| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-08-21 | |||
| 15:34:59 | sean-k-mooney | gmaan: so somethign like https://github.com/openstack/nova/tree/master/doc/source/contributor/testing | |
| 15:35:01 | gmaan | sean-k-mooney: ++ yeah. i did not check numa one but yes guide to test/results | |
| 15:35:23 | sean-k-mooney | well i dont thinik we should comemit one off results | |
| 15:35:23 | gmaan | yup, kind of this | |
| 15:35:39 | sean-k-mooney | but we can commit docs of how to test it manually properly | |
| 15:35:40 | gmaan | at least, which one worked or not | |
| 15:36:22 | sean-k-mooney | so of this is going to end up automated later in whitebox/tempest too | |
| 15:37:00 | sean-k-mooney | the system gibi borrowed may eventully end up geting used to test this perodicily downstream | |
| 15:37:11 | gmaan | ++ for tempest/whitebox testing but if we have some 3rd party CI to run them somewhere | |
| 15:37:54 | sean-k-mooney | we kind of do. righ tnow we are not allwoe do report reuslt publicly because of infra info discustore risks | |
| 15:38:21 | sean-k-mooney | gmaan: we have internal nightly master job for cybrog | |
| 15:38:22 | gmaan | anyways, let's start with similar doc first, antia are you ok to push something next week. I am saying that is blocker for series to merge but good to have when we are merging it | |
| 15:38:38 | sean-k-mooney | we shoudl be able to do the saem for TDX in the coming weeks | |
| 15:38:42 | sean-k-mooney | not a blocker for the feature | |
| 15:38:46 | gmaan | yeah | |
| 15:39:03 | sean-k-mooney | jsut fyi that we hope to have that in place proably before the year is up | |
| 15:39:47 | sean-k-mooney | we are still exploring options for public third party ci bu thats complicated | |
| 15:39:53 | antia | would it be a document about TDX testing in https://github.com/openstack/nova/tree/master/doc/source/contributor/testing? | |
| 15:41:24 | sean-k-mooney | yes so like https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/master/doc/source/contributor/testing/serial-console.rst | |
| 15:41:30 | sean-k-mooney | or the numa one | |
| 15:41:46 | antia | something like that I can fix | |
| 15:41:46 | sean-k-mooney | basiclly it woudl explain how to verify the feature is workign corectly | |
| 15:42:13 | sean-k-mooney | antia: i would keep that as a follwup patch provided that works for gmaan | |
| 15:42:36 | gmaan | yeah, works for me at the end of series. do not change existing series | |
| 15:42:46 | antia | sounds good | |
| 15:42:53 | gmaan | thanks | |
| 15:43:06 | antia | have a nice weekend all, and thanks for reviewing! | |
| 15:43:21 | gmaan | have a nice weekend antia | |
| 15:43:22 | gmaan | sean-k-mooney: I am not sure you are planning to go through series today but I will be able to do during end of my day. I will leave the merge things until gibi or you recheck. we still have 1 week before FF | |
| 15:44:27 | sean-k-mooney | im going to be aound for another hour or two | |
| 15:44:37 | sean-k-mooney | im trying to complete the cybrog nvme serise first | |
| 15:44:43 | sean-k-mooney | then loop back to this after | |
| 15:44:54 | gmaan | ack | |
| 15:45:05 | sean-k-mooney | the os-triats question above was we have a depency on the new os-trait release in that | |
| 15:45:33 | gmaan | we released that right? i thought changes was done in advanbce and released | |
| 15:45:44 | sean-k-mooney | they were don but not released | |
| 15:45:49 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1001835/1/deliverables/_independent/os-traits.yaml | |
| 15:45:54 | sean-k-mooney | i just created that | |
| 15:46:09 | sean-k-mooney | im going to raise it in the release channel shortly | |
| 15:46:17 | gmaan | sean-k-mooney: humm, tdx series added 3.8.0 in requirement.txt | |
| 15:46:34 | sean-k-mooney | yep that was done 2 months ago | |
| 15:46:52 | sean-k-mooney | the cyborg traits for nvme secure erase modes | |
| 15:46:55 | sean-k-mooney | merge last week | |
| 15:46:56 | gmaan | sean-k-mooney: its there https://github.com/openstack/os-traits/blob/3.8.0/os_traits/hw/cpu/x86/intel.py#L28 | |
| 15:47:10 | gmaan | yeah, os-traits updates was done long back | |
| 15:47:15 | sean-k-mooney | gmaan: right but we need a new release for a differnt feature | |
| 15:47:44 | sean-k-mooney | this isnt needed in nova but is needed in placment and cybrog | |
| 15:48:18 | gmaan | ohk, i thought you are saying TDX part is not released yet | |
| 15:48:31 | sean-k-mooney | no that is there | |
| 15:48:35 | gmaan | yeah | |
| 15:48:49 | sean-k-mooney | but i need to complete the nvme feature review before going back to the tdx series | |
| 15:49:32 | gmaan | got it | |
| 15:49:33 | sean-k-mooney | im trying to see if i can get os-traits 3.9.0 released so we can fully supprot requeting nvme devices based on tehre secure erase capabliteis | |
| 15:49:37 | gmaan | maybe we need more people here https://github.com/openstack/governance/blob/master/reference/projects.yaml#L1039 | |
| 15:50:02 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla if you can appove https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1001835 that woudl help | |
| 15:50:25 | gmaan | Uggla: ^^ idea to add a few more as release will stuck if you and bauzas both are on PTO | |
| 15:50:32 | sean-k-mooney | having more then one is nice for pto coverage but the ptl can alwasy approve as well | |
