| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2024-09-06 | |||
| 17:31:56 | dansmith | sean-k-mooney: cool thanks see you monday | |
| 17:37:34 | opendevreview | Dan Smith proposed openstack/nova master: DNM: Test with FAT image https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928451 | |
| 18:21:36 | artom | *to avoid proposing | |
| 19:10:17 | dansmith | artom: yeah, all manner of puns ahead | |
| 19:17:04 | JayF | You know, when I saw that comment, my thought was "oh god there's another image type?!" and completely missed the joke :D | |
| 19:18:19 | dansmith | JayF: does ironic support any naked vfat images for anything? | |
| 19:18:28 | JayF | no | |
| 19:18:54 | JayF | I saw your commit in oslo utils, I don't think it'd impact ironic | |
| 19:19:26 | dansmith | it certainly won't yet because you're using the earlier stuff which doesn't detect MBRs, but yeah I was just wondering if you might have any false positives from some case you do support | |
| 19:19:59 | dansmith | it's really silly that we format ephemerals at all, but especially silly that we will format them as FAT32 just so windows guests would have something to see, even though it's totally useless to them | |
| 21:06:22 | opendevreview | Merged openstack/nova stable/2023.2: hardware: Correct log https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/927473 | |
| 21:16:41 | zigo | Howdy here! New fun OpenStack cli tool: https://salsa.debian.org/openstack-team/clients/oscs | |
| 23:10:47 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM try minimalistic imagebackend refactor https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925635 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2024-09-07 | |||
| 00:35:36 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM try minimalistic imagebackend refactor https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925635 | |
| 01:21:29 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM try minimalistic imagebackend refactor https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925635 | |
| 03:14:15 | opendevreview | melanie witt proposed openstack/nova master: DNM try minimalistic imagebackend refactor https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925635 | |
| 10:10:54 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova stable/2023.1: hardware: Correct log https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928485 | |
| #openstack-nova - 2024-09-09 | |||
| 07:17:23 | bauzas | morning | |
| 08:37:45 | opendevreview | zhou zhong proposed openstack/nova master: nova-manage: modify image properties in request_spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924319 | |
| 08:39:18 | opendevreview | zhou zhong proposed openstack/nova master: nova-manage: modify image properties in request_spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924319 | |
| 08:42:51 | opendevreview | zhou zhong proposed openstack/nova master: nova-manage: modify image properties in request_spec https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/924319 | |
| 09:12:06 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/os-traits master: Add support for hw_vif_model igb image property https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/os-traits/+/928582 | |
| 09:14:35 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [ovo]Add igb value to hw_vif_model image property https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928583 | |
| 09:14:35 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [libvirt]Support hw_vif_model = igb https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928584 | |
| 09:15:17 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [libvirt]Support hw_vif_model = igb https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928584 | |
| 09:15:17 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [ovo]Add igb value to hw_vif_model image property https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928585 | |
| 09:16:40 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [ovo]Add igb value to hw_vif_model image property https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928456 | |
| 09:16:41 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [libvirt]Support hw_vif_model = igb https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928584 | |
| 10:05:03 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [ovo]Add igb value to hw_vif_model image property https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928456 | |
| 10:05:03 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [libvirt]Support hw_vif_model = igb https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928584 | |
| 10:05:04 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor obj_make_compatible to reduce complexity https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928590 | |
| 10:18:00 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor obj_make_compatible to reduce complexity https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928590 | |
| 10:18:01 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [ovo]Add igb value to hw_vif_model image property https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928456 | |
| 10:18:01 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [libvirt]Support hw_vif_model = igb https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928584 | |
| 11:36:42 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: Refactor obj_make_compatible to reduce complexity https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928590 | |
| 11:36:42 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [ovo]Add igb value to hw_vif_model image property https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928456 | |
| 11:36:43 | opendevreview | Balazs Gibizer proposed openstack/nova master: [libvirt]Support hw_vif_model = igb https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928584 | |
