| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-02-25 | |||
| 14:23:10 | fungi | that way it can release (or not) whenever it likes without needing to follow schedules set by the openstack release managers | |
| 14:23:32 | gtema | no, there were releases in this cycle | |
| 14:24:23 | gtema | release model of sdk was always in reality a question, but back those days decided to stick to that, cause sdk is used by i.e. nova | |
| 14:24:28 | fungi | but it's not observing the release freeze as there's new work going into master | |
| 14:25:24 | gtema | there were no features added required for the depending components | |
| 14:25:33 | gtema | thus from my pov latest release can be used as is without any issues | |
| 14:27:01 | gtema | changes from feature branch landed quite some time ago and issues blocking release has been identified | |
| 14:28:45 | fungi | i understand, it's more a question of it currently being marked as using a different set of rules. this is the release model the release managers think openstacksdk is following: https://releases.openstack.org/reference/release_models.html#cycle-with-intermediary | |
| 14:29:25 | fungi | "...commit to produce a release near the end of the 6-month development cycle to be used with projects using the other cycle-based release models that are required to produce a release at that time" | |
| 14:32:44 | gtema | I know. I fear there is currently no other suitable model for sdk as being that even it is something "special". In any way this is currently an exception, rather then the rule | |
| 14:33:09 | gtema | a big batch of changes were done in the feature branch and it got merged during suitable time frame | |
| 14:33:58 | fungi | well, it's not all that dissimilar from some other projects which follow the independent release model | |
| 14:34:01 | gtema | sadly issues requiring further work were also identified (i.e. hurting Zuul) and as such release need to be postponed unless those got worked on | |
| 14:34:41 | gtema | yeah, but if I read descriptions correctly just because being now considered a lib of some core components it must follow this model | |
| 14:35:41 | fungi | there are lots of lib dependencies which aren't managed as part of the coordinated release. in fact, most of openstack's dependencies aren't even developed within openstack at all | |
| 14:36:25 | gtema | well, if tc/whoever else is interested are not really objecting that for SDK - I have nothing agains | |
| 14:37:01 | gtema | I just recall there were some discussions on that and it was decided to leave it like it is now | |
| 14:40:43 | fungi | no worries, just suggesting that as it might create lower levels of friction since the project is doing development at a point in the cycle where libs are supposed to be frozen until the stable branches are cut | |
| 14:41:44 | fungi | but the release team can presumably branch stable/yoga from the 0.61.0 tag back in december | |
| 14:42:05 | gtema | sure. As mentioned, I was just somewhy keeping in the back of my mind there were real reasons for this decision | |
| 14:42:32 | gtema | hm, stable branches of SDK is another dirty story | |
| 14:46:51 | fungi | right, independent release model doesn't require stable branches either | |
| 14:47:31 | fungi | (allows them as needed, but does not require them cycle after cycle) | |
| 14:48:23 | gtema | maybe even that was somehow a reason for keeping sdk on this model | |
| 14:49:30 | gtema | decoupling sdk from releases is easy and makes sense on one side, but it will definitely face some resistance on release packaging side | |
| 14:49:46 | fungi | maybe, though if you follow semver conventions fairly closely and increment the minor revision on any dependency changes, you can still safely add a stable branch and tag patch level revisions on it after the fact | |
| 14:50:59 | fungi | problem arises if you change requirements.txt in 0.61.1 and then want to branch from 0.60.0 later, there's no room to tag stable point releases | |
| 14:51:23 | gtema | okay, would need to consider this again and potentially discuss during ptg | |
| 14:51:37 | fungi | yeah, it would certainly be a good conversation to have | |
| 14:52:20 | diablo_rojo_phone | +2 | |
| 14:56:20 | fungi | er, my example was slightly off. i meant to say "...if you change requirements.txt in 0.61.1 and then want to branch from 0.61.0 later..." | |
| 17:15:50 | opendevreview | Rajat Dhasmana proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: compute: Add support for microversion 2.91 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/831014 | |
| 18:22:43 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/keystoneauth master: Fix bindep for current rpm based distributions https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/830211 | |
| 18:25:05 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/keystoneauth master: setup.cfg: Replace dashes by underscores https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/827993 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-02-27 | |||
| 05:13:31 | opendevreview | yangjianfeng proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add CRUD methods for Neutron router ndp proxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/749036 | |
| 05:15:32 | opendevreview | yangjianfeng proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add CRUD methods for Neutron router ndp proxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/749036 | |
| 05:17:42 | opendevreview | yangjianfeng proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add CRUD methods for Neutron router ndp proxy https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/749036 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-02-28 | |||
| 16:33:34 | diablo_rojo | Haven't seen the SDK team sign up for the PTG yet. Were we planning to? | |
| 16:34:14 | gtema | yes, it's just cause of this war I am now not really thinking bout that | |
| 17:57:51 | diablo_rojo | Totally legit reason. | |
| 17:58:08 | diablo_rojo | I hope you and your family and friends are all doing okay. | |
| 17:59:25 | gtema | currently working on extraction, but not for everyone, some can not escape surrounding of big cities | |
| 18:01:10 | gtema | proper word is actually blockade and not anything so soft | |
| 18:42:33 | sshnaidm | gtema, where are yours? | |
| 18:44:43 | gtema | Everywhere across, mostly exactly Kharkov and Kiev | |
| 18:45:53 | sshnaidm | damn.. mine are in Kherson and Kiev | |
| 18:46:31 | sshnaidm | hope for best for all | |
| 18:46:33 | gtema | Sad | |
| 18:47:03 | gtema | Sure. Hope the mass extinction stops | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-03-01 | |||
| 07:21:19 | opendevreview | JIHOJU proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add more filter option of columns for server list -c COLUMN https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/807420 | |
| 15:05:51 | opendevreview | Arx Cruz proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update compute service info module to use proxy layer https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/828698 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-03-02 | |||
| 02:40:27 | opendevreview | Yi Feng proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: [WIP] OAuth2.0 Client Credentials Grant Flow Support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/830734 | |
