Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-sdks - 2021-04-21
18:36:12 melwitt gmann: yeah heh, that's why I was asking. normally we don't bump min versions on stable branches but I get confused on the l-c job failures and when it's valid to bump them because of it?
18:36:19 gmann that should fix it unless there are more l-c issue as they shows one by one
18:36:19 gmann that should fix it unless there are more l-c issue as they shows one by one
18:36:44 gmann melwitt: ohk, missed this '^^' :)
18:36:44 gmann melwitt: ohk, missed this '^^' :)
18:37:14 melwitt np, it's my fault I didn't mention it
18:37:14 melwitt np, it's my fault I didn't mention it
18:37:56 gmann melwitt: agree on stable branch and not to bump min. but most of those might have caused by pip resolver or distro things
18:37:56 gmann melwitt: agree on stable branch and not to bump min. but most of those might have caused by pip resolver or distro things
18:38:14 gmann it happened in many projects
18:38:14 gmann it happened in many projects
18:38:40 melwitt gmann: yeah, I have seen at a basic level but did not know details of what was involved (pip resolver or distro things)
18:38:41 melwitt gmann: yeah, I have seen at a basic level but did not know details of what was involved (pip resolver or distro things)
18:39:25 melwitt ok, my bad _dvd it looks like this is most likely fine based on what gmann has explained
18:39:25 melwitt ok, my bad _dvd it looks like this is most likely fine based on what gmann has explained
18:39:32 gmann distro is not updated on stable/train so it is most probably former one
18:39:32 gmann distro is not updated on stable/train so it is most probably former one
18:40:21 _dvd ok thanks
18:40:21 _dvd ok thanks
18:40:35 melwitt thank you for the explanation gmann++
18:40:35 melwitt thank you for the explanation gmann++
18:40:57 gmann np!
18:40:57 gmann np!
18:43:31 openstackgerrit David Vallee Delisle proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/train: [train-only] lower-constraint and test-requirements https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/787374
18:43:31 openstackgerrit David Vallee Delisle proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/train: [train-only] lower-constraint and test-requirements https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/787374
18:43:48 openstackgerrit David Vallee Delisle proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/train: compute: Add 'server group create --rule' option https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/787245
18:43:48 openstackgerrit David Vallee Delisle proposed openstack/python-openstackclient stable/train: compute: Add 'server group create --rule' option https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/787245
19:33:03 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add compute microversion 2.57 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/781131
19:33:03 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add compute microversion 2.57 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/781131
21:25:06 twilit_dragon diablo_rojo, just making sure: Are the methods within .../block_storage/v3/_proxy.py supposed to be sorted in any manner? Or do new methods get added towards the bottom of the class definition before all the private methods?
21:25:06 twilit_dragon diablo_rojo, just making sure: Are the methods within .../block_storage/v3/_proxy.py supposed to be sorted in any manner? Or do new methods get added towards the bottom of the class definition before all the private methods?
21:46:17 mordred no particular sort order
21:46:17 mordred no particular sort order
#openstack-sdks - 2021-04-22
04:27:59 frickler can we get a sdk release with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786148 soon?
04:27:59 frickler can we get a sdk release with https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786148 soon?
05:36:45 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Drop lower-constraints job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/773290
05:36:45 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Drop lower-constraints job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/773290
06:11:48 openstackgerrit Hudson Dahly proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for Messages resource https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/777502
08:33:12 openstackgerrit Ananya proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Migrating image module from AnsibleModule to OpenStackModule https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/774141
08:33:12 openstackgerrit Ananya proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Migrating image module from AnsibleModule to OpenStackModule https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/774141
09:06:20 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add compute microversion 2.77 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786169
09:06:20 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add compute microversion 2.77 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786169
09:24:29 dtantsur frickler: if you request a release, I can ack it
09:24:29 dtantsur frickler: if you request a release, I can ack it
09:24:37 dtantsur (unless gtema has other plans)
09:24:37 dtantsur (unless gtema has other plans)
09:25:16 gtema but I was already acking the change
09:25:16 gtema but I was already acking the change
09:25:52 gtema or we need a new release?
09:25:52 gtema or we need a new release?
