Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2019-06-12
13:07:23 mordred but, you konw - eventual consisteny
13:07:41 gtema great
13:07:47 mordred yeah. it's totally happy making
13:08:54 mordred gtema: that said - I'm 100% certain that whole stack could do with a refactor, that chunks should almost certainly be rewritten or rethought - it's definitely a mess
13:09:31 gtema sounds good. Let's do it this way then. Time to fix things
13:09:53 Shrews mordred: have you seen https://review.opendev.org/664681 ? that seems like it should be an openstacksdk option, not in nodepool
13:09:58 gtema so for now I will skip tests and focus on the implementation then
13:11:43 gtema this networking ___crapppp____
13:12:37 mordred Shrews: I agree - it seems similar to "default_network" and "floating_ip_source"
13:12:44 mordred Shrews: in fact, I believe we have an option for that already
13:14:33 Shrews oh, i didn't look at the actual change, just the commit msg. it's just that we aren't plumbing the ip_pool value through TO the sdk
13:15:07 mordred oh - we have that config option in nodepool already?
13:15:14 Shrews no
13:16:12 mordred yeah - I don't think that's needed
13:16:17 Shrews mordred: however, i would have thought that we'd have a 'default' value in clouds.yaml. but i guess not?
13:16:21 mordred https://docs.openstack.org/openstacksdk/latest/user/config/network-config.html - nat_source
13:16:40 Shrews ah! yes
13:16:57 Shrews excellent
13:17:17 mordred Shrews: we should maybe figure out how to document those _better_ - it seems like people can never find them
13:17:37 mordred so while there are some docs, they're clearly not working for people
13:17:39 Shrews (or remember them :)
13:17:44 mordred hehe. yeah :)
13:21:11 Shrews i'll comment on that review with that doc link
15:25:16 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add server event command documentation for compute API 2.21 https://review.opendev.org/664957
15:41:38 openstackgerrit Matt Riedemann proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add server add/remove volume description for microversion 2.20 https://review.opendev.org/664960
19:16:11 openstackgerrit Brian Haley proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: port: drop host-id and device-id https://review.opendev.org/664421
#openstack-sdks - 2019-06-13
08:55:50 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Support deleting all routes in update_router https://review.opendev.org/663369
10:22:46 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Prepare Server to be used in cloud layer https://review.opendev.org/665105
10:58:45 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Volume.Backup restore fixes https://review.opendev.org/665110
10:59:58 gtema mordred, dtantsur: would you please go through refactoring changes. It becomes hard to keep track what is done, what not and to still keep it merge-able
11:01:28 gtema mordred: for the server I decided to split things up into first preparing server itself for additional stuff (https://review.opendev.org/#/c/665105/) and on top of that there would be it's integration into cloud
11:05:43 dtantsur will try
11:05:54 gtema thks
12:11:20 dtantsur mordred, gtema, it doesn't look like anything happened to https://github.com/ansible/ansible/pull/54463 after your comments :(
12:28:24 gtema dtantsur: if recheck will not help - we will need to leave shipits again. They seem to work only one week after latest test
12:28:37 dtantsur I see
12:38:39 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Use Resource layer for network SecurityGroups https://review.opendev.org/662724
14:20:16 pgaxatte hello
14:20:45 pgaxatte haa just found my answer in the channel banner :D
14:20:50 pgaxatte "Bug tracker for SDK and OSC is now at https://storyboard.openstack.org"
14:21:11 pgaxatte the contributing page of osc-lib is not up-to-date
14:21:13 pgaxatte https://docs.openstack.org/developer/osc-lib/contributor/index.html
14:23:06 dtroyer pgaxatte: thanks for the heads-up
14:23:09 pgaxatte to submit a bug related to the openstack cli, the openstack/openstacksdk in the storyboard is the right place?
14:23:20 dtroyer yes
14:25:38 pgaxatte alright thanks dtroyer ;)
15:01:59 mordred pgaxatte: wait - no - you want https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/python-openstackclient for the CLI - openstack/openstacksdk is just for the sdk
15:09:40 pgaxatte mordred: alright thanks, doing that.
