Earlier  
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2024-09-09
13:09:14 sean-k-mooney i set it to inprogress and low beacuse of how long this has been broken
13:19:32 bauzas sean-k-mooney: sorry was afk for family matters
13:20:20 bauzas sean-k-mooney: fwiw, after that discussion with the foundation folks, I now have an AI on me, which is to update our contrib docs (and how to reach them)
13:20:39 bauzas like our wikipage is the first POC for nova but it's fucking old and stale
13:21:00 bauzas so I'll do all of that stuff shortly after RC1
13:21:16 sean-k-mooney bauzas: ok if we really are not going to back to using gerrit for this
13:21:29 sean-k-mooney then ill update our gerrit config to remvoe the review priorty flag
13:21:31 bauzas about the etherpad, we usually use codenames for etherpads, but I'm not opposed to use release numbers if people agree
13:21:48 sean-k-mooney bauzas: we proposed stoping using in the last two ptgs
13:21:59 sean-k-mooney both for the ptg and this status one
13:22:16 sean-k-mooney also for the launchpad series
13:22:55 sean-k-mooney we made the change in lauchpad form caracal
13:23:07 sean-k-mooney we didnt make the change for the ptg or status page however
13:23:34 sean-k-mooney in the retos both dan and i have prevsiouly expressed our desire to stop using names
13:23:52 sean-k-mooney for all our nova trackers/processes
13:24:04 sean-k-mooney but its not a hill i want to die on
13:26:16 sean-k-mooney my personal recolection (which might be wrong) is we agreed to use the number in caracal but that change was not implemnted
13:27:01 sean-k-mooney we started disucssing htis as far back as antelope
13:30:23 bauzas the written resolution on release names says that numbers are the official way to describe a release
13:30:45 sean-k-mooney yep
13:30:52 bauzas hence why we use them in both launchpad, stable branches and specs repo
13:31:09 bauzas that said, the resolution says we can use codenames for internal use
13:31:22 bauzas which is why we were naming the etherpad that way
13:31:47 sean-k-mooney right but we as a nova team discussed this and at lease dan and i advocated for using the number for lanchpad as well
13:31:52 bauzas now that I realize that this tracking etherpad is useful for new contributors, I think we can start using release numbers
13:31:54 sean-k-mooney and i tought we agreed we shoudl do that
13:32:04 bauzas launchpad *is* using numbers
13:32:13 sean-k-mooney but the etherpad is not
13:32:15 bauzas from 2023.1 caracal at least :)
13:32:34 bauzas correct, that's what I just said,
13:32:41 sean-k-mooney i was gong to bring this up as a low light in the rethro athat we had not chagned to the numeber for the epther pad for a second release in a row
13:33:01 bauzas I'm just creating the new etherpad, that's quick
13:35:29 bauzas https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2025.1-status
13:35:38 bauzas sean-k-mooney: ralonsoh ^
13:35:47 bauzas I'm also creating a second etherpad for rc tracking
13:35:59 bauzas (which will use the codename format since it's for dalmatian)
13:36:08 sean-k-mooney i think you ment ratailor_ https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-2025.1-status
13:36:32 bauzas my bad, typed too fast and autocompletion hit the road
13:39:33 opendevreview Merged openstack/nova stable/2023.1: hardware: Correct log https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928485
14:08:33 ratailor_ sean-k-mooney, bauzas Thanks!
14:23:40 ralonsoh bauzas, thanks for th elink
14:31:00 opendevreview Rajesh Tailor proposed openstack/nova master: Fix KeyError on assisted snapshot call https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/900783
16:07:24 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: doc: mark the maximum microversion for 2024.2 Dalmatian https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928660
16:10:12 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Update compute rpc alias for dalmatian https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928661
16:17:30 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova master: Add service version for Dalmatian https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/928662
16:19:53 noonedeadpunk hey folks! is there any way to suppli a custom URI to the VNC console? As I'm obviously getting `404 File not found` when tried to define `https://domain.com/novnc/vnc_lite.html`
16:20:34 noonedeadpunk I tried to find inspiration in devstack, but seems vnc there is just port-oriented?
