Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2017-01-12
14:21:12 RuiChen I saw the backport patch is abandoned, so ask these
14:22:19 dtroyer fortunately, stable releases will not be stuck in our upcoming freeze so there is not a time pressure from our side for that
14:23:19 RuiChen \o/, I will prepare the patch
14:23:55 RuiChen just make sure, will we release a stable osc version for it?
14:24:21 dtroyer yes
14:24:48 RuiChen thank you :)
14:32:29 stevemar RuiChen: thanks for your help with osc :)
14:33:05 dtroyer huanxuan: that image test is still racy, failed py35 but passed py27
14:33:33 huanxuan dtroyer: yes, I saw it
14:33:49 dtroyer I'm having a hard time reproducing it locally, can you?
14:34:20 huanxuan dtroyer: I am working on it
14:35:07 dtroyer I am wondering if we need to reset the mock inside the for loop
14:35:27 dtroyer well, reset is at the bottom, I mean re-initialize it
14:37:22 huanxuan dtroyer: re-initialize?
14:38:00 dtroyer move lines 855-857 below 859
14:40:13 huanxuan dtroyer: Oh! get your point!
14:43:13 dtroyer stevemar, huanxuan: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/419461/ looks ready to go
14:43:50 openstackgerrit Huanxuan Ao proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Fix gate broken by auth_ref in image unit test https://review.openstack.org/419445
14:44:12 huanxuan dtroyer: +A
15:06:03 openstackgerrit Huanxuan Ao proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Fix gate broken by auth_ref in image unit test https://review.openstack.org/419445
15:08:20 stevemar dtroyer: i dont understand the if statements in the tests
15:08:28 reedip ralonsoh : hehe, gate did it :D
15:11:35 dtroyer stevemar: Where? are you talking about test_image_set_membership_option()?
15:11:52 stevemar dtroyer: commented
15:11:55 stevemar https://review.openstack.org/#/c/419461/1
15:14:00 openstackgerrit Steve Martinelli proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Fix gate broken by auth_ref in image unit test https://review.openstack.org/419445
15:14:34 dtroyer ok… ugh, more parallel testing side effects maybe?
15:14:37 stevemar dtroyer: rebased https://review.openstack.org/#/c/419445/4 on top of the qos fix
15:15:03 stevemar dtroyer: yeah, i was wondering if we're just opening ourselves up to more racey tests
15:16:28 dtroyer totally. am I off base for just wanting unrolled multiple tests that don't try to share too much?
15:17:13 dtroyer my gut says the for loop in the image test is part of our pain
15:17:18 dtroyer too
15:18:14 dtroyer I'm going to do an unroll of the qos tests and see how bad it looks
15:18:44 dtroyer although not gettgin them to fail locally makes it hard to prove it is worth the effort
15:20:29 openstackgerrit Reedip proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Fix quota show output https://review.openstack.org/419067
15:20:33 stevemar hehe
15:21:27 dtroyer so I'm going to go find it, but I had to do a lot of deepcopy() in the past to avoid this sort of thing with shared mock return values, I think we've forgotten that
15:25:39 huanxuan dtroyer: failed again :(
15:40:16 dtroyer so I'm trying a simple unrolling of that loop and making it into 3 tests
15:43:16 openstackgerrit Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Fix image member unit tests occasional failures https://review.openstack.org/419528
15:43:25 dtroyer let's see what that does ^^^
15:45:58 huanxuan dtroyer: good idea, thank you!
15:47:07 huanxuan I am also trying in other ways
15:48:00 etoews cdent elmiko edleafe i have a conflicting meeting today and won't be able to attend the api wg meeting
15:49:05 etoews edleafe: you hoser
15:49:06 edleafe :)
15:49:17 openstackgerrit Huanxuan Ao proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Fix gate broken by auth_ref in image unit test https://review.openstack.org/419445
15:49:38 openstackgerrit Ed Leafe proposed openstack/api-wg: Add guidelines for boolean names https://review.openstack.org/411529
15:52:22 elmiko edleafe: ack
15:52:36 elmiko er etoews lol
15:52:59 edleafe elmiko: that's ok. etoews and I are practically indistinguishable
15:53:45 elmiko hehe =)
15:55:59 mordred edleafe: when is the api wg meeting?
