Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2018-12-05
10:25:14 openstackgerrit jacky06 proposed openstack/os-api-ref master: Update the remained discuss email https://review.openstack.org/622918
10:54:00 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: block_storage.backup func tests to use configurable timeout https://review.openstack.org/622933
11:29:59 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/os-api-ref master: Update the remained discuss email https://review.openstack.org/622918
11:59:51 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/microversion-parse master: Change openstack-dev to openstack-discuss https://review.openstack.org/622561
12:22:12 openstackgerrit melissaml proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Change openstack-dev to openstack-discuss https://review.openstack.org/622947
13:39:08 openstackgerrit Vlad Gusev proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add support for get details of Quota https://review.openstack.org/515401
13:45:52 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: fix query parameters of network.port_forward https://review.openstack.org/622963
13:47:24 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix query parameters of network.port_forwarding https://review.openstack.org/622963
13:54:04 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Support remote vendor profiles https://review.openstack.org/616228
15:35:32 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add possibility to override base_path for resource operations https://review.openstack.org/621153
15:35:32 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Add DNS support https://review.openstack.org/623009
15:54:22 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Add DNS support https://review.openstack.org/623009
15:54:33 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Add DNS support https://review.openstack.org/623009
16:56:19 openstackgerrit Hongbin Lu proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add propagate_uplink_status to port https://review.openstack.org/586687
19:49:20 openstackgerrit Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: [WIP] Fix requesting specific fields from ironic https://review.openstack.org/623059
21:07:09 openstackgerrit Hongbin Lu proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Support enable/disable uplink status propagation https://review.openstack.org/586684
#openstack-sdks - 2018-12-06
00:16:18 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/keystoneauth master: Change openstack-dev to openstack-discuss https://review.openstack.org/622765
02:07:37 openstackgerrit caoyuan proposed openstack-infra/shade master: Change the default wait to true https://review.openstack.org/623118
07:36:44 openstackgerrit Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Add DNS support https://review.openstack.org/623009
08:56:23 openstackgerrit melissaml proposed openstack/api-sig master: Change openstack-dev to openstack-discuss https://review.openstack.org/623166
09:59:53 openstackgerrit LIU Yulong proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Supports router gateway IP QoS https://review.openstack.org/622130
12:28:33 frickler osc cores: https://review.openstack.org/562300 could use some attention after more than 7 months
12:30:31 frickler oh, actually that's duplicate with https://review.openstack.org/548733 , probably best to merge those two
12:55:41 mordred frickler: do you wanna squash them?
13:17:44 frickler mordred: I think I'd give the original authors a couple of days to react on my comments first
13:39:29 mordred kk
15:40:34 ShilpaSD Hi All, facing issue while stack, E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1), any suggestions to resolve this?
15:50:58 frickler ShilpaSD: if you are talking about running devstack's stack.sh, please come over to #openstack-qa . otherwise please provide more context
15:56:26 ShilpaSD frickler:ok
16:00:18 elmiko API-SIG office hours are now OPEN
16:00:26 edleafe Let the API-SIG office hour begin!
16:01:46 cdent what can you api-sig people tell me about http/3 ?
16:01:54 cdent when will openstack apis start using it?
16:02:03 edleafe It's one better that HTTP/2!
16:02:29 edleafe Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOO5S4vxi0o
16:04:01 elmiko sorry edleafe, i'll hold off next week
16:04:19 elmiko well, it's like http/2 but with far few ACKs XD
16:05:59 elmiko cdent: pretty sure everything will be on gRPC or GraphQL by then
16:06:49 cdent naw, graphql is dead
16:07:07 elmiko good to know, i'll send flowes
16:07:11 elmiko *flowers
16:08:12 edleafe GraphQL is dead? Was it sick, or was this a sudden, unexpected demise?
16:08:17 edleafe So young.
16:08:26 elmiko we hardly knew ye
16:10:23 cdent it's too hipster to live long
16:10:41 elmiko live fast, die young, leave a great spec?
16:11:01 edleafe You and your hipster jokes
16:11:10 edleafe I was hating hipsters before it was cool
16:11:16 elmiko ooh, nice
16:13:37 dtantsur wow, such news
16:39:50 edleafe Hey elmiko, dtantsur - regarding https://review.openstack.org/#/c/616610/ (DELETE guidance), I'd like to take a crack at rewording it a bit. Not changing the meaning, but just making it read better. Once that's done and you guys OK it, should we consider freezing for the liaisons to review?
