Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2021-10-20
13:48:27 opendevreview Jiří Stránský proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add documentation links to README.md https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/814782
14:24:07 opendevreview WooJongSeong proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: impl OSC's cmd hypervisor servers set https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814790
14:24:14 opendevreview WooJongSeong proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: update docs for new command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814791
14:28:27 opendevreview WooJongSeong proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: impl OSC's cmd hypervisor servers set https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814792
17:14:20 opendevreview Rodolfo Alonso proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Remove "tenant_id" members from any Network resource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/814813
20:05:10 opendevreview Mamatisa Nurmatov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add Neutron Local IP CRUD https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/804988
#openstack-sdks - 2021-10-21
09:17:40 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/os-api-ref master: Fix exception logging https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-api-ref/+/799216
09:17:41 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/os-api-ref master: Drop support for Sphinx < 4.x https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-api-ref/+/814873
09:17:42 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/os-api-ref master: Remove six https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-api-ref/+/814874
09:17:43 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/os-api-ref master: tox: Don't use distutils entrypoint for coverage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-api-ref/+/814875
09:43:59 opendevreview Merged openstack/os-api-ref master: Drop support for Sphinx < 4.x https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-api-ref/+/814873
09:50:16 opendevreview Merged openstack/os-api-ref master: Remove six https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-api-ref/+/814874
09:50:18 opendevreview Merged openstack/os-api-ref master: tox: Don't use distutils entrypoint for coverage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-api-ref/+/814875
09:55:50 opendevreview Merged openstack/os-api-ref master: Fix exception logging https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-api-ref/+/799216
10:23:24 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Update the Nova CLI docoder document https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/812421
13:43:21 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332
13:43:32 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332
14:01:48 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332
16:16:38 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: tox: Ignore virtualenvs for pep8 environment https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/815031
16:16:38 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Remove 'get_osc_show_columns_for_sdk_resource' duplicates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/815032
16:16:39 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Remove remnants of 'six' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/815033
16:17:18 stephenfin gtema: Some dead simple patches there ^
16:17:26 stephenfin if you've got 5
16:17:37 gtema ok, looking
16:28:24 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: volume: Add 'volume cluster *' commands https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/795829
16:28:25 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: WIP: volume: Add 'volume filter list' command https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/794645
#openstack-sdks - 2021-10-22
11:04:48 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: tox: Ignore virtualenvs for pep8 environment https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/815031
11:04:51 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Remove 'get_osc_show_columns_for_sdk_resource' duplicates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/815032
11:04:53 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Remove remnants of 'six' https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/815033
13:48:49 stephenfin gtema: Bike shedding time! cinder allows you to configure the fields that you can filter various resources on (volumes, attachments, backups, snapshots, etc.). cinderclient lets you list these using a list-filter command. I need to add this to OSC. What do I call it?
13:50:20 stephenfin gtema: I was going to add a separate 'filter list' command for each resource (i.e. 'volume snapshot filter list', 'volume backup filter list') but the underlying API returns filters for all resources, so this seems wasteful: we'd be dumping info for all resources except the one we care about
13:50:39 stephenfin example cinderclient output https://paste.opendev.org/show/810167/
13:52:59 stephenfin I'm thinking 'volume service filter list' or 'volume filter list' but both have issues. The latter is simpler, but I'm concerned people might think the filters are only for volumes. The former avoids this but people could read it as a filter for the volume service (i.e. the entity shown by 'volume service list'). 'filter list' is too generic
13:53:15 stephenfin Any opinions? I'll just choose one if you don't :-D
14:04:50 gtema Uhm, no opinion in this now
14:05:36 frickler stephenfin: what about "volume resource filter list", just like you kind of said in the first sentence?
14:05:58 stephenfin frickler: oh, that's a good idea. I didn't think of that
14:06:07 stephenfin that'll do nicely. Thanks, frickler
14:06:26 frickler :)
14:07:56 gtema maybe also `block storage filter list`
14:08:24 gtema not to mix with volume as a resource
14:10:15 stephenfin OSC seems to use volume rather than block storage everywhere (though object store instead of simply object), so I'm not so sure about that one. I think 'volume resource' is as clear as e.g. 'volume service' is
14:16:17 gtema that is exactly what I mean. atm we have volume rather for the resource, than the service. If we want to have command related to the service (if I understood correctly what you mean) I would rather try using different name
14:18:10 stephenfin I agree that we shouldn't overload the term. I'm saying that we're already overloading it though and don't use "block storage" as a term anywhere except some docs. It doesn't seem wise to change direction unless we want to rename the existing commands?