| 12:52:15 | opendevreview | Mamatisa Nurmatov proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix metavars and typos in local_ip https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/830342 | |
| 16:44:03 | opendevreview | Tushar Trambak Gite proposed openstack/os-api-ref master: Add Python3 yoga unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-api-ref/+/831560 | |
| 18:18:37 | headphoneJames | gtema: any other steps before getting merge approval for: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/826193 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-03-03 | |||
| 12:28:09 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: doc: Remove references to 'examples' test env https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/822812 | |
| 12:38:58 | opendevreview | Arx Cruz proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update compute service info module to use proxy layer https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/828698 | |
| 15:14:02 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Identity: Add support for system role assignment https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/826193 | |
| 16:52:44 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Microversion 2.91: Support specifying destination host to unshelve https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/831823 | |
| 17:19:58 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Microversion 2.91: Support specifying destination host to unshelve https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/831823 | |
| 17:31:34 | headphoneJames | Thanks for merging https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/826193 | |
| 17:34:07 | headphoneJames | The related patch to support the system role configuration in the openstack ansible collection is https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/826395/ | |
| 17:36:02 | headphoneJames | A review of https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/826395/ would be very much appreciated. Thanks. | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2022-03-04 | |||
| 01:16:05 | opendevreview | Yi Feng proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: OAuth2.0 Client Credentials Grant Flow Support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/830734 | |
| 08:38:31 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Microversion 2.91: Support specifying destination host to unshelve https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/831902 | |
| 08:58:06 | isabek | gtema: Hi! Can you please check this patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/830342 . Thanks in advance! | |
| 14:47:27 | elodilles | hi team, quick question: is the situation the same for python-openstackclient as openstacksdk? (regarding my mail on ML: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2022-March/027495.html ) | |
| 15:10:55 | gtema | elodilles: OSC can be released | |
| 15:13:29 | elodilles | gtema: oh, cool, can you propose a release patch for it? | |
| 15:14:10 | gtema | Not today, am driving long today | |
| 15:14:40 | elodilles | gtema: i can propose a release patch too if that's OK for you | |
| 15:14:54 | gtema | Sure | |
| 15:14:55 | elodilles | gtema: if you could quickly review that that would be awesome | |
| 15:15:06 | gtema | Ok | |
| 15:24:24 | elodilles | gtema: https://gerrit.nordix.org/c/opendev/openstack/releases/+/12637 | |
| 15:24:34 | elodilles | gtema: i've added stable/yoga cut as well | |
| 15:24:40 | elodilles | gtema: thanks in advance | |
| 15:28:20 | elodilles | gtema: and the right link for the release patch: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/831963 | |
| 16:50:55 | opendevreview | Gage Hugo proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Update master for stable/wallaby https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/781869 | |
| 16:51:12 | opendevreview | Gage Hugo proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Update master for stable/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/809814 | |
| 17:00:48 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/cliff stable/yoga: Update .gitreview for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/831970 | |
| 17:00:51 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/cliff stable/yoga: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/831971 | |
| 17:01:19 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstacksdk stable/yoga: Update .gitreview for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/831972 | |
| 17:01:23 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstacksdk stable/yoga: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/831973 | |
| 17:01:27 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Update master for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/831974 | |
| 17:01:31 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add Python3 zed unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/831975 | |
| 17:01:47 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib stable/yoga: Update .gitreview for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/831976 | |
| 17:01:50 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib stable/yoga: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/831977 | |
| 17:01:53 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Update master for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/831978 | |
| 17:01:56 | opendevreview | OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Add Python3 zed unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/831979 | |
| 17:27:47 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/keystoneauth master: Clarify token_endpoint.Token usecases https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystoneauth/+/770001 | |
| 19:26:29 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/cliff stable/yoga: Update .gitreview for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/831970 | |
| 19:27:54 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/cliff stable/yoga: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/831971 | |
| 19:41:15 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/osc-lib stable/yoga: Update .gitreview for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/831976 | |
| 19:53:07 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Update master for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/831974 | |
| 19:54:36 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/osc-lib stable/yoga: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-lib/+/831977 | |
| 20:22:43 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk stable/yoga: Update .gitreview for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/831972 | |
| 20:28:33 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/openstacksdk stable/yoga: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/yoga https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/831973 | |
| 21:09:26 | opendevreview | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Run nudepool job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/826543 | |
| 21:12:23 | frickler | gtema: ^^ if that works, I think it may be an issue remaining in r1 still, see the depending nodepool patch. the server.flavor has an id attribute that returns the name of the flavor instead of the id, I think that that happens with the latest compute api, will do more testing tomorrow | |