09:44:00 openstackgerrit Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add support to setting image tags https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/783850
09:46:01 openstackgerrit Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add support to setting image tags https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/783850
10:25:58 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Use py3 as the default runtime for tox https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787009
10:25:58 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Use py3 as the default runtime for tox https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787009
10:27:32 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for Resource Filters https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/776271
10:27:32 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Add support for Resource Filters https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/776271
10:43:26 openstackgerrit Dmitriy Rabotyagov proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add support to setting image tags https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/783850
12:16:54 frickler gtema: we need a new release, because the current release is broken against older neutron, at least that's what I understand. I'm busy today, could do a release patch tomorrow if noone else is faster
12:16:54 frickler gtema: we need a new release, because the current release is broken against older neutron, at least that's what I understand. I'm busy today, could do a release patch tomorrow if noone else is faster
12:17:31 gtema ah, ok. there is currently small batch of changes in gate, so tomorrow would be best
12:17:31 gtema ah, ok. there is currently small batch of changes in gate, so tomorrow would be best
13:10:13 openstackgerrit Riccardo Pittau proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix import order in compute unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787553
13:10:13 openstackgerrit Riccardo Pittau proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix import order in compute unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/787553
13:21:12 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Allow for override of statsd/influxdb settings per cloud https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786814
13:21:12 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Allow for override of statsd/influxdb settings per cloud https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786814
16:30:52 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix import order in network unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786877
16:30:52 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Fix import order in network unit tests https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/786877
16:31:13 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Allow unknown attributes to be included in request body https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/768208
16:31:13 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Allow unknown attributes to be included in request body https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/768208
19:16:13 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Adds Node Vendor passthru https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/785445
19:16:13 openstackgerrit Merged openstack/openstacksdk master: Adds Node Vendor passthru https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/785445
20:40:13 openstackgerrit Tosin Farai proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Add support for node vendor passthru methods https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/ansible-collections-openstack/+/773399
#openstack-sdks - 2021-04-23
09:24:50 gtema frickler - I'll update https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/786598 once rechecked placement is finished
09:24:50 gtema frickler - I'll update https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/786598 once rechecked placement is finished
09:25:30 frickler gtema: the only open patch I currently find is https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/745375/7 , do you need this in the next release? or could we make an intermediate bugfix release now? because that patch also has a followup that isn't even reviewed yet
09:25:30 frickler gtema: the only open patch I currently find is https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/745375/7 , do you need this in the next release? or could we make an intermediate bugfix release now? because that patch also has a followup that isn't even reviewed yet
09:25:41 frickler ha, jinx
09:25:41 frickler ha, jinx
09:26:15 gtema if it fails - will exclude it
09:26:15 gtema if it fails - will exclude it
09:26:24 frickler I was writing before reading your comment. o.k.
09:26:24 frickler I was writing before reading your comment. o.k.
09:26:36 gtema np
09:26:36 gtema np
10:05:27 frickler gtema: some things about jobs I noticed: we should make py38 voting according to what other projects have and also https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/runtimes/xena.html
10:05:27 frickler gtema: some things about jobs I noticed: we should make py38 voting according to what other projects have and also https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/runtimes/xena.html
10:05:38 frickler maybe also add a nv py39 job
10:05:38 frickler maybe also add a nv py39 job
10:05:51 gtema oki, ack
10:05:51 gtema oki, ack
10:05:57 frickler and drop the py37 things or do you thing they still add value?
10:05:57 frickler and drop the py37 things or do you thing they still add value?
10:06:20 gtema backwards is what we need due to zuul folks
10:06:20 gtema backwards is what we need due to zuul folks
10:06:28 frickler and then there's the ansible-stable jobs that have long been broken, can we just drop them?
10:06:28 frickler and then there's the ansible-stable jobs that have long been broken, can we just drop them?
10:07:11 frickler I guess I can just prepare separate patch for all of this and we can discuss there if needed
10:07:11 frickler I guess I can just prepare separate patch for all of this and we can discuss there if needed
10:07:15 gtema we should be better fixing it
10:07:15 gtema we should be better fixing it

Earlier   Later