| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-07-13 | |||
| 16:38:54 | gibi | these links should have up to date stats and work assignment | |
| 16:39:04 | gibi | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:39:25 | gibi | Uggla is off for 3 weeks. bauzas will drive the next two IRC meetings | |
| 16:39:31 | gibi | any other topic to cover today? | |
| 16:41:05 | tkajinam | quick one | |
| 16:41:09 | gibi | antia: Hi! lets quickly get back to you. Is there any news on the intel TDX series? | |
| 16:42:03 | antia | Hi! Sorry for being late. Nothing mayor, had quite the busy downstream week but made some progress on parts of the series | |
| 16:42:22 | gibi | antia: feel free to push even a half working stuff so that we can start giving guidance | |
| 16:42:23 | antia | One problem I faced was when rebasing the patches and uploading to Gerrit | |
| 16:43:10 | antia | Is it normal to have the changes be pushed to the other series as well? | |
| 16:43:37 | sean-k-mooney | it depends on your local git tree | |
| 16:43:54 | gibi | antia: you can place your stuff on other people's changes just be careful not to change their commits | |
| 16:44:18 | antia | so as long as the commits remain unchanged it should be fine? | |
| 16:44:18 | sean-k-mooney | when you do that its best to do "git review -R" | |
| 16:44:47 | gibi | antia: yes | |
| 16:44:56 | sean-k-mooney | yes although normlalyits best to work off master when possible unless your cordianting with the other person | |
| 16:45:11 | sean-k-mooney | we stack changes if they have a natual depency | |
| 16:45:13 | gibi | sean-k-mooney: here we coordinating as the two series are in conflict | |
| 16:45:20 | sean-k-mooney | ack | |
| 16:45:26 | gibi | touching the same enum, etc | |
| 16:45:47 | antia | then it looks correctly, Gerrit just gives a scary warning :) | |
| 16:45:59 | gibi | antia: what warning? :) | |
| 16:46:24 | tkajinam | I guess it warns multiple commits are being proposed | |
| 16:47:00 | antia | yes exactly | |
| 16:47:02 | tkajinam | nothing (except for topic, which we can fix easily) should be changed unless you edit the existing commits | |
| 16:47:54 | tkajinam | or we could even revert the series back to the previous patch sets | |
| 16:48:52 | gibi | antia: double check that the hash the last commit from tkajinam in your local tree is the same as the latest from gerrit. I.e. to see if tkajinam pushed a new version of his patch in the meantime | |
| 16:49:16 | antia | Yes will do that before uploading | |
| 16:49:29 | gibi | if you are unsure then just drop the git log --oneline output to some 18:42 < antia> Hi! Sorry for being late. Nothing mayor, had quite the busy downstream week but made some progress on parts of the series | |
| 16:49:33 | gibi | sorry | |
| 16:49:40 | gibi | wrong copy-paste buffer | |
| 16:50:01 | gibi | so git log --oneline output to https://paste.openstack.org/ and we can help | |
| 16:50:29 | gibi | anyhow running out of time and tkajinam had another topic | |
| 16:50:34 | gibi | tkajinam: go ahead | |
| 16:51:01 | tkajinam | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/995620 | |
| 16:51:36 | tkajinam | I happened to find that in review queue and was involved in its review. it seems we likely need a new image prop. | |
| 16:52:01 | gibi | is this a new feature? | |
| 16:52:14 | tkajinam | I'm wondering which process should we follow now.(spec or specless bp) | |
| 16:52:29 | gibi | we are late for either at this point | |
| 16:52:30 | tkajinam | the new image prop to enable a new hyper-v enlightenment feature | |
| 16:52:54 | tkajinam | yeah I thought so, but just wanted to hear opinion from others for double-check | |
| 16:53:30 | tkajinam | ok I'll leave such comment in review. thanks (I'm unsure if the onwer is in irc) | |
| 16:53:55 | gibi | I think it might qualify for specless in Indri but we have to wait | |
| 16:54:18 | gibi | anything else before we close the meeting? | |
| 16:54:29 | tkajinam | nothing else from me ! | |
| 16:55:01 | gibi | #endmeeting | |
| 16:55:01 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Mon Jul 13 16:55:01 2026 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:55:01 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-07-13-16.00.html | |
| 16:55:01 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-07-13-16.00.txt | |
| 16:55:01 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2026/nova.2026-07-13-16.00.log.html | |
| 16:55:05 | gibi | thanks folks | |
| 16:55:11 | gibi | antia: we can continue | |
| 16:55:19 | elodilles | thanks too o/ | |
| 16:55:21 | tkajinam | thanks ! | |
| 16:59:10 | antia | gibi: here is gitlog and gerrit warning https://paste.openstack.org/show/b3hGRYq7qtxpuY2DRUpk/ | |
| 16:59:27 | sean-k-mooney | gibi: tkajinam so speaking of conflict im inclinet too say since i need to rebase my change anyway lets just land https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994342 | |