15:56:14 edleafe mordred: 5 minutes
15:56:28 edleafe mordred: in #openstack-meeting-3
15:57:00 mordred edleafe: neat
16:02:13 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/python-openstackclient: Fix Network QoS rule CLI attrs parsing https://review.openstack.org/419461
16:07:49 waj334 dtroyer: What's the verdict on this patch? https://review.openstack.org/#/c/412614/
16:09:16 stevemar waj334: probably wait til after client freeze to push that one
16:09:37 stevemar waj334: meaning it won't go into "ocata"
16:09:50 stevemar waj334: we made the call at the last osc meeting i believe
16:09:59 dtroyer waj334: nothing really, we're just not ready to merge it yet right before we do the stable release in a week or two. I don't think there is any advantage to having a very incomplete v3 in stable that will never get brought up to spec
16:10:50 waj334 Cool. I was just following up
16:12:16 waj334 I'm gonna proceed with the implementation of Cinder v3.3 (implements messages api) and maybe I'll be able to tackle this microversion problem
16:12:55 dtroyer waj334: cool. I think it is safe to use 412614 as the base for that now
16:14:12 stevemar waj334: dtroyer not sure if you guys saw this, but diana_clarke pushed https://review.openstack.org/#/c/419108/ which starts microversion support for nova stuff
16:14:25 stevemar mriedem was saying they'll be looking at it in pike, i think
16:14:35 dtroyer saw but have not really read it yet
16:16:27 waj334 stevemar: It doesn't seem to do much of anything
16:18:39 mordred dtroyer, stevemar: do we have any time at the PTG that we can sit down together and talk through / work through where we want the osc/occ config ownership and handoff to be? I think we keep wanting to talk about it and never quite getting to it ...
16:19:50 dtroyer mordred: we have a room mon/tues, it's just a matter of arranging the schedule
16:20:48 mordred dtroyer: woot
16:21:22 openstackgerrit Pavlo Shchelokovskyy proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Fix flavor create help re swap size units https://review.openstack.org/419549
16:23:47 openstackgerrit Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Fix image member unit tests occasional failures https://review.openstack.org/419528
16:27:25 waj334 The microversion issue is gonna be a bigger problem than I thought. Any ideas on how to handle 2 versions of the same function, but with different parameters? lol
16:27:39 waj334 * not so lol *
16:28:02 openstackgerrit Pavlo Shchelokovskyy proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Fix flavor create help re swap size units https://review.openstack.org/419549
16:29:24 dtroyer waj334: we've talked about a couple of strategies for handling those. #1 is user-breaking changes are bad and we have to abide by semver at the CLI level so if you're talking about CLi-visible differences we need to consider that and time it properly
16:30:05 dtroyer most of what we've talked about though is handling the differences internally, which is basically writing multiple versions and branching as required. No magic, copying code is not bad here
16:36:47 waj334 dtroyer: So, with the messages api in Cinder v3.3 and v3.5 I'll end up with 2 separate files is what you're saying? Like messages_3_3.py, messages_3_5.py? Or, just different versions of various methods, just named slightly different?
16:39:14 waj334 I may be overthinking this
16:41:44 dtroyer we only split fies by major version so far, I suppose if it's a huge change that might be easier, but there is no mechanism to handle minor version changes at the stevedore/entry-point level
16:42:02 dtroyer so we'll still wind up with a common entry point.
16:42:22 dtroyer my thinking is of a microversion is so different that it's a total re-work, then something went wrong somewhere
16:46:17 waj334 Well, luckily what I'm seeing in this messages api is where optional params were added in v3.5 so that's easier to deal with. How important is maintaining consistency of command parameters if they are allowed to change between versions?
16:47:01 Serlex Hi, can someone post an example of "add_gateway_to_router(router, **body)" cheers
16:50:17 openstackgerrit Dean Troyer proposed openstack/python-openstackclient: Fix image member unit tests occasional failures https://review.openstack.org/419528
16:56:08 waj334 dtroyer: Would it be wise to check the client version first before adding arguments? That way I could set up the command properly for that specific microversion by just a few if statements.
16:56:46 waj334 Provided that I know about the client before commands are set up that is
16:59:04 dtroyer we don't do version discovery until the very last minute, ie the first actual API call to the service. So we'll only know the specific API version if the user has specified it.
16:59:22 dtroyer otherwise we have to make multiple calls (auth, discovery) to even build help
17:00:13 dtroyer for that, and the fact that we don't want incompatible changes to begin with, we should go to a good bit of work internally to not expose unnecessary changes to the user
17:01:25 elmiko LOL
17:06:38 waj334 It seems that I'm defeated
17:13:17 stevemar mordred: handoff? you ditching occ and leaving it on our laps? :)
17:14:33 Serlex sooo
17:15:23 stevemar Serlex: you're using openstacksdk?
17:16:02 Serlex yes
17:16:25 Serlex I want to add external network to a router
17:16:44 Serlex "add_gateway_to_router(router, **body)", got my router...how do I apply the body bit

Earlier   Later