Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2021-09-20
18:38:35 opendevreview Merged openstack/openstacksdk stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/808355
22:58:33 opendevreview Merged openstack/cliff master: Automatically page interactive root help output https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/cliff/+/799345
#openstack-sdks - 2021-09-21
11:43:02 thomasb06 gtema: it's 3 times the build fails, would you see what is wrong: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/809972/1 ?
11:45:30 gtema Will look
12:51:04 thomasb06 maybe it's fixed
14:40:10 opendevreview Bence Romsics proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Add router add/update/remove external gateways operations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/810267
14:41:40 opendevreview Bence Romsics proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: WIP Add command: router add/update/remove gateway https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/810268
14:43:49 opendevreview Bence Romsics proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: WIP Add command: router add/update/remove gateway https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/810268
14:52:40 opendevreview Bence Romsics proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Add router add/update/remove external gateways operations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/810267
16:00:31 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add BFD monitor operations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/810078
16:09:53 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add BFD monitor commands https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/810286
16:40:32 opendevreview Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Added missing warn() used in cloud.openstack.quota https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/805534
#openstack-sdks - 2021-09-22
06:29:45 thomasb06 TestObjectStoreProxy: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/810344
07:10:57 opendevreview Przemyslaw Szczerbik proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add QoS min pps rule object and CRUD operations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/810346
08:35:42 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add bfd_monitor as optional arg to route https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/810370
10:42:14 opendevreview OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/810384
10:42:16 opendevreview OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/810385
10:42:18 opendevreview OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Update master for stable/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/810386
10:42:20 opendevreview OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add Python3 yoga unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/810387
16:09:59 diablo_rojo stephenfin, gtema how did it go? >
16:10:08 gtema almost done
16:10:30 gtema and now - done
16:11:25 gtema went well, we did some short intro, but maybe you will want to do something more.
16:11:33 stephenfin diablo_rojo: Yeah, just finished. It went well. They've enough to get started and we suggested a list of tasks to get started with
16:11:46 gtema arranged few next steps, so hopefully next week we can get more hands-on
16:12:23 stephenfin Namely creating a recurring meeting, getting IRC/gerrit accounts, getting a linux dev environment, and figuring out where they'll be able to run DevStack (I assume their uni will have cloud resources available)
16:12:41 stephenfin diablo_rojo: We deferred on introductions until the next meeting, if the hope that you'd be able to attend
16:13:05 stephenfin diablo_rojo: gtema: I might send out a doodle poll to figure out times that would work best going forward?
16:13:26 gtema yeah, sounds great
16:15:12 gtema need to run now, time is ticking. See you
16:38:23 diablo_rojo stephenfin, doodle pole sounds great
16:38:33 diablo_rojo Yeah next week I've got less on.
16:38:52 diablo_rojo Sounds like it went pretty well :) Sorry I couldn't make it!
20:49:55 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Update master for stable/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/810386
20:49:57 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add Python3 yoga unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/810387
20:49:59 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-openstackclient stable/xena: Update .gitreview for stable/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/810384
20:50:01 opendevreview Merged openstack/python-openstackclient stable/xena: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/xena https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/810385
#openstack-sdks - 2021-09-23
05:28:10 thomasb06 gtema: there's no `runTest` in the original `TestObjectStoreProxy`, maybe I need to rebase the code?
07:06:32 gtema thomasb06, I think you can skip object_store. It is already split somehow. On the other hand it look really weird, I will take a deeper look myself
07:16:37 thomasb06 alright
07:17:02 thomasb06 regarding the workflow, what should I do? Maybe cancel the commit and start over
07:17:59 gtema yes, abandon the change and go for next service
07:43:53 thomasb06 done: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/810558
07:44:31 thomasb06 would you know how to refetch the directory? It has become messy and I start to have error messages regularly
07:45:05 gtema pretty much `git reset --hard feature/r1`
07:47:31 thomasb06 It seems it just worked. Thanks
07:51:31 opendevreview Przemyslaw Szczerbik proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add support for CRUD operations for QoS minimum packet rate rule https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/810559
08:27:05 seongsoocho In Korea mentoring, We are trying to implement a command that is not implemented for each component command of openstackcli. ( I'm referencing this link. https://docs.openstack.org/python-openstackclient/wallaby/cli/decoder.html )
08:27:12 seongsoocho Are there any special reasons for things that haven't been implemented yet? If not, we'll try.
