Posted	Nick	Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2020-06-22
13:55:54	gtema	no, why should they
13:55:54	mordred	2.8 isn't EOL I don't think
13:56:02	sshnaidm|ruck	mordred, no, but it doesn't make sense upload a pure role
13:56:12	mordred	it does if you're not using a collection-aware ansible :)
13:56:27	sshnaidm|ruck	mordred, well, from 2.8
13:56:50	mordred	or if you are already doing a role workflow and haven't gotten a chance to change everything you're doing - there's lots of people with roles out there so far
13:57:10	mordred	I mena - I know we're _eventually_ going to all migrate to collections, but it's going to take some time
13:57:40	gtema	there is half of internet of articles about roles ;-)
13:57:45	sshnaidm|ruck	mordred, yeah, that's about migration, but if you start from scratch - better to create a collection
13:58:29	gtema	it's clear, I wanted to start publishing my roles which exist since years with Zuul, that's why I was asking
13:58:56	sshnaidm|ruck	gtema, worth to add to them galaxy.yml and voila, you have a collection :)
13:59:23	gtema	and all the users not using latest ansible are cut-off
13:59:30	gtema	that's my problem
13:59:51	sshnaidm|ruck	mordred, btw, these patches seem to need more love https://review.opendev.org/#/c/730360/
13:59:54	gtema	I am unfortunately having much of those
14:00:10	sshnaidm|ruck	gtema, using collection is possible from 2.8
14:00:21	sshnaidm|ruck	do you have 2.7 still somewhere?
14:00:38	gtema	no, but in 2.8 it is rather a "hack"
14:00:53	mordred	yeah - ansible-galaxy install doesn't work in 2.8
14:01:17	gtema	I think it was also "ansible-galaxy role install vs ansible-galaxy collection install"
14:01:19	mordred	I don't expect people to really start using collections until they're on 2.9 at least
14:01:41	mordred	because of the ansible-galaxy thing
14:02:01	gtema	and then, there is "ansible-galaxy COLLECTION publish", at least according to 2.10 docs
14:03:15	gtema	and there is no way to upload role using cli from what I see
14:03:35	mordred	oh - right
14:03:44	mordred	that's one of the issues with pre-collection galaxy
14:03:47	mordred	it's tied to github
14:03:51	mordred	for publication
14:03:57	mordred	it can only import from github
14:04:07	mordred	this is one of the big wins with collections
14:05:28	gtema	okay, will need to "consider" forcing to move to collections
14:15:54	gtema	hmm, devstack is still broken? openstacksdk-functional-devstack-networking doesn't pass still
14:17:29	mordred	gtema: let me look - devstack should work at this point
14:17:39	gtema	https://f8bf2d4a845608449589-8f1f171af5507b30533733754e7f1ad8.ssl.cf5.rackcdn.com/735336/3/check/openstacksdk-functional-devstack-networking/718c56c/job-output.txt
14:21:22	frickler	No 'neutron.service_plugins' driver found, looking for 'firewall_v2'
14:24:15	mordred	oh -didn't fwaas get retired?
14:24:27	frickler	that has been retired, seems we need to pull it from the job definition, yes
14:24:30	frickler	slaweq: ^^
14:24:32	mordred	https://review.opendev.org/#/c/735858/
14:24:35	mordred	frickler, gtema ^^
14:25:05	mordred	now - I'm not sure why the nodepool job failed in gtema's change
14:25:16	mordred	since ensure-virtualenv was added to it
14:25:54	gtema	didn't I say I hate Mondays?
