| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2021-04-22 | |||
| 09:25:52 | gtema | or we need a new release? | |
| 09:25:52 | gtema | or we need a new release? | |
| 09:44:00 | openstackgerrit | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add support to setting image tags https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/783850 | |
| 09:46:01 | openstackgerrit | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add support to setting image tags https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/783850 | |
| 10:25:58 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Use py3 as the default runtime for tox https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787009 | |
| 10:25:58 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Use py3 as the default runtime for tox https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787009 | |
| 10:27:32 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for Resource Filters https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/776271 | |
| 10:27:32 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for Resource Filters https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/776271 | |
| 10:43:26 | openstackgerrit | Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add support to setting image tags https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/783850 | |
| 12:16:54 | frickler | gtema: we need a new release, because the current release is broken against older neutron, at least that's what I understand. I'm busy today, could do a release patch tomorrow if noone else is faster | |
| 12:16:54 | frickler | gtema: we need a new release, because the current release is broken against older neutron, at least that's what I understand. I'm busy today, could do a release patch tomorrow if noone else is faster | |
| 12:17:31 | gtema | ah, ok. there is currently small batch of changes in gate, so tomorrow would be best | |
| 12:17:31 | gtema | ah, ok. there is currently small batch of changes in gate, so tomorrow would be best | |
| 13:10:13 | openstackgerrit | Riccardo Pittau proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix import order in compute unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787553 | |
| 13:10:13 | openstackgerrit | Riccardo Pittau proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix import order in compute unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787553 | |
| 13:21:12 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Allow for override of statsd/influxdb settings per cloud https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786814 | |
| 13:21:12 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Allow for override of statsd/influxdb settings per cloud https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786814 | |
| 16:30:52 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix import order in network unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786877 | |
| 16:30:52 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix import order in network unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786877 | |
| 16:31:13 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Allow unknown attributes to be included in request body https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/768208 | |
| 16:31:13 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Allow unknown attributes to be included in request body https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/768208 | |
| 19:16:13 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Adds Node Vendor passthru https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/785445 | |
| 19:16:13 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Adds Node Vendor passthru https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/785445 | |
| 20:40:13 | openstackgerrit | Tosin Farai proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add support for node vendor passthru methods https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/773399 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2021-04-23 | |||
| 09:24:50 | gtema | frickler - I'll update https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/786598 once rechecked placement is finished | |
| 09:24:50 | gtema | frickler - I'll update https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/786598 once rechecked placement is finished | |
| 09:25:30 | frickler | gtema: the only open patch I currently find is https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/745375/7 , do you need this in the next release? or could we make an intermediate bugfix release now? because that patch also has a followup that isn't even reviewed yet | |
| 09:25:30 | frickler | gtema: the only open patch I currently find is https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/745375/7 , do you need this in the next release? or could we make an intermediate bugfix release now? because that patch also has a followup that isn't even reviewed yet | |
| 09:25:41 | frickler | ha, jinx | |
| 09:25:41 | frickler | ha, jinx | |
| 09:26:15 | gtema | if it fails - will exclude it | |
| 09:26:15 | gtema | if it fails - will exclude it | |
| 09:26:24 | frickler | I was writing before reading your comment. o.k. | |
| 09:26:24 | frickler | I was writing before reading your comment. o.k. | |
| 09:26:36 | gtema | np | |
| 09:26:36 | gtema | np | |
| 10:05:27 | frickler | gtema: some things about jobs I noticed: we should make py38 voting according to what other projects have and also https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/runtimes/xena.html | |
