Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2025-12-15
16:33:47 Uggla tkajinam, please go ahead with your topics.
16:33:52 bauzas +1, you'll help me finishing my paperwork tasks, like some yearly compliance check :)
16:34:00 tkajinam Uggla, thx
16:34:09 tkajinam #link https://lists.openstack.org/archives/list/openstack-discuss@lists.openstack.org/thread/KVXZIET5ZK3C6I7S45O4WWYPGBVFDIWC/
16:34:31 tkajinam we are updating whereto (the library to generate rewrite rules) to use PCRE2 instead of PCRE(3)
16:34:53 tkajinam this is required because modern OS versions like debian trixie and centos stream 10 no longer ships PCRE(3)
16:35:37 tkajinam once a new release is out, we have to update the package in bindep.txt accordingly. the release is still pending but I need some attention to merge the required updates.
16:35:42 tkajinam will ping people in this channel then
16:35:46 gibi tkajinam: hit me with links to review
16:36:14 tkajinam gibi, thx ! the nova changes are not yet prepared but will do once I create ones
16:36:31 gibi cool
16:36:42 tkajinam #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/970638
16:36:44 gibi thanks for handling the situation
16:36:47 tkajinam this is the release patch. just fyi
16:36:55 bauzas ack
16:37:20 tkajinam moving on to the second one.
16:37:23 gibi there is not many things better than a dependency hell for Christmass
16:37:29 bauzas \o/
16:37:33 tkajinam :-P
16:37:38 elodilles :]
16:37:42 tkajinam #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2122288
16:38:05 tkajinam it seems recent update in noble introduced the rom type ovmf firmware which is breaking the existing firmware detection logic
16:38:37 tkajinam this is eventually fixed by my work to use libvirt's selection but we likely need a quick workaround which is backportable.
16:38:52 tkajinam I've prepared https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/968942 for it. Any feedback is appreciated.
16:39:16 tkajinam that's all. I might ask these early next year too.
16:39:20 gibi tkajinam: I will review it tomorrow
16:39:31 tkajinam gibi, thx !
16:39:39 gibi I agree we need a fix as we want to backport
16:39:52 Uggla tkajinam, no promises, I'll try to review too.
16:39:55 gibi your new work probably not something we considered backporting yet
16:40:10 tkajinam gibi, yeah. that's too large for backport IMHO.
16:40:17 tkajinam Uggla, thank you!
16:41:03 Uggla something else you'd like to discuss.
16:41:29 tkajinam nothing else from my end :-)
16:42:47 gibi nothing here either
16:43:36 Uggla Ok tbh I'm a bit down today. So unless you'd like to discuss an important bug. I propose to have the bug scrubbing beginning of 2026 and close now.
16:43:58 Uggla ok .
16:43:59 Uggla ?
16:44:18 tkajinam +1
16:44:20 elodilles +1
16:44:29 elodilles Uggla: get well soon
16:44:58 Uggla elodilles, just a little tired by previous week, nothing serious.
16:45:17 gmaan fine for me
16:45:19 elodilles ++
16:45:33 tkajinam Uggla, hope you get good rest this week to enjoy the holidays :-)
16:45:48 Uggla tkajinam, I wish you the same.
16:46:08 Uggla ok last chance.
16:46:10 Uggla 3
16:46:22 Uggla 2
16:46:38 Uggla 1
16:47:30 Uggla Thanks for joining this meeting. I wish you happy Christmas holidays and an happy new year. See you beginning of 2027.
16:47:36 gibi Yeah enjoy the vacation period folks! And after this week see you in 2026
16:47:36 fwiesel Thanks, and happy holidays.
16:47:48 Uggla #endmeeting
16:47:48 opendevmeet Meeting ended Mon Dec 15 16:47:48 2025 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4)
16:47:48 opendevmeet Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-12-15-16.03.html
16:47:48 opendevmeet Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-12-15-16.03.txt
16:47:48 opendevmeet Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2025/nova.2025-12-15-16.03.log.html
16:47:48 gibi Uggla: of by one :):
16:48:22 Uggla gibi, yes 2026
16:48:25 elodilles thanks o/
16:48:26 Uggla :)
16:49:16 tkajinam thank you !
