Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2026-08-21
15:49:32 gmaan got it
15:49:33 sean-k-mooney im trying to see if i can get os-traits 3.9.0 released so we can fully supprot requeting nvme devices based on tehre secure erase capabliteis
15:49:37 gmaan maybe we need more people here https://github.com/openstack/governance/blob/master/reference/projects.yaml#L1039
15:50:02 sean-k-mooney Uggla if you can appove https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1001835 that woudl help
15:50:25 gmaan Uggla: ^^ idea to add a few more as release will stuck if you and bauzas both are on PTO
15:50:32 sean-k-mooney having more then one is nice for pto coverage but the ptl can alwasy approve as well
15:51:05 gmaan yeah, just thinking to have 1 or 2 more along with PTL
15:51:31 sean-k-mooney for cybrog and watcher we have 2 release liasons seperate form teh ptl with 3 possbel aprpovers we are genneraly pretty PTO resitent
15:54:18 Uggla sean-k-mooney, done. Tbh I was here this week but forget about it.
15:54:52 sean-k-mooney no worries am we shoudl check os-vif and os-resouce classees for pendign release as well
15:55:06 sean-k-mooney but im not aware of any critial patches in those
15:56:09 sean-k-mooney os vif was milestone 2
15:56:46 sean-k-mooney we actuul;y do have a few fixes we shoudl include in 2026.2
15:56:51 sean-k-mooney ill also prospoe that now
15:57:07 sean-k-mooney we specificly want https://github.com/openstack/os-vif/commit/8f2d2cc92d6f79c85e03e52d61b0f71d08a0cca2
15:58:52 sean-k-mooney Uggla: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/1001844
16:05:36 Uggla sean-k-mooney i approved
16:19:45 opendevreview Clif Houck proposed openstack/nova master: Parallelize per-node resource updates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/980679
17:26:49 opendevreview Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Add doc and release notes for the graceful shutdown task tracking https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/997141
17:55:24 gouthamr ack on the periodic cleanup on the virtiofs/cold migration patch dansmith..
17:55:24 gouthamr i'm working on it
18:02:22 dansmith gouthamr: cool
18:20:46 gmaan dansmith: updated the doc change
18:33:18 dansmith gmaan: got it
18:34:14 gmaan dansmith: thanks for reviews on the whole series.
21:01:50 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Report OWNER_NOVA trait on resource providers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994299
21:17:42 opendevreview Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Use a per-instance cephx identity for CephFS shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1001900
21:46:50 opendevreview Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Use a per-instance cephx identity for CephFS shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1001900
21:46:50 opendevreview Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Extract share management from ComputeManager https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999349
21:46:51 opendevreview Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Support cold migration with virtiofs shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/989633
22:28:11 opendevreview Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Use a per-instance cephx identity for CephFS shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1001900
22:28:11 opendevreview Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Extract share management from ComputeManager https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999349
22:28:12 opendevreview Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Support cold migration with virtiofs shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/989633
#openstack-nova - 2026-08-22
07:19:40 opendevreview Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Reconcile stale Manila share access rules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1001916
08:02:51 opendevreview Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Reconcile stale Manila share access rules https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1001916
#openstack-nova - 2026-08-24
03:47:31 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Switch Cyborg client from keystoneauth1 to openstacksdk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1002007
06:48:07 opendevreview Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Add virtiofs share attachment CI jobs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999772
06:48:32 opendevreview Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Rewrite share admin guide and add user guide https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1000166
07:13:52 opendevreview Ashish Gupta proposed openstack/nova master: Stabilize threading functional tests for async races https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1002017
07:19:59 opendevreview Ashish Gupta proposed openstack/nova master: Stabilize threading functional tests for async races https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1002017
09:28:30 gibi gmaan: I think one of the graceful shutdown func test is unstable https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2164880
11:26:15 gibi and I reported one more, less frequent functional instability https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2164888
11:29:11 gibi also saw hit on https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2160254
11:29:28 gibi I would say our gate is not in a great shape
11:29:37 gibi it is almost like we have a FF this week :)
11:33:10 gibi and one more functional instability bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2164893
11:35:04 gibi Uggla: ^^ things to raise about the gate on the meeting toda
11:35:05 gibi y
12:14:43 Uggla gibi 👍
13:12:22 elodilles stephenfin: sorry for pinging you, but you +2+W'd the master version of this trivial gate fix, so it would be awesome if you have a couple of mins to review the stable versions as well o:) https://review.opendev.org/q/I57d5e77056e643b821f1c26ae371e26c6df2f20a
13:13:12 stephenfin nw, done
13:18:35 elodilles thx \o/
13:23:59 opendevreview Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Replace StaticallyDelayingWrapper with futurist DelayingExecutor https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/997410
13:29:17 opendevreview Merged openstack/osc-placement stable/2025.1: [tox] Use constraints for requirements in docs job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/999815
13:34:32 opendevreview Merged openstack/osc-placement stable/2025.2: [tox] Use constraints for requirements in docs job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/999814
13:43:35 opendevreview Merged openstack/osc-placement stable/2026.1: [tox] Use constraints for requirements in docs job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/999813
13:46:11 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: libvirt: Add Intel TDX host capability detection https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994421
14:03:25 opendevreview Paweł Koniszewski proposed openstack/nova master: [WIP] Support AZ as a destination target for migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1002115
14:21:55 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: Report virtio-fs support for only qemu/kvm virt_type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/997818
14:21:56 opendevreview Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Remove redundant version check for remote managed ports https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/995160
14:54:55 gibi aaan one more bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2164912
14:56:26 dansmith gibi: you think all of these are related to graceful shutdown, more than just the obvious ones?
