| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-07-13 | |||
| 16:24:31 | sean-k-mooney | and the dynamic one has some pathalogicl behvior with small short lived tasks | |
| 16:24:33 | gibi | Kamil's work https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/futurist/+/975508 Sean's work https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/futurist/+/975508 | |
| 16:25:25 | sean-k-mooney | im goign to bring the 2 bugfixes to the front and leave the larger effincy feature to the end of my work | |
| 16:25:26 | gmaan | sean-k-mooney: this series? #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/futurist/+/996817/1 | |
| 16:25:40 | gmaan | can you add a single topic/hashtag, I will add those in my list | |
| 16:25:42 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/futurist/+/996574/1 | |
| 16:25:46 | sean-k-mooney | that was the end of the serise | |
| 16:26:04 | sean-k-mooney | gmaan: ya i can git-reivew nolonger does that by default | |
| 16:26:06 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: make sense pulling the bugfixes in front, thanks | |
| 16:26:29 | gibi | that is my eventlet update. Anything else on eventlet? | |
| 16:26:30 | gmaan | but can you add somewere which one is must for bug fixes and others are improvement? | |
| 16:26:47 | sean-k-mooney | gmaan: yep ill do that when i clean up the seriese | |
| 16:26:52 | tkajinam | I guess https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/futurist/+/996568 is must-have | |
| 16:26:52 | gmaan | thanks | |
| 16:26:55 | tkajinam | seeing the closes-bug tag | |
| 16:27:07 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/futurist/+/996574/1/tools/threadpool_executor_benchmark_report.md is not intened to be meged but its ased on the testing i was doing | |
| 16:27:07 | tkajinam | and its parent is reproducer | |
| 16:27:15 | gibi | tkajinam: yepp | |
| 16:27:29 | sean-k-mooney | tkajinam: ya i need to file a second bug for the second isseu i found | |
| 16:27:39 | gmaan | because that will be needed/helpful for graceful shutdown also | |
| 16:27:47 | sean-k-mooney | and ill add the relevent metadta in the commits | |
| 16:27:53 | gibi | awesome | |
| 16:28:13 | tkajinam | sounds good | |
| 16:28:17 | gibi | moving on | |
| 16:28:19 | gibi | #topic Nova using openstack sdk for neutron | |
| 16:28:30 | gibi | I think Lajos is off this week | |
| 16:28:32 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/futurist/+/996573/1 is the second bugfix by the way | |
| 16:28:41 | sean-k-mooney | anyway moving on | |
| 16:29:08 | gibi | anybody has any update on the SDKifying work? | |
| 16:29:27 | elodilles | nope | |
| 16:29:29 | sean-k-mooney | i have not looked at it in about 2 weeks | |
| 16:29:41 | gibi | OK moving on then | |
| 16:29:43 | gibi | #topic Ironic review priorities | |
| 16:29:52 | gibi | anything stuck with ironic? | |
| 16:30:19 | sean-k-mooney | https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22startup-time%22 could be worth looking at :) | |
| 16:31:01 | gibi | I made some review there and will contineu | |
| 16:31:07 | sean-k-mooney | thanks | |
| 16:31:32 | sean-k-mooney | the first 4 patches are the important ones | |
| 16:31:43 | gibi | OK | |
| 16:31:50 | sean-k-mooney | the simulator and docs are useful but not strictly needed | |
| 16:32:22 | gibi | #topic Confidential computing, status of SNP and TDX features | |
| 16:32:35 | gibi | tkajinam: antia: any news? | |
| 16:33:48 | tkajinam | based on the agreement about the way to detect SNP support in host, I've updated the whole implementation chain. | |
| 16:33:55 | tkajinam | the agreement is being captured in this spec update https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/996394 | |
| 16:34:44 | gibi | ohh I need to jump on that spec update as well. thanks for the reminder. | |
| 16:34:55 | gibi | I looked that the SNP series today and I'm happy with it | |
| 16:35:39 | tkajinam | I think we are concluding the implementation so any final feedback is welcome. I saw Hiroki also voted his +1 so I believe he is agreeing with the direction, too (though I'm struggling to catch up with him honestly) | |
| 16:35:56 | gibi | tkajinam: good call | |
| 16:36:31 | gibi | I don't see antia on IRC today and the intel TDX series not moved yet | |
| 16:36:42 | tkajinam | yeah | |
