| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-04-04 | |||
| 13:43:20 | dtantsur | mordred: hi! how are things like Connection.baremetal generated? | |
| 13:45:15 | mordred | dtantsur: magic | |
| 13:45:32 | mordred | dtantsur: one sec - getting link | |
| 13:47:04 | mordred | dtantsur: https://opendev.org/openstack/openstacksdk/src/branch/master/openstack/_meta/connection.py#L37-L82 | |
| 13:48:31 | dtantsur | mordred: ah, so it's generated from os-service-types. So baremetal-introspection should already be there. | |
| 13:51:30 | mordred | should be, yes | |
| 13:52:00 | mordred | but we do those ServiceDescription objects so that we only instantiate the Proxy if someone tries to use it | |
| 14:15:43 | JeremyHouser | Are python-openstackclient functional tests assumed to be ran by a user with admin privileges? | |
| 14:16:39 | dtroyer | JeremyHouser: yes | |
| 14:16:48 | JeremyHouser | Fantastic, thank you | |
| 14:52:52 | openstackgerrit | Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: [WIP] Support for the baremetal introspection service https://review.openstack.org/650044 | |
| 14:53:47 | dtantsur | initial bits ^^^ needs testing (later) | |
| 16:00:12 | edleafe | Welcome one and all to the API-SIG Office Hour! | |
| 16:00:23 | elmiko | quick on the fingers today edleafe ;) | |
| 16:00:39 | edleafe | Shoulda been a pickpocket | |
| 16:00:44 | elmiko | haha | |
| 16:02:00 | gtema | I was already thinking what has happened to Office Hour - again DST effect | |
| 16:03:21 | mordred | one in the US - and then another in EU | |
| 16:03:40 | gtema | this is all such a mess | |
| 16:03:45 | elmiko | lol | |
| 16:03:49 | elmiko | i agree gtema | |
| 16:04:26 | mordred | edleafe: so dull | |
| 16:04:36 | mordred | edleafe: especially now that I have NO MORE FLIGHTS until July!!!!! | |
| 16:04:55 | gtema | wow, good for you | |
| 16:05:09 | edleafe | Not coming to Denver? | |
| 16:05:34 | gtema | he will simply walk | |
| 16:06:05 | elmiko | mordred: no flights till july? color me jealous ;) | |
| 16:06:18 | mordred | edleafe: I'm driving | |
| 16:06:34 | edleafe | Ah, so a metal box instead of tube | |
| 16:06:41 | mordred | yes. much more pleasant | |
| 16:07:07 | mordred | edleafe: we bought a used tesla that's grandfathered in to free supercharging - so road trips are free | |
| 16:07:21 | edleafe | schweet | |
| 16:07:22 | gtema | cooool | |
| 16:07:46 | mordred | also - used teslas are a great deal right now - they're still depreciating like they have gas engines in them | |
| 16:10:14 | elmiko | very cool about the used tesla | |
| 16:15:06 | gtema | that's dull not to fight with a hacke on a highway | |
| 16:15:14 | gtema | s/hacke/hacher/ | |
| 16:15:18 | mordred | I know. I'm getting old and lame | |
| 16:15:57 | cdent | mordred: you're totally out of bounds, this is the api-sig office hour. remote hackability is the whole point, yo! | |
| 16:16:29 | mordred | ooh - cookies! | |
| 16:16:32 | edleafe | is there a non-hackable auto-pilot system? | |
| 16:16:44 | elmiko | lol cdent | |
| 16:19:44 | dtantsur | but does it have a good API? | |
| 16:20:11 | gtema | I guess it is only good for black hackers | |
| 16:20:48 | elmiko | dtantsur asking the real questions ;) | |
| 16:22:00 | openstackgerrit | LIU Yulong proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add floating IP Port Forwarding commands https://review.openstack.org/650062 | |
| 16:22:07 | dtantsur | so, IIRC we have Thursday morning at the PTG, right? | |
| 16:22:32 | dtantsur | do we need to plan something? or will it be mordred and me drinking whisk^Wcoffee and hacking on things? :) | |
| 16:22:55 | gtema | me too | |
| 16:23:06 | gtema | (if PTG ticket will be finally clarified) | |
| 16:23:06 | edleafe | I'll be there too just to bug you guys | |
| 16:23:09 | openstackgerrit | LIU Yulong proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add floating IP port forwarding related methods https://review.openstack.org/650063 | |
| 16:23:42 | edleafe | gtema: IBM *finally* approved my travel last week. Only took them two months this time :) | |
| 16:23:48 | dtantsur | \o/ | |
| 16:23:48 | elmiko | yikes | |
| 16:23:55 | gtema | yo | |
| 16:24:02 | dtantsur | great, it sounds like we can even have some kind of agenda | |
| 16:24:30 | edleafe | "Item A: make jokes about elmiko" | |
| 16:24:39 | edleafe | "Items B-Z: repeat" | |
