| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-01-18 | |||
| 16:08:26 | bauzas | #info FeatureApprovalFreeze was Jan 13st | |
| 16:08:32 | bauzas | #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/yoga 23 approved blueprints for the Yoga cycle with 16 of them having specs | |
| 16:08:36 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-yoga-blueprint-status Etherpad for blueprints tracking | |
| 16:08:48 | bauzas | so, as you see, I created an etherpad for yoga | |
| 16:08:55 | bauzas | I'll look at each of the blueprints | |
| 16:09:17 | bauzas | and I'll modify the etherpad to explain which ones are started, and which ones need reviews | |
| 16:09:40 | bauzas | but if folks want to modify the etherpad and explain the changes they have for their blueprint, fine by me :) | |
| 16:10:08 | bauzas | every meeting until FeatureFreeze, I'll provide this etherpad during the meeting | |
| 16:10:24 | gibi | cool | |
| 16:10:25 | bauzas | just remember that we now have 6 weeks before it | |
| 16:11:31 | bauzas | anyway, let's discuss about this etherpad by next week as I need to modify it for providing the changes | |
| 16:11:47 | bauzas | also, last thought | |
| 16:12:14 | bauzas | given it's difficult to merge API changes as they're conficting once we merge one | |
| 16:12:31 | bauzas | I'll provide all the changes wanting to add a new microversion | |
| 16:12:57 | sean-k-mooney | ya we can likely come up with a merge order when we get a little closer to FF | |
| 16:12:58 | bauzas | so during the reviews, people could organize themselves to see who and what could be reviewed first etc. | |
| 16:13:38 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: yeah, here I just want to tell it by now so people see | |
| 16:13:47 | sean-k-mooney | i think there are only 3 specs that would need a microversion maybe 4 | |
| 16:13:54 | bauzas | like, for the moment, I wonder how many blueprints are asking to get a microversion | |
| 16:14:20 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: that's the question I have for the moment, but I'll look back at the specs | |
| 16:14:24 | bauzas | anyway | |
| 16:14:38 | bauzas | the etherpad is just starting, we'll see how we organize it | |
| 16:14:52 | artom | Probably not | |
| 16:15:00 | bauzas | artom: we can't ask slots | |
| 16:15:06 | sean-k-mooney | i think they are https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/remove-tenant-id https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/unified-limits-nova and https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/libvirt-virtiofs-attach-manila-shares | |
| 16:15:25 | bauzas | artom: as we need to merge them one after the other | |
| 16:15:39 | artom | bauzas, I was thinking some sort of gate job that does it | |
| 16:15:50 | bauzas | artom: we don't need a job | |
| 16:15:54 | artom | So the final microversion isn't known until merge, it's all placeholders | |
| 16:16:02 | artom | Anways, I'm inventing complexity for nothing, carry on :) | |
| 16:16:06 | bauzas | artom: you get a merge conflict for your change if another one was merged :p | |
| 16:16:09 | gibi | modifying a code by a gate job... hm | |
| 16:16:33 | bauzas | gibi: agreed, let's keep it simple | |
| 16:17:02 | bauzas | if we only have 4 changes asking microversions, they can organize themselves to be depending on each of them if really needed | |
| 16:17:30 | bauzas | but again, before saying this, I need to look at which ones specifically so we know them | |
| 16:18:07 | bauzas | lol | |
| 16:18:36 | bauzas | anyway, moving on ? | |
| 16:18:42 | sean-k-mooney | sure | |
| 16:19:02 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:19:09 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1 | |
| 16:19:16 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/816861 bauzas proposing a documentation change for helping contributors to ask for reviews, needs a second +2 | |
| 16:19:45 | bauzas | nothing to tell it for this meeting from me | |
| 16:20:28 | bauzas | oh actually my change was +W and got a CI issue | |
| 16:20:38 | bauzas | because of the centos8 job | |
| 16:20:43 | bauzas | anyway, nothing to tell here | |
| 16:20:57 | bauzas | I guess we should discuss about the job and the stable branches now | |
| 16:21:15 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:21:19 | bauzas | elodilles: your turn | |
| 16:21:31 | elodilles | #info stable gates were blocked, due to centos-8-stream job, which is now set as non-voting ( https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/824740 ) so should be OK | |
| 16:21:46 | elodilles | at least i think so :) | |
