauzas: okay well, I'm just talking about a general read on the principle of the thing, but ... okay | |
| 18:37:27 | bauzas | dansmith: if you want, mock them indeed and just leave the unittests for checking them | |
| 18:38:24 | dansmith | ack | |
| 18:38:38 | dansmith | probably need a read from the other two before I go down that route | |
| 18:39:05 | sean-k-mooney | you could use a class constant to enable/disbale it | |
| 18:39:13 | sean-k-mooney | but enabel it by default in the base test | |
| 18:39:26 | dansmith | to enable/disable the mocking you mean? | |
| 18:39:32 | sean-k-mooney | yep | |
| 18:39:43 | sean-k-mooney | kind of like the microversion class constant | |
| 18:40:20 | sean-k-mooney | or the db one | |
| 18:40:45 | dansmith | okay, I'm not sure that will get me much, assuming you mean "so you can test it in one functional that does things in a specific way" because of the way the rest of the singleton virt node mocking works | |
| 18:40:53 | dansmith | but I can try | |
| 18:41:24 | sean-k-mooney | no i mean by default mock it out so it passes | |
| 18:41:42 | sean-k-mooney | and if you need to test it then you would set MOCK_STABLE_UUID=False | |
| 18:41:51 | sean-k-mooney | where you are explictly testing something that cares | |
| 18:42:22 | sean-k-mooney | following this pattern https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/nova/test.py#L158-L173 | |
| 18:43:08 | dansmith | what I'm saying is, even with the mock disabled for one test, the virt node mock always returns None, so testing this in a full stack is kinda difficult without *also* making that parameterized | |
| 18:43:28 | sean-k-mooney | oh ok | |
| 18:43:39 | dansmith | but perhaps if I put them both behind that flag I'll get what I need, I'll have to see | |
| 18:44:10 | sean-k-mooney | this is just needed for the last patch correct? | |
| 18:44:28 | sean-k-mooney | as in you already worked though the other test isseus in the previous ones | |
| 18:45:27 | dansmith | yeah | |
| 18:46:01 | sean-k-mooney | so do you want to go up one level and just mock out _ensure_existing_node_identity and the check function for host and hypervisor hostname | |
| 18:46:53 | dansmith | that's what I was going to do, after two hours of trying to mock only the second call to it, | |
| 18:47:03 | dansmith | but there are just too many permutations of start, restart, stop, start, etc | |
| 18:47:36 | dansmith | but let me try to the flag for both the node mock and that one and see if i think it results in something meaningful | |
| 18:48:18 | dansmith | I feel like it will probably end up with 10,000 tests having that set, just so one can have it unset, but still need mocks to make it not very useful, vs. just unit testing it in isolation | |
| 18:48:23 | dansmith | but I'll see | |
| 18:49:06 | dansmith | tbh I wasn't thinking about tying the node mock to the compute _ensure one, so will try that first | |
| 19:05:34 | dansmith | actually, maybe this will be better anyway and then I can write some dedicated lifecycle tests to simulate the manual testing we've been doing with devstack | |
| 19:16:37 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Fixup patch for stable-compute-uuid series https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871848 | |
| 19:31:52 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Check our nodes for hypervisor_hostname changes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/872220 | |
| 19:31:53 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Protect against a deleted node id file https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/872204 | |
| 19:31:53 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Move comment about _destroy_evacuated_instances() https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/872348 | |
| 19:55:33 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Protect against a deleted node id file https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/872204 | |
| 19:55:33 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Move comment about _destroy_evacuated_instances() https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/872348 | |
| 20:11:28 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Protect against a deleted node id file https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/872204 | |
| 20:11:28 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: Move comment about _destroy_evacuated_instances() https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/872348 | |
| 23:07:45 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Add further workaround features for qemu_monitor_announce_self https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/867324 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2023-02-01 | |||
| 07:12:50 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Detect host renames and abort startup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/863920 | |
| 08:33:11 | dvo-plv | Hello, All. Could you please review our new changes in the next blueprint https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/859290 | |
| 08:33:57 | opendevreview | Maxim Monin proposed openstack/nova master: Server Rescue leads to Server ERROR state if basew image is deleted https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/872385 | |
| 08:41:02 | sean-k-mooney | hum ^ is expected if you dont pass an image to use instead | |
| 08:41:50 | sean-k-mooney | dvo-plv: we are well after spec freeze specs wont reopen until ~march | |
| 08:50:43 | dvo-plv | Okay, I see, we told about our approach to add NT NIC support. So we made some poc and I have pushed new code to simplify understating of our approach | |
| 08:51:56 | sean-k-mooney | ok so Feature Feeze is in 2 week RC 1 will be about 2 week after that and the master branch will reopen for the 2023.2 release | |
| 08:52:48 | sean-k-mooney | in the interim you can rebase you spec to the 2023.2 folder on when that is created and it can be reviewd | |
| 08:53:03 | sean-k-mooney | has the neutron work been accpeted yet | |
| 08:53:20 | sean-k-mooney | and if so is it implemtned/reviewd or pending | |
| 09:11:04 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/os-traits master: Add 'COMPUTE_SHARE_LOCAL_FS' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/872185 | |
| 09:31:11 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: gibi im happy with both sahid's seriese and dans at this point and think we can proceed with merging both if ye can rereview them again this morning that would be great | |
| 09:32:17 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: yup I wanted to look at it yesterday, will do it this morning | |
| 09:33:19 | sahid | o/ ++ guys, I will be around if you want me to change or add something | |
| 09:33:50 | sean-k-mooney | there were some trivial nits but i was fine with a followup patch for those | |
| 09:34:06 | sahid | sure I will do that | |
| 09:34:56 | sean-k-mooney | at this point i would prefer to land the changes so that the sdk/osc changes can merge ectra and so you can avoid any conflicts on api ro compute service verison | |
| 09:35:07 | sahid | ++ | |
| 09:53:49 | opendevreview | Rodolfo Alonso proposed openstack/os-vif master: Implement "BaseCommand" result property https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/872391 | |
| 09:55:48 | sean-k-mooney | ralonsoh: ok so that is a premtive mesure to allow the ovsdbapp to be updated when its relased. | |
| 09:56:03 | ralonsoh | sean-k-mooney, yes | |
| 09:56:17 | sean-k-mooney | your cutting it kind of close | |
| 09:56:36 | ralonsoh | sean-k-mooney, I know that, that's why I'm speeding it | |