| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2026-04-28 | |||
| 17:55:02 | sean-k-mooney | i mean that works. it shoudl get added into the devstack roels | |
| 17:55:12 | sean-k-mooney | but we can figure that out now that we have a working baseline | |
| 17:56:01 | melwitt | yeah that was my thinking. hack it for the POC but then propose them in the proper places if it got to working | |
| 17:57:01 | sean-k-mooney | as long as we are calling it a hack im ok with it if we call it a tempory solution it will out live cochroaches | |
| 17:57:06 | melwitt | claude thought some of it should go under openstack/zuul-jobs so maybe that's true, maybe it isn't haha | |
| 17:57:14 | sean-k-mooney | tempory colution that work never get fixed | |
| 17:57:23 | sean-k-mooney | melwitt: yes some of it should | |
| 17:57:44 | sean-k-mooney | we do the multi node bridge configuraiton in zuul/zuul-jobs | |
| 17:58:10 | sean-k-mooney | https://opendev.org/zuul/zuul-jobs/src/branch/master/roles/multi-node-bridge | |
| 17:58:16 | melwitt | yeah. I just didn't want to make the depends-on web really big while I was trial-and-erroring on it | |
| 17:58:18 | melwitt | yes exactly what it was saying | |
| 17:58:21 | sean-k-mooney | so we shudl proably make that proply do ipv6 as well | |
| 17:58:30 | melwitt | yes exactly | |
| 17:58:46 | sean-k-mooney | https://opendev.org/zuul/zuul-jobs/src/branch/master/roles/multi-node-bridge/tasks/switch.yaml | |
| 17:59:09 | sean-k-mooney | same for the host file https://opendev.org/zuul/zuul-jobs/src/branch/master/roles/multi-node-hosts-file/tasks/main.yaml | |
| 18:00:00 | melwitt | I cloned all of the relevant repos and claude knew where stuff should go, which was really cool considering I would have zero idea. I know you told me first but I also had claude look at all of it locally and it made all of the connections between them | |
| 18:00:27 | sean-k-mooney | so if you want to see a beautful hack that i have not updated in a long time | |
| 18:00:50 | melwitt | sure | |
| 18:00:54 | sean-k-mooney | https://github.com/SeanMooney/ard/tree/master/molecule | |
| 18:01:03 | sean-k-mooney | so i dont know if you knwo what molecule is | |
| 18:01:09 | sean-k-mooney | btu its how you test ansible | |
| 18:01:19 | sean-k-mooney | https://github.com/SeanMooney/ard/blob/master/molecule/default/molecule.yml | |
| 18:01:33 | sean-k-mooney | i defiend a moluel role using vagrnat/libvtr/qemu | |
| 18:01:35 | JayF | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/983753 this is a high quality change to the Ironic virt driver which would have a significant impact on Ironic users, it's also simpler and easy to understand than most ironic virt driver changes. Your attention would be appreciated :D | |
| 18:01:51 | sean-k-mooney | that create a contoler and comptue and then runs the devstack ansible playbooks form the ci jobs on them | |
| 18:02:23 | melwitt | no I didn't know what molecule is. I had heard you say it before but I never knew what you were talking about haha | |
| 18:02:24 | sean-k-mooney | so you can do molecule up adn it will use the ci roles to deploy a 2 node devstack | |
| 18:02:45 | melwitt | ahh that's pretty cool | |
| 18:03:02 | sean-k-mooney | melwitt: i used to ocationlly use it to test jobs changes locally | |
| 18:03:24 | sean-k-mooney | JayF: ay yes that woudl be good to do and yes its pretty simple | |
| 18:04:15 | sean-k-mooney | melwitt: i should see if it still work, but you could point it at phsyicla system too and just run it | |
| 18:04:15 | JayF | you also got a 3-in-1 ironic cores review on it (me/cli.f/ci.d in a GR-OSS team review) | |
| 18:04:26 | JayF | although admittedly some % of that time was spent explaining resechedules in nova :D | |
| 18:04:47 | sean-k-mooney | JayF: technially they nolonger exist | |
| 18:04:54 | sean-k-mooney | we replaced it with alternitive hosts | |
| 18:05:04 | sean-k-mooney | so we can aovid going back to the schduler | |
| 18:05:10 | JayF | is there a meaningful difference from an Ironic standpoint? | |
| 18:05:17 | sean-k-mooney | no | |
| 18:05:29 | sean-k-mooney | the diffent is es dont goback to the chsduelr if ther first host fails | |
| 18:05:35 | JayF | Nice, so you just get to avoid the double dip in the scheduler | |
| 18:05:41 | sean-k-mooney | we callulate alterntive in advnace and just select the next one | |
| 18:05:46 | sean-k-mooney | yep | |
| 18:05:51 | JayF | if those alternatives are scheduled to in the meantime | |
