Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2026-09-08
13:26:33 opendevreview OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-placement stable/2026.2: Update .gitreview for stable/2026.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/1004595
13:26:35 opendevreview OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-placement stable/2026.2: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2026.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/1004597
13:26:36 opendevreview OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/osc-placement master: Update master for stable/2026.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/1004599
13:26:44 opendevreview OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/python-novaclient stable/2026.2: Update .gitreview for stable/2026.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/1004601
13:26:45 opendevreview OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/python-novaclient stable/2026.2: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2026.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/1004602
13:26:47 opendevreview OpenStack Release Bot proposed openstack/python-novaclient master: Update master for stable/2026.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-novaclient/+/1004603
13:51:47 opendevreview Merged openstack/os-vif master: Update master for stable/2026.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/1004594
13:56:12 opendevreview Merged openstack/os-vif stable/2026.2: Update .gitreview for stable/2026.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/1004592
13:56:17 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Move Hibiscus implemented specs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/1004442
13:59:38 opendevreview Merged openstack/os-vif stable/2026.2: Update TOX_CONSTRAINTS_FILE for stable/2026.2 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/1004593
14:00:25 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Add regression test for scheduler cache pollution on anti-affinity violation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004646
15:08:13 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reproduce bug 2166786 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004658
16:07:36 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reproduce bug 2166786 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004658
16:44:09 opendevreview Mike Lowe proposed openstack/nova master: Detect orphaned PCI allocations in nova-manage placement audit https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004670
16:49:47 tkajinam anyone care to merge this trivial one-line cleanup ? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/995321
16:58:30 sean-k-mooney enought to approve but not enought to sugget we includ it in rc1
17:01:18 tkajinam that's ok
17:01:45 sean-k-mooney we can alwasy backported it if needed i guess but i approved it
17:07:06 tkajinam thx
18:30:42 opendevreview Merged openstack/placement master: Drop reference to lower-constraints.txt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/995321
19:28:17 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: move nova-next to ubuntu 26.04 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004687
#openstack-nova - 2026-09-09
03:25:16 opendevreview Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Fix task leak for live migration rollback case https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1003386
03:25:27 opendevreview Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: [func test]Catch hanging task at graceful shutdown https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1003266
03:27:05 gmaan gibi: on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1001369, i replied to your comment. basically test is failing because of RPC thread is beeing sleep and shutdown wait for that to finish si deadlock. manager_shutdown_timoeut does not solve things here
03:28:06 gmaan gibi: ashigupt_ I am testing this on manager_shutdown_timeout default value change also https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1003266
03:29:05 gmaan gibi: sambork: Uggla: I will not be able to join eventlet or upstream bug meeting if any. still in my kids school transition and will be online around ~10 AMish my time
05:14:06 opendevreview Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova stable/2026.1: Use a per-instance cephx identity for CephFS shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004765
05:21:09 opendevreview Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Use a per-instance cephx identity for CephFS shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004766
05:21:44 opendevreview Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Use a per-instance cephx identity for CephFS shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004767
06:18:42 sambork gmaan, thanks for letting us know!
08:19:32 opendevreview Arnaud Morin proposed openstack/os-vif master: Drop pyroute2 win32 marker https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/1004780
08:23:08 opendevreview Arnaud Morin proposed openstack/nova master: Add pyroute2 in doc dependencies https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004781
08:23:48 amorin Hey nova team, I created the two changes above ^
08:24:09 amorin to fix an issue in documentation (at least) not showing the os_vif_ovs parameters anymore
08:24:19 amorin e.g. https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html
08:24:25 amorin look for ovsdb_connection
08:24:38 amorin and compare with: https://docs.openstack.org/nova/2026.1/configuration/config.html#os_vif_ovs.ovsdb_connection
08:25:14 amorin I believe that should be fix before 2026.2 release, or the release will miss these params
08:32:36 mhen Uggla: are you around?
08:32:51 Uggla Hi mhen
08:33:01 mhen hi :)
08:33:20 mhen Concerning https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/AE4FL6L374WQTUJI65RDHQE3GLTI3R5B/
08:33:46 mhen eharney stated "i think the basic summary there is that we landed cinder code but never completed nova work for it, so it's pretty broken"
08:34:09 mhen which seemed to confirm my suspicion that things in Nova (and os-brick) are missing
08:34:33 mhen I am trying to get a cross-project session between Cinder and Nova organized for the upcoming PTG for this
08:36:01 mhen Uggla: can you assist me with this? is there a PTG etherpad for Nova to register sessions?
08:36:21 mhen (I will also talk to Cinder in their meeting today)
08:39:06 Uggla mhen, sure I can help to discuss that, no pb. I have not created the ptg etherpad page for Indri.
08:40:03 Uggla mhen, I will create the page today and ping you. So you will be able to enter the topic
08:40:32 mhen Uggla: splendid, thank you!
