Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2022-01-18
16:25:41 sean-k-mooney if its not fixed ill flag it internally and see if i can find more info
16:26:03 bauzas clarkb: we're in a meeting but should be ended quickly in 5 mins hopefully
16:26:23 bauzas nothing to say more about stable branches ?
16:26:33 bauzas if not, let's move on and wrap this thing :)
16:26:39 bauzas #topic Sub/related team Highlights
16:26:43 bauzas #info No subteam left
16:26:47 bauzas #topic Open discussion
16:26:50 bauzas nothing on the agenda
16:27:02 bauzas so, I guess we're done ?
16:27:09 bauzas anyone whats to shout something ?
16:27:19 bauzas or yelling about something ?
16:27:32 bauzas s/whats/wants (gosh)
16:28:14 bauzas if not, let's pretend we're done
16:28:18 bauzas #endmeeting
16:28:18 opendevmeet Meeting ended Tue Jan 18 16:28:18 2022 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:28:18 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-01-18-16.00.html
16:28:18 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-01-18-16.00.txt
16:28:18 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2022/nova.2022-01-18-16.00.log.html
16:29:29 gibi this was faaast
16:29:36 clarkb I didn't mean to interrupt the meeting, just wanted to point out that I don't think anything has been fixed on centos 8 stream yet. At least not if you look at the package git repos
16:29:45 clarkb maybe they can revert packages without going through git
16:30:09 sean-k-mooney clarkb: i think i miss read the mail thread
16:33:14 sean-k-mooney i tought ye had forced the mirror update in http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-January/026687.html
16:33:36 sean-k-mooney https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037807 is currently on qa
16:33:38 bauzas clarkb: oh my bad, missed the context
16:34:04 bauzas clarkb: that's the problems with the meetings in lieu of the regular IRC chan
16:34:12 bauzas we get interruptions often
16:34:23 clarkb sean-k-mooney: I think fungi had the impression that it was fixed upstream when it wasn't. As far as I can tell there has been no fix made upstream yet.
16:34:26 bauzas so I thought your ping was unintentional
16:34:30 clarkb bauzas: ah
16:34:46 clarkb I could've been more specific that I was referring to the centos 8 ping issues :)
16:34:55 sean-k-mooney clarkb: ya its still on qa so it has not been shiped yet in rhel and presumable not yet in centos stream
16:35:06 bauzas clarkb: but yeah, reading at what you wrote, this makes perfect sense this was on purpose :D my bad.
16:35:33 sean-k-mooney clarkb: the plue reuest seams to have been merged here https://github.com/redhat-plumbers/systemd-rhel8/pull/246
16:35:44 clarkb sean-k-mooney: we want systemd-239-55 or newer or a revert on the iputils package aiui
16:36:11 sean-k-mooney yes http://pkgs.devel.redhat.com/cgit/rpms/systemd/commit/?id=a4b172eaddf0882435fd2eb4d146012db8e5a2f2
16:38:05 sean-k-mooney https://git.centos.org/rpms/systemd/commits/c8s
16:38:12 sean-k-mooney its still on 239-54
16:39:59 sean-k-mooney sorry for the confusion ill see if i can find someoen internally
16:51:11 fungi clarkb: sean-k-mooney: the mirror update i forced was for centos stream 9, because the official mirror we'd been copying from started refusing rsync connections on friday
16:51:27 fungi unrelated to the ping behavior
18:47:13 opendevreview Ade Lee proposed openstack/nova master: Add check job for FIPS https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/790519
20:03:49 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add announce-self post live-migration workaround https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/741529
21:26:33 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/xena: libvirt: Add announce-self post live-migration workaround https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/825064
21:32:54 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: libvirt: Add announce-self post live-migration workaround https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/825175
21:34:32 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: libvirt: Add announce-self post live-migration workaround https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/825176
21:37:20 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/train: libvirt: Add announce-self post live-migration workaround https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/825177
21:45:42 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/wallaby: libvirt: Add announce-self post live-migration workaround https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/825178
21:48:10 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/victoria: libvirt: Add announce-self post live-migration workaround https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/825175
21:49:47 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/ussuri: libvirt: Add announce-self post live-migration workaround https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/825176
21:51:29 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/train: libvirt: Add announce-self post live-migration workaround https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/825177
22:46:01 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Remove deprecated opts from VNC conf https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/824478
#openstack-nova - 2022-01-19
16:05:36 opendevreview Alexey Stupnikov proposed openstack/nova master: Support use_multipath for NVME driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/823941
17:37:24 spatel Folks, i have glusterfs mounted on /var/lib/nova for my vms shared storage and everything working but when i delete my vm it didn't clean up files. i can still see disk and other file which taking lots of space. is that normal for nova
17:38:37 sean-k-mooney hum technially we dont support moutning /var/lib/nova on glusterfs however the shared file system support we have for mounting it on NFS shoudl work with it
17:39:10 sean-k-mooney the way we detect a shared files system is by touching a file which shoudl just work with any shared file system
17:39:25 sean-k-mooney in terems of deleting files
17:39:45 sean-k-mooney when you delete the vm it should delete the vm disk and other files in general
17:40:12 sean-k-mooney the backing files for hte guest image may stay in the image cache for a peiord of time but it will eventully get cleaned up
17:40:19 sean-k-mooney i wonder if this is liek the ceph issue
17:40:55 sean-k-mooney https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html#workarounds.ensure_libvirt_rbd_instance_dir_cleanup
17:41:24 spatel hmm why did you say don't support glusterfs for /var/lib/nova ?
