| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2021-04-23 | |||
| 09:25:30 | frickler | gtema: the only open patch I currently find is https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/745375/7 , do you need this in the next release? or could we make an intermediate bugfix release now? because that patch also has a followup that isn't even reviewed yet | |
| 09:25:30 | frickler | gtema: the only open patch I currently find is https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/745375/7 , do you need this in the next release? or could we make an intermediate bugfix release now? because that patch also has a followup that isn't even reviewed yet | |
| 09:25:41 | frickler | ha, jinx | |
| 09:25:41 | frickler | ha, jinx | |
| 09:26:15 | gtema | if it fails - will exclude it | |
| 09:26:15 | gtema | if it fails - will exclude it | |
| 09:26:24 | frickler | I was writing before reading your comment. o.k. | |
| 09:26:24 | frickler | I was writing before reading your comment. o.k. | |
| 09:26:36 | gtema | np | |
| 09:26:36 | gtema | np | |
| 10:05:27 | frickler | gtema: some things about jobs I noticed: we should make py38 voting according to what other projects have and also https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/runtimes/xena.html | |
| 10:05:27 | frickler | gtema: some things about jobs I noticed: we should make py38 voting according to what other projects have and also https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/runtimes/xena.html | |
| 10:05:38 | frickler | maybe also add a nv py39 job | |
| 10:05:38 | frickler | maybe also add a nv py39 job | |
| 10:05:51 | gtema | oki, ack | |
| 10:05:51 | gtema | oki, ack | |
| 10:05:57 | frickler | and drop the py37 things or do you thing they still add value? | |
| 10:05:57 | frickler | and drop the py37 things or do you thing they still add value? | |
| 10:06:20 | gtema | backwards is what we need due to zuul folks | |
| 10:06:20 | gtema | backwards is what we need due to zuul folks | |
| 10:06:28 | frickler | and then there's the ansible-stable jobs that have long been broken, can we just drop them? | |
| 10:06:28 | frickler | and then there's the ansible-stable jobs that have long been broken, can we just drop them? | |
| 10:07:11 | frickler | I guess I can just prepare separate patch for all of this and we can discuss there if needed | |
| 10:07:11 | frickler | I guess I can just prepare separate patch for all of this and we can discuss there if needed | |
| 10:07:15 | gtema | we should be better fixing it | |
| 10:07:15 | gtema | we should be better fixing it | |
| 10:08:07 | frickler | gtema: but if nobody does this in a year, maybe it isn't so relevant. ansible 2.8 is very old | |
| 10:08:07 | frickler | gtema: but if nobody does this in a year, maybe it isn't so relevant. ansible 2.8 is very old | |
| 10:08:25 | gtema | i know, too less people | |
| 10:08:25 | gtema | i know, too less people | |
| 10:08:36 | gtema | 2.8 is old but zuul is still supporting it | |
| 10:08:37 | gtema | 2.8 is old but zuul is still supporting it | |
| 10:09:03 | frickler | and always running a job that is known to fail isn't friendly to CI resources. we can always re-add the job if someone repairs it | |
| 10:09:03 | frickler | and always running a job that is known to fail isn't friendly to CI resources. we can always re-add the job if someone repairs it | |
| 10:09:46 | frickler | I can mention the removal patch in #zuul so maybe someone is then motivated to fix it | |
| 10:09:46 | frickler | I can mention the removal patch in #zuul so maybe someone is then motivated to fix it | |
| 10:10:23 | gtema | not sure zuul is interested in the job, I mean there is still support for in in the community | |
| 10:10:23 | gtema | not sure zuul is interested in the job, I mean there is still support for in in the community | |
| 10:11:34 | frickler | by the ansible community or which one? | |
| 10:11:34 | frickler | by the ansible community or which one? | |
| 10:11:38 | gtema | maybe 2.8 we can really at least disable for the beginning | |
| 10:11:38 | gtema | maybe 2.8 we can really at least disable for the beginning | |
| 10:11:52 | gtema | zuul community, since zuul still supports 2.8 | |
| 10:11:52 | gtema | zuul community, since zuul still supports 2.8 | |
| 10:12:09 | gtema | and zuul relies on sdk | |
| 10:12:09 | gtema | and zuul relies on sdk | |
| 14:11:23 | frickler | meh, gate is slow, lots of neutron failures causing resets :( | |
| 14:11:23 | frickler | meh, gate is slow, lots of neutron failures causing resets :( | |
| 14:12:25 | mordred | yeah - I don;'t think we use any openstack ansible modules in zuul | |
| 14:12:25 | mordred | yeah - I don;'t think we use any openstack ansible modules in zuul | |
| 14:12:49 | mordred | so the 2.8 job is probably not as important as the 37 support? | |
| 14:12:49 | mordred | so the 2.8 job is probably not as important as the 37 support? | |
| 14:13:11 | gtema | i guess ansible 2.8 job is coming from collections and not from sdk itself | |
| 14:13:11 | gtema | i guess ansible 2.8 job is coming from collections and not from sdk itself | |
| 14:14:40 | mordred | yah - but if it's always failing and nobody is fixing it, it's probably not providing much value to run it on sdk patches | |
| 14:14:40 | mordred | yah - but if it's always failing and nobody is fixing it, it's probably not providing much value to run it on sdk patches | |
| 14:14:50 | gtema | yupp | |
| 14:16:22 | gtema | mordred - was missing you in sdk room during ptg | |
