| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2020-04-07 | |||
| 08:53:07 | gibi | cool | |
| 08:53:38 | bauzas | TIL init_host() is not really called when initing the host :p | |
| 08:56:34 | gibi | I alway have to look up the code to see what is the init order | |
| 09:13:44 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Drop concept of '?validation' parameter https://review.opendev.org/717789 | |
| 09:13:44 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: api: Add microversion for extra spec validation https://review.opendev.org/708436 | |
| 09:13:45 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: docs: Add documentation for flavor extra specs https://review.opendev.org/710037 | |
| 09:34:01 | openstackgerrit | Guo Jingyu proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: nova supports password encrypted VNC https://review.opendev.org/622336 | |
| 09:38:05 | nightmare_unreal | hello can someone review this : https://review.opendev.org/#/c/715395/ . Not sure why Zuul verification is failing | |
| 09:38:06 | nightmare_unreal | thanks | |
| 09:42:58 | gibi | nightmare_unreal: the zuul failure seems to be unrelated. | |
| 09:43:53 | nightmare_unreal | Yeah, I was not sure why it is failing. It had merge conflict. I resolved it and since then it's -1 from zuul | |
| 09:44:09 | nightmare_unreal | I did checked before submitting, ( pre-commit, pep8 and others) | |
| 09:58:14 | nightmare_unreal | thanks for the review | |
| 09:59:23 | huaqiang | stephenfin: can you have a look for this ? url:https://review.opendev.org/#/c/714658/4/nova/objects/instance_numa.py@87 | |
| 09:59:37 | huaqiang | and do you agree with my reply for your comments? | |
| 10:01:13 | stephenfin | huaqiang: I need to dig into it, to be honest. I think you should just include a summary of what you said as a note for now. We can bring it up again if needed | |
| 10:02:04 | huaqiang | sure, I'll provide a note. | |
| 10:02:51 | lyarwood | stephenfin: not sure if you saw my ping re https://review.opendev.org/#/c/708436/ earlier? | |
| 10:02:56 | stephenfin | I did not | |
| 10:03:01 | lyarwood | stephenfin: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/708436/17 - Stupid question, so this doesn't need doc/api_samples and nova/tests/functional/api_sample_tests/api_samples/ updates as you're not changing request/responses in this microversion right? | |
| 10:03:06 | lyarwood | stephenfin: asking as I've added them in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/701430/ assuming we needed to do this regardless, if we don't I can rm -rf this from that change. | |
| 10:03:29 | lyarwood | stephenfin: just about to rebase on your change and take the next microversion btw | |
| 10:03:36 | stephenfin | lyarwood: I'd assumed not, but tbh I'm not certain. Maybe gibi would know? | |
| 10:03:56 | stephenfin | I'm not sure why you'd need them if you're not changing the request or response | |
| 10:05:25 | lyarwood | stephenfin: yeah right, I can't recall why I added these originally tbh, I assume something was failing but that clearly isn't the case in your change | |
| 10:05:28 | gibi | stephenfin, lyarwood: did query param removed too? | |
| 10:05:49 | stephenfin | gibi: In my change? Yeah | |
| 10:06:15 | gibi | I guess I mixing changes | |
| 10:06:28 | openstackgerrit | jayaditya gupta proposed openstack/nova master: Support for --overwrite flag for nova-manage placement heal_allocations command Closes-Bug:#1868997 https://review.opendev.org/715395 | |
| 10:06:36 | lyarwood | yeah that isn't part of the microversion change | |
| 10:06:49 | lyarwood | nothing changes in the request or response for that change | |
| 10:07:14 | lyarwood | I'm just going to rm -rf my samples changes from mine while I rebase | |
| 10:07:28 | gibi | so neither lyarwood nor stephenfin's change introduce any request or response or query string change | |
| 10:07:41 | gibi | so both patch is OK without api sample | |
| 10:07:49 | lyarwood | ack, thanks for clearing that up | |
| 10:08:15 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Correct server shelve policy check_str https://review.opendev.org/717542 | |
| 10:14:21 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/nova master: Correct server topology policy check_str https://review.opendev.org/717525 | |
| 10:16:40 | lyarwood | stephenfin: ah, you didn't fetch and rebase on origin/master, any chance you could so I can rebase on https://review.opendev.org/#/c/708436/ ? | |
| 10:17:27 | lyarwood | stephenfin: otherwise I end up pulling in loads of stuff that has already merged between your HEAD and origin/master when I rebase on your change | |
| 10:18:07 | stephenfin | lyarwood: If I do, the bottom patch will get kicked out of the gate queue :( Do you depend on any of that additional stuff being pulled in from master? If not, can you just delete it? | |
| 10:18:43 | lyarwood | stephenfin: ah sorry didn't see that was in the gate, assumed it hadn't been picked up in the check queue yet | |
| 10:18:51 | lyarwood | stephenfin: yeah I can trim things down for now | |
| 10:18:57 | nightmare_unreal | is there a devstack specific channel ? | |
| 10:19:20 | sean-k-mooney | its #openstack-qa | |
| 10:19:47 | sean-k-mooney | nightmare_unreal: ^ | |
| 10:19:56 | nightmare_unreal | thanks sean-k-mooney | |
| 10:50:04 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: virt: Provide block_device_info during rescue https://review.opendev.org/700811 | |
| 10:50:04 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add support for stable device rescue https://review.opendev.org/700812 | |
| 10:50:05 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: compute: Report COMPUTE_RESCUE_BFV and check during rescue https://review.opendev.org/701429 | |
