| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-08-03 | |||
| 16:20:59 | Uggla | i'll try to sync it probably tomorrow. | |
| 16:21:10 | Uggla | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:21:21 | Uggla | nothing listed on the agenda. | |
| 16:21:23 | Leo[m] | Hello. My apologies, I thought I added this to the open discussion agenda but it appears my change didn’t take. As was decided last week, I wrote a blueprint with possible ways to support hostname-based Ceph Mon references. Here is a link to the blueprint: https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/hostname-mon-references. Please let me know what my next steps should be. Thank you for your time and attention | |
| 16:21:29 | Uggla | Something you'd like to discuss ? | |
| 16:22:38 | Uggla | if not I guess we are done for today. | |
| 16:23:02 | Leo[m] | Could we discuss what the next steps would be for the above ^^? | |
| 16:23:18 | Uggla | oh sorry Leo[m] | |
| 16:23:28 | Uggla | I thought it was from last week | |
| 16:23:46 | Leo[m] | Oh no worries | |
| 16:23:59 | Leo[m] | * Oh, no worries | |
| 16:24:48 | Uggla | I guess the next step it to have a spec, so it could be reviewed at the next PTG. | |
| 16:25:06 | Leo[m] | Sorry, what's a PTG? | |
| 16:25:06 | bauzas | we said last week we should discuss this whether it would be specless or not | |
| 16:25:30 | bauzas | but as we already said too, we're too late for this cycle | |
| 16:25:59 | Uggla | ok, so if specless, no spec required. | |
| 16:26:24 | Uggla | Leo[m], PTG is a long week meeting to prepare the tech topic for next cycle. | |
| 16:26:47 | Uggla | https://openinfra.org/ptg/ | |
| 16:27:17 | dansmith | feels like a spec is warranted, | |
| 16:27:30 | dansmith | because I dunno what would happen if someone flips that config on a live system with some existing instances, etc | |
| 16:27:40 | dansmith | and what upgrade requirements there should be | |
| 16:27:52 | dansmith | or what the implications of reading ceph.conf directly are | |
| 16:27:55 | bauzas | I wasn't saying this is specless, I was referring to the fact last week we were missing quorum | |
| 16:30:09 | Leo[m] | I can write a spec and do more testing on our end. Is there a gut-reaction preference to one of the options? | |
| 16:30:39 | dansmith | not option 3, IMHO | |
| 16:30:58 | dansmith | (gut reaction) | |
| 16:31:07 | Uggla | still no quorum today, but from Dan's questions I guess it would be good to have one. | |
| 16:31:15 | dansmith | but providing the pros/cons of each in the spec will help narrow down the right path | |
| 16:31:52 | tkajinam | +1 | |
| 16:32:18 | tkajinam | we discussed similar concerns during the previous meeting and indicated this may need a spec | |
| 16:32:44 | Leo[m] | Sounds good. Thank you | |
| 16:33:32 | Uggla | Leo[m] 👍 | |
| 16:33:38 | Uggla | something else ? | |
| 16:35:05 | Uggla | so this time I think we are good for today. | |
| 16:35:21 | Uggla | Thanks for joining this meeting. Have a nice day/evening. | |
| 16:35:27 | Uggla | #endmeeting | |
| 16:35:27 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Mon Aug 3 16:35:27 2026 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:35:27 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-08-03-16.00.html | |
| 16:35:27 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-08-03-16.00.txt | |
| 16:35:27 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-08-03-16.00.log.html | |
| 16:35:36 | elodilles | thanks o/ | |
| 16:35:51 | Leo[m] | thank you o/ | |
| 16:35:52 | lajoskatona | o/ | |
| 16:36:05 | tkajinam | thanks | |
| 18:11:11 | opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Fix deny_share host locality for NFS https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/998752 | |
| 18:11:11 | opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Extract share management from ComputeManager https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999349 | |
| 18:11:12 | opendevreview | Goutham Pacha Ravi proposed openstack/nova master: Support cold migration with virtiofs shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/989633 | |
| 19:54:21 | clif | I'm trying to run py3 tox target locally on latest master but I'm getting a lot (217) failed unit tests. Is there something I'm supposed to do besides git clone and then tox -epy3? | |
| 19:54:38 | clif | I've made sure I have a completely clean tree | |
| 19:55:02 | clif | One message I'm seeing a lot of in failures: "Exception: This test invokes builtins.open on /sys/module/kvm_amd/parameters/sev. It is bad, you should mock it." | |
| 20:22:46 | dansmith | clif: are you on something other than linux? although from the look of that, I'd guess maybe even being on linux but without SEV support you might hit that | |
| 20:22:50 | dansmith | I'd think the latter would affect CI though | |
| 20:23:36 | clif | linux, fedora specifically | |
| 20:24:33 | dansmith | ack, should work of course.. maybe hit tkajinam knows if something merged recently for the CC stuff that might be related | |
| 20:25:33 | clif | Is there a way to turn off or skip sev specific tests? I'm not familiar with the feature, I *am* running an AMD cpu | |
| 20:25:57 | clif | but a desktop chip, not EPYC | |
| 20:28:06 | JayF | I don't know if practices in Nova are different, but we'd also generally treat a non-mocked read of stuff outta /sys (or proc, or dev, or anything-local) in unit tests as a bug | |
| 20:28:10 | JayF | (in Ironic) | |
| 20:37:10 | dansmith | yep for sure, hence why I'm suggesting it might be a recent merge and the CC people might know of something obvious | |
| 23:20:58 | tkajinam | clif, which commit hash are you using ? | |
| 23:27:09 | clif | 39dc667a1f9a7c12814f5892b900462560b1a229 as of last attemp | |
| 23:35:42 | opendevreview | Seyeong Kim proposed openstack/nova stable/2026.1: Restore 'fork' start method for daemon mode on Python 3.14 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999667 | |
