Posted	Nick	Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2019-06-13
14:23:06	dtroyer	pgaxatte: thanks for the heads-up
14:23:09	pgaxatte	to submit a bug related to the openstack cli, the openstack/openstacksdk in the storyboard is the right place?
14:23:20	dtroyer	yes
14:25:38	pgaxatte	alright thanks dtroyer ;)
15:01:59	mordred	pgaxatte: wait - no - you want https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/project/openstack/python-openstackclient for the CLI - openstack/openstacksdk is just for the sdk
15:09:40	pgaxatte	mordred: alright thanks, doing that.
15:15:29	efried	dtantsur: Thanks for starting to look at the ironicclient=>sdk in nova series
15:16:39	dtantsur	sure thing
15:20:01	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Prepare Server to be used in cloud layer https://review.opendev.org/665105
15:23:40	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Prepare Server to be used in cloud layer https://review.opendev.org/665105
15:28:11	gtema	mordred: can you please go through refactor changes, since it's hard to keep everything from merge conflicts
15:31:08	mordred	gtema: yes - although we're packing moving over the next couple of days, so it might be a couple of days - but that stack will be the next thing I look at and I won't merge anything else before
15:31:34	gtema	ah, ok. Thks for the headsup
15:31:58	gtema	happy packing!
15:34:33	pgaxatte	dtroyer, mordred: thanks for your help, the bug is here https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2005877 :)
15:57:54	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Prepare Server to be used in cloud layer https://review.opendev.org/665105
16:00:35	elmiko	API SIG office hour now open!
16:00:49	edleafe	You beat me fair and square this time, elmiko
16:01:13	elmiko	i like to think we are just collaborating from different time zones
16:01:40	gtema	aren't we?
16:02:12	edleafe	Unfortuantely, we won't be collaborating for much longer. I got my "resource action" notice from IBM, so I'll be gone come September
16:02:28	elmiko	oh wow...
16:02:32	gtema	ups
16:02:58	elmiko	edleafe: does that mean you are working with a different group or...?
16:03:11	edleafe	I'm trying to look at it as a positive thing. I've been working on OpenStack since before OpenStack existed, so maybe it's time for some new adventure
16:03:20	elmiko	yeah, fair
16:03:23	edleafe	elmiko: No, it's a layoff
16:03:28	elmiko	urgh
16:03:28	njohnston	edleafe: Maybe you can come over to Red Hat, and slip right back in...
16:03:37	elmiko	haha, njohnston was just about to say that!
16:03:37	gtema	ehh, that's sad
16:03:40	edleafe	njohnston: Sneaky!!
16:03:50	elmiko	we have other positions too though, not just openstack =)
16:04:42	edleafe	I've found tons of positions available, but for most companies I've seen "senior" developer means "more than 3 years out of college"
16:05:29	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Use resource layer for compute.server cloud methods https://review.opendev.org/664593
16:07:54	elmiko	edleafe: well, if you do find something at the hat, definitely reach out i'm sure there are enough of us around willing to put in a good word for you =)
16:09:54	edleafe	Thanks, elmiko. And if you hear of anything... :)
16:13:34	elmiko	++
16:16:46	openstackgerrit	Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add 'openstack server migrate [--resize|--confirm]' flags https://review.opendev.org/664393
16:46:51	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Prepare Server to be used in cloud layer https://review.opendev.org/665105
16:59:49	elmiko	catch ya later edleafe , have a nice weekend =)
16:59:54	edleafe	You too!
17:05:04	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Use resource layer for compute.server cloud methods https://review.opendev.org/664593
17:05:47	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Use resource layer for compute.server cloud methods https://review.opendev.org/664593
17:07:08	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Use resource layer for compute.server cloud methods https://review.opendev.org/664593
22:43:28	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/osc-lib master: Add FakeModule from OSC https://review.opendev.org/660230
#openstack-sdks - 2019-06-14
02:25:03	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/python-openstackclient master: Rename review.openstack.org to review.opendev.org https://review.opendev.org/658562
02:38:15	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/osc-lib master: Move the _tag module from OSC to osc-lib https://review.opendev.org/662859
02:44:46	openstackgerrit	Merged openstack/osc-lib master: Corrent using auth_type=none in clouds.yaml https://review.opendev.org/664830
04:08:24	openstackgerrit	Martin Chlumsky proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Allow "server migrate" (not live) to take "--host" option https://review.opendev.org/628334
04:13:16	openstackgerrit	Martin Chlumsky proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Allow "server migrate" (not live) to take "--host" option https://review.opendev.org/628334
06:28:02	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Prepare Server to be used in cloud layer https://review.opendev.org/665105
06:39:01	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Use resource layer for compute.server cloud methods https://review.opendev.org/664593
08:56:11	gtema	dtantsur: thanks for reviews. Will fix stuff when achieve submittable state with servers
08:56:41	gtema	btw, do you remember how to rebase on to a pending change from git (not via gerrit)?