| 10:50:05 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: api: Introduce microverion 2.87 allowing boot from volume rescue https://review.opendev.org/701430 | |
| 10:50:06 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: compute: Extract _get_bdm_image_metadata into nova.utils https://review.opendev.org/705212 | |
| 10:50:06 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Support boot from volume stable device instance rescue https://review.opendev.org/701431 | |
| 10:51:42 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Microversion 2.84 - action event fault details https://review.opendev.org/714561 | |
| 10:51:50 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Microversion 2.85: Change volume-update CLI https://review.opendev.org/712651 | |
| 10:51:59 | openstackgerrit | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Microversion 2.86 - Stable device boot from volume rescue https://review.opendev.org/714956 | |
| 10:52:55 | lyarwood | stephenfin: I was about to move these around | |
| 10:53:20 | stephenfin | oh, sorry. I just rebased them | |
| 10:53:35 | lyarwood | np do you have a change for 2.86? | |
| 10:53:53 | lyarwood | I'll create one now if not | |
| 10:54:02 | stephenfin | Not yet, no | |
| 10:54:17 | lyarwood | kk 2 secs | |
| 10:58:10 | gibi | bauzas: feedback in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/715490 (I have to go back and review the test later) | |
| 10:59:46 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Microversion 2.87 - Stable device boot from volume rescue https://review.opendev.org/714956 | |
| 10:59:46 | openstackgerrit | Lee Yarwood proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Microversion 2.86 - Extra spec validation https://review.opendev.org/718057 | |
| 10:59:49 | lyarwood | stephenfin: ^ there you go | |
| 11:00:22 | stephenfin | thanks :) | |
| 11:02:39 | bauzas | gibi: thanks, I'll look at them after lunching | |
| 11:03:40 | openstackgerrit | John Garbutt proposed openstack/nova master: Fix configure() called after DatabaseAtVersion fixture https://review.opendev.org/619723 | |
| 11:06:30 | sean-k-mooney | given the recet conversations on the topic stephenfin lyarwood do you have osc changes for the same? if those are noops just bumping the max version in novaclinet i guess they are not needed but if actully added something osc might want to be extended too | |
| 11:10:10 | huaqiang | stephenfin: I prepared a summary and a detail analysis in this link:https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/versioned_object-obj_from_primitive-behavior | |
| 11:10:32 | huaqiang | please have a look when you have time. | |
| 11:11:06 | huaqiang | and the content is in RST format, it will have a better look if you check it in a RST reader. | |
| 11:14:13 | sean-k-mooney | stephenfin: by the way any chance we could land this https://review.opendev.org/#/c/700894/ we both kind of forgot about it but noticed it on lee's review dashboard yesterday | |
| 11:14:59 | lyarwood | sean-k-mooney: no I didn't have anything for osc | |
| 11:15:21 | sean-k-mooney | lyarwood: cool just said i would ask. | |
| 11:17:34 | lyarwood | kk np | |
| 11:52:14 | lyarwood | stephenfin: https://review.opendev.org/#/q/status:open+topic:workaround_native_luksv1+project:openstack/nova - would you mind hitting these today if you have any time? | |
| 12:09:56 | brinzhang | lyarwood: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/712651/13/novaclient/tests/unit/v2/test_shell.py@4006 I think this test is ok, I replied your comment | |
| 12:12:00 | brinzhang | lyarwood: because we changed the PUT API, I think we should add the older feature test, and ensure it runs ok, do you think so? | |
| 12:13:55 | bauzas | gibi: no worries about looking at the func test, it's just a WIP now | |
| 12:14:02 | brinzhang | lyarwood: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/711194/ this policy change patch, I dont think I got dansmith want to say, so I was not rebased on, | |
| 12:14:18 | bauzas | gibi: I provided it because you could look at why it wasn't working for you | |
| 12:15:15 | brinzhang | lyarwood: I also agree with you, that can change the depends-on to the policy sparate patch, that we can better control the microversion 2.85 | |
| 12:15:22 | gibi | bauzas: ack. I also did not look at the unit test on the main patch. but will at some point | |
| 12:34:39 | openstackgerrit | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: (WIP) Functional test with pGPUs https://review.opendev.org/717975 | |
| 12:40:41 | lyarwood | brinzhang: replied in the change, I just wanted to assert that the same call is made if --delete-on-termination isn't provided from 2.85 | |
| 12:41:03 | lyarwood | brinzhang: your other tests didn't check this | |
| 12:42:16 | brinzhang | lyarwood: ok, Got it, I will update it. | |
| 12:42:55 | brinzhang | lyarwood: thanks | |
| 12:44:12 | lyarwood | brinzhang: thanks :) | |
| 12:49:18 | openstackgerrit | Brin Zhang proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Microversion 2.85: Change volume-update CLI https://review.opendev.org/712651 | |
| 12:49:43 | brinzhang | lyarwood: update done ^^ | |
| 12:54:20 | stephenfin | lyarwood: any chance of getting a TODO for https://review.opendev.org/#/c/708030/8, per comment? | |
| 12:55:19 | lyarwood | brinzhang: ack thanks | |
| 12:55:22 | lyarwood | stephenfin: looking | |
| 12:55:46 | lyarwood | stephenfin: yeah sure | |
| 12:56:06 | stephenfin | A follow-up is fine, btw | |
| 12:56:33 | lyarwood | stephenfin: that would be easier yeah thanks | |
| 12:59:07 | stephenfin | lyarwood: As for the second one, is there any reason someone would set disable_native_luksv1 but not rbd_volume_local_attach ? | |
| 12:59:56 | lyarwood | stephenfin: Yes, if they are using a non-RBD Cinder Volume backend and LUKSv1 encrypted volumes. | |