| 16:21:53 | elodilles | #info patches waiting for a 2nd +2 (please review some if you have time): https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/nova+branch:%255Estable/.*+is:open+label:Code-Review%253D%252B2 | |
| 16:22:22 | elodilles | these were probably interesting things for now | |
| 16:22:47 | bauzas | agreed | |
| 16:22:53 | sean-k-mooney | the centos-8-stream issues should i belive be fixed now with the release of a new package | |
| 16:22:57 | elodilles | i know that stable is not the top priority between Yoga-2 and Yoga-3, but if anyone have some time... :) | |
| 16:23:10 | sean-k-mooney | so they could go back to voting shortly once we confrim they are stable | |
| 16:23:36 | elodilles | sean-k-mooney: thanks for the info! | |
| 16:24:15 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:24:44 | clarkb | sean-k-mooney: I don't see commits to systemd or iputils in git.centos.org. Any idea where the fix is? | |
| 16:25:16 | sean-k-mooney | oh i tought it had been fixed and pushed to some of our mirrors. was that just pinning to an old verion | |
| 16:25:41 | sean-k-mooney | if its not fixed ill flag it internally and see if i can find more info | |
| 16:26:03 | bauzas | clarkb: we're in a meeting but should be ended quickly in 5 mins hopefully | |
| 16:26:23 | bauzas | nothing to say more about stable branches ? | |
| 16:26:33 | bauzas | if not, let's move on and wrap this thing :) | |
| 16:26:39 | bauzas | #topic Sub/related team Highlights | |
| 16:26:43 | bauzas | #info No subteam left | |
| 16:26:47 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:26:50 | bauzas | nothing on the agenda | |
| 16:27:02 | bauzas | so, I guess we're done ? | |
| 16:27:09 | bauzas | anyone whats to shout something ? | |
| 16:27:19 | bauzas | or yelling about something ? | |
| 16:27:32 | bauzas | s/whats/wants (gosh) | |
| 16:28:14 | bauzas | if not, let's pretend we're done | |
| 16:28:18 | bauzas | #endmeeting | |
| 16:28:18 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Jan 18 16:28:18 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:28:18 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-01-18-16.00.html | |
| 16:28:18 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-01-18-16.00.txt | |
| 16:28:18 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-01-18-16.00.log.html | |
| 16:29:29 | gibi | this was faaast | |
| 16:29:36 | clarkb | I didn't mean to interrupt the meeting, just wanted to point out that I don't think anything has been fixed on centos 8 stream yet. At least not if you look at the package git repos | |
| 16:29:45 | clarkb | maybe they can revert packages without going through git | |
| 16:30:09 | sean-k-mooney | clarkb: i think i miss read the mail thread | |
| 16:33:14 | sean-k-mooney | i tought ye had forced the mirror update in http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-January/026687.html | |
| 16:33:36 | sean-k-mooney | https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037807 is currently on qa | |
| 16:33:38 | bauzas | clarkb: oh my bad, missed the context | |
| 16:34:04 | bauzas | clarkb: that's the problems with the meetings in lieu of the regular IRC chan | |
| 16:34:12 | bauzas | we get interruptions often | |
| 16:34:23 | clarkb | sean-k-mooney: I think fungi had the impression that it was fixed upstream when it wasn't. As far as I can tell there has been no fix made upstream yet. | |
| 16:34:26 | bauzas | so I thought your ping was unintentional | |
| 16:34:30 | clarkb | bauzas: ah | |
| 16:34:46 | clarkb | I could've been more specific that I was referring to the centos 8 ping issues :) | |
| 16:34:55 | sean-k-mooney | clarkb: ya its still on qa so it has not been shiped yet in rhel and presumable not yet in centos stream | |
| 16:35:06 | bauzas | clarkb: but yeah, reading at what you wrote, this makes perfect sense this was on purpose :D my bad. | |
| 16:35:33 | sean-k-mooney | clarkb: the plue reuest seams to have been merged here https://github.com/redhat-plumbers/systemd-rhel8/pull/246 | |
| 16:35:44 | clarkb | sean-k-mooney: we want systemd-239-55 or newer or a revert on the iputils package aiui | |
| 16:36:11 | sean-k-mooney | yes http://pkgs.devel.redhat.com/cgit/rpms/systemd/commit/?id=a4b172eaddf0882435fd2eb4d146012db8e5a2f2 | |
| 16:38:05 | sean-k-mooney | https://git.centos.org/rpms/systemd/commits/c8s | |
| 16:38:12 | sean-k-mooney | its still on 239-54 | |
| 16:39:59 | sean-k-mooney | sorry for the confusion ill see if i can find someoen internally | |
| 16:51:11 | fungi | clarkb: sean-k-mooney: the mirror update i forced was for centos stream 9, because the official mirror we'd been copying from started refusing rsync connections on friday | |