| 14:16:22 | gtema | mordred - was missing you in sdk room during ptg | |
| 14:16:25 | gtema | :( | |
| 14:16:25 | gtema | :( | |
| 14:16:37 | frickler | the jobs are defined here https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/.zuul.yaml#L295-L333 | |
| 14:16:37 | frickler | the jobs are defined here https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/.zuul.yaml#L295-L333 | |
| 14:17:06 | frickler | the ansible-collections job is passing | |
| 14:17:06 | frickler | the ansible-collections job is passing | |
| 14:17:43 | gtema | hm, I was sure those were added for collections | |
| 14:17:43 | gtema | hm, I was sure those were added for collections | |
| 14:18:22 | frickler | but https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/.zuul.yaml#L379 is weird, that should have been wallaby and now become xena, any idea why that wasn't updated earlier? just oversight? | |
| 14:18:22 | frickler | but https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/.zuul.yaml#L379 is weird, that should have been wallaby and now become xena, any idea why that wasn't updated earlier? just oversight? | |
| 14:18:49 | mordred | gtema: yah - me too :( | |
| 14:18:49 | mordred | gtema: yah - me too :( | |
| 14:19:41 | mordred | gtema: I think those might be the pre-collections jobs | |
| 14:19:41 | mordred | gtema: I think those might be the pre-collections jobs | |
| 14:19:57 | gtema | maybe | |
| 14:19:57 | gtema | maybe | |
| 14:20:00 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Drop jobs failing for too long https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787754 | |
| 14:20:00 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Drop jobs failing for too long https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787754 | |
| 14:20:05 | mordred | yeah - almost certainly - these still pull in the ansible github repo | |
| 14:20:05 | mordred | yeah - almost certainly - these still pull in the ansible github repo | |
| 14:20:07 | gtema | patch is there to disable those | |
| 14:20:07 | gtema | patch is there to disable those | |
| 14:20:20 | mordred | so I think these were the jobs we added to test against the modules when they were still in ansible tree | |
| 14:20:20 | mordred | so I think these were the jobs we added to test against the modules when they were still in ansible tree | |
| 14:20:29 | gtema | frickler - I guess nobody really noticed that | |
| 14:20:29 | gtema | frickler - I guess nobody really noticed that | |
| 14:29:32 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Switch to openstack-python3-xena-jobs template https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787758 | |
| 14:29:32 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Switch to openstack-python3-xena-jobs template https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787758 | |
| 18:41:39 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: placement: Add support for resource providers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/745375 | |
| 18:41:39 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: placement: Add support for resource providers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/745375 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2021-04-24 | |||
| 00:01:48 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Drop jobs failing for too long https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787754 | |
| 00:01:48 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Drop jobs failing for too long https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787754 | |
| 09:56:17 | openstackgerrit | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/openstacksdk stable/wallaby: Don't send empty remote_address_group_id for security groups https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787838 | |
| 09:56:17 | openstackgerrit | Dr. Jens Harbott proposed openstack/openstacksdk stable/wallaby: Don't send empty remote_address_group_id for security groups https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787838 | |
| 10:55:16 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Switch to openstack-python3-xena-jobs template https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787758 | |
| 10:55:16 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Switch to openstack-python3-xena-jobs template https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787758 | |
| 17:37:38 | openstackgerrit | Dylan Zapzalka proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for the GroupType resource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/784178 | |
| 17:37:38 | openstackgerrit | Dylan Zapzalka proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for the GroupType resource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/784178 | |
| 22:23:11 | openstackgerrit | Dylan Zapzalka proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Added support for the Quota set extension resource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/784704 | |
| 23:14:59 | openstackgerrit | Dylan Zapzalka proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Added support for the Quota set extension resource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/784704 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2021-04-25 | |||
| 02:53:24 | openstackgerrit | Wenping Song proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Dropping lower constraints testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/787861 | |