| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-sdks - 2020-06-22 | |||
| 13:54:01 | gtema | okay, will need to make own one then | |
| 13:54:03 | sshnaidm|ruck | gtema, it should be the same | |
| 13:54:10 | mordred | I imagine it should be easy to adapt the collection ones | |
| 13:54:11 | sshnaidm|ruck | ansible-galaxy publish ... | |
| 13:54:32 | gtema | really? | |
| 13:54:44 | sshnaidm|ruck | gtema, and why to upload roles only if you can make a collection from them | |
| 13:55:01 | mordred | sshnaidm|ruck: maybe we should make ansible-collection-publish ansible-galaxy-publish - | |
| 13:55:23 | mordred | (maybe that's not worth it with the world moving to collections though) | |
| 13:55:24 | sshnaidm|ruck | gtema, mordred, I don't think uploading roles to galaxy is a thing now | |
| 13:55:35 | sshnaidm|ruck | just format it as a collection and that's it | |
| 13:55:38 | mordred | sshnaidm|ruck: I don't think they removed it yet did they? | |
| 13:55:54 | mordred | 2.8 isn't EOL I don't think | |
| 13:55:54 | gtema | no, why should they | |
| 13:56:02 | sshnaidm|ruck | mordred, no, but it doesn't make sense upload a pure role | |
| 13:56:12 | mordred | it does if you're not using a collection-aware ansible :) | |
| 13:56:27 | sshnaidm|ruck | mordred, well, from 2.8 | |
| 13:56:50 | mordred | or if you are already doing a role workflow and haven't gotten a chance to change everything you're doing - there's lots of people with roles out there so far | |
| 13:57:10 | mordred | I mena - I know we're _eventually_ going to all migrate to collections, but it's going to take some time | |
| 13:57:40 | gtema | there is half of internet of articles about roles ;-) | |
| 13:57:45 | sshnaidm|ruck | mordred, yeah, that's about migration, but if you start from scratch - better to create a collection | |
| 13:58:29 | gtema | it's clear, I wanted to start publishing my roles which exist since years with Zuul, that's why I was asking | |
| 13:58:56 | sshnaidm|ruck | gtema, worth to add to them galaxy.yml and voila, you have a collection :) | |
| 13:59:23 | gtema | and all the users not using latest ansible are cut-off | |
| 13:59:30 | gtema | that's my problem | |
| 13:59:51 | sshnaidm|ruck | mordred, btw, these patches seem to need more love https://review.opendev.org/#/c/730360/ | |
| 13:59:54 | gtema | I am unfortunately having much of those | |
| 14:00:10 | sshnaidm|ruck | gtema, using collection is possible from 2.8 | |
| 14:00:21 | sshnaidm|ruck | do you have 2.7 still somewhere? | |
| 14:00:38 | gtema | no, but in 2.8 it is rather a "hack" | |
| 14:00:53 | mordred | yeah - ansible-galaxy install doesn't work in 2.8 | |
| 14:01:17 | gtema | I think it was also "ansible-galaxy role install vs ansible-galaxy collection install" | |
| 14:01:19 | mordred | I don't expect people to really start using collections until they're on 2.9 at least | |
| 14:01:41 | mordred | because of the ansible-galaxy thing | |
| 14:02:01 | gtema | and then, there is "ansible-galaxy COLLECTION publish", at least according to 2.10 docs | |
| 14:03:15 | gtema | and there is no way to upload role using cli from what I see | |
| 14:03:35 | mordred | oh - right | |
| 14:03:44 | mordred | that's one of the issues with pre-collection galaxy | |
| 14:03:47 | mordred | it's tied to github | |
| 14:03:51 | mordred | for publication | |
| 14:03:57 | mordred | it can only import from github | |
| 14:04:07 | mordred | this is one of the big wins with collections | |
| 14:05:28 | gtema | okay, will need to "consider" forcing to move to collections | |
| 14:15:54 | gtema | hmm, devstack is still broken? openstacksdk-functional-devstack-networking doesn't pass still | |
| 14:17:29 | mordred | gtema: let me look - devstack should work at this point | |
| 14:17:39 | gtema | https://f8bf2d4a845608449589-8f1f171af5507b30533733754e7f1ad8.ssl.cf5.rackcdn.com/735336/3/check/openstacksdk-functional-devstack-networking/718c56c/job-output.txt | |
| 14:21:22 | frickler | No 'neutron.service_plugins' driver found, looking for 'firewall_v2' | |
| 14:24:15 | mordred | oh -didn't fwaas get retired? | |
| 14:24:27 | frickler | that has been retired, seems we need to pull it from the job definition, yes | |
| 14:24:30 | frickler | slaweq: ^^ | |
| 14:24:32 | mordred | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/735858/ | |
| 14:24:35 | mordred | frickler, gtema ^^ | |
| 14:25:05 | mordred | now - I'm not sure why the nodepool job failed in gtema's change | |
| 14:25:16 | mordred | since ensure-virtualenv was added to it | |
| 14:25:54 | gtema | didn't I say I hate Mondays? | |
| 14:25:57 | mordred | yeah | |
| 14:26:04 | mordred | https://review.opendev.org/#/c/737130/ <-- that added ensure-virtualenv in nodepool | |
| 14:26:12 | slaweq | frickler: sorry, I'm in the meeting | |
| 14:26:26 | slaweq | frickler: as mordred mentioned, there is patch for that already | |
