Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2021-10-18
08:36:27 gtema maybe try adding "-v"?
08:43:23 thomasb06 after a `git reset HEAD~3` it worked, but I haven't a clue what I did: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/814369
08:43:33 frickler thomasb06: "! [remote rejected] HEAD -> refs/for/feature/r1 (no new changes)" indicates that you are trying so submit an empty commit
08:43:55 gtema yeah, I also noticed that and was suspecting it
08:46:05 thomasb06 frickler: indeed, my script generates a new _proxy_new.py, but in this case, the diff was null...
08:46:10 thomasb06 thanks though
08:46:26 thomasb06 message/v2: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/814370
08:48:14 thomasb06 accelerator/v2: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/814372
08:48:56 thomasb06 going for my meal, I'll do the rest this afternoon. Meanwhile, let's see what Zuul says...
08:49:22 gtema ok
10:16:28 thomasb06 baremetal/v1: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/814395
10:18:39 thomasb06 identity/v2: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/814396
10:19:52 thomasb06 identity/v3: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/814398
10:21:11 thomasb06 key_manager/v1: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/814399
10:24:08 thomasb06 Arg, `:rtype:` is also an entry...
16:03:14 gtema stephenfin, diablo_rojo_phone joining the meeting?
16:04:06 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332
#openstack-sdks - 2021-10-19
06:39:17 opendevreview Frode Nordahl proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add support for 'smart-nic' vnic-type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814518
14:16:53 thomasb06 gtema: hello. The build fails in the second commit, but it seems it comes from the first one: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/814370
17:15:59 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332
18:33:55 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. Add temporary helper methods in fakes.py for server commands. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332
#openstack-sdks - 2021-10-20
02:02:41 opendevreview WooJongSeong proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: remove not used codes and fix the format https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814686
02:02:48 opendevreview WooJongSeong proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: fix the type used in server.py https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814687
02:02:55 opendevreview WooJongSeong proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: add new test codes for new command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814688
05:30:58 opendevreview Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Keep creating keystone admin endpoint for heat https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/777343
06:39:51 opendevreview Mamatisa Nurmatov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add Neutron Local IP CRUD https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/804988
06:40:01 opendevreview Mamatisa Nurmatov proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Support Neutron Local IP CRUD https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/805618
08:13:19 opendevreview WooJongSeong proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: fix the code format https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814723
10:10:54 opendevreview Mamatisa Nurmatov proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Support Neutron Local IP CRUD https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/805618
10:11:08 opendevreview Mamatisa Nurmatov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add Neutron Local IP CRUD https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/804988
12:55:04 opendevreview Mamatisa Nurmatov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add Neutron Local IP CRUD https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/804988
13:48:27 opendevreview Jiří Stránský proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add documentation links to README.md https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/814782
14:24:07 opendevreview WooJongSeong proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: impl OSC's cmd hypervisor servers set https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814790
14:24:14 opendevreview WooJongSeong proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: update docs for new command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814791
14:28:27 opendevreview WooJongSeong proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: impl OSC's cmd hypervisor servers set https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814792
17:14:20 opendevreview Rodolfo Alonso proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Remove "tenant_id" members from any Network resource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/814813
20:05:10 opendevreview Mamatisa Nurmatov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add Neutron Local IP CRUD https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/804988
#openstack-sdks - 2021-10-21
09:17:40 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/os-api-ref master: Fix exception logging https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-api-ref/+/799216
09:17:41 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/os-api-ref master: Drop support for Sphinx < 4.x https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-api-ref/+/814873
09:17:42 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/os-api-ref master: Remove six https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-api-ref/+/814874
09:17:43 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/os-api-ref master: tox: Don't use distutils entrypoint for coverage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-api-ref/+/814875
09:43:59 opendevreview Merged openstack/os-api-ref master: Drop support for Sphinx < 4.x https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-api-ref/+/814873
09:50:16 opendevreview Merged openstack/os-api-ref master: Remove six https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-api-ref/+/814874
09:50:18 opendevreview Merged openstack/os-api-ref master: tox: Don't use distutils entrypoint for coverage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-api-ref/+/814875
09:55:50 opendevreview Merged openstack/os-api-ref master: Fix exception logging https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-api-ref/+/799216
10:23:24 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Update the Nova CLI docoder document https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/812421
13:43:21 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332
13:43:32 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332
14:01:48 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332
16:16:38 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: tox: Ignore virtualenvs for pep8 environment https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/815031
16:16:38 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Remove 'get_osc_show_columns_for_sdk_resource' duplicates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/815032
16:16:39 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Remove remnants of 'six' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/815033
16:17:18 stephenfin gtema: Some dead simple patches there ^
16:17:26 stephenfin if you've got 5
16:17:37 gtema ok, looking
16:28:24 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: volume: Add 'volume cluster *' commands https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/795829
16:28:25 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: WIP: volume: Add 'volume filter list' command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/794645
#openstack-sdks - 2021-10-22
11:04:48 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: tox: Ignore virtualenvs for pep8 environment https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/815031
11:04:51 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Remove 'get_osc_show_columns_for_sdk_resource' duplicates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/815032
11:04:53 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Remove remnants of 'six' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/815033
13:48:49 stephenfin gtema: Bike shedding time! cinder allows you to configure the fields that you can filter various resources on (volumes, attachments, backups, snapshots, etc.). cinderclient lets you list these using a list-filter command. I need to add this to OSC. What do I call it?