15:15:29 efried dtantsur: Thanks for starting to look at the ironicclient=>sdk in nova series
15:16:39 dtantsur sure thing
15:20:01 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Prepare Server to be used in cloud layer https://review.opendev.org/665105
15:23:40 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Prepare Server to be used in cloud layer https://review.opendev.org/665105
15:28:11 gtema mordred: can you please go through refactor changes, since it's hard to keep everything from merge conflicts
15:31:08 mordred gtema: yes - although we're packing moving over the next couple of days, so it might be a couple of days - but that stack will be the next thing I look at and I won't merge anything else before
15:31:34 gtema ah, ok. Thks for the headsup
15:31:58 gtema happy packing!
15:34:33 pgaxatte dtroyer, mordred: thanks for your help, the bug is here https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2005877 :)
15:57:54 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Prepare Server to be used in cloud layer https://review.opendev.org/665105
16:00:35 elmiko API SIG office hour now open!
16:00:49 edleafe You beat me fair and square this time, elmiko
16:01:13 elmiko i like to think we are just collaborating from different time zones
16:01:40 gtema aren't we?
16:02:12 edleafe Unfortuantely, we won't be collaborating for much longer. I got my "resource action" notice from IBM, so I'll be gone come September
16:02:28 elmiko oh wow...
16:02:32 gtema ups
16:02:58 elmiko edleafe: does that mean you are working with a different group or...?
16:03:11 edleafe I'm trying to look at it as a positive thing. I've been working on OpenStack since before OpenStack existed, so maybe it's time for some new adventure
16:03:20 elmiko yeah, fair
16:03:23 edleafe elmiko: No, it's a layoff
16:03:28 elmiko urgh
16:03:28 njohnston edleafe: Maybe you can come over to Red Hat, and slip right back in...
16:03:37 elmiko haha, njohnston was just about to say that!
16:03:37 gtema ehh, that's sad
16:03:40 edleafe njohnston: Sneaky!!
16:03:50 elmiko we have other positions too though, not just openstack =)
16:04:42 edleafe I've found tons of positions available, but for most companies I've seen "senior" developer means "more than 3 years out of college"
16:05:29 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Use resource layer for compute.server cloud methods https://review.opendev.org/664593
16:07:54 elmiko edleafe: well, if you do find something at the hat, definitely reach out i'm sure there are enough of us around willing to put in a good word for you =)
16:09:54 edleafe Thanks, elmiko. And if you hear of anything... :)
16:13:34 elmiko ++
16:16:46 openstackgerrit Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add 'openstack server migrate [--resize|--confirm]' flags https://review.opendev.org/664393
16:46:51 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Prepare Server to be used in cloud layer https://review.opendev.org/665105
16:59:49 elmiko catch ya later edleafe , have a nice weekend =)
16:59:54 edleafe You too!
17:05:04 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Use resource layer for compute.server cloud methods https://review.opendev.org/664593
17:05:47 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Use resource layer for compute.server cloud methods https://review.opendev.org/664593
17:07:08 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Use resource layer for compute.server cloud methods https://review.opendev.org/664593
22:43:28 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/osc-lib master: Add FakeModule from OSC https://review.opendev.org/660230
#openstack-sdks - 2019-06-14
02:25:03 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Rename review.openstack.org to review.opendev.org https://review.opendev.org/658562
02:38:15 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/osc-lib master: Move the _tag module from OSC to osc-lib https://review.opendev.org/662859
02:44:46 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/osc-lib master: Corrent using auth_type=none in clouds.yaml https://review.opendev.org/664830
04:08:24 openstackgerrit Martin Chlumsky proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Allow "server migrate" (not live) to take "--host" option https://review.opendev.org/628334
04:13:16 openstackgerrit Martin Chlumsky proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Allow "server migrate" (not live) to take "--host" option https://review.opendev.org/628334
06:28:02 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Prepare Server to be used in cloud layer https://review.opendev.org/665105
06:39:01 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Use resource layer for compute.server cloud methods https://review.opendev.org/664593
08:56:11 gtema dtantsur: thanks for reviews. Will fix stuff when achieve submittable state with servers
08:56:41 gtema btw, do you remember how to rebase on to a pending change from git (not via gerrit)?
08:59:07 dtantsur gtema: fetch the new root with `git review -d <number>`, then do a regular rebase
08:59:28 gtema ah, ok. thanks
09:19:25 openstackgerrit Brin Zhang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Microversion 2.74: Support Specifying AZ to unshelve https://review.opendev.org/665336

Earlier   Later