| 18:06:08 | sean-k-mooney | the allcoation fails super early adn we go to the next one | |
| 18:06:15 | JayF | ack, so it is a meaningful change for Ironic users :) | |
| 18:06:26 | sean-k-mooney | basiclly the first thing we do is see if the canidate allcation is still valid and if not we go to the next | |
| 18:06:32 | JayF | there's nearly zero chance that after a timed out deployment (hours) those allocs would still be valid | |
| 18:07:00 | sean-k-mooney | well perhasp but this also changed in like pike or rocky | |
| 18:07:26 | sean-k-mooney | it was part fo the cell_v2 work | |
| 18:07:32 | JayF | Nice to know, albeit WAY too late, about the behavior though. Could be surprising for an Ironic user. | |
| 18:08:06 | JayF | (I'm not saying you all had some responsibility to tell us; mainly annoyed I've had a flawed mental model for bordering-on a decade) | |
| 18:09:51 | JayF | cid: clif: Worth reading the backlog if you wanna fill in the gaps around how retrying actually works now ^^^ | |
| 18:15:15 | dansmith | yeah I think at this point it has worked that way for longer than it worked the other way :) | |
| 18:16:30 | JayF | dansmith: I still find myself un-learning things that I "learned" from the old, hacked to @%$! cloud at my first OpenStack employer :) | |
| 18:16:43 | JayF | this is added to the list, a good 12 years later :( | |
| 19:05:08 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Increase wait retries for resize reschedule with qos port test https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986468 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2026-04-29 | |||
| 01:18:32 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test removal of enforce_scope https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986479 | |
| 01:24:01 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: performance: reduce calls to libvirt / add caching https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/922855 | |
| 01:24:15 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: ironic: Abort build on fatal image validation errors https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/983753 | |
| 01:24:29 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/2025.2: fix: device_by_alias should respect config type https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984920 | |
| 01:24:40 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/2025.1: api: Handle empty imageRef alongside null for local BDM check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/980541 | |
| 01:24:52 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/2024.2: Reproduce bug/2115905 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960244 | |
| 01:25:02 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/2024.2: [PCI tracker]Remove non configured devs when freed https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960245 | |
| 01:25:14 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/2024.2: [pci]Keep used dev in Placement regardless of dev_spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960246 | |
| 04:02:45 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Standardize the service-to-service communication https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986590 | |
| 04:05:49 | opendevreview | Ghanshyam Maan proposed openstack/nova master: Standardize the service-to-service communication https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986590 | |
| 06:24:58 | opendevreview | Nilesh Thathagar proposed openstack/nova master: Dell PowerFlex: Pass requested_size to os-brick on extend https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986604 | |
| 07:12:25 | opendevreview | Philipp Dreesens proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Add spec for bidirectional RPC liveness handshake https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/984384 | |
| 07:59:18 | opendevreview | Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova stable/2026.1: Doc: add short doc section for mdev_class https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986618 | |
| 08:30:03 | opendevreview | Ashish Gupta proposed openstack/nova master: Disable greenlet-based notifier sender check under native threading temporarily https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/985621 | |
| 11:18:47 | elodilles | Uggla: hi, this is just a heads up, that i might not be able to join to today's bug roster meeting, i've added comments/question to my bugs to those i had time to look at. | |