14:19:06 gtema I wouldn't change existing commands, cause they refer to the volume as a resource. Where we refer to volume as a service - we can think
14:20:21 gtema object store is not having a prefix at all and that is already creating confusion (not only in OSC, but also in ansible)
14:21:02 stephenfin hmm, fair. Let me see what it looks like and how it fits with existing commands
14:22:41 stephenfin gtema: How about 'volume service resource filter list'? It's a heck of a mouthful but it works?
14:23:00 stephenfin If not, I'd be tempted to rename 'volume service list' to 'block storage service list'
14:23:11 stephenfin with a deprecated alias, of course
14:23:22 gtema maybe it would be really better in the major release introduce block_storage and object_storage
14:23:55 gtema `block storage service list` sounds much better to me
14:24:38 stephenfin so also 'block storage service cluster' for clusters of block storage services?
14:25:17 gtema service cluster? not `block storage cluster`?
14:25:40 gtema which cluster you mean?
14:27:09 stephenfin They're clusters of services https://docs.openstack.org/cinder/latest/contributor/api_microversion_history.html#id7
14:27:33 gtema oh great, this is not on https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/block-storage/v3
14:27:39 stephenfin I think it's a HA thing, but I'm not really sure /o\ I'll have to ask Gorka
14:27:46 stephenfin Yeah, they're missing a few things from the docs :(
14:28:42 gtema very sad - really lot
14:29:08 gtema anyway, in this case I would rather go for `block storage cluster`
14:29:27 gtema I do not think using `service` inside in the command is useful
14:30:28 gtema missing stuff in docs mean we might miss lot in SDK
14:55:27 gtema stephenfin, if you are still around - is nova /limits still accept tenant_id as query_param? https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/compute/?expanded=show-rate-and-absolute-limits-detail#show-rate-and-absolute-limits
15:27:45 stephenfin gtema: yes, it's still tenant_id
15:28:02 gtema ok, thks
15:28:13 stephenfin there's a blueprint to change it to project_id (ditto for all other remaining references to tenant) but that hasn't landed yet
15:28:34 gtema good, adding it this way
15:31:10 gtema uhm, and quota-set is also non-standard (whatever standard actually is) - no support for ?usage=, but with /quota-sets/XXX/details
15:33:11 stephenfin yeah, there's a lot of those in the nova API, sadly
15:33:37 stephenfin i.e. 'GET /servers/{id}/detail' instead of e.g. 'GET /servers/{id}?detail=1'
15:34:45 gtema https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/763414 is making me doubt in myself
15:35:01 gtema check passes, gate fails (single test I mean)
15:36:36 stephenfin not entirely related but why is HypervisorTests.test_hypervisor_list calling 'hypervisor show'? :)
15:37:11 stephenfin that's a strange failure
15:37:15 gtema nice question
15:39:39 stephenfin so the test fails at 2021-10-22 15:04:02.759154 after 5.132781s
15:39:45 gtema ah, cause I first try to get list of existing ids
15:42:11 stephenfin there's the request hitting the API at 15:04:02.564172 https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/1f6c15565b2840bfb6e4f09ec7714ea0/log/controller/logs/screen-n-api.txt#1979
15:43:07 gtema apparently OSC receives empty response back
15:46:20 stephenfin the compute service is still up
15:46:30 stephenfin https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/1f6c15565b2840bfb6e4f09ec7714ea0/log/controller/logs/screen-n-cpu.txt#7018
15:47:58 gtema I'm not able to understand why check and gate behaves differently - and this 2 times
15:48:07 gtema maybe I should rebase
15:48:22 stephenfin I'd suggest trying it. That's weird
15:48:36 opendevreview Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch hypervisor operations to SDK https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/763414
15:49:14 gtema well, and if check will fail now I would be even more confused ;-)
#openstack-sdks - 2021-10-23
12:39:30 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332
12:45:03 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332
#openstack-sdks - 2021-10-25
08:18:01 thomasb06 gtema: Hello. The lines are two long, would you any guidelines in this case: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/814395
08:18:14 thomasb06 sometimes the class name is huge
10:59:31 gtema thomasb06 - pushed update to this change
11:32:25 opendevreview Jiří Stránský proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add documentation links to README.md https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/814782
15:02:37 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332
16:00:45 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332
16:45:10 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332
18:55:00 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332
20:41:49 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332
22:34:38 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332
23:40:28 opendevreview Diwei Zhu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Switch server backup to sdk. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/814332

Earlier   Later