| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2024-05-14 | |||
| 14:20:26 | bauzas | I'll try to review it too today | |
| 14:20:36 | bauzas | but that's an old spec | |
| 14:22:09 | gibi | it was revised around the PTG so the content is fairly fresh | |
| 14:22:41 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/placement master: Add placement.wsgi.api module https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/919569 | |
| 14:22:42 | opendevreview | Stephen Finucane proposed openstack/placement master: setup: Remove pbr's wsgi_scripts https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/919582 | |
| 14:25:27 | gibi | Does anybody remember why we name our db contraints like uniq_key_pairs0user_id0name It feels like there is a reason for that specific structure but I never come accross the explanation | |
| 14:25:33 | gibi | https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/7096423b343ffce9622fd078fc2b3a87fd3386f7/nova/db/api/models.py#L308-L310 | |
| 14:31:50 | dansmith | yeah I think there was a reason, but it might have just been "consistency" | |
| 14:45:18 | bauzas | indeed | |
| 14:56:32 | gibi | OK, then I ask Uggla_ to follow the pattern just for consistency | |
| 14:56:51 | gibi | here https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/912518/2/nova/db/main/models.py#767 | |
| 15:03:42 | Uggla_ | gibi, ok | |
| 15:04:01 | stephenfin | fyi the sqlalchemy 2.x bump *finally* merged, so if you want to free up some resources we can merge these now https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/915562 https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/placement/+/915568 | |
| 15:10:04 | ykarel | #topic Stable branches | |
| 15:10:09 | ykarel | all good | |
| 15:10:18 | ykarel | #topic Stadium projects | |
| 15:10:22 | ykarel | all green | |
| 15:10:30 | ykarel | #topic Rechecks | |
| 15:10:44 | ykarel | 6/14 bare rechecks | |
| 15:10:53 | frickler | ykarel: wrong channel? | |
| 15:11:04 | ykarel | ahh right | |
| 15:11:07 | ykarel | thx frickler | |
| 15:16:40 | opendevreview | Gorka Eguileor proposed openstack/nova master: Support os-brick specific lock_path https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/849328 | |
| 15:32:46 | bauzas | nova meeting in 30 mins | |
| 15:33:31 | opendevreview | Takashi Kajinami proposed openstack/nova-specs master: Remove template files from non-empty directories https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova-specs/+/919597 | |
| 15:56:29 | bauzas | gibi: shit, I forgot I'll need to travel to the French OpenInfra Day in Paris on next Tuesday | |
| 15:56:52 | bauzas | so I couldn't be able to run the meeting | |
| 15:59:13 | gibi | bauzas: I will be off on next Tuesday | |
| 15:59:50 | bauzas | no worries, I'll ask in our meeting today | |
| 16:01:17 | bauzas | #startmeeting nova | |
| 16:01:17 | opendevmeet | Meeting started Tue May 14 16:01:17 2024 UTC and is due to finish in 60 minutes. The chair is bauzas. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. | |
| 16:01:17 | opendevmeet | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #startvote. | |
| 16:01:17 | opendevmeet | The meeting name has been set to 'nova' | |
| 16:01:21 | bauzas | hey folks | |
| 16:01:44 | tkajinam | o/ | |
| 16:01:46 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:02:04 | fwiesel | o/ | |
| 16:02:04 | gibi | o/ | |
| 16:02:42 | Uggla_ | o/ | |
| 16:02:50 | bauzas | okay, let's softly start | |
| 16:02:58 | bauzas | #link https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Nova#Agenda_for_next_meeting | |
| 16:03:07 | bauzas | #topic Bugs (stuck/critical) | |
| 16:03:11 | bauzas | #info No Critical bug | |
| 16:03:16 | bauzas | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:03:21 | bauzas | anything important to tell about bugs ? | |
| 16:03:58 | bauzas | looks not | |
| 16:04:03 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:04:07 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:04:10 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal | |
| 16:04:15 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:04:20 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:04:25 | bauzas | #info Please try to provide meaningful comment when you recheck | |
| 16:05:06 | tkajinam | just fyi. global u-c was updated and sqlalchemy was bumped to 2.0. I don't expect any problems with core services since sqlahcmely 2.0 has been tested for some time, but we may need to pay some attention to gate. | |
| 16:05:50 | bauzas | okay, all of the perodics are green, even the nova-emulation one | |
| 16:05:57 | dansmith | o/ | |
| 16:06:08 | sean-k-mooney | the emultaion one was just being OMM killed | |
| 16:06:30 | sean-k-mooney | so it can pass currently i have a patch to correct that | |
| 16:06:32 | bauzas | oh, for the moment, the latest master job for nova-emulation was still failing | |
| 16:06:43 | bauzas | we'll see it next week then | |
| 16:07:05 | bauzas | do people want to discuss about the guest kernel issues now or not ? | |
| 16:08:05 | sean-k-mooney | just an fyi https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/918464 is the fix for the emulator job | |
| 16:08:14 | sean-k-mooney | regarding panics | |
| 16:08:40 | sean-k-mooney | im not sure i have seen them get any worse but i know dansmith wants to try reverting the way we define the glance images | |
| 16:08:48 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: did you have time to push a patch for that | |
| 16:08:50 | bauzas | okay | |
| 16:09:16 | dansmith | no, I need to do that still | |
| 16:09:37 | sean-k-mooney | ack if you dont get around to it by the next meeting ill push a patch to do it | |
| 16:10:21 | bauzas | kk | |
| 16:11:55 | bauzas | moving on then | |
| 16:12:03 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:12:08 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/dalmatian/schedule.html | |
| 16:12:13 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/918422 nova specific schedule is proposed | |
| 16:12:25 | bauzas | I saw sean-k-mooney's comment, I'll provide a new revision | |
| 16:12:38 | bauzas | (but fwiw, we discussed it on the PTG) | |
| 16:12:51 | bauzas | #info Dalmatian-1 this week | |
| 16:12:56 | bauzas | #info Spec review day is today | |
| 16:13:11 | bauzas | I started to review some specs and I saw also some other comments | |
| 16:13:30 | bauzas | thanks to the folks that already started to review <3 | |
| 16:13:49 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:13:53 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-dalmatian-status | |
| 16:14:25 | bauzas | tomorrow, I'll modify the etherpad by adding the new series related to the specs that will be merged today | |
| 16:15:52 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:15:57 | bauzas | elodilles: hehe | |
| 16:16:00 | bauzas | \o | |
| 16:16:05 | elodilles | ~o~ | |
| 16:16:09 | elodilles | #info all stable gates are OK (stable/2024.1, stable/2023.2, stable/2023.1) as grenade jobs are fixed and passing | |
| 16:16:31 | elodilles | #info stable nova versions released: nova 28.1.0 (2023.2 Bobcat), nova 27.3.0 (2023.1 Antelope) | |
| 16:16:49 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:16:58 | elodilles | that's all for today :) | |
| 16:19:14 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:19:21 | bauzas | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:19:21 | elodilles | cool indeed | |
| 16:19:29 | bauzas | fwiesel: anything to tell ? | |
| 16:19:52 | fwiesel | Not much... | |
| 16:20:06 | fwiesel | #info Sync script in place. CI working through the backlog. | |
| 16:20:13 | sean-k-mooney | is https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/910627 the next patch on your review list | |
| 16:20:22 | fwiesel | So, if you do not see any messages, it is because of that. | |
| 16:20:51 | fwiesel | sean-k-mooney: Yes, that would be the next one. That should cut down the errors to one, IRC. | |
| 16:21:05 | bauzas | ok | |
| 16:21:37 | fwiesel | That would be from my side, unless there are more questions. | |