| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2018-12-06 | |||
| 02:07:37 | openstackgerrit | caoyuan proposed openstack-infra/shade master: Change the default wait to true https://review.openstack.org/623118 | |
| 07:36:44 | openstackgerrit | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: WIP Add DNS support https://review.openstack.org/623009 | |
| 08:56:23 | openstackgerrit | melissaml proposed openstack/api-sig master: Change openstack-dev to openstack-discuss https://review.openstack.org/623166 | |
| 09:59:53 | openstackgerrit | LIU Yulong proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Supports router gateway IP QoS https://review.openstack.org/622130 | |
| 12:28:33 | frickler | osc cores: https://review.openstack.org/562300 could use some attention after more than 7 months | |
| 12:30:31 | frickler | oh, actually that's duplicate with https://review.openstack.org/548733 , probably best to merge those two | |
| 12:55:41 | mordred | frickler: do you wanna squash them? | |
| 13:17:44 | frickler | mordred: I think I'd give the original authors a couple of days to react on my comments first | |
| 13:39:29 | mordred | kk | |
| 15:40:34 | ShilpaSD | Hi All, facing issue while stack, E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1), any suggestions to resolve this? | |
| 15:50:58 | frickler | ShilpaSD: if you are talking about running devstack's stack.sh, please come over to #openstack-qa . otherwise please provide more context | |
| 15:56:26 | ShilpaSD | frickler:ok | |
| 16:00:18 | elmiko | API-SIG office hours are now OPEN | |
| 16:00:26 | edleafe | Let the API-SIG office hour begin! | |
| 16:01:46 | cdent | what can you api-sig people tell me about http/3 ? | |
| 16:01:54 | cdent | when will openstack apis start using it? | |
| 16:02:03 | edleafe | It's one better that HTTP/2! | |
| 16:02:29 | edleafe | Reference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KOO5S4vxi0o | |
| 16:04:01 | elmiko | sorry edleafe, i'll hold off next week | |
| 16:04:19 | elmiko | well, it's like http/2 but with far few ACKs XD | |
| 16:05:59 | elmiko | cdent: pretty sure everything will be on gRPC or GraphQL by then | |
| 16:06:49 | cdent | naw, graphql is dead | |
| 16:07:07 | elmiko | good to know, i'll send flowes | |
| 16:07:11 | elmiko | *flowers | |
| 16:08:12 | edleafe | GraphQL is dead? Was it sick, or was this a sudden, unexpected demise? | |
| 16:08:17 | edleafe | So young. | |
| 16:08:26 | elmiko | we hardly knew ye | |
| 16:10:23 | cdent | it's too hipster to live long | |
| 16:10:41 | elmiko | live fast, die young, leave a great spec? | |
| 16:11:01 | edleafe | You and your hipster jokes | |
| 16:11:10 | edleafe | I was hating hipsters before it was cool | |
| 16:11:16 | elmiko | ooh, nice | |
| 16:13:37 | dtantsur | wow, such news | |
| 16:39:50 | edleafe | Hey elmiko, dtantsur - regarding https://review.openstack.org/#/c/616610/ (DELETE guidance), I'd like to take a crack at rewording it a bit. Not changing the meaning, but just making it read better. Once that's done and you guys OK it, should we consider freezing for the liaisons to review? | |
| 16:40:05 | elmiko | edleafe: sgtm | |
| 16:40:12 | dtantsur | I'm kind of -0 on the whole idea, but not blocking | |
| 16:40:23 | dtantsur | explicit better than implicit etc | |
| 16:40:41 | elmiko | i like the clarification in general, but i agree that wording it more clearly would be nice | |
| 16:41:03 | edleafe | dtantsur: yeah, you've said that before. That's why I'd like the liaisons to give their opinions, too. | |
| 16:41:10 | elmiko | ++ | |
| 16:44:39 | cdent | since when has a guideline every changed existing behavior? | |
| 16:44:45 | elmiko | exactly... | |
| 16:48:26 | edleafe | I was thinking the same thing :) | |
| 16:50:49 | openstackgerrit | Hongbin Lu proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add propagate_uplink_status to port https://review.openstack.org/586687 | |
| 17:00:52 | elmiko | catch ya next week api-sig folks =) | |
| 17:02:08 | dtantsur | o/ | |
| 17:02:13 | edleafe | \o | |
| 20:38:00 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Deal with double-normalization of host_id https://review.openstack.org/623308 | |
| 20:51:06 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Deal with double-normalization of host_id https://review.openstack.org/623308 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2018-12-07 | |||
| 09:51:35 | openstackgerrit | Yuval Shalev proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add host aggregate missing functions https://review.openstack.org/621695 | |
| 13:11:36 | openstackgerrit | melissaml proposed openstack/cliff master: Change openstack-dev to openstack-discuss https://review.openstack.org/623482 | |
| 13:22:37 | openstackgerrit | Gergely Csatari proposed openstack/os-api-ref master: readthedocs.io support https://review.openstack.org/623485 | |
| 16:06:43 | cdent | elmiko: I think sdk and api sig is good match. we don't want api to be just about api good behavior, it should be about using apis in general | |