16:49:57 gibi thanks
18:03:16 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for services APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953196
18:03:29 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for server usage audit log APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/953209
18:03:41 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for tenant network APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956088
18:19:05 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: api: Add response body schemas for simple tenant usage APIs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956096
#openstack-nova - 2025-12-16
02:59:14 gmaan gibi: while reviewing the tpool_wrap series, I have one comment but +w this first change. I did not want to block the whole series as this comment is not something can break but I think this is good to do as follow up - https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956089/17/nova/tests/unit/test_utils.py#240
03:00:25 gmaan will continue review the remaining one tomorrow
04:11:38 opendevreview Masahito Muroi proposed openstack/nova master: Add check_instance_state validation to lock API https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/946223
04:11:38 opendevreview Masahito Muroi proposed openstack/nova master: Add bug 2106085 reproducer test case https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971153
04:49:42 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Make RBD Tpool usage conditional https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956089
04:49:55 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Make libvirt Tpool proxying conditional https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/956090
08:40:35 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/2025.2: Collect result of _live_migration_operation https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971156
08:48:30 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Remove eventlet from CacheConcurrencyTestCase https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/970069
08:48:30 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Remove eventlet from libvirt/test_driver https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/970070
08:48:31 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Remove eventlet from libvirt/volume/test_mount https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/970071
09:09:53 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Enable mypy on nova/utils.py https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/969936
11:19:50 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Rally job for eventlet-removal https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/960130
11:41:20 opendevreview Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Follow up test change for 8c8047ce2afae https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971171
11:44:46 gibi gmaan: ^^ that is a followup based on your comment on the first tpool change you approved yesterday
11:44:53 gibi thanks for all the reviews
12:26:01 opendevreview Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: NUMA Topology with Resource Providers: Scheduler changes https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971176
12:27:18 opendevreview Dominik proposed openstack/nova master: NUMA Topology with Resource Providers: Libvirt NUMA Migrate https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971177
13:27:32 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Make guestfs' Tpool usage optional https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/965821
14:37:38 jayaanand Hello Everyone, I am from NetApp. One of our client is looking for ephemeral volumes solution with FlexGroup similar to Ceph. Can i look at current Ceph ephemeral volumes solution and come up with similar solution for NetApp. Is there any recommendation from Nova community. Please let me know. Thank you! your response is greatly appreciated. Also, i am seeing new framework proposals from community for Ephemeral volumes.
14:37:38 jayaanand Do we have to follow those recommandations?
15:46:09 opendevreview Johannes Kulik proposed openstack/nova master: WIP: Attaching a volume returns HTTP 202 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/971068
16:03:48 gmaan gibi: ack, thanks
17:26:02 opendevreview sean mooney proposed openstack/os-vif master: Add pyroute2 tap device creation support https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-vif/+/971231
17:29:31 opendevreview Lajos Katona proposed openstack/nova master: blueprint: iothreads-for-instances https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/939254
19:29:45 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova master: Make image upload tpool usage conditional https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/966505
#openstack-nova - 2025-12-17
00:46:23 cardoe sean-k-mooney: what do ya need from me on the spec? You want me to actually create the base 2026.2 file?
00:46:44 cardoe Cause it failed cause it says 2026.2 is not opened yet.
08:33:37 opendevreview Marius Leustean proposed openstack/nova master: Faults from cell DB missing in GET /servers/detail https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/699176
08:44:29 jkulik melwitt, sean-k-mooney you left -1 on ^ before. would be nice if you could take another look
08:53:34 sean-k-mooney jkulik: looks form 1000 feet the patch looks more or less correct minor comment inline
08:54:24 jkulik thank you!
08:54:42 sean-k-mooney jkulik: its nice ot have a functional reporudcer test for most bug but its not alwasy required so if you had time to add one following the repoduce and fix patther that would be nice but not strictly required.

Earlier   Later