Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2026-08-03
15:17:07 dansmith your spec says "to prevent collisions" so that tells me there _would_ be problems
15:22:48 jgilaber yes, there would be problems indeed
15:24:57 dansmith okay I'm not really sure how we went wrong here... my point is that today they can't be mixed without problems, so there's no sort of "before" scenario we need to protect across an upgrade boundary,
15:25:21 dansmith just the after case where we need to make sure to never find cyborg devices *once* they start being reported
15:26:15 jgilaber in this concrete case, the version check is to avoid requiring the owner trait before it's added
15:26:42 jgilaber it protects against nova becoming unable to schedule resources, not against nova-cyborg conflicts
15:26:53 dansmith I guess doing a service version check to determine if we _can_ always select for OWNER_NOVA is okay, although it's sort of unfortunate to have to do that extra bit of expensive work
15:27:32 dansmith the assumption is that even if you never use cyborg, all nova's mdev devices will be reported with that trait henceforth so after we're past the upgrade boundary we can just always require that trait for everyone right?
15:28:12 jgilaber that's right
15:28:46 jgilaber althought the proposal was to add the trait to all nova resource providers, not only mdevs
15:35:04 lajoskatona sean-k-mooney: Hi, there is a patch ( https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/982085) for https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2051685 (After repeat of incomplete migration nova applies wrong (status=error) migration context in update_available_resource periodic job)
15:36:50 lajoskatona sean-k-mooney: and a reproducer functional test under the commit. As I remember we had a chance to have a short chat about it, if you have time can you please check it? Bence / rubasov started to work on it but He was moved to another project so I am kind of responsible for it now :)
15:38:42 Uggla Reminder, upstream meeting in ~20mn
16:00:10 Uggla #startmeeting nova
16:00:10 opendevmeet Meeting started Mon Aug 3 16:00:10 2026 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is Uggla. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot.
16:00:10 opendevmeet Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote.
16:00:10 opendevmeet The meeting name has been set to 'nova'
16:00:19 Uggla Hello everyone
16:00:34 bauzas o/ and welcome back
16:00:39 dansmith o/
16:00:40 elodilles o/
16:00:48 Leo[m] o/
16:01:07 tkajinam o/
16:01:21 lajoskatona o/
16:02:32 Uggla Let's start
16:02:47 Uggla #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:02:52 Uggla #info No Critical bug
16:03:02 Uggla #topic Gate status
16:03:10 Uggla #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs
16:03:19 Uggla #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal
16:03:26 Uggla #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&branch=stable%2F*&branch=master&pipeline=periodic-weekly&skip=0 Nova&Placement periodic jobs status
16:03:34 Uggla #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag.
16:03:39 Uggla #info Please try to provide a meaningful comment when you recheck
16:03:52 fwiesel o/
16:04:10 Uggla I have just look quickly at the gate. That looks ok. Anything to say ?
16:05:10 Uggla seems not, moving on
16:05:11 Uggla #topic Release Planning
16:05:19 Uggla #link https://releases.openstack.org/hibiscus/schedule.html
16:05:26 Uggla #info Nova deadlines are set in the above schedule
16:05:33 elodilles (just a heads-up that 2027.1 Indri release schedule is available: https://releases.openstack.org/indri/schedule.html )
16:05:34 Uggla #info PTG etherpad for 2026.2 is available: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.2-ptg
16:05:49 Uggla #info Tomorrow is first Nova Implementation Review Day
16:06:13 Uggla I think I'll have a look at the virtiofs cold migration.
16:06:36 Uggla #topic Review priorities
16:06:44 Uggla #link New file for Hibiscus https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.2-status
16:06:49 Uggla #info I have updated Launchpad and the above doc. Please ping me if you spot something missing.
16:06:55 Uggla #info Starting: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2026.2-status#L16 interesting bugs to review.