| 16:06:58 | cdent | otherwise sigs are too special and will fade away (like api-sig pretty much did) | |
| 16:09:13 | mordred | ++ | |
| 16:13:13 | dtantsur | this | |
| 17:05:41 | openstackgerrit | Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix requesting specific fields from ironic https://review.openstack.org/623059 | |
| 17:27:24 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Deal with double-normalization of host_id https://review.openstack.org/623308 | |
| 17:27:25 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Change openstack-dev to openstack-discuss https://review.openstack.org/622947 | |
| 18:14:08 | elmiko | cdent: i agree. additionally, i think the noise and process around creating another sig just adds confusion. i'm happy to include the sdk in the api sig's mission, i just wanted to add some context around what i think we need to do to make it a success. | |
| 18:14:13 | elmiko | edleafe dtantsur|afk ^^ | |
| 18:14:22 | cdent | ✔ | |
| 18:15:00 | elmiko | my main reasoning for even bringing up the working group thing, was just around the initial effort that Melvin is proposing. it seemed really well scoped. | |
| 18:15:18 | edleafe | elmiko: we discussed this at the last few PTGs. The SDK work is a good fit for our SIG. | |
| 18:16:11 | elmiko | no disagreement from me | |
| 18:16:57 | cdent | elmiko: the reason I brought it up was because it was vaguely sounding the thread like somebody (not sure if it was you or not) was thinking a separate sig was the way to go. I admit to not reading as closely as I should have | |
| 18:17:55 | elmiko | cdent: yeah, i think second sig was definitely amongst the ideas tossed out there | |
| 18:18:36 | elmiko | i don't really have a _strong_ opinion on it, but we did talk about this a few PTGs ago (and maybe more that i missed) and it still makes sense to me. | |
| 18:18:39 | edleafe | Yeah, I think Melvin thought that would be the easiest approach | |
| 18:18:48 | elmiko | i think my main concern is getting more bodies to step up and participate | |
| 18:19:26 | elmiko | dtantsur|afk's work aside, we need someone to represent the sdk side of this | |
| 18:19:38 | edleafe | If it's gonna work, it's gonna need the SDK people to do the bulk of the organizing and work. We can help with our experience, but it will need to be new blood. | |
| 18:19:42 | cdent | Can't we just get dtantsur|afk to do everything, since he's afk? | |
| 18:20:05 | edleafe | Done! dtantsur|afk now owns the responsibility for All The Things | |
| 18:20:06 | elmiko | edleafe: yeah, i remember him approaching us about adding more sdk/operator focused stuff to our agenda, and i thought we were all fine with it back then | |
| 18:20:11 | elmiko | cdent: ++ | |
| 18:20:19 | elmiko | SIG All-The-Things? | |
| 18:20:38 | elmiko | edleafe: ++ agreed about the workload | |
| 18:20:51 | elmiko | i guess that's what i wanted to capture in my response to Thierry | |
| 18:21:20 | edleafe | I was going to reply, but thought it would be just "what elmiko said" | |
| 18:21:59 | elmiko | edleafe: =) | |
| 18:28:11 | elmiko | cdent: i hope it didn't sound like i was advocating the other way. it sounds like we have a good consensus though | |
| 18:28:38 | cdent | somebody may wish to clarify? not sure, I'm not caught up on the thread | |
| 18:29:08 | elmiko | good idea, i'll take another look to see if i was ambiguous and could potentially make it clearer | |
| 18:29:15 | elmiko | or maybe just link to this talk in chat | |
| 18:32:15 | cdent | but we have our professional reputations to consider!! | |
| 18:34:40 | openstackgerrit | Ed Leafe proposed openstack/api-sig master: Add idempotent DELETE guidance https://review.openstack.org/616610 | |
| 18:35:06 | edleafe | elmiko: cdent: ^^ Cleaned up the wording. Let me know if you think it's better | |
| 18:36:06 | elmiko | edleafe: ack | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2018-12-10 | |||
| 11:26:37 | dtantsur | cdent, edleafe, /me git rm -f /all/the/things && git commit -m "My work here is done" && git push -f | |
| 11:26:54 | cdent | yes!!! | |
| 12:31:14 | openstackgerrit | Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix requesting specific fields from ironic https://review.openstack.org/623059 | |
| 13:38:00 | edleafe | dtantsur: | |
| 13:38:32 | edleafe | dtantsur: oh, crap - now we're all out of a job. Nothing left to do! | |
| 13:47:30 | dtantsur | what do you mean? we still can rewrite everything in rust! | |
| 13:48:07 | cdent | I think you just used up openstack's ninth life. game over. | |
| 13:48:19 | dtantsur | lol | |
| 13:58:30 | dtantsur | mordred: morning! new ironic bug fix (sigh :) ready for review: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/623059/ | |
| 14:50:22 | mordred | yay bug fixes! | |
| 14:53:40 | mordred | dtantsur: in https://review.openstack.org/#/c/623059/4/openstack/baremetal/v1/chassis.py you set _max_microversion = 1.8 ... is that supposed to be min? | |