| 15:51:05 | gmaan | yeah, just thinking to have 1 or 2 more along with PTL | |
| 15:51:31 | sean-k-mooney | for cybrog and watcher we have 2 release liasons seperate form teh ptl with 3 possbel aprpovers we are genneraly pretty PTO resitent | |
| 15:54:18 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney, done. Tbh I was here this week but forget about it. | |
| 15:54:52 | sean-k-mooney | no worries am we shoudl check os-vif and os-resouce classees for pendign release as well | |
| 15:55:06 | sean-k-mooney | but im not aware of any critial patches in those | |
| 15:56:09 | sean-k-mooney | os vif was milestone 2 | |
| 15:56:46 | sean-k-mooney | we actuul;y do have a few fixes we shoudl include in 2026.2 | |
| 15:56:51 | sean-k-mooney | ill also prospoe that now | |
| 15:57:07 | sean-k-mooney | we specificly want https://github.com/openstack/os-vif/commit/8f2d2cc92d6f79c85e03e52d61b0f71d08a0cca2 | |
| 15:58:52 | sean-k-mooney | Uggla: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1001844 | |
| 16:05:36 | Uggla | sean-k-mooney i approved | |
| 16:19:45 | opendevreview | Clif Houck proposed openstack/nova master: Parallelize per-node resource updates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/980679 | |
| 17:26:49 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Add doc and release notes for the graceful shutdown task tracking https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/997141 | |
| 17:55:24 | gouthamr | ack on the periodic cleanup on the virtiofs/cold migration patch dansmith.. | |
| 17:55:24 | gouthamr | i'm working on it | |
| 18:02:22 | dansmith | gouthamr: cool | |
| 18:20:46 | gmaan | dansmith: updated the doc change | |
| 18:33:18 | dansmith | gmaan: got it | |
| 18:34:14 | gmaan | dansmith: thanks for reviews on the whole series. | |
| 21:01:50 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Report OWNER_NOVA trait on resource providers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994299 | |
| 21:17:42 | opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Use a per-instance cephx identity for CephFS shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1001900 | |
| 21:46:50 | opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Use a per-instance cephx identity for CephFS shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1001900 | |
| 21:46:50 | opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Extract share management from ComputeManager https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999349 | |
| 21:46:51 | opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Support cold migration with virtiofs shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/989633 | |
| 22:28:11 | opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Use a per-instance cephx identity for CephFS shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1001900 | |
| 22:28:11 | opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Extract share management from ComputeManager https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999349 | |
| 22:28:12 | opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Support cold migration with virtiofs shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/989633 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-08-22 | |||
| 07:19:40 | opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Reconcile stale Manila share access rules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1001916 | |
| 08:02:51 | opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Reconcile stale Manila share access rules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1001916 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-08-24 | |||
| 03:47:31 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Switch Cyborg client from keystoneauth1 to openstacksdk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1002007 | |
| 06:48:07 | opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Add virtiofs share attachment CI jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999772 | |
| 06:48:32 | opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Rewrite share admin guide and add user guide https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1000166 | |
| 07:13:52 | opendevreview | Ashish Gupta proposed openstack/nova master: Stabilize threading functional tests for async races https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1002017 | |
| 07:19:59 | opendevreview | Ashish Gupta proposed openstack/nova master: Stabilize threading functional tests for async races https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1002017 | |
| 09:28:30 | gibi | gmaan: I think one of the graceful shutdown func test is unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2164880 | |
| 11:26:15 | gibi | and I reported one more, less frequent functional instability https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2164888 | |
| 11:29:11 | gibi | also saw hit on https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2160254 | |
| 11:29:28 | gibi | I would say our gate is not in a great shape | |
| 11:29:37 | gibi | it is almost like we have a FF this week :) | |
| 11:33:10 | gibi | and one more functional instability bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2164893 | |
| 11:35:04 | gibi | Uggla: ^^ things to raise about the gate on the meeting toda | |
| 11:35:05 | gibi | y | |
| 12:14:43 | Uggla | gibi 👍 | |