Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-01-18
16:15:39 artom bauzas, I was thinking some sort of gate job that does it
16:15:50 bauzas artom: we don't need a job
16:15:54 artom So the final microversion isn't known until merge, it's all placeholders
16:16:02 artom Anways, I'm inventing complexity for nothing, carry on :)
16:16:06 bauzas artom: you get a merge conflict for your change if another one was merged :p
16:16:09 gibi modifying a code by a gate job... hm
16:16:33 bauzas gibi: agreed, let's keep it simple
16:17:02 bauzas if we only have 4 changes asking microversions, they can organize themselves to be depending on each of them if really needed
16:17:30 bauzas but again, before saying this, I need to look at which ones specifically so we know them
16:18:07 bauzas lol
16:18:36 bauzas anyway, moving on ?
16:18:42 sean-k-mooney sure
16:19:02 bauzas #topic Review priorities
16:19:09 bauzas #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1
16:19:16 bauzas #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/816861 bauzas proposing a documentation change for helping contributors to ask for reviews, needs a second +2
16:19:45 bauzas nothing to tell it for this meeting from me
16:20:28 bauzas oh actually my change was +W and got a CI issue
16:20:38 bauzas because of the centos8 job
16:20:43 bauzas anyway, nothing to tell here
16:20:57 bauzas I guess we should discuss about the job and the stable branches now
16:21:15 bauzas #topic Stable Branches
16:21:19 bauzas elodilles: your turn
16:21:31 elodilles #info stable gates were blocked, due to centos-8-stream job, which is now set as non-voting ( https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/824740 ) so should be OK
16:21:46 elodilles at least i think so :)
16:21:53 elodilles #info patches waiting for a 2nd +2 (please review some if you have time): https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/nova+branch:%255Estable/.*+is:open+label:Code-Review%253D%252B2
16:22:22 elodilles these were probably interesting things for now
16:22:47 bauzas agreed
16:22:53 sean-k-mooney the centos-8-stream issues should i belive be fixed now with the release of a new package
16:22:57 elodilles i know that stable is not the top priority between Yoga-2 and Yoga-3, but if anyone have some time... :)
16:23:10 sean-k-mooney so they could go back to voting shortly once we confrim they are stable
16:23:36 elodilles sean-k-mooney: thanks for the info!
16:24:15 bauzas cool
16:24:44 clarkb sean-k-mooney: I don't see commits to systemd or iputils in git.centos.org. Any idea where the fix is?
16:25:16 sean-k-mooney oh i tought it had been fixed and pushed to some of our mirrors. was that just pinning to an old verion
16:25:41 sean-k-mooney if its not fixed ill flag it internally and see if i can find more info
16:26:03 bauzas clarkb: we're in a meeting but should be ended quickly in 5 mins hopefully
16:26:23 bauzas nothing to say more about stable branches ?
16:26:33 bauzas if not, let's move on and wrap this thing :)
16:26:39 bauzas #topic Sub/related team Highlights
16:26:43 bauzas #info No subteam left
16:26:47 bauzas #topic Open discussion
16:26:50 bauzas nothing on the agenda
16:27:02 bauzas so, I guess we're done ?
16:27:09 bauzas anyone whats to shout something ?
16:27:19 bauzas or yelling about something ?
16:27:32 bauzas s/whats/wants (gosh)
16:28:14 bauzas if not, let's pretend we're done
16:28:18 bauzas #endmeeting
16:28:18 opendevmeet Meeting ended Tue Jan 18 16:28:18 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:28:18 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-01-18-16.00.html
16:28:18 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-01-18-16.00.txt
16:28:18 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-01-18-16.00.log.html
16:29:29 gibi this was faaast
16:29:36 clarkb I didn't mean to interrupt the meeting, just wanted to point out that I don't think anything has been fixed on centos 8 stream yet. At least not if you look at the package git repos
16:29:45 clarkb maybe they can revert packages without going through git
16:30:09 sean-k-mooney clarkb: i think i miss read the mail thread
16:33:14 sean-k-mooney i tought ye had forced the mirror update in http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-January/026687.html
16:33:36 sean-k-mooney https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037807 is currently on qa
16:33:38 bauzas clarkb: oh my bad, missed the context
16:34:04 bauzas clarkb: that's the problems with the meetings in lieu of the regular IRC chan
16:34:12 bauzas we get interruptions often
16:34:23 clarkb sean-k-mooney: I think fungi had the impression that it was fixed upstream when it wasn't. As far as I can tell there has been no fix made upstream yet.
