| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2020-01-23 | |||
| 16:27:09 | dtantsur | esp. if done in advance | |
| 16:27:10 | sshnaidm | gtema, no, unfortunately | |
| 16:27:17 | gtema | ok | |
| 16:27:41 | sshnaidm | dtantsur, I think some biergarten will be ok too | |
| 16:28:07 | dtantsur | we even have breweries downtown | |
| 16:29:17 | sshnaidm | dtantsur, you mean Berlin, right? | |
| 16:29:37 | dtantsur | sshnaidm: I'm in Düsseldorf nowadays, hence Altbier | |
| 16:29:45 | sshnaidm | dtantsur, oh, I see | |
| 16:29:53 | dtantsur | There is local beer in Berlin, I'm not sure it's worth drinking :) | |
| 16:30:52 | dtantsur | sshnaidm: you can do Cologne and Düsseldorf in one shot, essentially, because of how close they are (30 mins by local train) | |
| 16:31:16 | dtantsur | (and Bonn, and a few smaller cities) | |
| 16:31:41 | sshnaidm | dtantsur, looks like a challenge for a "digital nomad" | |
| 16:31:48 | dtantsur | right | |
| 16:33:08 | sshnaidm | I suppose need to wait till spring with it | |
| 16:33:19 | sshnaidm | I survived even Laplands winter | |
| 16:33:28 | dtantsur | nice! I would totally try that | |
| 16:33:40 | sshnaidm | just -30 | |
| 16:34:03 | dtantsur | not bad, I used to go to the university when it was -36. by foot because trains broke down. | |
| 16:34:31 | sshnaidm | dtantsur, you need to change nick to "lomonosov" then :D | |
| 16:34:50 | gtema | hehe, sounds familiar, but in the last 10 years not experienced anything lower -10 | |
| 16:36:05 | gtema | this shitty west german winter | |
| 16:36:50 | sshnaidm | gtema, at least you have below 0 | |
| 16:37:11 | gtema | eh, only few nights during winter | |
| 16:37:59 | gtema | the only "white" outside is a fog - everything is white and you can't literaly see your nose | |
| 16:40:07 | dtantsur | sshnaidm: we have just above 0, not the best weather | |
| 16:46:33 | sshnaidm | around 0 is the worst weather I can imagine, everything is half melted, snow with soil.. | |
| 16:47:11 | sshnaidm | and everything is like ice hockey field in the morning | |
| 16:48:05 | dtantsur | fortunately, it's quite dry here | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2020-01-24 | |||
| 00:02:50 | mordred | sshnaidm|afk: I'm not actually here this week - but as soon as I get back I'll work on getting the galaxy access set up so that we can push from zuul | |
| 08:16:39 | masterpe | Is it possible with the SDK to disable a nova-compute node. With CLI I would use the command: "openstack compute service set --disable --disable-reason Standby compute01 nova-compute" | |
| 14:02:00 | frickler | mordred: seems we need https://review.opendev.org/700897 as a fix for failing jobs in neutron. the func tests are failing though with the same issue the patch wants to fix, likely because they don't use tips. do you have a better idea than making them non-voting temporarily? | |
| 14:10:48 | frickler | actually maybe there still is something wrong with that patch, let me test locally a bit | |
| 16:18:08 | dtantsur | mordred, gtema, I'm considering an openstacksdk release, we need it for ironic to move on with migration. If there are no objects, I'll request it on Monday. | |
| 16:18:35 | gtema | yes, fully support this, since for a long time I depend on my imaging patch | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2020-01-25 | |||
| 09:33:16 | openstackgerrit | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/js-openstack-lib master: WIP: New nodejs jobs https://review.opendev.org/702132 | |
| 10:14:27 | openstackgerrit | Radosław Piliszek proposed openstack/js-openstack-lib master: WIP: New nodejs jobs https://review.opendev.org/702132 | |
| 10:24:07 | mordred | dtantsur|afk: ++ | |
| 10:24:17 | mordred | dtantsur|afk: link me to if when you do and I'll ack it | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2020-01-26 | |||