| 12:46:41 | ratailor_ | Hi All, can I get reviews on my open patches, https://review.opendev.org/q/owner:ratailor@redhat.com+status:open | |
| 12:46:57 | ratailor_ | some of those are open since long. | |
| 12:48:38 | sean-k-mooney | have you put them on the review etherpad | |
| 12:48:52 | sean-k-mooney | or pingged us about them recently | |
| 12:49:24 | sean-k-mooney | they should all be listed here https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-dalmatian-status#L60 | |
| 12:49:56 | sean-k-mooney | we will be creating an epoxy version of that soon | |
| 12:50:02 | sean-k-mooney | so maybe we should add them there | |
| 12:50:19 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: is there a nova-epoxy-status etherpad yet | |
| 12:50:45 | sean-k-mooney | or nova-2025.1-status | |
| 12:51:36 | sean-k-mooney | i would prefer 2025.1 personally like ubuntu i prefer the number over the name but either is fine | |
| 12:59:59 | ratailor_ | sean-k-mooney, no yet, I will do it asap. Thanks! | |
| 13:01:17 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: not yet, I'm literrally catching up with all pre-RC1 PTL tasks | |
| 13:01:37 | bauzas | which include rpcapin pin patch and other fancy prelude writing | |
| 13:01:52 | sean-k-mooney | no worries | |
| 13:02:05 | sean-k-mooney | the only thing you really need to decied is which one to use and then we can just create it | |
| 13:02:09 | bauzas | I'm rushing over deadlines, since RC1 is planned on Thur | |
| 13:02:21 | sean-k-mooney | ill create it for you | |
| 13:02:27 | sean-k-mooney | which would you prefer name or number | |
| 13:02:31 | bauzas | well, creating an etherpad isn't really a problem | |
| 13:02:54 | sean-k-mooney | right its not so i can do it quickly | |
| 13:02:55 | bauzas | I just discussed with the Foundation and they were amazed we were having some tracking process | |
| 13:03:10 | sean-k-mooney | well we have alwasy had one | |
| 13:03:16 | bauzas | but given we don't document it actually, this isn't really useful | |
| 13:03:33 | sean-k-mooney | well we document that we shoudl use review priorty in gerrit | |
| 13:03:39 | sean-k-mooney | which i still perfer | |
| 13:03:58 | sean-k-mooney | but since you wanted to use ether pad we document that currently in the channel topic | |
| 13:04:04 | sean-k-mooney | but not in our contubutors guide | |
| 13:05:58 | ratailor_ | sean-k-mooney, also could you please move this to Triaged, its still showing in new. https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2058928 | |
| 13:06:39 | sean-k-mooney | ok although you stared on it a while ago so should i put it in inprogress | |
| 13:06:53 | ratailor_ | sean-k-mooney, yes, sure. Thanks! | |
| 13:06:54 | sean-k-mooney | note the traige team is open so you can join it and do this yourself too | |
| 13:08:56 | ratailor_ | sean-k-mooney, ack. sure. | |
| 13:09:14 | sean-k-mooney | i set it to inprogress and low beacuse of how long this has been broken | |
| 13:19:32 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: sorry was afk for family matters | |
| 13:20:20 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: fwiw, after that discussion with the foundation folks, I now have an AI on me, which is to update our contrib docs (and how to reach them) | |
| 13:20:39 | bauzas | like our wikipage is the first POC for nova but it's fucking old and stale | |
| 13:21:00 | bauzas | so I'll do all of that stuff shortly after RC1 | |
| 13:21:16 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: ok if we really are not going to back to using gerrit for this | |
| 13:21:29 | sean-k-mooney | then ill update our gerrit config to remvoe the review priorty flag | |
| 13:21:31 | bauzas | about the etherpad, we usually use codenames for etherpads, but I'm not opposed to use release numbers if people agree | |
| 13:21:48 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: we proposed stoping using in the last two ptgs | |
| 13:21:59 | sean-k-mooney | both for the ptg and this status one | |
| 13:22:16 | sean-k-mooney | also for the launchpad series | |
| 13:22:55 | sean-k-mooney | we made the change in lauchpad form caracal | |
| 13:23:07 | sean-k-mooney | we didnt make the change for the ptg or status page however | |
| 13:23:34 | sean-k-mooney | in the retos both dan and i have prevsiouly expressed our desire to stop using names | |
| 13:23:52 | sean-k-mooney | for all our nova trackers/processes | |
| 13:24:04 | sean-k-mooney | but its not a hill i want to die on | |
| 13:26:16 | sean-k-mooney | my personal recolection (which might be wrong) is we agreed to use the number in caracal but that change was not implemnted | |
| 13:27:01 | sean-k-mooney | we started disucssing htis as far back as antelope | |
| 13:30:23 | bauzas | the written resolution on release names says that numbers are the official way to describe a release | |
| 13:30:45 | sean-k-mooney | yep | |
| 13:30:52 | bauzas | hence why we use them in both launchpad, stable branches and specs repo | |
| 13:31:09 | bauzas | that said, the resolution says we can use codenames for internal use | |
| 13:31:22 | bauzas | which is why we were naming the etherpad that way | |
| 13:31:47 | sean-k-mooney | right but we as a nova team discussed this and at lease dan and i advocated for using the number for lanchpad as well | |
| 13:31:52 | bauzas | now that I realize that this tracking etherpad is useful for new contributors, I think we can start using release numbers | |
| 13:31:54 | sean-k-mooney | and i tought we agreed we shoudl do that | |
| 13:32:04 | bauzas | launchpad *is* using numbers | |
| 13:32:13 | sean-k-mooney | but the etherpad is not | |
| 13:32:15 | bauzas | from 2023.1 caracal at least :) | |
| 13:32:34 | bauzas | correct, that's what I just said, | |
| 13:32:41 | sean-k-mooney | i was gong to bring this up as a low light in the rethro athat we had not chagned to the numeber for the epther pad for a second release in a row | |