16:34:26 bauzas so I thought your ping was unintentional
16:34:30 clarkb bauzas: ah
16:34:46 clarkb I could've been more specific that I was referring to the centos 8 ping issues :)
16:34:55 sean-k-mooney clarkb: ya its still on qa so it has not been shiped yet in rhel and presumable not yet in centos stream
16:35:06 bauzas clarkb: but yeah, reading at what you wrote, this makes perfect sense this was on purpose :D my bad.
16:35:33 sean-k-mooney clarkb: the plue reuest seams to have been merged here https://github.com/redhat-plumbers/systemd-rhel8/pull/246
16:35:44 clarkb sean-k-mooney: we want systemd-239-55 or newer or a revert on the iputils package aiui
16:36:11 sean-k-mooney yes http://pkgs.devel.redhat.com/cgit/rpms/systemd/commit/?id=a4b172eaddf0882435fd2eb4d146012db8e5a2f2
16:38:05 sean-k-mooney https://git.centos.org/rpms/systemd/commits/c8s
16:38:12 sean-k-mooney its still on 239-54
16:39:59 sean-k-mooney sorry for the confusion ill see if i can find someoen internally
16:51:11 fungi clarkb: sean-k-mooney: the mirror update i forced was for centos stream 9, because the official mirror we'd been copying from started refusing rsync connections on friday
16:51:27 fungi unrelated to the ping behavior
18:47:13 opendevreview Ade Lee proposed openstack/nova master: Add check job for FIPS https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790519
20:03:49 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add announce-self post live-migration workaround https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/741529
21:26:33 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: libvirt: Add announce-self post live-migration workaround https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/825064
21:32:54 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: libvirt: Add announce-self post live-migration workaround https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/825175
21:34:32 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: libvirt: Add announce-self post live-migration workaround https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/825176
21:37:20 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/train: libvirt: Add announce-self post live-migration workaround https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/825177
21:45:42 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: libvirt: Add announce-self post live-migration workaround https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/825178
21:48:10 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: libvirt: Add announce-self post live-migration workaround https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/825175
21:49:47 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: libvirt: Add announce-self post live-migration workaround https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/825176
21:51:29 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/train: libvirt: Add announce-self post live-migration workaround https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/825177
22:46:01 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Remove deprecated opts from VNC conf https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/824478
#openstack-nova - 2022-01-19
16:05:36 opendevreview Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Support use_multipath for NVME driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/823941
17:37:24 spatel Folks, i have glusterfs mounted on /var/lib/nova for my vms shared storage and everything working but when i delete my vm it didn't clean up files. i can still see disk and other file which taking lots of space. is that normal for nova
17:38:37 sean-k-mooney hum technially we dont support moutning /var/lib/nova on glusterfs however the shared file system support we have for mounting it on NFS shoudl work with it
17:39:10 sean-k-mooney the way we detect a shared files system is by touching a file which shoudl just work with any shared file system
17:39:25 sean-k-mooney in terems of deleting files
17:39:45 sean-k-mooney when you delete the vm it should delete the vm disk and other files in general
17:40:12 sean-k-mooney the backing files for hte guest image may stay in the image cache for a peiord of time but it will eventully get cleaned up
17:40:19 sean-k-mooney i wonder if this is liek the ceph issue
17:40:55 sean-k-mooney https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html#workarounds.ensure_libvirt_rbd_instance_dir_cleanup
17:41:24 spatel hmm why did you say don't support glusterfs for /var/lib/nova ?
17:41:58 sean-k-mooney spatel: because we dont offcialy support or test that upstream
17:42:27 sean-k-mooney we test /var/lib/nova on nfs even thouhg we recommend using it
17:42:34 spatel but generally shared storage is storage just create file and delete file.. no matter who is in backend
17:42:42 sean-k-mooney but we have never offcially supprot clusterfs as afar as i recall

Earlier   Later