| 16:36:49 | gibi | so I'm getting a bit worried about progress there | |
| 16:37:02 | gibi | I will try to reach out to antia during the week | |
| 16:37:34 | gibi | anything else about confidential computing features? | |
| 16:38:18 | tkajinam | nothing else from my end | |
| 16:38:29 | gibi | I skip bug scrubbing as I have no new data since last week | |
| 16:38:37 | gibi | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:38:42 | gibi | #link https://truc.uggla.fr/ | |
| 16:38:54 | gibi | these links should have up to date stats and work assignment | |
| 16:39:04 | gibi | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:39:25 | gibi | Uggla is off for 3 weeks. bauzas will drive the next two IRC meetings | |
| 16:39:31 | gibi | any other topic to cover today? | |
| 16:41:05 | tkajinam | quick one | |
| 16:41:09 | gibi | antia: Hi! lets quickly get back to you. Is there any news on the intel TDX series? | |
| 16:42:03 | antia | Hi! Sorry for being late. Nothing mayor, had quite the busy downstream week but made some progress on parts of the series | |
| 16:42:22 | gibi | antia: feel free to push even a half working stuff so that we can start giving guidance | |
| 16:42:23 | antia | One problem I faced was when rebasing the patches and uploading to Gerrit | |
| 16:43:10 | antia | Is it normal to have the changes be pushed to the other series as well? | |
| 16:43:37 | sean-k-mooney | it depends on your local git tree | |
| 16:43:54 | gibi | antia: you can place your stuff on other people's changes just be careful not to change their commits | |
| 16:44:18 | antia | so as long as the commits remain unchanged it should be fine? | |
| 16:44:18 | sean-k-mooney | when you do that its best to do "git review -R" | |
| 16:44:47 | gibi | antia: yes | |
| 16:44:56 | sean-k-mooney | yes although normlalyits best to work off master when possible unless your cordianting with the other person | |
| 16:45:11 | sean-k-mooney | we stack changes if they have a natual depency | |
| 16:45:13 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: here we coordinating as the two series are in conflict | |
| 16:45:20 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 16:45:26 | gibi | touching the same enum, etc | |
| 16:45:47 | antia | then it looks correctly, Gerrit just gives a scary warning :) | |
| 16:45:59 | gibi | antia: what warning? :) | |
| 16:46:24 | tkajinam | I guess it warns multiple commits are being proposed | |
| 16:47:00 | antia | yes exactly | |
| 16:47:02 | tkajinam | nothing (except for topic, which we can fix easily) should be changed unless you edit the existing commits | |
| 16:47:54 | tkajinam | or we could even revert the series back to the previous patch sets | |
| 16:48:52 | gibi | antia: double check that the hash the last commit from tkajinam in your local tree is the same as the latest from gerrit. I.e. to see if tkajinam pushed a new version of his patch in the meantime | |
| 16:49:16 | antia | Yes will do that before uploading | |
| 16:49:29 | gibi | if you are unsure then just drop the git log --oneline output to some 18:42 < antia> Hi! Sorry for being late. Nothing mayor, had quite the busy downstream week but made some progress on parts of the series | |
| 16:49:33 | gibi | sorry | |
| 16:49:40 | gibi | wrong copy-paste buffer | |
| 16:50:01 | gibi | so git log --oneline output to https://paste.openstack.org/ and we can help | |
| 16:50:29 | gibi | anyhow running out of time and tkajinam had another topic | |
| 16:50:34 | gibi | tkajinam: go ahead | |
| 16:51:01 | tkajinam | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/995620 | |
| 16:51:36 | tkajinam | I happened to find that in review queue and was involved in its review. it seems we likely need a new image prop. | |
| 16:52:01 | gibi | is this a new feature? | |
| 16:52:14 | tkajinam | I'm wondering which process should we follow now.(spec or specless bp) | |
| 16:52:29 | gibi | we are late for either at this point | |
| 16:52:30 | tkajinam | the new image prop to enable a new hyper-v enlightenment feature | |
| 16:52:54 | tkajinam | yeah I thought so, but just wanted to hear opinion from others for double-check | |
| 16:53:30 | tkajinam | ok I'll leave such comment in review. thanks (I'm unsure if the onwer is in irc) | |
| 16:53:55 | gibi | I think it might qualify for specless in Indri but we have to wait | |