| 09:25:52 | frickler | mordred: this should fix the stable/stein testing https://review.opendev.org/704243 Fix branch for stable job testing | |
| 09:26:29 | frickler | I thinking that this pinning to master might generally be obsolete now that we do seem to have stable branches everywhere | |
| 09:30:47 | frickler | mordred: dtroyer: /me thinks we should also see stable branch patches here, proposed https://review.opendev.org/704244 Adapt branches for sdk projects in gerritbot | |
| 10:04:12 | yoctozepto | frickler, mordred, dtroyer: you might also like the patchbot we have in a few channels (e.g. #openstack-kolla) around (provided by timburke) - it responds to gerrit links like openstack to launchpad's | |
| 10:04:33 | yoctozepto | 11:04:22 <yoctozepto> testing... | |
| 10:04:34 | yoctozepto | 11:04:24 |
|
| 10:04:34 | yoctozepto | 11:04:25 <patchbot> patch 704244 - project-config - Adapt branches for sdk projects in gerritbot - 1 patch set | |
| 10:05:39 | yoctozepto | gmann: while we are at it, qa might also like it ^ | |
| 11:15:10 | frickler | yoctozepto: yes I've seen patchbot but I have a difficult time to decide whether I consider it more useful than noisy. I'd also prefer it to be infra-managed if people decide they want it | |
| 11:53:36 | yoctozepto | frickler: good point, it is a tradeoff but I'm obviously in favor of the extra help so that I don't have to type out descriptions of changes I am linking to | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2020-01-27 | |||
| 01:45:23 | mordred | dtantsur|afk: https://review.opendev.org/704264 Release 0.40.0 of openstacksdk | |
| 02:56:41 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk stable/stein: Fix branch for stable job testing https://review.opendev.org/704243 | |
| 03:13:43 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk stable/stein: Add fake support for global_request_id https://review.opendev.org/700897 | |
| 07:07:16 | frickler | mordred: dtantsur|afk: can we also have a stable/stein release with this in, please? ^^ | |
| 07:08:17 | frickler | I'm also wondering when would be a good time for a 1.0.0 release. would give some more numbering space for stable branches | |
| 10:23:53 | dtantsur | frickler: will request as well | |
| 10:31:34 | dtantsur | frickler: honestly, https://review.opendev.org/#/c/700897/ is sooo bad.. I'm having hard time signing off on a release with it | |
| 10:33:32 | dtantsur | I will wait for mordred who probably understands why this was approved | |
| 10:58:54 | frickler | dtantsur: the job is running against neutron stable/stein patches and was constantly failing there, although it seems to be fixed with the merge, so maybe we don't actually need the release as I had expected http://zuul.openstack.org/builds?job_name=openstacksdk-functional-devstack-networking&branch=stable%2Fstein | |
| 10:59:57 | dtantsur | frickler: what was the root cause? some project using recent features? cannot it be reverted on the consumer side? | |
| 11:00:10 | frickler | oh, wait, the successes were against openstacksdk, will have to wait for another result from neutron | |
| 11:00:19 | dtantsur | ah | |
| 11:00:22 | dtantsur | anyway | |
| 11:00:35 | dtantsur | we're about to release a new stub feature on a stable branch | |
| 11:00:36 | frickler | dtantsur: I think the issue came from running master tempest which requires the new attribute | |
| 11:00:57 | frickler | dtantsur: but I'm fine with waiting for further feedback from mordred | |
| 11:00:59 | dtantsur | so, the branchless nature of tempest bites us | |
| 11:01:19 | dtantsur | I think tempest must be compatible with every release of the SDK without us stabbing out features it uses incorrectly | |
| 11:01:30 | dtantsur | but it may be only me. I'll wait for mordred. | |
| 11:03:04 | frickler | dtantsur: oh, wait, if you look at e.g. http://zuul.openstack.org/build/44ccbf47065a435d98e54b4c604c66a2 it was an OSC call that was failing, so not tempest related this time | |
