| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2018-07-03 | |||
| 13:49:43 | mordred | Luzi: let me push up the work-in-progress in just a few minutes and see what you think | |
| 13:50:21 | Luzi | mordred, that sounds good :) | |
| 13:51:25 | mordred | Luzi: the generator class itself should probably just go in its own file in openstack/image - and then it should get attached to the image upload code in openstack/image/v1/_proxy and openstack/image/v2/_proxy ... but step 1 is to take the existing image upload logic from openstackcloud and move it to the proxy classes | |
| 13:58:45 | mordred | frickler: speaking of osc patches - https://review.openstack.org/#/c/540541/ | |
| 14:00:18 | dtantsur | mordred: any reason Resource does not implement the dict interface? This way it would be compatible with a Munch | |
| 14:00:33 | dtantsur | e.g. I could start returning openstack.baremetal.v1.Node from *machine* calls | |
| 14:00:56 | mordred | dtantsur: that is the _other_ main patch I wanna finish before cutting 1.0 | |
| 14:01:04 | dtantsur | very good :) | |
| 14:01:46 | mordred | dtantsur: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/530835/ is the very broken WIP patch for that | |
| 14:01:55 | dtantsur | I want to move *machine* calls to use openstack.baremetal.v1.* stuff internally, but currently they return incompatible result | |
| 14:02:07 | mordred | yup | |
| 14:02:13 | mordred | we share the same goal | |
| 14:03:18 | dtantsur | good | |
| 14:03:34 | dtantsur | I guess currently I can do munchify(node.to_dict()) as an ugly hack | |
| 14:04:00 | dtantsur | but what I'm hitting with my provisioning state patch is that I get a redundant GET call on each conversion between a Munch and a Node | |
| 14:04:07 | dtantsur | which is probably fine for now, but has to be fixed eventually | |
| 14:04:16 | mordred | yah - extra calls seem lame | |
| 14:04:26 | dtantsur | is it acceptable temporary? | |
| 14:06:13 | mordred | dtantsur: I'd be curious to discover why a GET call is being made during the conversion ... | |
| 14:07:12 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Use openstack.config for config and Session objects https://review.openstack.org/579139 | |
| 14:07:13 | dtantsur | mordred: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/570895/4/openstack/cloud/openstackcloud.py@9400 causes uuid-to-Node conversion | |
| 14:07:28 | mordred | dtroyer: ^^ that patch passes for me locally now, so might be not a waste of your time to review | |
| 14:07:37 | dtantsur | even when this call is used from e.g. register_machine where we already have a Munch | |
| 14:07:55 | dtantsur | because we cannot pass in a Munch, we need a UUID or a Node | |
| 14:09:55 | mordred | if we have a munch, we should be able to make a Node from it without an api call - I'd think Node(**munch_node) would do the trick? | |
| 14:10:47 | dtantsur | good idea, maybe we should generalize it as Resource.from_munch? | |
| 14:11:03 | dtantsur | defaulting to just cls(**munch) | |
| 14:12:55 | frickler | mordred: oh, that makes me wonder whether it'll fix my neutron ssl issues. will check. | |
| 14:13:49 | mordred | dtantsur: good idea - although maybe make it Resource._from_munch for now - since we might not need it once we finish and land the other thing | |
| 14:14:23 | dtantsur | mordred: okay, I'll see what I can do | |
| 14:14:42 | dtroyer | mordred: coolio, will have a look | |
| 14:23:42 | dtroyer | mordred: looks nice, thank you! | |
| 14:27:57 | mordred | dtroyer: yay! | |
| 16:11:18 | openstackgerrit | Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add Resource._from_munch class method https://review.openstack.org/579908 | |
| 16:11:19 | dtantsur | mordred: ^^^ | |
| 16:11:28 | dtantsur | now let's see if I can get a good use of it | |
| 16:11:40 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Use shade create_image method in image proxy layer https://review.openstack.org/579168 | |
| 16:11:48 | mordred | dtantsur: neat. I could probably use that in that patch ^^ | |
| 16:12:52 | dtantsur | mordred: oh, curious, I'm doing it the other way around in my patch: shade level calling baremetal proxy | |
| 16:13:02 | dtantsur | is there The Right approach here? or just whatever fits? | |
| 16:20:02 | dtantsur | hmm, and should I wire this _from_munch into Proxy._get_resource? so that all proxies support it automagically? | |
| 16:20:14 | dtantsur | this can be dangerous, maybe only for ironic for now.. | |
| 16:22:47 | dtantsur | actually, from_munch can probably be implemented using the Body() fields | |
| 16:32:18 | openstackgerrit | Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add Resource._from_munch class method https://review.openstack.org/579908 | |
| 16:43:29 | openstackgerrit | Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Handle Munch objects in proxies https://review.openstack.org/579908 | |
| 16:55:15 | openstackgerrit | Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Handle Munch objects in proxies https://review.openstack.org/579908 | |
| 17:42:37 | mordred | dtantsur|afk: your way is the better way - we want to get to the shade layer calling the proxy layer rather than the other way around | |
| 17:43:37 | mordred | dtantsur|afk: but for create_image that's going to require some surgery, so I figured invert it for now, then iterate on getting it done right as a followup | |
| 20:28:53 | openstackgerrit | David Shrewsbury proposed openstack-infra/shade master: Fix for passing dict for get_* methods https://review.openstack.org/579974 | |