08:59:07	dtantsur	gtema: fetch the new root with `git review -d <number>`, then do a regular rebase
08:59:28	gtema	ah, ok. thanks
09:19:25	openstackgerrit	Brin Zhang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Microversion 2.74: Support Specifying AZ to unshelve https://review.opendev.org/665336
10:06:00	openstackgerrit	Brin Zhang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Microversion 2.74: Support Specifying AZ to unshelve https://review.opendev.org/665336
10:54:45	openstackgerrit	Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add 'openstack server migrate (confirm|revert)' commands https://review.opendev.org/664393
10:54:45	openstackgerrit	Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add 'openstack server resize (confirm|revert)' commands https://review.opendev.org/665357
10:54:46	openstackgerrit	Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Bump hacking version https://review.opendev.org/665358
11:28:23	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Use resource layer for compute.server cloud methods https://review.opendev.org/664593
11:44:05	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Prepare Server to be used in cloud layer https://review.opendev.org/665105
12:43:21	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Volume.Backup restore fixes https://review.opendev.org/665110
13:03:36	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Use Resource layer for compute KeyPairs https://review.opendev.org/662729
15:02:44	openstackgerrit	Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Bump hacking version https://review.opendev.org/665358
16:02:02	openstackgerrit	Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Allow specifying destination for cold migrations https://review.opendev.org/649574
17:09:15	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Switch cloud layer to use proxy for DNS https://review.opendev.org/665435
17:09:34	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Use resource layer for compute.server cloud methods https://review.opendev.org/664593
17:20:04	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Volume.Backup restore fixes https://review.opendev.org/665110
19:16:13	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Volume.Backup restore fixes https://review.opendev.org/665110
19:27:05	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Switch cloud layer to use proxy for DNS https://review.opendev.org/665435
19:29:41	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Switch cloud layer to use proxy for DNS https://review.opendev.org/665435
#openstack-sdks - 2019-06-17
09:16:30	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Volume.Backup restore fixes https://review.opendev.org/665110
09:44:21	openstackgerrit	yanpuqing proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: [WIP]Client should parse string to boolean for valuse 'is_domain' https://review.opendev.org/665629
09:53:09	openstackgerrit	yanpuqing proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: [WIP]Client should parse string to boolean for value 'is_domain' https://review.opendev.org/665629
10:30:41	dtantsur	folks, will https://github.com/openstack/openstacksdk/commit/86ad9debd1cb08c2a2e53fd30502b020a0c3e4fe work if a project name contains dashes? I suspect no
10:45:38	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Switch cloud layer to use proxy for DNS https://review.opendev.org/665435
11:20:49	openstackgerrit	Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: from_conf: fix handling service names with dashes https://review.opendev.org/665645
11:20:50	dtantsur	and here goes the fix ^^^
11:40:40	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Volume.Backup restore fixes https://review.opendev.org/665110
12:10:56	openstackgerrit	yanpuqing proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: [WIP]Client should parse string to boolean for value 'is_domain' https://review.opendev.org/665629
12:54:00	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Switch cloud layer to use proxy for DNS https://review.opendev.org/665435
17:31:32	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Switch cloud layer to use proxy for DNS https://review.opendev.org/665435
17:33:42	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Switch cloud layer to use proxy for DNS https://review.opendev.org/665435
#openstack-sdks - 2019-06-18
01:42:32	openstackgerrit	yanpuqing proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: [WIP]Client should parse string to boolean for value 'is_domain' https://review.opendev.org/665629
04:03:24	openstackgerrit	yanpuqing proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: [WIP]Client should parse string to boolean for value 'is_domain' https://review.opendev.org/665629
06:49:24	openstackgerrit	yanpuqing proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: [WIP]Client should parse string to boolean for value 'is_domain' https://review.opendev.org/665629
07:30:14	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Switch cloud layer to use proxy for DNS https://review.opendev.org/665435
07:50:41	openstackgerrit	Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Volume.Backup restore fixes https://review.opendev.org/665110
11:39:26	openstackgerrit	yanpuqing proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: [WIP]Client should parse string to boolean for value 'is_domain' https://review.opendev.org/665629
14:54:20	openstackgerrit	jacky06 proposed openstack/cliff master: Sync Sphinx requirement https://review.opendev.org/666009
20:37:24	corvus	what does it mean when osc says "(2, 'No such file or directory')" on invocation?
20:37:56	corvus	eg: http://paste.openstack.org/show/753157/
20:38:20	corvus	mordred: ^?
20:45:09	corvus	i think that may happen if the cache file directory doesn't exist
20:45:23	corvus	it would be nice if it said which directory didn't exist. that would save time.
20:45:41	corvus	or just don't mask the exception
#openstack-sdks - 2019-06-19
01:34:08	openstackgerrit	yanpuqing proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Client should parse string to boolean for value 'is_domain' https://review.opendev.org/665629

Earlier   Later