| 10:05:27 | frickler | gtema: some things about jobs I noticed: we should make py38 voting according to what other projects have and also https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/runtimes/xena.html | |
| 10:05:38 | frickler | maybe also add a nv py39 job | |
| 10:05:38 | frickler | maybe also add a nv py39 job | |
| 10:05:51 | gtema | oki, ack | |
| 10:05:51 | gtema | oki, ack | |
| 10:05:57 | frickler | and drop the py37 things or do you thing they still add value? | |
| 10:05:57 | frickler | and drop the py37 things or do you thing they still add value? | |
| 10:06:20 | gtema | backwards is what we need due to zuul folks | |
| 10:06:20 | gtema | backwards is what we need due to zuul folks | |
| 10:06:28 | frickler | and then there's the ansible-stable jobs that have long been broken, can we just drop them? | |
| 10:06:28 | frickler | and then there's the ansible-stable jobs that have long been broken, can we just drop them? | |
| 10:07:11 | frickler | I guess I can just prepare separate patch for all of this and we can discuss there if needed | |
| 10:07:11 | frickler | I guess I can just prepare separate patch for all of this and we can discuss there if needed | |
| 10:07:15 | gtema | we should be better fixing it | |
| 10:07:15 | gtema | we should be better fixing it | |
| 10:08:07 | frickler | gtema: but if nobody does this in a year, maybe it isn't so relevant. ansible 2.8 is very old | |
| 10:08:07 | frickler | gtema: but if nobody does this in a year, maybe it isn't so relevant. ansible 2.8 is very old | |
| 10:08:25 | gtema | i know, too less people | |
| 10:08:25 | gtema | i know, too less people | |
| 10:08:36 | gtema | 2.8 is old but zuul is still supporting it | |
| 10:08:37 | gtema | 2.8 is old but zuul is still supporting it | |
| 10:09:03 | frickler | and always running a job that is known to fail isn't friendly to CI resources. we can always re-add the job if someone repairs it | |
| 10:09:03 | frickler | and always running a job that is known to fail isn't friendly to CI resources. we can always re-add the job if someone repairs it | |
| 10:09:46 | frickler | I can mention the removal patch in #zuul so maybe someone is then motivated to fix it | |
| 10:09:46 | frickler | I can mention the removal patch in #zuul so maybe someone is then motivated to fix it | |
| 10:10:23 | gtema | not sure zuul is interested in the job, I mean there is still support for in in the community | |
| 10:10:23 | gtema | not sure zuul is interested in the job, I mean there is still support for in in the community | |
| 10:11:34 | frickler | by the ansible community or which one? | |
| 10:11:34 | frickler | by the ansible community or which one? | |
| 10:11:38 | gtema | maybe 2.8 we can really at least disable for the beginning | |
| 10:11:38 | gtema | maybe 2.8 we can really at least disable for the beginning | |
| 10:11:52 | gtema | zuul community, since zuul still supports 2.8 | |
| 10:11:52 | gtema | zuul community, since zuul still supports 2.8 | |
| 10:12:09 | gtema | and zuul relies on sdk | |
| 10:12:09 | gtema | and zuul relies on sdk | |
| 14:11:23 | frickler | meh, gate is slow, lots of neutron failures causing resets :( | |
| 14:11:23 | frickler | meh, gate is slow, lots of neutron failures causing resets :( | |
| 14:12:25 | mordred | yeah - I don;'t think we use any openstack ansible modules in zuul | |
| 14:12:25 | mordred | yeah - I don;'t think we use any openstack ansible modules in zuul | |
| 14:12:49 | mordred | so the 2.8 job is probably not as important as the 37 support? | |
| 14:12:49 | mordred | so the 2.8 job is probably not as important as the 37 support? | |
| 14:13:11 | gtema | i guess ansible 2.8 job is coming from collections and not from sdk itself | |
| 14:13:11 | gtema | i guess ansible 2.8 job is coming from collections and not from sdk itself | |
| 14:14:40 | mordred | yah - but if it's always failing and nobody is fixing it, it's probably not providing much value to run it on sdk patches | |
| 14:14:40 | mordred | yah - but if it's always failing and nobody is fixing it, it's probably not providing much value to run it on sdk patches | |
| 14:14:50 | gtema | yupp | |
| 14:16:22 | gtema | mordred - was missing you in sdk room during ptg | |
| 14:16:22 | gtema | mordred - was missing you in sdk room during ptg | |
| 14:16:25 | gtema | :( | |
| 14:16:25 | gtema | :( | |
| 14:16:37 | frickler | the jobs are defined here https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/.zuul.yaml#L295-L333 | |
| 14:16:37 | frickler | the jobs are defined here https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/.zuul.yaml#L295-L333 | |
| 14:17:06 | frickler | the ansible-collections job is passing | |
| 14:17:06 | frickler | the ansible-collections job is passing | |
| 14:17:43 | gtema | hm, I was sure those were added for collections | |
| 14:17:43 | gtema | hm, I was sure those were added for collections | |
| 14:18:22 | frickler | but https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/.zuul.yaml#L379 is weird, that should have been wallaby and now become xena, any idea why that wasn't updated earlier? just oversight? | |
| 14:18:22 | frickler | but https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/.zuul.yaml#L379 is weird, that should have been wallaby and now become xena, any idea why that wasn't updated earlier? just oversight? | |
| 14:18:49 | mordred | gtema: yah - me too :( | |
| 14:18:49 | mordred | gtema: yah - me too :( | |
| 14:19:41 | mordred | gtema: I think those might be the pre-collections jobs | |
| 14:19:41 | mordred | gtema: I think those might be the pre-collections jobs | |
| 14:19:57 | gtema | maybe | |