13:50:20 stephenfin gtema: I was going to add a separate 'filter list' command for each resource (i.e. 'volume snapshot filter list', 'volume backup filter list') but the underlying API returns filters for all resources, so this seems wasteful: we'd be dumping info for all resources except the one we care about
13:50:39 stephenfin example cinderclient output https://paste.opendev.org/show/810167/
13:52:59 stephenfin I'm thinking 'volume service filter list' or 'volume filter list' but both have issues. The latter is simpler, but I'm concerned people might think the filters are only for volumes. The former avoids this but people could read it as a filter for the volume service (i.e. the entity shown by 'volume service list'). 'filter list' is too generic
13:53:15 stephenfin Any opinions? I'll just choose one if you don't :-D
14:04:50 gtema Uhm, no opinion in this now
14:05:36 frickler stephenfin: what about "volume resource filter list", just like you kind of said in the first sentence?
14:05:58 stephenfin frickler: oh, that's a good idea. I didn't think of that
14:06:07 stephenfin that'll do nicely. Thanks, frickler
14:06:26 frickler :)
14:07:56 gtema maybe also `block storage filter list`
14:08:24 gtema not to mix with volume as a resource
14:10:15 stephenfin OSC seems to use volume rather than block storage everywhere (though object store instead of simply object), so I'm not so sure about that one. I think 'volume resource' is as clear as e.g. 'volume service' is
14:16:17 gtema that is exactly what I mean. atm we have volume rather for the resource, than the service. If we want to have command related to the service (if I understood correctly what you mean) I would rather try using different name
14:18:10 stephenfin I agree that we shouldn't overload the term. I'm saying that we're already overloading it though and don't use "block storage" as a term anywhere except some docs. It doesn't seem wise to change direction unless we want to rename the existing commands?
14:19:06 gtema I wouldn't change existing commands, cause they refer to the volume as a resource. Where we refer to volume as a service - we can think
14:20:21 gtema object store is not having a prefix at all and that is already creating confusion (not only in OSC, but also in ansible)
14:21:02 stephenfin hmm, fair. Let me see what it looks like and how it fits with existing commands
14:22:41 stephenfin gtema: How about 'volume service resource filter list'? It's a heck of a mouthful but it works?
14:23:00 stephenfin If not, I'd be tempted to rename 'volume service list' to 'block storage service list'
14:23:11 stephenfin with a deprecated alias, of course
14:23:22 gtema maybe it would be really better in the major release introduce block_storage and object_storage
14:23:55 gtema `block storage service list` sounds much better to me
14:24:38 stephenfin so also 'block storage service cluster' for clusters of block storage services?
14:25:17 gtema service cluster? not `block storage cluster`?
14:25:40 gtema which cluster you mean?
14:27:09 stephenfin They're clusters of services https://docs.openstack.org/cinder/latest/contributor/api_microversion_history.html#id7
14:27:33 gtema oh great, this is not on https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/block-storage/v3
14:27:39 stephenfin I think it's a HA thing, but I'm not really sure /o\ I'll have to ask Gorka
14:27:46 stephenfin Yeah, they're missing a few things from the docs :(
14:28:42 gtema very sad - really lot
14:29:08 gtema anyway, in this case I would rather go for `block storage cluster`
14:29:27 gtema I do not think using `service` inside in the command is useful
14:30:28 gtema missing stuff in docs mean we might miss lot in SDK
14:55:27 gtema stephenfin, if you are still around - is nova /limits still accept tenant_id as query_param? https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/?expanded=show-rate-and-absolute-limits-detail#show-rate-and-absolute-limits
15:27:45 stephenfin gtema: yes, it's still tenant_id
15:28:02 gtema ok, thks
15:28:13 stephenfin there's a blueprint to change it to project_id (ditto for all other remaining references to tenant) but that hasn't landed yet
15:28:34 gtema good, adding it this way
15:31:10 gtema uhm, and quota-set is also non-standard (whatever standard actually is) - no support for ?usage=, but with /quota-sets/XXX/details

Earlier   Later