| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-02-25 | |||
| 14:20:29 | elodilles | anyway, thanks for the response, just wanted to double check | |
| 14:22:39 | fungi | i guess that means the project's development schedule is no longer aligned with the coordinated openstack release, and it should be switched to the independent release model? | |
| 14:23:10 | fungi | that way it can release (or not) whenever it likes without needing to follow schedules set by the openstack release managers | |
| 14:23:32 | gtema | no, there were releases in this cycle | |
| 14:24:23 | gtema | release model of sdk was always in reality a question, but back those days decided to stick to that, cause sdk is used by i.e. nova | |
| 14:24:28 | fungi | but it's not observing the release freeze as there's new work going into master | |
| 14:25:24 | gtema | there were no features added required for the depending components | |
| 14:25:33 | gtema | thus from my pov latest release can be used as is without any issues | |
| 14:27:01 | gtema | changes from feature branch landed quite some time ago and issues blocking release has been identified | |
| 14:28:45 | fungi | i understand, it's more a question of it currently being marked as using a different set of rules. this is the release model the release managers think openstacksdk is following: https://releases.openstack.org/reference/release_models.html#cycle-with-intermediary | |
| 14:29:25 | fungi | "...commit to produce a release near the end of the 6-month development cycle to be used with projects using the other cycle-based release models that are required to produce a release at that time" | |
| 14:32:44 | gtema | I know. I fear there is currently no other suitable model for sdk as being that even it is something "special". In any way this is currently an exception, rather then the rule | |
| 14:33:09 | gtema | a big batch of changes were done in the feature branch and it got merged during suitable time frame | |
| 14:33:58 | fungi | well, it's not all that dissimilar from some other projects which follow the independent release model | |
| 14:34:01 | gtema | sadly issues requiring further work were also identified (i.e. hurting Zuul) and as such release need to be postponed unless those got worked on | |
| 14:34:41 | gtema | yeah, but if I read descriptions correctly just because being now considered a lib of some core components it must follow this model | |
| 14:35:41 | fungi | there are lots of lib dependencies which aren't managed as part of the coordinated release. in fact, most of openstack's dependencies aren't even developed within openstack at all | |
| 14:36:25 | gtema | well, if tc/whoever else is interested are not really objecting that for SDK - I have nothing agains | |
| 14:37:01 | gtema | I just recall there were some discussions on that and it was decided to leave it like it is now | |
| 14:40:43 | fungi | no worries, just suggesting that as it might create lower levels of friction since the project is doing development at a point in the cycle where libs are supposed to be frozen until the stable branches are cut | |
| 14:41:44 | fungi | but the release team can presumably branch stable/yoga from the 0.61.0 tag back in december | |
| 14:42:05 | gtema | sure. As mentioned, I was just somewhy keeping in the back of my mind there were real reasons for this decision | |
| 14:42:32 | gtema | hm, stable branches of SDK is another dirty story | |
| 14:46:51 | fungi | right, independent release model doesn't require stable branches either | |
| 14:47:31 | fungi | (allows them as needed, but does not require them cycle after cycle) | |
| 14:48:23 | gtema | maybe even that was somehow a reason for keeping sdk on this model | |
| 14:49:30 | gtema | decoupling sdk from releases is easy and makes sense on one side, but it will definitely face some resistance on release packaging side | |
| 14:49:46 | fungi | maybe, though if you follow semver conventions fairly closely and increment the minor revision on any dependency changes, you can still safely add a stable branch and tag patch level revisions on it after the fact | |
| 14:50:59 | fungi | problem arises if you change requirements.txt in 0.61.1 and then want to branch from 0.60.0 later, there's no room to tag stable point releases | |
| 14:51:23 | gtema | okay, would need to consider this again and potentially discuss during ptg | |
| 14:51:37 | fungi | yeah, it would certainly be a good conversation to have | |
| 14:52:20 | diablo_rojo_phone | +2 | |
| 14:56:20 | fungi | er, my example was slightly off. i meant to say "...if you change requirements.txt in 0.61.1 and then want to branch from 0.61.0 later..." | |
| 17:15:50 | opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: compute: Add support for microversion 2.91 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/831014 | |
| 18:22:43 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/keystoneauth master: Fix bindep for current rpm based distributions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/830211 | |
| 18:25:05 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/keystoneauth master: setup.cfg: Replace dashes by underscores https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/827993 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-02-27 | |||
| 05:13:31 | opendevreview | yangjianfeng proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add CRUD methods for Neutron router ndp proxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/749036 | |
| 05:15:32 | opendevreview | yangjianfeng proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add CRUD methods for Neutron router ndp proxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/749036 | |
| 05:17:42 | opendevreview | yangjianfeng proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add CRUD methods for Neutron router ndp proxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/749036 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-02-28 | |||
| 16:33:34 | diablo_rojo | Haven't seen the SDK team sign up for the PTG yet. Were we planning to? | |
| 16:34:14 | gtema | yes, it's just cause of this war I am now not really thinking bout that | |
| 17:57:51 | diablo_rojo | Totally legit reason. | |
| 17:58:08 | diablo_rojo | I hope you and your family and friends are all doing okay. | |
| 17:59:25 | gtema | currently working on extraction, but not for everyone, some can not escape surrounding of big cities | |
| 18:01:10 | gtema | proper word is actually blockade and not anything so soft | |
| 18:42:33 | sshnaidm | gtema, where are yours? | |
| 18:44:43 | gtema | Everywhere across, mostly exactly Kharkov and Kiev | |
| 18:45:53 | sshnaidm | damn.. mine are in Kherson and Kiev | |
| 18:46:31 | sshnaidm | hope for best for all | |
| 18:46:33 | gtema | Sad | |
| 18:47:03 | gtema | Sure. Hope the mass extinction stops | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-03-01 | |||
| 07:21:19 | opendevreview | JIHOJU proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add more filter option of columns for server list -c COLUMN https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/807420 | |