16:20:39 noonedeadpunk https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/092ca27659d5466aa3c19120b58b5031/log/controller/logs/etc/nova/nova-cpu_conf.txt#155
16:22:07 noonedeadpunk so basically console is not under /compute while nova overall is
16:28:22 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/placement master: Update 2024.2 reqs to support os-traits 3.1.0 as min version We're now close to RC1, we need to ensure that 2024.2 Placement will support the new traits. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/928663
16:28:48 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/placement master: Update 2024.2 reqs to support os-traits 3.1.0 as min version https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/928663
16:38:11 opendevreview Sylvain Bauza proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Move Dalmatian implemented specs https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/928666
16:57:03 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Amend ShareMappingStatus due to asynchronous call https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/908864
16:57:03 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Amend DB model add a unique constraint. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/912518
16:57:04 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (manila abstraction) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/831194
16:57:04 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Use client token when talking to manila https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/925277
16:57:05 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (drivers and compute manager part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/833090
16:57:05 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Mounting the shares as part of the initialization process https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/880075
16:57:06 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Deletion of associated share mappings on instance deletion https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/881472
16:57:07 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add metadata for shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850500
16:57:07 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add share_info parameter to reboot method for each driver (driver part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854823
16:57:09 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support rebooting an instance with shares (compute manager part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/854824
16:57:09 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add share_info parameter to resume method for each driver (driver part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860284
16:57:11 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support resuming an instance with shares (compute manager part) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860285
16:57:11 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add helper methods to rescue/unrescue shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860286
16:57:13 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Support rescuing an instance with shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860287
16:57:13 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Allow to mount manila share using Cephfs protocol https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/883862
16:57:15 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Check shares support (compute manager) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/885751
16:57:15 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Attach Manila shares via virtiofs (API) https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/836830
16:57:17 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add helper methods to attach/detach shares https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/885753
16:57:17 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_attach notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/850501
16:57:19 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_detach notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851028
16:57:19 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add shares to InstancePayload https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/851029
16:57:21 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_attach_error notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860282
16:57:23 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add instance.share_detach_error notification https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/860283
16:57:23 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Reports instance events to the DB regarding attaching and detaching a share https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/927088
16:57:25 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add libvirt test to ensure metadata are working. https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852086
16:57:25 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Add virt/libvirt error test cases https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/852087
16:57:27 opendevreview ribaudr proposed openstack/nova master: Docs about Manila shares API usage https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/871642
16:57:39 noonedeadpunk it feels like the usecase of custom URI for consoleproxy is just not supported
17:02:34 noonedeadpunk as I'd guess I'd expect to see some api-paste for nova-novncproxy but obviously there's none
17:25:38 sean-k-mooney noonedeadpunk: you can customise it to a degree
17:25:47 sean-k-mooney what are you tryign to do
17:26:22 noonedeadpunk trying to have smth like `https://domain.com/novnc/vnc_lite.html`
17:26:42 noonedeadpunk instead of `https://domain.com:6080/vnc_lite.html`
17:27:27 noonedeadpunk and feels like the way forward would be to place novnc install folder somewhere under DEFAULT.web
17:27:46 noonedeadpunk ie make a subtree or smth
17:27:48 sean-k-mooney ya so you can do that
17:28:17 sean-k-mooney we have conifg option for tha tlet me find it
17:28:31 sean-k-mooney https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/configuration/config.html#vnc.novncproxy_base_url
17:28:56 sean-k-mooney we should really upgrade our default to default to vnc_lite.html at some point
17:28:58 noonedeadpunk yeah, so ^ is not helpful
17:29:23 sean-k-mooney how so
17:29:28 noonedeadpunk as I have that and novncproxy ends up with 404
17:29:41 noonedeadpunk openstack console url show returns expected URL though
17:30:04 noonedeadpunk ie https://domain.com/novnc/vnc_lite.html?path=%3Ftoken%3D880916e7-2e8a-4d0c-a814-9e16f6633194
17:30:12 sean-k-mooney right so to use that you need to aslo modify your reverse proxy
17:30:19 noonedeadpunk but then it's just 404 from nova-novncproxy service itself
17:30:41 noonedeadpunk with File not found
17:30:53 noonedeadpunk I'd guess I would need to do rewrite

Earlier   Later