16:40:05 elmiko edleafe: sgtm
16:40:12 dtantsur I'm kind of -0 on the whole idea, but not blocking
16:40:23 dtantsur explicit better than implicit etc
16:40:41 elmiko i like the clarification in general, but i agree that wording it more clearly would be nice
16:41:03 edleafe dtantsur: yeah, you've said that before. That's why I'd like the liaisons to give their opinions, too.
16:41:10 elmiko ++
16:44:39 cdent since when has a guideline every changed existing behavior?
16:44:45 elmiko exactly...
16:48:26 edleafe I was thinking the same thing :)
16:50:49 openstackgerrit Hongbin Lu proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add propagate_uplink_status to port https://review.openstack.org/586687
17:00:52 elmiko catch ya next week api-sig folks =)
17:02:08 dtantsur o/
17:02:13 edleafe \o
20:38:00 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Deal with double-normalization of host_id https://review.openstack.org/623308
20:51:06 openstackgerrit Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Deal with double-normalization of host_id https://review.openstack.org/623308
#openstack-sdks - 2018-12-07
09:51:35 openstackgerrit Yuval Shalev proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add host aggregate missing functions https://review.openstack.org/621695
13:11:36 openstackgerrit melissaml proposed openstack/cliff master: Change openstack-dev to openstack-discuss https://review.openstack.org/623482
13:22:37 openstackgerrit Gergely Csatari proposed openstack/os-api-ref master: readthedocs.io support https://review.openstack.org/623485
16:06:43 cdent elmiko: I think sdk and api sig is good match. we don't want api to be just about api good behavior, it should be about using apis in general
16:06:58 cdent otherwise sigs are too special and will fade away (like api-sig pretty much did)
16:09:13 mordred ++
16:13:13 dtantsur this
17:05:41 openstackgerrit Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix requesting specific fields from ironic https://review.openstack.org/623059
17:27:24 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Deal with double-normalization of host_id https://review.openstack.org/623308
17:27:25 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Change openstack-dev to openstack-discuss https://review.openstack.org/622947
18:14:08 elmiko cdent: i agree. additionally, i think the noise and process around creating another sig just adds confusion. i'm happy to include the sdk in the api sig's mission, i just wanted to add some context around what i think we need to do to make it a success.
18:14:13 elmiko edleafe dtantsur|afk ^^
18:14:22 cdent ✔
18:15:00 elmiko my main reasoning for even bringing up the working group thing, was just around the initial effort that Melvin is proposing. it seemed really well scoped.
18:15:18 edleafe elmiko: we discussed this at the last few PTGs. The SDK work is a good fit for our SIG.
18:16:11 elmiko no disagreement from me
18:16:57 cdent elmiko: the reason I brought it up was because it was vaguely sounding the thread like somebody (not sure if it was you or not) was thinking a separate sig was the way to go. I admit to not reading as closely as I should have
18:17:55 elmiko cdent: yeah, i think second sig was definitely amongst the ideas tossed out there
18:18:36 elmiko i don't really have a _strong_ opinion on it, but we did talk about this a few PTGs ago (and maybe more that i missed) and it still makes sense to me.
18:18:39 edleafe Yeah, I think Melvin thought that would be the easiest approach
18:18:48 elmiko i think my main concern is getting more bodies to step up and participate
18:19:26 elmiko dtantsur|afk's work aside, we need someone to represent the sdk side of this
18:19:38 edleafe If it's gonna work, it's gonna need the SDK people to do the bulk of the organizing and work. We can help with our experience, but it will need to be new blood.
18:19:42 cdent Can't we just get dtantsur|afk to do everything, since he's afk?
18:20:05 edleafe Done! dtantsur|afk now owns the responsibility for All The Things
18:20:06 elmiko edleafe: yeah, i remember him approaching us about adding more sdk/operator focused stuff to our agenda, and i thought we were all fine with it back then
18:20:11 elmiko cdent: ++
18:20:19 elmiko SIG All-The-Things?
18:20:38 elmiko edleafe: ++ agreed about the workload
18:20:51 elmiko i guess that's what i wanted to capture in my response to Thierry
18:21:20 edleafe I was going to reply, but thought it would be just "what elmiko said"
18:21:59 elmiko edleafe: =)
18:28:11 elmiko cdent: i hope it didn't sound like i was advocating the other way. it sounds like we have a good consensus though
18:28:38 cdent somebody may wish to clarify? not sure, I'm not caught up on the thread

Earlier   Later