| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2022-01-18 | |||
| 15:00:16 | gibi | without a restart | |
| 15:00:59 | sean-k-mooney | honestly unless we have done a major rpc bump the comptue wont impact the conductor if they start | |
| 15:01:30 | sean-k-mooney | but yes if you use force down you shoudl fulfil its requiremetns | |
| 15:02:38 | gibi | hm an old compute cannot decided if it is too old, as the old code does not know what is the service version of the N+2 release | |
| 15:03:01 | gibi | except if we backport fixes to stable branches after the N | |
| 15:03:04 | gibi | N+2 release | |
| 15:03:23 | sean-k-mooney | well i was more thingink it would try to connect to the conductor and it would say its too old | |
| 15:03:32 | sean-k-mooney | but ya they cant really | |
| 15:04:10 | gibi | yeah the conductor could tell the compute to go away you are too old | |
| 15:04:35 | sean-k-mooney | it will do that if a new compute tries to regeister | |
| 15:17:13 | bauzas | gibi: I could be late for the meeting, could you please start it if so ? | |
| 15:17:20 | bauzas | the agenda is updated | |
| 15:18:08 | bauzas | reminder : nova meeting starts in 42 mins here | |
| 15:22:20 | gibi | bauzas: sure | |
| 15:47:02 | gibi | just a quick reminder nova meeting starts in 13 minutes here in the channel | |
| 15:57:03 | bauzas | I'm back | |
| 15:57:09 | bauzas | right on time | |
| 16:00:00 | bauzas | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:00:00 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue Jan 18 16:00:00 2022 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:00:00 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:00:00 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:00:12 | gibi | o. | |
| 16:00:13 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:00:55 | chateaulav | \o | |
| 16:00:56 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:01:19 | bauzas | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting | |
| 16:01:53 | bauzas | ok, let's start | |
| 16:02:01 | bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:02:06 | bauzas | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:02:10 | bauzas | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:02:15 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 32 new untriaged bugs (-4 since the last meeting) | |
| 16:02:20 | bauzas | #help Nova bug triage help is appreciated https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova/BugTriage | |
| 16:02:24 | bauzas | #link https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/placement 23 open stories (-2 since the last meeting) in Storyboard for Placement | |
| 16:02:34 | bauzas | thanks to those who helped to triage | |
| 16:02:43 | bauzas | (I dunno who about placement :p) | |
| 16:04:06 | gibi | bauzas: can be that the any-trait spec merges closed the related ticjket | |
| 16:04:09 | gibi | I will check | |
| 16:04:33 | bauzas | maybe | |
| 16:04:35 | bauzas | anyway | |
| 16:04:42 | bauzas | any bug to want to discuss ? | |
| 16:05:21 | bauzas | looks not | |
| 16:05:27 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:05:32 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:05:37 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Placement periodic job status | |
| 16:05:43 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures, file a bug, and add an elastic-recheck signature in the opendev/elastic-recheck repo (example: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/759967) | |
| 16:06:21 | bauzas | let's discuss about the centos8 job with elodilles in the stable branches topic | |
| 16:06:21 | gibi | (yepp the two missing placement ticket is the any-trait support, I will reopen them by creating an open task on them) | |
| 16:06:55 | bauzas | apart from this job, nothing to say | |
| 16:06:59 | bauzas | anyone ? | |
| 16:08:11 | bauzas | mmmm, ok, let's move | |
| 16:08:18 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:08:26 | bauzas | #info FeatureApprovalFreeze was Jan 13st | |
| 16:08:32 | bauzas | #link https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/yoga 23 approved blueprints for the Yoga cycle with 16 of them having specs | |
| 16:08:36 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-yoga-blueprint-status Etherpad for blueprints tracking | |
| 16:08:48 | bauzas | so, as you see, I created an etherpad for yoga | |