| 11:03:13 | dtantsur | hmmm? | |
| 11:04:05 | dtantsur | I see. Is it OSC using something new or the devstack plugin not constraining OSC properly? | |
| 11:06:10 | frickler | dtantsur: looking again, maybe https://review.opendev.org/704243 was the real issue and 700897 wasn't even needed anymore after that | |
| 11:06:43 | dtantsur | frickler: is it possible to try reverting it and have a job run with depends-on? | |
| 11:07:10 | frickler | so that issue was running master openstacksdk against stable/stein keystoneauth1 if I traced it correctly | |
| 11:07:23 | frickler | dtantsur: I guess I could do that, yes, give me a few | |
| 11:07:59 | dtantsur | ++ thx | |
| 11:08:26 | openstackgerrit | Jens Harbott (frickler) proposed openstack/openstacksdk stable/stein: Revert "Add fake support for global_request_id" https://review.opendev.org/704305 | |
| 11:12:20 | frickler | dtantsur: let's see what the CI has to say about this one: https://review.opendev.org/704307 DNM: Test openstacksdk revert | |
| 11:13:05 | dtantsur | frickler: ++ but zuul doesn't like something here | |
| 11:15:30 | frickler | dtantsur: ah yes, thx, I was editing out the other jobs, but not enough of them | |
| 12:11:39 | mordred | dtantsur, frickler: oh good - I didn't like backporting that either - let's fingers crossed that the revert works | |
| 12:19:51 | frickler | lgtm http://zuul.openstack.org/stream/7e749006afc448498fe34e31844e3286?logfile=console.log | |
| 12:23:51 | mordred | frickler: woot! | |
| 12:44:34 | openstackgerrit | Daniel Bengtsson proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Stop configuring install_command in tox and stop use pip. https://review.opendev.org/694484 | |
| 12:54:41 | dtantsur | mordred: thx for checking! FYI https://review.opendev.org/#/c/704300/ | |
| 12:58:11 | mordred | dtantsur: woot | |
| 12:59:12 | mordred | dtantsur: btw - I agree on a 1.0 - I've been hoping to get a minute to walk through and make sure we don't have any super gross things still laying around that need excising first. I'll try to do that next week when I'm properly back | |
| 13:06:22 | mordred | oh - wait - it was frickler mentioning a 1.0 ... | |
| 13:12:48 | frickler | crazy ideas I get in the morning ;) | |
| 13:26:35 | sshnaidm | just a reminder, this patch needs some love from openstacksdk cores: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/703342/ | |
| 13:34:40 | mordred | sshnaidm, dtantsur: I left a question. also - I left a +2 but not a +A because I'm only partially here and not 100% caught up and dtantsur had a question.. so I'd like to make sure dtantsur is happy before pulling the trigger | |
| 14:32:07 | dtantsur | ++ | |
| 14:33:02 | frickler | sshnaidm: for the job failure, I think ansible-collections-openstack-functional-devstack is missing openstack/ansible-collections-openstack as required-project, making it fail when not running against itself | |
| 14:33:47 | sshnaidm | frickler, I don't think you need it in required project, since it's defined in this project | |
| 14:33:56 | sshnaidm | the job actually pass on collections repo | |
| 14:34:21 | sshnaidm | seems like it's something weird in devstack post playbook, let's see the last run.. | |
| 14:34:23 | frickler | sshnaidm: yes, when running against the project itself, it is there, when running against other project, like openstacksdk, it is missing | |
| 14:34:44 | frickler | FileNotFoundError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/home/zuul/src/opendev.org/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack' | |
| 14:36:32 | dtantsur | sshnaidm: the project where a job is defined in is not necessary added to required-projects | |
| 14:36:48 | dtantsur | (e.g. for ironic we explicitly add ironic to all its jobs to make them reusable) | |
| 14:38:49 | sshnaidm | hmm.. was sure it's smart enough, will check again | |