| 20:29:12 | Shrews | that probably could use a test | |
| 20:29:43 | mordred | yah. also - I'm pretty sure pep8 is going to complain about the whitespace | |
| 20:32:06 | openstackgerrit | David Shrewsbury proposed openstack-infra/shade master: Fix for passing dict for get_* methods https://review.openstack.org/579974 | |
| 20:32:18 | Shrews | pep8 passed for me | |
| 20:33:56 | mordred | Shrews: cool | |
| 20:35:31 | Shrews | mordred: you want a release note for that? | |
| 20:38:51 | wacuuu | yyy question: are there any plans for sdk in go? | |
| 20:42:17 | mordred | wacuuu: the gophercloud project is basically that | |
| 20:42:22 | mordred | Shrews: nah | |
| 20:42:38 | mordred | wacuuu: https://github.com/gophercloud/gophercloud | |
| 20:47:37 | Shrews | oh that's interesting | |
| 20:47:55 | Shrews | mordred: my fav part: "Backwards-Compatibility Guarantees - None. Vendor it and write tests covering the parts you use." | |
| 20:49:22 | wacuuu | thanks | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2018-07-04 | |||
| 02:09:42 | openstackgerrit | Fan Zhang proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Add --key-name and --key-unset option for server rebuild API. https://review.openstack.org/576422 | |
| 03:00:32 | openstackgerrit | tianhui proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Compute:Support keypair set key-type https://review.openstack.org/577768 | |
| 03:03:00 | openstackgerrit | tianhui proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Compute:Support keypair set key-type https://review.openstack.org/577768 | |
| 07:57:49 | openstackgerrit | Josephine Seifert proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Implement signature generation functionality https://review.openstack.org/580080 | |
| 08:21:48 | openstackgerrit | Josephine Seifert proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: [WIP] osc-included image signing (using openstacksdk) https://review.openstack.org/580086 | |
| 10:21:45 | openstackgerrit | Mohammed Naser proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Allow setting volume attach status https://review.openstack.org/574719 | |
| 11:17:06 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Use openstack.config for config and Session objects https://review.openstack.org/579139 | |
| 12:05:06 | dtantsur | mordred: got it. this munch vs resource thing does give me a headache.. | |
| 12:05:32 | dtantsur | also I realized that we probably need this redundant GET now: the microversion to do an action may depend on the current state | |
| 12:07:45 | dtantsur | mordred: also, how does self.assert_calls() order calls? it insist PUT is run the first, while I'm pretty sure GET happens ealier.. | |
| 12:13:16 | dtantsur | never mind me. I might have been wrong from the beginning about this redundant GET | |
| 12:42:29 | mordred | dtantsur: yay, glad I could help | |
| 12:42:51 | mordred | dtantsur: (and yes, I will be VERY happy once we've rationalized Resource and shade/munch) | |
| 13:07:02 | openstackgerrit | Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: [WIP] set_provision_state and wait_for_provision_state for baremetal Node https://review.openstack.org/570895 | |
| 13:07:07 | dtantsur | okay, this could use more unit tests, but is reviewable ^^^ | |
| 13:09:21 | dtantsur | TheJulia: if you have a minute ^^^ | |
| 13:14:55 | openstackgerrit | Dmitry Tantsur proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: [WIP] set_provision_state and wait_for_provision_state for baremetal Node https://review.openstack.org/570895 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2018-07-05 | |||
| 09:37:26 | frickler | mordred: I'm still affected by the network SSL issue, maybe you or someone else can take a look and check whether they can at least reproduce to confirm I'm not doing something dumb https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/1756723 | |
| 13:30:47 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Use openstack.config for config and Session objects https://review.openstack.org/579139 | |
| 13:30:47 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/osc-lib master: Update sphinx lower-constraint to match test-requirements https://review.openstack.org/580380 | |
| 14:00:47 | mordred | frickler: I'll look in to it - there is still a decent amount of unwinding we need to do | |
| 15:33:40 | mordred | dtroyer: woot! https://review.openstack.org/#/c/579139 passed tests | |
| 15:51:30 | dtroyer | \o/ | |
| 16:26:04 | mordred | mriedem: does https://review.openstack.org/#/c/578960/ look ok to you now? | |
| 16:29:54 | mriedem | looking | |
| 16:30:38 | mriedem | hells yeah! | |
| 16:33:02 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add task manager parameter to Connection https://review.openstack.org/577616 | |
| 16:38:57 | mordred | mriedem: woot! | |
| 16:56:19 | cdent | dtantsur, edleafe, elmiko : a bit boring but https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/api-sig-newsletter | |
| 16:56:28 | cdent | also, I forgot to mention: I won't be at next week's meeting | |
| 16:58:02 | dtantsur | oh, nor will I | |
| 16:58:39 | cdent | jroll: thanks for that "that's the job of the server" response on web server headers | |
| 16:58:45 | jroll | :) | |
| 17:02:17 | elmiko | cdent dtantsur ack, might just be me and edleafe then | |
| 17:03:04 | elmiko | cdent: lgtm | |
| 17:03:16 | edleafe | cdent: ship it | |
| 17:03:19 | cdent | i'll wait on edleafe a bit longer, as he.... | |
| 17:03:20 | cdent | omg | |