16:07:07 Uggla #topic Stable Branches
16:07:19 elodilles thanks
16:07:26 elodilles #info osc-placement's stable/2025.2 and stable/2025.1 gate is blocked by tox-docs job - fix: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/osc-placement/+/998816
16:07:42 elodilles i'll backport the fix when this has landed ^^^
16:07:50 elodilles #info other stable gates should be OK
16:07:59 elodilles at least i'm not aware of any issue
16:08:05 elodilles #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:08:26 Uggla thx elodilles
16:08:33 Uggla #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights
16:08:34 elodilles np
16:08:44 Uggla fwiesel, something to share ?
16:08:51 fwiesel Hi, no news from my side, except that I will be on PTO until September
16:09:07 Uggla thx, enjoy your PTO
16:09:11 fwiesel thx
16:09:47 Uggla #topic Kamil's news about eventlet removal
16:10:29 Uggla Neither Kamim not gibi are available today, but Kamil gave an update earlier:
16:10:35 Uggla Not much to update. This week's eventlet-removal work in Nova was dominated by test work: gibi is trying to make the functional-py313-threading job voting (#997216), while a refactor replacing StaticallyDelayingWrapper with a futurist-based executor (#997410) is under review
16:11:10 Uggla #topic Nova using openstack sdk for neutron
16:11:23 Uggla hello lajoskatona, something to share today ?
16:11:28 lajoskatona Hi,
16:12:03 lajoskatona the actually what I shared last week: I added option to SDK to have filtering option for fields
16:12:05 lajoskatona https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/995724
16:12:42 lajoskatona with this we can do the same low-cost API requestst toward Neutron like it happened with neutronclient
16:13:21 lajoskatona that's it actually for this topic from me
16:13:41 Uggla thx lajoskatona
16:13:52 Uggla #topic Confidential computing, status of SNP and TDX features
16:14:06 Uggla tkajinam, antia something you'd like to share ?
16:14:42 antia Got a TDX vm up and running. Will add some documentation to go with it.
16:14:56 Uggla antia cool !
16:15:42 tkajinam I've not yet checked https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999249 but will review it later this week
16:16:13 Uggla I understood SNP is merged now, so nothing remaining on that side ?
16:16:58 tkajinam yeah, nothing from nova's perspective
16:17:23 Uggla tkajinam cool thanks for all this work.
16:17:32 tkajinam though I've found a few problems with ovmf in ubuntu 26.04 package. in case anyoen is interested please check https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/edk2/+bug/2161231 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/edk2/+bug/2160129
16:17:42 tkajinam at this moment c10s would be a better choice, it seems
16:18:59 Uggla tkajinam good to know thanks
16:19:09 Uggla anything else ?
16:19:49 tkajinam nothing from my end
16:19:59 Uggla ok moving on
16:20:05 Uggla #topic Bug scrubbing
16:20:17 Uggla #info 80 open bugs
16:20:24 Uggla #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster
16:20:29 Uggla #link https://truc.uggla.fr/ to follow the trend.
16:20:34 Uggla Next meeting (this week): [public] Upstream bug triage. Wednesday, August 5th · 15:30 – 16:00 UTC. Video call link: meet.google.com/zjr-rxus-hzj
16:20:59 Uggla i'll try to sync it probably tomorrow.
16:21:10 Uggla #topic Open discussion
16:21:21 Uggla nothing listed on the agenda.
16:21:23 Leo[m] Hello. My apologies, I thought I added this to the open discussion agenda but it appears my change didn’t take. As was decided last week, I wrote a blueprint with possible ways to support hostname-based Ceph Mon references. Here is a link to the blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/hostname-mon-references. Please let me know what my next steps should be. Thank you for your time and attention
16:21:29 Uggla Something you'd like to discuss ?
16:22:38 Uggla if not I guess we are done for today.
16:23:02 Leo[m] Could we discuss what the next steps would be for the above ^^?
16:23:18 Uggla oh sorry Leo[m]
16:23:28 Uggla I thought it was from last week

Earlier   Later