| 11:36:55 | opendevreview | Kamil Sambor proposed openstack/nova master: Change nova-alt-configurations job https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/983179 | |
| 11:52:05 | gibi | Uggla: have to say the same unfortunately | |
| 11:55:52 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Test nova CLI commands with native threading https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/984036 | |
| 13:36:52 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Doc: fix misleading PCI address in multi-VF example https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986650 | |
| 13:57:22 | sambork | @Uggla: Hey, Same here (in case of bug triage) i have updated the etherpad; two ofthe bugs are duplicates, and i'm currently trying to create a reproducer for the third one | |
| 13:57:46 | Uggla | sambork ok no problem. | |
| 14:12:01 | opendevreview | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/nova master: Fix invalid jsonschema for keypair list response https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986660 | |
| 14:17:06 | opendevreview | ribaudr proposed openstack/nova-specs master: WIP: Support different resource classes for VFs on the same PF https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/986661 | |
| 14:36:39 | opendevreview | Artem Goncharov proposed openstack/nova master: Fix invalid jsonschema for keypair list response https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986660 | |
| 14:37:54 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova master: Drop redundant N371 check https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/972302 | |
| 15:08:02 | stephenfin | gmaan: Looks like gtema found a bug in the keypair JSON schema spec, if you've time to take a look https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986660 | |
| 15:18:11 | melwitt | bauzas: hey do you think you might be able to take a look at the bottom 3 patches for vtpm prep? it's a follow up and two small things that got split out during code review. dansmith has reviewed them https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/978836 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/983504 and https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/983505 | |
| 15:18:56 | gmaan | stephenfin: done, saw from gerrit email | |
| 15:18:57 | bauzas | melwitt: not sure I'll have time, but I'll try | |
| 15:19:10 | stephenfin | gmaan++ ty 🙏 | |
| 15:20:19 | melwitt | bauzas: ack thanks | |
| 15:21:05 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova master: libvirt: Use native IntOpt for tx_queue_size and rx_queue_size https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969014 | |
| 15:32:27 | gmaan | melwitt: stephenfin sean-k-mooney gibi bauzas dansmith Uggla, As we were not able to discuss the 'standardization of service-to-service communication' topic in PTG, I am proposing it in gerrit, please check when you have time https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/986590 | |
| 15:32:48 | gmaan | I am not in hurry to merge it but would like to get a kind of team agreement on it | |
| 15:33:49 | sean-k-mooney | gmaan: ack. to soften my stand a bit. it may be ok to use the service_user section as a fall back ot create teh user token for requst made by nova on behalvf of a user. but it idally shoudl not be the only way | |
| 15:33:58 | gmaan | sean-k-mooney: I think it is aligned what you were suggesting but I am adding a fallback to service_user which you objected to use for service calling | |
| 15:34:17 | gmaan | sean-k-mooney: yeah | |
| 15:34:25 | sean-k-mooney | the reason im brinign that up is we know that cern and other have one nova that talks to neutron in 3 regions | |
| 15:34:52 | sean-k-mooney | so we can assume that all service a given compute host talks to are in the same region or use the same CA for tls ectra | |
| 15:35:24 | sean-k-mooney | so each service nova talsk to shoudl ahve its onw cofnig section with the common keystone auth optiosn in it | |
| 15:35:25 | gmaan | sean-k-mooney: and i ack your concern for devstack bug for mess up on configuring service users which I will take up as a separate things to solve, I can work on that when get time | |
| 15:35:35 | sean-k-mooney | and then and only then fallback to service_user | |
| 15:37:03 | bauzas | do people know that we have upstream bug triage discussion at the moment ? | |
| 15:37:12 | bauzas | I don't see Uggla telling about it | |