| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-02-05 | |||
| 07:04:31 | openstackgerrit | Vlad Gusev proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add support for get details of Quota https://review.openstack.org/515401 | |
| 10:01:20 | gtema | mordred, are you here? | |
| 11:50:57 | openstackgerrit | Vlad Gusev proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add support for get details of Quota https://review.openstack.org/515401 | |
| 11:55:23 | openstackgerrit | Vlad Gusev proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add support for get details of Quota https://review.openstack.org/515401 | |
| 14:27:28 | openstackgerrit | Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: More state handling in volume transfer requests functional tests https://review.openstack.org/634776 | |
| 15:11:53 | mordred | gtema: morning | |
| 15:18:37 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Added server diagnostics https://review.openstack.org/634618 | |
| 15:29:41 | gtema | oh, hi mordred. I was going through the load-balancer series of changes for review and found, that in each a QueryParameter are used not in the way how I understand it | |
| 15:30:04 | gtema | mordred: but you approved them, so I wonder whether something has changed in the meanwhile | |
| 15:31:18 | gtema | mordred: they somehow use QueryParameters as if a list of returned parameters was expected. But octavia do this only if you specify column=col_a,col_b,etc | |
| 15:38:34 | mordred | gtema: oh - it's entirely possible I just totally missed that - let me go re-look | |
| 15:39:13 | gtema | i just posted -1 on couple of them, but they all have same issue | |
| 15:42:10 | mordred | gtema: "The Octavia API v2 supports filtering based on all top level attributes of a resource. Filters are applicable to all list requests." - doesn't that mean that, for instance, on https://review.openstack.org/#/c/634518/1/openstack/load_balancer/v2/flavor_profile.py provider_name and flavor_data are both possible url filter criteria? | |
| 15:42:25 | mordred | (although I canot imagine how someone would choose to filter on flavor_data) | |
| 15:42:56 | gtema | that is exactly the point | |
| 15:43:43 | gtema | but ok, if this is really what is meant here - then ok | |
| 15:44:08 | mordred | I mean - I could see leaving flavor_data off because how would that work - but provider_name seems totally reasonable, yeah? | |
| 15:44:42 | gtema | agree | |
| 15:45:28 | johnsom | flavor_data is technically a string, so *maybe*? | |
| 15:45:52 | mordred | johnsom: yeah. I mean - it would *physically* work :) | |
| 15:47:52 | mordred | johnsom: dare I ask why flavor_data is a json string and not just a dict? | |
| 15:47:58 | gtema | anyway - removing my "-1". Sorry and thanks for clarification | |
| 15:48:24 | mordred | gtema: thanks for reviewing deeply! | |
| 15:48:25 | gtema | because it is stated in docs: flavor_databodystringThe JSON string containing the flavor metadata. | |
| 15:48:35 | johnsom | It's a string we share with third party drivers, so wanted to make it as neutral as possible. | |
| 15:48:48 | gtema | mordred: welcome | |
| 15:49:46 | johnsom | Basically the whole path for that string is json, including the schema validation, so it seemed silly to keep flipping back and forth with it. | |
| 15:50:04 | johnsom | Plus it makes the CLI super easy | |
| 15:53:28 | gtema | mordred: seen some changes with hints to upcoming R1.0. Any concrete plans on that? | |
| 15:58:34 | mordred | gtema: I think there's three things I'd like to see done first ... | |
| 15:58:40 | mordred | gtema: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/604926/ - remove task manager | |
| 15:59:05 | mordred | gtema: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/630912/ align shade/sdk server objects and use server in shade layer | |
| 15:59:45 | mordred | gtema: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/609684/ - same thing with image | |
| 16:00:28 | mordred | (mostly because at least for image, I'm 100% certain it's going to break the existing image api in the sdk layer - even though I'm also 100% sure that api isn't terribly usable right now) | |
| 16:00:46 | mordred | I think most of the rest of the objects are actually in pretty good shape | |
| 16:00:47 | gtema | ok. Bad question: any "estimation timeline"? | |
| 16:00:50 | mordred | hehe | |
| 16:01:24 | mordred | I don't think those are too far off - the hardest one is finishing landing the semaphore patch to ksa | |
| 16:01:38 | mordred | so "soon"? :) | |
| 16:01:45 | gtema | agree, looks "stalled" | |
| 16:02:38 | mordred | yah - I keep meaning to poke kmalloc in the face to see if we can do the final push and get it in there | |
| 16:02:43 | gtema | ok. I wanted to probably bring DNS in time and potentially add "create container from directory" for object | |
| 16:03:02 | kmalloc | the fair semaphore? | |
| 16:03:04 | mordred | ++ | |
| 16:03:21 | kmalloc | because i think we just need to have a real functional test for it. | |
| 16:03:23 | mordred | kmalloc: yah. you went and took vacation, which is totally my excuse for that patch | |
| 16:03:25 | kmalloc | otherwise it's ready | |
| 16:03:39 | kmalloc | the few -1 nits can be cleaned up after. | |
| 16:04:35 | mordred | gtema: oh - we should do the same thing for object as those patches for server and image - we've got comprehensive object upload support in the shade layer, including handling SLO/DLO for large objects | |