| 14:26:52 | mordred | slaweq: now we just have to get it landed :) | |
| 14:27:06 | gtema | +A'ed | |
| 14:27:14 | slaweq | mordred: gtema thx | |
| 14:30:51 | gtema | mordred, in my change nodepool passed in the last recheck (which is still running) | |
| 14:31:37 | mordred | gtema: oh good | |
| 14:32:02 | gtema | the status is from 19th, and venv merged on 20th | |
| 14:32:09 | mordred | gtema: so the recheck of slaweq's change should work | |
| 14:32:20 | gtema | yupp, fingers crossed | |
| 14:34:21 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/keystoneauth master: Implement HTTP Basic client support in keystoneauth1 https://review.opendev.org/727562 | |
| 14:52:39 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk stable/ussuri: Update docs to work with newer Sphinx https://review.opendev.org/737083 | |
| 14:59:09 | mordred | dtantsur: ^^ http basic client landed | |
| 14:59:16 | dtantsur | \o/ | |
| 15:01:16 | mordred | dtantsur: there's one more patch in the gate (simple one, it's about raising lower constraints) - once that's in, I think we should suggest a release | |
| 15:01:29 | dtantsur | +++ | |
| 15:06:19 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Drop python 3.5 support https://review.opendev.org/737285 | |
| 15:06:52 | mordred | lbragstad: ^^ we dropped 3.5 in sdk already, so I think it's fine to land that now | |
| 15:07:57 | lbragstad | mordred makes sense, thank you | |
| 16:43:27 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/keystoneauth master: Update lower-constraints versions https://review.opendev.org/734803 | |
| 16:43:48 | openstackgerrit | Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: DNM test new CI https://review.opendev.org/737226 | |
| 19:19:23 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/keystoneauth master: Drop python 3.5 support https://review.opendev.org/737285 | |
| 21:30:23 | openstackgerrit | Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: DNM test new CI https://review.opendev.org/737226 | |
| 21:48:48 | openstackgerrit | Slawek Kaplonski proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Remove neutron-fwaas from the jobs' required project https://review.opendev.org/735858 | |
| 22:17:56 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk stable/ussuri: Fix issues found by latest flake8 https://review.opendev.org/730332 | |
| 22:18:05 | openstackgerrit | Monty Taylor proposed openstack/openstacksdk stable/ussuri: Don't error if clouds.yaml is not readable https://review.opendev.org/726962 | |
| #openstack-sdks - 2020-06-23 | |||
| 01:55:13 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk stable/ussuri: Fix issues found by latest flake8 https://review.opendev.org/730332 | |
| 01:55:14 | openstackgerrit | Merged openstack/openstacksdk stable/ussuri: Don't error if clouds.yaml is not readable https://review.opendev.org/726962 | |
| 04:23:46 | openstackgerrit | melissaml proposed openstack/python-openstackclient master: Remove translation sections from setup.cfg https://review.opendev.org/737436 | |
| 09:11:15 | frickler | sdk networking tests are currently failing on master, fix is https://review.opendev.org/737460 | |
| 09:12:00 | gtema | thks for the heads-up frickler | |
| 09:14:01 | openstackgerrit | Slawek Kaplonski proposed openstack/openstacksdk master: Remove neutron-fwaas from the jobs' required project https://review.opendev.org/735858 | |
| 09:27:19 | openstackgerrit | Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: New CI jobs configuration https://review.opendev.org/736946 | |
| 09:35:27 | openstackgerrit | Hervé Beraud proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Remove elementtree deprecated methods https://review.opendev.org/737475 | |
| 09:35:27 | openstackgerrit | Hervé Beraud proposed openstack/keystoneauth master: Remove elementtree deprecated methods https://review.opendev.org/737475 | |
| 12:28:26 | openstackgerrit | Olaf Seibert proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Only remove/add interfaces when needed. https://review.opendev.org/737519 | |
| 13:24:07 | openstackgerrit | Sagi Shnaidman proposed openstack/ansible-collections-openstack master: Fix typos in job definitions https://review.opendev.org/737538 | |
| 15:46:09 | zallen | Why do I not have `openstack network trunk ...` commands on the python client version 5.2.1? | |
| 16:01:13 | mordred | zallen: good question. I agree with you - they are not showing up for me either | |
| 16:01:19 | mordred | zallen: I will look in to it | |
| 16:13:37 | mordred | zallen: I don't see this in 4.0.0 either - did this work for you before? | |
| 16:13:40 | mordred | slaweq: ^^ ?? | |
| 16:20:19 | mordred | zallen, slaweq: ok - so it doesn't look like python-neutronclient is providing trunk create as an osc plugin - it's a neutronclient plugin | |
| 16:21:59 | mordred | mnaser: ^^ you concur with this, yes? | |