14:56:37 gibi just the obvious one
14:56:42 dansmith FWIW, I didn't hit any of these locally when I tried (and obviously they're not 100%)
14:56:43 dansmith okay
14:56:53 gibi yeah they are not 100%
14:56:57 gibi some more frequent than others
14:57:04 gibi I think the graceful one is the most frequent
14:57:36 gibi I'm just seeing these why trying to land the TDX series and reporting the unstable functional test visible there
14:57:53 gibi at some point I will start fixing them as well :)
14:58:16 gibi I guess at least some of them are threading related
15:03:05 gibi aaand one more :) https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2164914
15:08:07 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Switch Cyborg client from keystoneauth1 to openstacksdk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1002007
15:23:04 opendevreview melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: Switch Cyborg client from keystoneauth1 to openstacksdk https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1002007
15:26:11 sean-k-mooney melwitt: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/1002007/comment/1cab5aaa_0e65a66a/ unfortunetly the sdk patch is not correct
15:27:07 melwitt sean-k-mooney: argh :( ok thanks for catching that
15:27:37 sean-k-mooney i found it while rebaseing, for right now im goign to backout your patch so i can push an updated version of min against master
15:27:56 melwitt ok
15:28:03 sean-k-mooney i can rebase again once that is pushed if we want to pull back in the sdk change infront of it
15:31:17 melwitt sure. sorry about that
15:31:40 sean-k-mooney no worries, i actully had hit that issue locally before but forgot about it
15:31:51 sean-k-mooney its one of the reason i puhsed of using the sdk till after this feature
15:32:17 sean-k-mooney since we cant just use latest or a shared client today
15:32:25 sean-k-mooney we can make this work iwth the sdk
15:32:36 melwitt yeah ... I couldn't shake the feeling of the one-off microversion part so I wanted to see if there was a way to do this in a simple way
15:32:39 sean-k-mooney it just requies extra work
15:33:22 sean-k-mooney ya os because we never did microversion supprot in nova before we alwasy got 2.0 semantics
15:33:42 sean-k-mooney so we just need to properly suprpot the relevent microversions as part of the move
15:34:35 sean-k-mooney and until we supprot 2.1 that measn we cant use the admin client from the config
15:34:40 sean-k-mooney we have to use the user token
15:35:43 sean-k-mooney i hit all of these edgecase when trying to fix the cybrog cves at the start of the cycle and the srbac work after
15:36:27 melwitt I see :(
15:37:23 sean-k-mooney until nova supprots using the service/admin token (and 2.1 to pass the intened project id) cybrog has to supprot the user binding arqs
15:37:40 sean-k-mooney which is not correct longterm but just how it works today
15:38:13 sean-k-mooney i did the hackign thing we do for cidner and require that the user token is accompaine by a service user token with the service role
15:38:41 sean-k-mooney but long term that not ideal and just for upgrades
15:38:45 Uggla Reminder: upstream meeting in ~20mn
15:39:34 sean-k-mooney melwitt: i dont know that we need a ptg topic for this persay but its was a topic i wanted to look at next cycle
15:43:27 melwitt sean-k-mooney: I see, thanks
15:44:24 sean-k-mooney i am prepareing a seperate host ot test/validate the cybrog nvme work i can continue ot test with your patch and if its actully working end ot end then we could proceed with it

Earlier   Later