| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-09-08 | |||
| 16:07:36 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reproduce bug 2166786 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004658 | |
| 16:44:09 | opendevreview | Mike Lowe proposed openstack/nova master: Detect orphaned PCI allocations in nova-manage placement audit https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004670 | |
| 16:49:47 | tkajinam | anyone care to merge this trivial one-line cleanup ? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/995321 | |
| 16:58:30 | sean-k-mooney | enought to approve but not enought to sugget we includ it in rc1 | |
| 17:01:18 | tkajinam | that's ok | |
| 17:01:45 | sean-k-mooney | we can alwasy backported it if needed i guess but i approved it | |
| 17:07:06 | tkajinam | thx | |
| 18:30:42 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/placement master: Drop reference to lower-constraints.txt https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/995321 | |
| 19:28:17 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: move nova-next to ubuntu 26.04 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004687 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-09-09 | |||
| 03:25:16 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Fix task leak for live migration rollback case https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1003386 | |
| 03:25:27 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: [func test]Catch hanging task at graceful shutdown https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1003266 | |
| 03:27:05 | gmaan | gibi: on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1001369, i replied to your comment. basically test is failing because of RPC thread is beeing sleep and shutdown wait for that to finish si deadlock. manager_shutdown_timoeut does not solve things here | |
| 03:28:06 | gmaan | gibi: ashigupt_ I am testing this on manager_shutdown_timeout default value change also https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1003266 | |
| 03:29:05 | gmaan | gibi: sambork: Uggla: I will not be able to join eventlet or upstream bug meeting if any. still in my kids school transition and will be online around ~10 AMish my time | |
| 05:14:06 | opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova stable/2026.1: Use a per-instance cephx identity for CephFS shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004765 | |
| 05:21:09 | opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Use a per-instance cephx identity for CephFS shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004766 | |
| 05:21:44 | opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Use a per-instance cephx identity for CephFS shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004767 | |
| 06:18:42 | sambork | gmaan, thanks for letting us know! | |
| 08:19:32 | opendevreview | Arnaud Morin proposed openstack/os-vif master: Drop pyroute2 win32 marker https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/1004780 | |
| 08:23:08 | opendevreview | Arnaud Morin proposed openstack/nova master: Add pyroute2 in doc dependencies https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004781 | |
| 08:23:48 | amorin | Hey nova team, I created the two changes above ^ | |
| 08:24:09 | amorin | to fix an issue in documentation (at least) not showing the os_vif_ovs parameters anymore | |
| 08:24:19 | amorin | e.g. https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html | |
| 08:24:25 | amorin | look for ovsdb_connection | |
| 08:24:38 | amorin | and compare with: https://docs.openstack.org/nova/2026.1/configuration/config.html#os_vif_ovs.ovsdb_connection | |
| 08:25:14 | amorin | I believe that should be fix before 2026.2 release, or the release will miss these params | |
| 08:32:36 | mhen | Uggla: are you around? | |
| 08:32:51 | Uggla | Hi mhen | |
| 08:33:01 | mhen | hi :) | |
| 08:33:20 | mhen | Concerning https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/AE4FL6L374WQTUJI65RDHQE3GLTI3R5B/ | |
| 08:33:46 | mhen | eharney stated "i think the basic summary there is that we landed cinder code but never completed nova work for it, so it's pretty broken" | |
| 08:34:09 | mhen | which seemed to confirm my suspicion that things in Nova (and os-brick) are missing | |
| 08:34:33 | mhen | I am trying to get a cross-project session between Cinder and Nova organized for the upcoming PTG for this | |
| 08:36:01 | mhen | Uggla: can you assist me with this? is there a PTG etherpad for Nova to register sessions? | |
| 08:36:21 | mhen | (I will also talk to Cinder in their meeting today) | |
| 08:39:06 | Uggla | mhen, sure I can help to discuss that, no pb. I have not created the ptg etherpad page for Indri. | |
| 08:40:03 | Uggla | mhen, I will create the page today and ping you. So you will be able to enter the topic | |
| 08:40:32 | mhen | Uggla: splendid, thank you! | |
| 08:48:18 | Uggla | mhen, https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2027.1-ptg (a bit raw at the moment), but please add your topic at the bottom and I will schedule it for the vPTG. | |
| 10:25:03 | stephenfin | Uggla: a reminder that we're still waiting on your ack on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/988094/3 | |
| 11:15:43 | mhen | Uggla: thanks, I have added the cross-project session description to the bottom | |
| 11:37:46 | gibi | amorin: replied in your doc patches | |
| 12:05:21 | amorin | ack thanks! | |
| 12:07:33 | opendevreview | Arnaud Morin proposed openstack/nova master: Add pyroute2 in doc dependencies https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004781 | |
| 12:08:03 | gibi | amorin: if we miss the RC1 deadline with this I would not sweat on it much and just fix it on master and backport as soon as the GA is out and then push a point release if needed from stable | |
| 12:08:44 | gibi | but feel free to disagree if this somehow creates an ackward situation productifying the GA | |
| 12:08:52 | gibi | Uggla: can arrange for an RC2 if it is warranted | |
| 12:08:59 | gibi | s/:// | |
| 12:09:29 | amorin | I do not care that much on my side, I was just surprised that the doc was wrong. I may not be the only one, so better trying to have this before the GA IMHO | |
| 12:17:15 | gibi | ack | |
| 12:32:09 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Reproduce bug 2166786 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004658 | |