14:25:57	mordred	yeah
14:26:04	mordred	https://review.opendev.org/#/c/737130/ <-- that added ensure-virtualenv in nodepool
14:26:12	slaweq	frickler: sorry, I'm in the meeting
14:26:26	slaweq	frickler: as mordred mentioned, there is patch for that already
14:26:52	mordred	slaweq: now we just have to get it landed :)
14:27:06	gtema	+A'ed
14:27:14	slaweq	mordred: gtema thx
14:30:51	gtema	mordred, in my change nodepool passed in the last recheck (which is still running)
14:31:37	mordred	gtema: oh good
14:32:02	gtema	the status is from 19th, and venv merged on 20th
14:32:09	mordred	gtema: so the recheck of slaweq's change should work
14:32:20	gtema	yupp, fingers crossed
14:34:21	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/keystoneauth master: Implement HTTP Basic client support in keystoneauth1 https://review.opendev.org/727562
14:52:39	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/openstacksdk stable/ussuri: Update docs to work with newer Sphinx https://review.opendev.org/737083
14:59:09	mordred	dtantsur: ^^ http basic client landed
14:59:16	dtantsur	\o/
15:01:16	mordred	dtantsur: there's one more patch in the gate (simple one, it's about raising lower constraints) - once that's in, I think we should suggest a release
15:01:29	dtantsur	+++
15:06:19	openstackgerrit	Monty Taylor proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Drop python 3.5 support https://review.opendev.org/737285
15:06:52	mordred	lbragstad: ^^ we dropped 3.5 in sdk already, so I think it's fine to land that now
15:07:57	lbragstad	mordred makes sense, thank you
16:43:27	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/keystoneauth master: Update lower-constraints versions https://review.opendev.org/734803
16:43:48	openstackgerrit	Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: DNM test new CI https://review.opendev.org/737226
19:19:23	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/keystoneauth master: Drop python 3.5 support https://review.opendev.org/737285
21:30:23	openstackgerrit	Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: DNM test new CI https://review.opendev.org/737226
21:48:48	openstackgerrit	Slawek Kaplonski proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Remove neutron-fwaas from the jobs' required project https://review.opendev.org/735858
22:17:56	openstackgerrit	Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk stable/ussuri: Fix issues found by latest flake8 https://review.opendev.org/730332
22:18:05	openstackgerrit	Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk stable/ussuri: Don't error if clouds.yaml is not readable https://review.opendev.org/726962
#openstack-sdks - 2020-06-23
01:55:13	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/openstacksdk stable/ussuri: Fix issues found by latest flake8 https://review.opendev.org/730332
01:55:14	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/openstacksdk stable/ussuri: Don't error if clouds.yaml is not readable https://review.opendev.org/726962
04:23:46	openstackgerrit	melissaml proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Remove translation sections from setup.cfg https://review.opendev.org/737436
09:11:15	frickler	sdk networking tests are currently failing on master, fix is https://review.opendev.org/737460
09:12:00	gtema	thks for the heads-up frickler
09:14:01	openstackgerrit	Slawek Kaplonski proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Remove neutron-fwaas from the jobs' required project https://review.opendev.org/735858
09:27:19	openstackgerrit	Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: New CI jobs configuration https://review.opendev.org/736946
09:35:27	openstackgerrit	Hervé Beraud proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Remove elementtree deprecated methods https://review.opendev.org/737475
09:35:27	openstackgerrit	Hervé Beraud proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Remove elementtree deprecated methods https://review.opendev.org/737475
12:28:26	openstackgerrit	Olaf Seibert proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Only remove/add interfaces when needed. https://review.opendev.org/737519
13:24:07	openstackgerrit	Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix typos in job definitions https://review.opendev.org/737538
15:46:09	zallen	Why do I not have `openstack network trunk ...` commands on the python client version 5.2.1?
16:01:13	mordred	zallen: good question. I agree with you - they are not showing up for me either
16:01:19	mordred	zallen: I will look in to it
16:13:37	mordred	zallen: I don't see this in 4.0.0 either - did this work for you before?
16:13:40	mordred	slaweq: ^^ ??
16:20:19	mordred	zallen, slaweq: ok - so it doesn't look like python-neutronclient is providing trunk create as an osc plugin - it's a neutronclient plugin
16:21:59	mordred	mnaser: ^^ you concur with this, yes?
18:00:00	zallen	mordered This didn't work for me before, but it's working for a friend using python2
18:00:42	zallen	There are certainly trunks in openstack... do I just need to install python-neutronclient
18:04:28	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: New CI jobs configuration https://review.opendev.org/736946
18:04:29	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix typos in job definitions https://review.opendev.org/737538
18:42:26	openstackgerrit	Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Only remove/add interfaces when needed. https://review.opendev.org/737519
18:42:59	openstackgerrit	Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add trunk module https://review.opendev.org/737190
18:43:05	openstackgerrit	Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add volume_info module https://review.opendev.org/735949
18:43:10	openstackgerrit	Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add more useful information from exception https://review.opendev.org/736953
18:51:20	openstackgerrit	Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Update author lines https://review.opendev.org/736307
18:58:31	mordred	zallen: yes - as best I can tell at the moment, the code implementing this inside of neutronclient is not registering plugins for openstackclient - but only for neutronclient
18:58:50	mordred	I do intend to fix that - but that's part of a larger effort

Earlier   Later