| 15:05:51 | opendevreview | Arx Cruz proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update compute service info module to use proxy layer https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/828698 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-03-02 | |||
| 02:40:27 | opendevreview | Yi Feng proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: [WIP] OAuth2.0 Client Credentials Grant Flow Support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/830734 | |
| 12:52:15 | opendevreview | Mamatisa Nurmatov proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix metavars and typos in local_ip https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/830342 | |
| 16:44:03 | opendevreview | Tushar Trambak Gite proposed openstack/os-api-ref master: Add Python3 yoga unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-api-ref/+/831560 | |
| 18:18:37 | headphoneJames | gtema: any other steps before getting merge approval for: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/826193 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-03-03 | |||
| 12:28:09 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: doc: Remove references to 'examples' test env https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/822812 | |
| 12:38:58 | opendevreview | Arx Cruz proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update compute service info module to use proxy layer https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/828698 | |
| 15:14:02 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Identity: Add support for system role assignment https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/826193 | |
| 16:52:44 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Microversion 2.91: Support specifying destination host to unshelve https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/831823 | |
| 17:19:58 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Microversion 2.91: Support specifying destination host to unshelve https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/831823 | |
| 17:31:34 | headphoneJames | Thanks for merging https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/826193 | |
| 17:34:07 | headphoneJames | The related patch to support the system role configuration in the openstack ansible collection is https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/826395/ | |
| 17:36:02 | headphoneJames | A review of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/826395/ would be very much appreciated. Thanks. | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-03-04 | |||
| 01:16:05 | opendevreview | Yi Feng proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: OAuth2.0 Client Credentials Grant Flow Support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/830734 | |
| 08:38:31 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Microversion 2.91: Support specifying destination host to unshelve https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/831902 | |
| 08:58:06 | isabek | gtema: Hi! Can you please check this patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/830342 . Thanks in advance! | |
| 14:47:27 | elodilles | hi team, quick question: is the situation the same for python-openstackclient as openstacksdk? (regarding my mail on ML: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-March/027495.html ) | |
| 15:10:55 | gtema | elodilles: OSC can be released | |
| 15:13:29 | elodilles | gtema: oh, cool, can you propose a release patch for it? | |
| 15:14:10 | gtema | Not today, am driving long today | |
| 15:14:40 | elodilles | gtema: i can propose a release patch too if that's OK for you | |
| 15:14:54 | gtema | Sure | |
| 15:14:55 | elodilles | gtema: if you could quickly review that that would be awesome | |
| 15:15:06 | gtema | Ok | |
| 15:24:24 | elodilles | gtema: https://gerrit.nordix.org/c/opendev/openstack/releases/+/12637 | |
| 15:24:34 | elodilles | gtema: i've added stable/yoga cut as well | |
| 15:24:40 | elodilles | gtema: thanks in advance | |
| 15:28:20 | elodilles | gtema: and the right link for the release patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/831963 | |
| 16:50:55 | opendevreview | Gage Hugo proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Update master for stable/wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/781869 | |
| 16:51:12 | opendevreview | Gage Hugo proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Update master for stable/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/809814 | |
| 17:00:48 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/cliff stable/yoga: Update .gitreview for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/831970 | |
| 17:00:51 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/cliff stable/yoga: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/831971 | |
| 17:01:19 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstacksdk stable/yoga: Update .gitreview for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/831972 | |
| 17:01:23 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstacksdk stable/yoga: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/831973 | |
| 17:01:27 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Update master for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/831974 | |
| 17:01:31 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add Python3 zed unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/831975 | |
| 17:01:47 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib stable/yoga: Update .gitreview for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/831976 | |
| 17:01:50 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib stable/yoga: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/831977 | |
| 17:01:53 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Update master for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/831978 | |
| 17:01:56 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Add Python3 zed unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/831979 | |
| 17:27:47 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/keystoneauth master: Clarify token_endpoint.Token usecases https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/770001 | |
| 19:26:29 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/cliff stable/yoga: Update .gitreview for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/831970 | |
| 19:27:54 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/cliff stable/yoga: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/831971 | |
| 19:41:15 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/osc-lib stable/yoga: Update .gitreview for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/831976 | |
| 19:53:07 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Update master for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/831974 | |
| 19:54:36 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/osc-lib stable/yoga: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/831977 | |
| 20:22:43 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk stable/yoga: Update .gitreview for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/831972 | |
| 20:28:33 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk stable/yoga: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/831973 | |