| 16:04:35 | kmalloc | i can try an spin up a test for it, but i admit i'm a bit out of my element for that (mostly because my brain is still recovering from vacation, almost all caught up finally) | |
| 16:04:53 | kmalloc | it's amazing how much time a vacation takes to fully recover from :P | |
| 16:04:58 | mordred | kmalloc: yeah - I think we each have almost half of the story going on | |
| 16:05:03 | gtema | mordred: oh, yeah | |
| 16:05:04 | kmalloc | ++ | |
| 16:05:34 | gtema | mordred: ok, will have a look on that | |
| 16:05:35 | mordred | kmalloc: I'm a little sad we haven't managed to annoy cmurphy enough with the incomplete code that she just finished it for us | |
| 16:06:03 | mordred | gtema: sweet. | |
| 16:06:06 | kmalloc | i make an effort to not annoy cmurphy for those things :P she's busy enough (she always seems to have multiple meetings going on) | |
| 16:06:48 | cmurphy | i make an effort not to look at ksa when i don't have to | |
| 16:08:35 | kmalloc | haha | |
| 16:10:14 | kmalloc | mordred: you're not in -meeting-alt, just asked for some eyes to make sure that interface is something folks are ok with | |
| 16:10:20 | kmalloc | mordred: just FYI | |
| 16:12:30 | mordred | kmalloc: woot thanks | |
| 19:03:40 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Add DNS support https://review.openstack.org/623009 | |
| 19:57:58 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Make all resource locations process project_id https://review.openstack.org/634572 | |
| 19:57:58 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Rename compute.service.zone to availability_zone https://review.openstack.org/634573 | |
| 19:57:59 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Stop mocking method in fwaas test https://review.openstack.org/634574 | |
| 21:01:33 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Add DNS support https://review.openstack.org/623009 | |
| 21:15:24 | openstackgerrit | Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: More state handling in volume transfer requests functional tests https://review.openstack.org/634776 | |
| 21:23:26 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Add DNS support https://review.openstack.org/623009 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-02-06 | |||
| 09:04:19 | openstackgerrit | Vlad Gusev proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add support for get details of Quota https://review.openstack.org/515401 | |
| 12:21:33 | openstackgerrit | Lajos Katona proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add agent property: resources-synced https://review.openstack.org/635143 | |
| 15:08:58 | openstackgerrit | Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: More state handling in volume transfer requests functional tests https://review.openstack.org/634776 | |
| 19:09:53 | openstackgerrit | Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: More state handling in volume transfer requests functional tests https://review.openstack.org/634776 | |
| 21:41:05 | openstackgerrit | Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: More state handling in volume transfer requests functional tests https://review.openstack.org/634776 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-02-07 | |||
| 02:52:57 | dtroyer | mordred, amotoki: ^^^ should finally ease some of the pain with the volume transfer functional tests, I think there is something going on in the back-end between parallel tests and using names rather than IDs, but that may be a Cinder/cinderclient lib issue to follow-up on. | |
| 06:48:16 | openstackgerrit | Adrian Turjak proposed openstack/service-types-authority master: Add Adjutant as operator-logic https://review.openstack.org/633854 | |
| 09:32:50 | mordred | dtroyer: I'm a fan of more stableness | |
| 09:33:47 | gtema | mordred: same for me ;) | |
| 09:35:07 | mordred | gtema: :) | |
| 10:15:18 | openstackgerrit | Christian Schneemann proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Typo fix https://review.openstack.org/635471 | |
| 15:56:10 | edleafe | API-SIG Office Hour: the fun begins in 4 minutes!!!! | |
| 15:59:27 | elmiko | lol | |
| 16:00:55 | edleafe | Having fun yet, elmiko? | |
| 16:01:11 | elmiko | it just started, i'm still ramping up my fun scalar | |
| 16:01:37 | edleafe | Good idea - pace yourself | |
| 16:01:41 | elmiko | haha, ++ | |
| 16:01:44 | elmiko | how about you edleafe ? | |
| 16:03:57 | edleafe | I'm at peak fun level right now | |
| 16:04:40 | elmiko | haha | |
| 16:27:46 | cdent | I keep wishing I had an api canard to bring | |
| 16:27:52 | elmiko | lol | |
| 16:27:59 | elmiko | bring it! | |
| 16:28:08 | elmiko | json home anyone? | |
| 16:28:10 | edleafe | What, and make us work?? | |
| 17:02:14 | elmiko | catch ya later folks, have a good weekend =) | |
| 17:02:24 | edleafe | c ya, elmiko! | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-02-08 | |||
| 14:02:06 | openstackgerrit | Lajos Katona proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add agent property: resources-synced https://review.openstack.org/635143 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-02-09 | |||
| 20:38:27 | openstackgerrit | Colleen Murphy proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: [WIP] Expose app creds in token and fixtures https://review.openstack.org/636030 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2019-02-10 | |||
| 23:51:49 | openstackgerrit | Colleen Murphy proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Expose app creds and new attrs in fixtures https://review.openstack.org/636030 | |