| 16:24:41 | dtantsur | it's a recurring item, like reviewing things | |
| 16:24:44 | dtantsur | right | |
| 16:24:46 | gtema | edleafe: as a Summit sponsor we get free tickets to Summit, but not PTG | |
| 16:25:03 | elmiko | edleafe: ++ | |
| 16:25:21 | edleafe | As a past PTG attendee I get a free ticket to the summit but not the PTG | |
| 16:25:24 | elmiko | i hope you take notes though, i could use a good laugh! | |
| 16:26:18 | dtantsur | elmiko: we'll write a spec and propose to our repo | |
| 16:26:42 | edleafe | elmiko: if people know their elmiko jokes are being recorded, they might hold back | |
| 16:27:14 | elmiko | haha | |
| 16:27:30 | elmiko | i definitely want elmiko joke guidelines, there has to be /some/ order here! | |
| 16:27:39 | dtantsur | and microversioning | |
| 16:27:59 | elmiko | wel obviously, how will now which joke version i am hearing XD | |
| 16:28:28 | elmiko | i also reserve the right to adjust the minimum acceptable microversion, so old jokes won't fly! | |
| 16:29:17 | edleafe | No - the guidelines clearly state that once you release an elmiko joke, you have to support it forever | |
| 16:29:32 | elmiko | hahaha | |
| 16:29:34 | dtantsur | :D | |
| 16:29:55 | elmiko | oh the maintenance /me draws hand to forehead | |
| 16:30:26 | dtantsur | do we want to give folks an opportunity to suggest less important agenda items? | |
| 16:30:45 | edleafe | dtantsur: well, I guess we sort of have to | |
| 16:30:48 | elmiko | XD | |
| 16:31:02 | dtantsur | edleafe: well, we can tell them we have serious business | |
| 16:31:48 | dtantsur | but yeah, anyone wants to start an etherpad maybe? | |
| 16:32:34 | edleafe | dtantsur: like this? https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/api-sig-ptg-train | |
| 16:32:48 | dtantsur | cheers! | |
| 16:33:39 | elmiko | hahaha | |
| 16:40:01 | dtantsur | okay, we have a few topics proposed, sweet! | |
| 16:43:53 | elmiko | ++ | |
| 17:05:21 | elmiko | catch y'all later o/ | |
| 17:05:42 | gtema | ciao | |
| 17:27:13 | openstackgerrit | Jeremy Houser proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Remove hard-coded "admin" in test_port https://review.openstack.org/650082 | |
| 17:28:00 | openstackgerrit | Jeremy Houser proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Remove hard-coded "admin" in test_port https://review.openstack.org/650082 | |
| 18:54:03 | openstackgerrit | Jeremy Houser proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Remove hard-coded "admin" in test_port https://review.openstack.org/650082 | |
| 19:14:24 | openstackgerrit | Jeremy Houser proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Remove hard-coded "admin" in test_port https://review.openstack.org/650082 | |
| 19:43:04 | openstackgerrit | Jeremy Houser proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Remove hard-coded "admin" in test_port https://review.openstack.org/650082 | |
| 20:17:48 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Test _alternate_id logic https://review.openstack.org/379594 | |
| 23:00:58 | openstackgerrit | James E. Blair proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Expand on a brief error message https://review.openstack.org/650161 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-04-05 | |||
| 06:09:57 | stephenfin | mordred: Are we collecting things for osc 4.0? Is so, thoughts on converting the likes of 'openstack security group create' to 'openstack security-group create' (with aliases, maybe)? The former feels wrong 'openstack security' isn't a command and I think it was only done because of cliff's use of underscores in entry point names | |
| 08:22:05 | frickler | stephenfin: mordred: I'd say keep those consistent with "floating ip", "subnet pool" and others. you also most certainly don't want "security-group-rule create" in addition | |
| 08:23:13 | frickler | if you want to change something in that regard, my vote would be to make "key pair" instead of "keypair", because to me that is inconsistent with all the other variants and always makes me need two attempts to get right | |
| 10:16:03 | stephenfin | frickler: Oh yeah, I mean anything where the top level command ('openstack floating' would fall into this) doesn't make sense or means something entirely different ('openstack subnet' would fall into this) | |
| 10:46:01 | dtantsur | stephenfin: I think the idea is to keep it as close to a human language sentence as possible | |