| 16:59:42 | sean-k-mooney | so im going to go review that properly now with that in mind | |
| 16:59:58 | sean-k-mooney | well | |
| 17:00:26 | sean-k-mooney | im still not sure about the new is_supported_mem_encryption_model fucntion and if its ok to remvoe that again | |
| 17:01:23 | tkajinam | checking | |
| 17:02:25 | sean-k-mooney | antia: so if you did "git review -R" that disables rebasing in git review | |
| 17:02:35 | gibi | eb455009ac this is an old version of tkajinam's series | |
| 17:02:43 | sean-k-mooney | antia: so provided you didnt already rebase the inital commits in the series they wont be updated | |
| 17:03:03 | antia | I need to update this based on the changes | |
| 17:03:51 | gibi | (in pure git without git review, this means pulling the ps 13 from https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/994764 and rebasing your commit on top) | |
| 17:04:12 | tkajinam | sean-k-mooney, hmm a problem is that memory encryption support is not in driver capabilities yet. we could add it but that'd be removed later once start up check is delegated to drivers. | |
| 17:05:43 | antia | yes I rebased in pure git before so it is just about rebasing with the new ps | |
| 17:05:50 | tkajinam | sean-k-mooney, are you ok if I propose a follow-up to add that capability ? though I'd abandon that once your validation delegation is merged. | |
| 17:06:28 | sean-k-mooney | adding and removing a cpablity is cheaper then a dirver function | |
| 17:06:51 | sean-k-mooney | but once we add and remove either i think and dont do a release in between we are sort of ok | |
| 17:07:19 | sean-k-mooney | there wont have been a release for any one to depend on it | |
| 17:07:30 | sean-k-mooney | so no need for deprecation of your new methond | |
| 17:07:52 | sean-k-mooney | i just want to make sure other agree that i can jsut delete is as part fo the refactor | |
| 17:15:19 | gibi | antia: yepp one more rebase :) | |
| 17:16:16 | antia | I think it is clear then :) | |
| 17:16:44 | antia | I'll ask again if I run into something else | |
| 17:18:08 | gibi | antia: sure | |
| 17:36:40 | tkajinam | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/builds?job_name=nova-alt-configurations&project=openstack/nova | |
| 17:37:09 | tkajinam | it seems nova-alt-configurations POST_FAILURE is now broken now due to missing cinder service | |
| 17:42:47 | tkajinam | https://bugs.launchpad.net/python-openstackclient/+bug/2160553 | |
| 17:45:06 | melwitt | OSC server create requires cinder? that seems ... wrong | |
| 17:47:59 | tkajinam | yeah | |
| 17:48:37 | tkajinam | I roughly suspect it is an regression caused by https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/994996 | |
| 17:54:42 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Testing https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/997104 | |
| 17:55:24 | tkajinam | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/python-openstackclient/+/996626 | |
| 17:55:30 | tkajinam | oh slawek already proposed a fix | |
| 17:56:33 | melwitt | ahh nice | |
| 18:03:03 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova stable/2026.1: Make QEMU_IMG_LIMITS process limits configurable https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/997027 | |
| 18:03:19 | sean-k-mooney | melwitt: elodilles if that work for you ill update the rest | |
| 18:03:46 | sean-k-mooney | although ill probly to the rest tomorrow | |
| 18:03:53 | sean-k-mooney | so no rush | |
| 18:05:12 | melwitt | cool thanks sean-k-mooney, will review | |
| 18:31:24 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Speed up functional test in threading mode https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/996500 | |
| 20:05:10 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Delegate startup instance processing to drivers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/990552 | |
| 20:07:43 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Add vTPM startup validation reproducer https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/990551 | |
| 20:07:44 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Delegate startup instance processing to drivers https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/990552 | |
| 20:07:44 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Reduce ProviderTree copy cost for Ironic https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/980676 | |
| 20:08:29 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: Parallelize per-node resource updates https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/980679 | |
| 20:08:59 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: perf: add ironic startup performance simulator https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/980641 | |
| 20:09:00 | opendevreview | sean mooney proposed openstack/nova master: docs: add Ironic startup performance measurements https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/980680 | |