17:41:58 sean-k-mooney spatel: because we dont offcialy support or test that upstream
17:42:27 sean-k-mooney we test /var/lib/nova on nfs even thouhg we recommend using it
17:42:34 spatel but generally shared storage is storage just create file and delete file.. no matter who is in backend
17:42:42 sean-k-mooney but we have never offcially supprot clusterfs as afar as i recall
17:43:03 sean-k-mooney spatel: there are a buch of issue with locks and move operation that the latency of shared storage can cause
17:43:12 sean-k-mooney so in general we do not support it
17:43:19 spatel we have 800TB of glusterfs and it would be bad if i mount that on foo server and then mount on 50 compute nodes
17:44:07 spatel That is interesting...
17:44:12 sean-k-mooney in generall if you want ot use glusterfs with openstack the only supporte way to do it would via cinder
17:44:37 sean-k-mooney it can work the way you have it deplyed but its not a tested configuration and was never expiclty supported
17:46:06 spatel may be i am the first use case here.. :) i would still like to push it and try out because we already have large storage which i would like to use.
17:46:33 spatel if i see any issue (major issue) then i may switch to NFS
17:47:20 spatel If i go with cinder then its not going to be shared storage correct? does live migration will be supported with cinder base deployment?
17:48:07 sean-k-mooney spatel: well jsut a word of warning if we could remove support for this capablity entirly we would
17:48:25 sean-k-mooney we dont like support nfs backed /var/lib/nova
17:48:51 sean-k-mooney we only maintian supprot becasue we have some old large clouds that use it but this area fo the code is not activly maintained
17:49:03 spatel hmm! so in short no to shared storage except ceph. correct?
17:49:24 sean-k-mooney basically and even for ceph not by using cephfs
17:49:42 spatel ceph rbd
17:49:49 sean-k-mooney the probelm is that when using shared storate like this we are actully using a local storage driver in nova
17:50:06 sean-k-mooney e.g. image_type=qcow
17:50:07 spatel i know what you saying.. mounting nova on shared storage can have all kind of issue
17:50:31 sean-k-mooney and have sprincked some check in random parts of the code to do something else fi we detect its on shared storage
17:50:59 sean-k-mooney the main one come up aroudn move operations and evacuate
17:51:16 sean-k-mooney e.g. we need to make sure we dont overrie the image if we do a cold/live migration
17:51:36 sean-k-mooney and dont recreate it if we evacuate
17:51:42 sean-k-mooney to prevent loosing data
17:51:56 spatel hmm
17:52:22 spatel so what option i have in current design with glusterfs ?
17:52:36 spatel cinder boot volum?
17:52:43 sean-k-mooney if the sync time between writing a file on one host and reading it on another is long enough we might not detect its on shared storage whchi can be bad
17:52:58 sean-k-mooney cinder boot form vomue woudl work yes
17:53:19 spatel does cinder support glusterfs ?
17:53:23 sean-k-mooney what you are doign can work just be aware that there are dragons wehn you do this.
17:53:26 sean-k-mooney am it used too
17:54:08 spatel I understand this cluster not going to hold critical data. this is for crunch some data and give dynamic result
17:54:37 sean-k-mooney am its avaible for cinder backup
17:54:38 sean-k-mooney https://docs.openstack.org/cinder/latest/drivers.html#glusterfsbackupdriver

Earlier   Later