08:29:09 gtema seongsoocho - mostly just because nobody has found time yet to do that, or even that the list is not up2date
08:30:13 seongsoocho great. I think It is a good starting point to contribute to the openstackcli . :-)
15:48:59 diablo_rojo gtema, still good to meet in ~12 min?
15:49:16 gtema yupp, can start even earlier if you are free
15:50:21 diablo_rojo Gimme like 3 min to make a cup of tea and get an etherpad up for notes and then I will poke you :)
15:51:06 gtema sure
15:52:37 diablo_rojo unless you already have an etherpad or doc started somewhere?
15:52:52 gtema actually nope
15:53:40 diablo_rojo kk
15:54:33 diablo_rojo https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/openstacksdk-docs
#openstack-sdks - 2021-09-24
15:02:00 thomasb06 class `TestPlacementProxy: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/810933
15:15:33 thomasb06 This commit has only one file staged: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/810936
16:00:14 opendevreview Ryan Zimmerman proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add os-instance-actions API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/797551
16:07:58 opendevreview Ryan Zimmerman proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add os-instance-actions API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/797551
#openstack-sdks - 2021-09-25
06:55:55 opendevreview SEUNG TAE KIM proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix bug that configuration show --mask cannot masking the password & token https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/811005
08:22:59 opendevreview JIHOJU proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix bug that readonly option doesn’t setup with volume create. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/811006
09:11:19 opendevreview SEUNG TAE KIM proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix bug that configuration show --mask cannot masking the password & token https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/811005
09:23:36 opendevreview SEUNG TAE KIM proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix that the path of functional test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/811008
09:25:04 opendevreview SEUNG TAE KIM proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix that the path of functional test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/811008
12:35:18 opendevreview SEUNG TAE KIM proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Fix that the path of functional test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/811008
#openstack-sdks - 2021-09-28
08:07:29 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add BFD monitor operations https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/810078
08:38:08 voondo Hi all, here we have to deal with an old version of openstack (newton). I acknowledged the versions matrix of the various CLI https://releases.openstack.org/newton/index.html#library-projects but I cannot figure if we can use the unified cli or not https://pypi.org/project/python-openstackclient/ If yes, what version ?
08:38:56 gtema voondo - OSC is build to be backward compatible, so you should be able to use latest version of it on your installation
08:39:52 gtema the only exclusion from this rule is a current issue of relying on cinderclient that recently dropped support for v2, so if you still use v2 there - you need to manually force installation of a little bit older cinderclient
08:40:32 voondo ok so the latest python-openstackclient but mixed with the old novaclient, neutronclient & co. ?
08:40:51 gtema latest openstackclient with only older cinderclient
08:41:13 gtema we are going to work on that to drop this dependency, but at the moment this is not yet done
08:42:16 voondo what about the version matrix defined here https://releases.openstack.org/newton/index.html#library-projects ? eg.
08:42:17 voondo python-novaclient
08:42:19 voondo 3.4.0
08:42:20 voondo 6.0.2
08:42:54 voondo what about the version matrix defined here https://releases.openstack.org/newton/index.html#library-projects ? eg. python-novaclient >3.4.0 <6.0.2
08:42:55 gtema latest osc is not relying on novaclient
08:43:07 voondo (oops sorry)
08:43:25 gtema if you want to use "nova ..." - sure, if you want to use "openstack server ..." - no dependency
08:43:40 voondo ah ok....
08:46:59 voondo and what about https://pypi.org/project/openstacksdk ? does it depend on python-novaclient & co or only openstacksdk ?
08:47:44 gtema osc depends on openstacksdk
08:48:11 gtema and itself it only depend on keystoneauth lib
08:48:41 voondo ok, it makes sense, thanks a lot for the clarification !
08:48:47 gtema I mean reasonable dependency, sure it depends on some other basic stuff, but no clients
08:49:01 gtema welcome
08:49:14 voondo yes of course, thanks !!
13:36:05 thomasb06 class SharedFileSystemStorageProxy: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/811420
#openstack-sdks - 2021-09-29
07:51:34 thomasb06 gtema: Hello. It seems this is pretty much it for the unit directory. Would you have another series of refactoring for me?
07:51:58 gtema hi thomasb06. Yes
07:52:08 gtema this is also part of the bigger cleanup
07:52:32 gtema it's about fixing identation of the docstrings through the code
07:52:43 thomasb06 cool. Then, I can go on elsewhere
07:53:08 gtema https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/openstack/block_storage/v3/_proxy.py#L574 - good example of docstring identation
07:53:18 gtema https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/openstack/block_storage/v3/_proxy.py#L368 - bad example

Earlier   Later