| 23:36:09 | opendevreview | Seyeong Kim proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Restore 'fork' start method for daemon mode on Python 3.14 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999668 | |
| 23:36:53 | opendevreview | Seyeong Kim proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Restore 'fork' start method for daemon mode on Python 3.14 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999669 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-08-04 | |||
| 00:20:10 | opendevreview | Seyeong Kim proposed openstack/nova stable/2026.1: Restore 'fork' start method for daemon mode on Python 3.14 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999667 | |
| 00:20:18 | opendevreview | Seyeong Kim proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Restore 'fork' start method for daemon mode on Python 3.14 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999668 | |
| 00:20:25 | opendevreview | Seyeong Kim proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Restore 'fork' start method for daemon mode on Python 3.14 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999669 | |
| 00:41:00 | opendevreview | Seyeong Kim proposed openstack/nova stable/2026.1: Restore 'fork' start method for daemon mode on Python 3.14 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999667 | |
| 00:41:13 | opendevreview | Seyeong Kim proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Restore 'fork' start method for daemon mode on Python 3.14 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999668 | |
| 00:41:21 | opendevreview | Seyeong Kim proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Restore 'fork' start method for daemon mode on Python 3.14 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999669 | |
| 00:41:49 | opendevreview | Seyeong Kim proposed openstack/nova master: Avoid serializing orphaned instance in log https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/992574 | |
| 00:42:44 | opendevreview | Seyeong Kim proposed openstack/nova master: Avoid serializing orphaned instance in log https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/992574 | |
| 00:46:14 | opendevreview | Seyeong Kim proposed openstack/nova master: Avoid serializing orphaned instance in log https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/992574 | |
| 00:47:03 | opendevreview | Seyeong Kim proposed openstack/nova stable/2026.1: Restore 'fork' start method for daemon mode on Python 3.14 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999667 | |
| 00:47:04 | opendevreview | Seyeong Kim proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Restore 'fork' start method for daemon mode on Python 3.14 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999668 | |
| 00:47:11 | opendevreview | Seyeong Kim proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.1: Restore 'fork' start method for daemon mode on Python 3.14 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999669 | |
| 07:48:26 | opendevreview | Joan Gilabert proposed openstack/nova master: Report OWNER_NOVA trait on resource providers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994299 | |
| 07:48:26 | opendevreview | Joan Gilabert proposed openstack/nova master: Add libvirt driver MDEV ARQ support for Cyborg https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/995840 | |
| 08:07:33 | opendevreview | Joan Gilabert proposed openstack/nova master: Report OWNER_NOVA trait on resource providers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994299 | |
| 08:07:34 | opendevreview | Joan Gilabert proposed openstack/nova master: Add libvirt driver MDEV ARQ support for Cyborg https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/995840 | |
| 08:36:44 | gibi | bauzas: could you look back at you gpu doc patch we have some question there https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999607 | |
| 08:37:52 | bauzas | gibi: you're making a great point, this is not only for vfio-mdev but also for vfio-pci variant driver migrations | |
| 08:38:33 | bauzas | I'll amend the doc patch to mention vfio-pci too | |
| 09:19:31 | opendevreview | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Document postcopy incompatibility with vGPU live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999607 | |
| 09:45:16 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: you or cursor added "Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>" that wrong, but otherwise the commit looks fine to me | |
| 09:45:27 | bauzas | doh | |
| 09:45:35 | bauzas | I'll change that | |
| 09:46:28 | opendevreview | Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: doc: Document postcopy incompatibility with vGPU live migration https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/999607 | |
| 09:46:46 | sean-k-mooney | thanks | |
| 09:48:35 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: speaking of gpus i have some cyborg related gpu patches that i would like to progress on the nova side. | |
| 09:49:09 | sean-k-mooney | if i can find them again :) | |
| 09:49:36 | sean-k-mooney | ah yes https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22bp/support-vfio-variant-driver-managed-mode-via-cyborg%22 | |
| 09:49:52 | bauzas | no promises I can review them but I'll try | |
| 09:49:55 | sean-k-mooney | im going to be rebasing those later today | |
| 09:51:03 | sean-k-mooney | i basically have 6 patches in nova that i want to try an land this cycle, those 2 for vfio-varitnt driver suport via cybrog | |
| 09:51:25 | sean-k-mooney | 2 patches that jgilaber is creating for time sliced gpus (vfio-mdev) | |
| 09:51:38 | sean-k-mooney | and then 2 for ironci start up time | |
| 09:52:11 | sean-k-mooney | if you have time to look at any of those that woudl be great if not i will try and follow up with other to land them in time | |
| 09:52:12 | bauzas | okay, I'm pretty busy before my two-week PTO which will be on next Tuesday but I'll definitely try | |
| 09:52:29 | bauzas | thanks for the effortd | |