| 12:46:09 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: move nova-alt-config to debian-13 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/966479 | |
| 13:15:52 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/placement master: tox: Use constraints option https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/996893 | |
| 13:15:53 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/placement master: Replace license classifier https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/1004422 | |
| 13:15:53 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/placement master: Migrate requirements to pyproject.toml https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/1004423 | |
| 13:17:24 | Uggla | stephenfin, I have just +1 the change above, sorry for the latency. | |
| 13:42:04 | gibi | Uggla: finally back to https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999977/ I left some small suggestion inline but it is looks good pretty good now | |
| 13:43:18 | Uggla | gibi, thanks I will look at that. | |
| 14:12:13 | gibi | Uggla: also left some comments in the RC1 etherpad about api microversion history and prelude I guess those are still needs to be done | |
| 14:17:09 | Uggla | gibi, regarding prelude as it is a copy of highlight, I was waiting the HL to be settled which is the case now, so I'll create it. Thanks for the microversion history because I thought it was ok but missed it. | |
| 14:18:03 | gibi | cool | |
| 14:18:13 | gibi | I think the rest looks good | |
| 14:20:04 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova-specs master: Move Hibiscus implemented specs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/1004442 | |
| 15:01:09 | gibi | Uggla: left feedback on https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999978 I think this evac bug and my evac bug discussed on the Monday call are sharing a root case. I left suggestion how to combine the two fixes that is non-controversial from the Monday discussion perspective but probably useful for both bugs. It is pretty complicated so feel free to ask me to jump on a call to explain more | |
| 15:05:01 | bauzas | gibi: I guess we won't have eventlet meeting, right? | |
| 15:07:21 | Uggla | gibi, yeah I had the feeling that Monday topic was more or less linked and that a 2 steps approach is required. One short term to meet customer happy and one longer term for the PTG. | |
| 15:15:30 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Mark 2.104 as maximum API version for 2026.2 Hibiscus https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004872 | |
| 15:22:35 | gibi | bauzas: it is ongoing but nothing important there | |
| 15:27:44 | dansmith | gmaan: sorry I just realized I never replied on your task leak thing | |
| 15:30:39 | Uggla | Reminder: upstream triage (https://meet.google.com/zjr-rxus-hzj) | |
| 15:31:36 | gibi | couple of mintues lte | |
| 15:31:37 | gibi | late | |
| 15:39:32 | opendevreview | Grzegorz Grasza proposed openstack/nova master: Match fixed_ip literally instead of partially escaping it as a regex https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004878 | |
| 16:28:15 | opendevreview | Clif Houck proposed openstack/nova stable/2026.1: perf(ironic): eliminate O(N²) ProviderTree deepcopy at startup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004890 | |
| 16:37:22 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/placement master: tox: Use constraints option https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/996893 | |
| 16:43:00 | dansmith | gibi: are you still around/ | |
| 16:52:07 | gmaan | dansmith: thanks for reply, reading | |
| 16:52:24 | dansmith | gmaan: I'm curious what gibi thinks about this | |
| 16:52:37 | dansmith | wondering if he was already okay with the RPC breakage or didn't realize when he +2d | |
| 16:53:52 | gmaan | dansmith: I think he mentioned about the revert if it fails but not specific to new vs old node | |
| 16:54:13 | dansmith | I know | |
| 17:03:41 | opendevreview | Clif Houck proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: perf(ironic): eliminate O(N²) ProviderTree deepcopy at startup https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1004899 | |
| 17:05:52 | gmaan | dansmith: I think, adding a new RPC call (end_tracked_task or something) will be better here with RPC version bump. do you want me change that way or wanted to wait for gibi reply? | |
| 17:06:50 | dansmith | I guess I'd rather not have a new call just for the very rare "cancel before started" case... why do you like that better? | |
| 17:06:52 | gmaan | that is what i was thinking to bump the RPC for either change but was not sure if we can do the version bumo at this stage or not. if yes then no issue | |
| 17:07:26 | gmaan | dansmith: it will not cancel before started, it can check if task is recorded otherwise log warning | |
| 17:07:40 | dansmith | it's not great to bump for either for sure at this point | |
| 17:08:06 | dansmith | gmaan: it's a cancel to the destination because we basically never started the migration which now doesn't need to be cleaned up right? | |
| 17:08:12 | gmaan | I am thinking it generic way where this common RPC call can be used in other place, because I am not sure we handle all cases of error on each node for cross-node operations | |
| 17:08:13 | dansmith | bauzas: are you still around? | |
| 17:08:22 | bauzas | I am | |
| 17:08:34 | dansmith | bauzas: can you skim this? https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1003386 | |
| 17:09:00 | dansmith | just looking for another opinion.. I don't really like either option but they both require an RPC bump to fix (or we just ignore this case and leave it as a delayed shutdown bug I guess) | |
| 17:10:03 | bauzas | hah, ok, I can try to take a look but I don't have a lot of context for now | |
| 17:10:53 | gmaan | dansmith: but if rollback happening on source then it means migration started in dest right? | |
| 17:11:32 | dansmith | gmaan: started in nova but probably not libvirt yet right? | |
| 17:11:55 | gmaan | yes not till libvirt | |
| 17:12:35 | bauzas | wait | |
| 17:12:45 | bauzas | now I have a bit more of knowledge | |
| 17:13:16 | bauzas | all of the skim is for _post_live_migration, ie. once the instance is either fully migrated or rollbacked | |