08:48:18 Uggla mhen, https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2027.1-ptg (a bit raw at the moment), but please add your topic at the bottom and I will schedule it for the vPTG.
10:25:03 stephenfin Uggla: a reminder that we're still waiting on your ack on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/988094/3
11:15:43 mhen Uggla: thanks, I have added the cross-project session description to the bottom
11:37:46 gibi amorin: replied in your doc patches
12:05:21 amorin ack thanks!
12:07:33 opendevreview Arnaud Morin proposed openstack/nova master: Add pyroute2 in doc dependencies https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004781
12:08:03 gibi amorin: if we miss the RC1 deadline with this I would not sweat on it much and just fix it on master and backport as soon as the GA is out and then push a point release if needed from stable
12:08:44 gibi but feel free to disagree if this somehow creates an ackward situation productifying the GA
12:08:52 gibi Uggla: can arrange for an RC2 if it is warranted
12:08:59 gibi s/://
12:09:29 amorin I do not care that much on my side, I was just surprised that the doc was wrong. I may not be the only one, so better trying to have this before the GA IMHO
12:17:15 gibi ack
12:32:09 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reproduce bug 2166786 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004658
12:46:09 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: move nova-alt-config to debian-13 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/966479
13:15:52 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/placement master: tox: Use constraints option https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/996893
13:15:53 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/placement master: Replace license classifier https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/1004422
13:15:53 opendevreview Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/placement master: Migrate requirements to pyproject.toml https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/1004423
13:17:24 Uggla stephenfin, I have just +1 the change above, sorry for the latency.
13:42:04 gibi Uggla: finally back to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999977/ I left some small suggestion inline but it is looks good pretty good now
13:43:18 Uggla gibi, thanks I will look at that.
14:12:13 gibi Uggla: also left some comments in the RC1 etherpad about api microversion history and prelude I guess those are still needs to be done
14:17:09 Uggla gibi, regarding prelude as it is a copy of highlight, I was waiting the HL to be settled which is the case now, so I'll create it. Thanks for the microversion history because I thought it was ok but missed it.
14:18:03 gibi cool
14:18:13 gibi I think the rest looks good
14:20:04 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Move Hibiscus implemented specs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/1004442
15:01:09 gibi Uggla: left feedback on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999978 I think this evac bug and my evac bug discussed on the Monday call are sharing a root case. I left suggestion how to combine the two fixes that is non-controversial from the Monday discussion perspective but probably useful for both bugs. It is pretty complicated so feel free to ask me to jump on a call to explain more
15:05:01 bauzas gibi: I guess we won't have eventlet meeting, right?
15:07:21 Uggla gibi, yeah I had the feeling that Monday topic was more or less linked and that a 2 steps approach is required. One short term to meet customer happy and one longer term for the PTG.
15:15:30 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Mark 2.104 as maximum API version for 2026.2 Hibiscus https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004872
15:22:35 gibi bauzas: it is ongoing but nothing important there
15:27:44 dansmith gmaan: sorry I just realized I never replied on your task leak thing
15:30:39 Uggla Reminder: upstream triage (https://meet.google.com/zjr-rxus-hzj)
15:31:36 gibi couple of mintues lte
15:31:37 gibi late
15:39:32 opendevreview Grzegorz Grasza proposed openstack/nova master: Match fixed_ip literally instead of partially escaping it as a regex https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004878
16:28:15 opendevreview Clif Houck proposed openstack/nova stable/2026.1: perf(ironic): eliminate O(N²) ProviderTree deepcopy at startup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004890
16:37:22 opendevreview Merged openstack/placement master: tox: Use constraints option https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/996893
16:43:00 dansmith gibi: are you still around/
16:52:07 gmaan dansmith: thanks for reply, reading
16:52:24 dansmith gmaan: I'm curious what gibi thinks about this
16:52:37 dansmith wondering if he was already okay with the RPC breakage or didn't realize when he +2d
16:53:52 gmaan dansmith: I think he mentioned about the revert if it fails but not specific to new vs old node
16:54:13 dansmith I know
17:03:41 opendevreview Clif Houck proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: perf(ironic): eliminate O(N²) ProviderTree deepcopy at startup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004899
17:05:52 gmaan dansmith: I think, adding a new RPC call (end_tracked_task or something) will be better here with RPC version bump. do you want me change that way or wanted to wait for gibi reply?
17:06:50 dansmith I guess I'd rather not have a new call just for the very rare "cancel before started" case... why do you like that better?
17:06:52 gmaan that is what i was thinking to bump the RPC for either change but was not sure if we can do the version bumo at this stage or not. if yes then no issue
17:07:26 gmaan dansmith: it will not cancel before started, it can check if task is recorded otherwise log warning
17:07:40 dansmith it's not great to bump for either for sure at this point
17:08:06 dansmith gmaan: it's a cancel to the destination because we basically never started the migration which now doesn't need to be cleaned up right?

Earlier   Later