| 16:08:55 | bauzas | I'll look at each of the blueprints | |
| 16:09:17 | bauzas | and I'll modify the etherpad to explain which ones are started, and which ones need reviews | |
| 16:09:40 | bauzas | but if folks want to modify the etherpad and explain the changes they have for their blueprint, fine by me :) | |
| 16:10:08 | bauzas | every meeting until FeatureFreeze, I'll provide this etherpad during the meeting | |
| 16:10:24 | gibi | cool | |
| 16:10:25 | bauzas | just remember that we now have 6 weeks before it | |
| 16:11:31 | bauzas | anyway, let's discuss about this etherpad by next week as I need to modify it for providing the changes | |
| 16:11:47 | bauzas | also, last thought | |
| 16:12:14 | bauzas | given it's difficult to merge API changes as they're conficting once we merge one | |
| 16:12:31 | bauzas | I'll provide all the changes wanting to add a new microversion | |
| 16:12:57 | sean-k-mooney | ya we can likely come up with a merge order when we get a little closer to FF | |
| 16:12:58 | bauzas | so during the reviews, people could organize themselves to see who and what could be reviewed first etc. | |
| 16:13:38 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: yeah, here I just want to tell it by now so people see | |
| 16:13:47 | sean-k-mooney | i think there are only 3 specs that would need a microversion maybe 4 | |
| 16:13:54 | bauzas | like, for the moment, I wonder how many blueprints are asking to get a microversion | |
| 16:14:20 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: that's the question I have for the moment, but I'll look back at the specs | |
| 16:14:24 | bauzas | anyway | |
| 16:14:38 | bauzas | the etherpad is just starting, we'll see how we organize it | |
| 16:14:52 | artom | Probably not | |
| 16:15:00 | bauzas | artom: we can't ask slots | |
| 16:15:06 | sean-k-mooney | i think they are https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/remove-tenant-id https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/unified-limits-nova and https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/libvirt-virtiofs-attach-manila-shares | |
| 16:15:25 | bauzas | artom: as we need to merge them one after the other | |
| 16:15:39 | artom | bauzas, I was thinking some sort of gate job that does it | |
| 16:15:50 | bauzas | artom: we don't need a job | |
| 16:15:54 | artom | So the final microversion isn't known until merge, it's all placeholders | |
| 16:16:02 | artom | Anways, I'm inventing complexity for nothing, carry on :) | |
| 16:16:06 | bauzas | artom: you get a merge conflict for your change if another one was merged :p | |
| 16:16:09 | gibi | modifying a code by a gate job... hm | |
| 16:16:33 | bauzas | gibi: agreed, let's keep it simple | |
| 16:17:02 | bauzas | if we only have 4 changes asking microversions, they can organize themselves to be depending on each of them if really needed | |
| 16:17:30 | bauzas | but again, before saying this, I need to look at which ones specifically so we know them | |
| 16:18:07 | bauzas | lol | |
| 16:18:36 | bauzas | anyway, moving on ? | |
| 16:18:42 | sean-k-mooney | sure | |
| 16:19:02 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:19:09 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/q/status:open+(project:openstack/nova+OR+project:openstack/placement+OR+project:openstack/os-traits+OR+project:openstack/os-resource-classes+OR+project:openstack/os-vif+OR+project:openstack/python-novaclient+OR+project:openstack/osc-placement)+label:Review-Priority%252B1 | |
| 16:19:16 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/816861 bauzas proposing a documentation change for helping contributors to ask for reviews, needs a second +2 | |
| 16:19:45 | bauzas | nothing to tell it for this meeting from me | |
| 16:20:28 | bauzas | oh actually my change was +W and got a CI issue | |
| 16:20:38 | bauzas | because of the centos8 job | |
| 16:20:43 | bauzas | anyway, nothing to tell here | |
| 16:20:57 | bauzas | I guess we should discuss about the job and the stable branches now | |
| 16:21:15 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:21:19 | bauzas | elodilles: your turn | |
| 16:21:31 | elodilles | #info stable gates were blocked, due to centos-8-stream job, which is now set as non-voting ( https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/tempest/+/824740 ) so should be OK | |