| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2024-05-14 | |||
| 16:06:30 | sean-k-mooney | so it can pass currently i have a patch to correct that | |
| 16:06:32 | bauzas | oh, for the moment, the latest master job for nova-emulation was still failing | |
| 16:06:43 | bauzas | we'll see it next week then | |
| 16:07:05 | bauzas | do people want to discuss about the guest kernel issues now or not ? | |
| 16:08:05 | sean-k-mooney | just an fyi https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/918464 is the fix for the emulator job | |
| 16:08:14 | sean-k-mooney | regarding panics | |
| 16:08:40 | sean-k-mooney | im not sure i have seen them get any worse but i know dansmith wants to try reverting the way we define the glance images | |
| 16:08:48 | sean-k-mooney | dansmith: did you have time to push a patch for that | |
| 16:08:50 | bauzas | okay | |
| 16:09:16 | dansmith | no, I need to do that still | |
| 16:09:37 | sean-k-mooney | ack if you dont get around to it by the next meeting ill push a patch to do it | |
| 16:10:21 | bauzas | kk | |
| 16:11:55 | bauzas | moving on then | |
| 16:12:03 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:12:08 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/dalmatian/schedule.html | |
| 16:12:13 | bauzas | #link https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/releases/+/918422 nova specific schedule is proposed | |
| 16:12:25 | bauzas | I saw sean-k-mooney's comment, I'll provide a new revision | |
| 16:12:38 | bauzas | (but fwiw, we discussed it on the PTG) | |
| 16:12:51 | bauzas | #info Dalmatian-1 this week | |
| 16:12:56 | bauzas | #info Spec review day is today | |
| 16:13:11 | bauzas | I started to review some specs and I saw also some other comments | |
| 16:13:30 | bauzas | thanks to the folks that already started to review <3 | |
| 16:13:49 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:13:53 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-dalmatian-status | |
| 16:14:25 | bauzas | tomorrow, I'll modify the etherpad by adding the new series related to the specs that will be merged today | |
| 16:15:52 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:15:57 | bauzas | elodilles: hehe | |
| 16:16:00 | bauzas | \o | |
| 16:16:05 | elodilles | ~o~ | |
| 16:16:09 | elodilles | #info all stable gates are OK (stable/2024.1, stable/2023.2, stable/2023.1) as grenade jobs are fixed and passing | |
| 16:16:31 | elodilles | #info stable nova versions released: nova 28.1.0 (2023.2 Bobcat), nova 27.3.0 (2023.1 Antelope) | |
| 16:16:49 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:16:58 | elodilles | that's all for today :) | |
| 16:19:14 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:19:21 | bauzas | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:19:21 | elodilles | cool indeed | |
| 16:19:29 | bauzas | fwiesel: anything to tell ? | |
| 16:19:52 | fwiesel | Not much... | |
| 16:20:06 | fwiesel | #info Sync script in place. CI working through the backlog. | |
| 16:20:13 | sean-k-mooney | is https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/910627 the next patch on your review list | |
| 16:20:22 | fwiesel | So, if you do not see any messages, it is because of that. | |
| 16:20:51 | fwiesel | sean-k-mooney: Yes, that would be the next one. That should cut down the errors to one, IRC. | |
| 16:21:05 | bauzas | ok | |
| 16:21:37 | fwiesel | That would be from my side, unless there are more questions. | |
| 16:21:55 | bauzas | not from me | |
| 16:21:57 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:21:59 | bauzas | and thanks | |
| 16:22:07 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:22:12 | bauzas | I have one item | |
| 16:22:21 | sean-k-mooney | i also have one but i can wait | |
| 16:22:24 | bauzas | next Tuesday, I'll be on a train when the meeting starts | |
| 16:22:35 | bauzas | (going to the OpenInfra Day in Paris) | |
| 16:22:46 | bauzas | so anyone happy to lead the meeting ? | |
| 16:23:00 | bauzas | if not, we'll just punt it to the next week | |
| 16:23:15 | JayF | Hey, can | |
| 16:23:19 | JayF | whoops, one thing | |
| 16:23:40 | JayF | Can https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/ironic-guest-metadata be re-approved for Dalmation? | |
| 16:23:56 | bauzas | JayF: you're next in queue after sean-k-mooney's point :) | |
| 16:24:00 | bauzas | we're on meeting now :) | |
| 16:24:20 | bauzas | so, anyone volunteering for running the meeting next week ? | |
| 16:24:20 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: if we dont have anything urgent i think we can skip next week | |
| 16:24:27 | bauzas | no worries, then we'll skip it | |
| 16:24:42 | sean-k-mooney | lets do JayF point first | |
| 16:24:47 | sean-k-mooney | im fine with reappoving that | |
| 16:24:48 | bauzas | #agreed next nova meeting on May 21 is CANCELLED | |
| 16:25:02 | bauzas | #action bauzas to communicate about the cancellation | |
| 16:25:10 | bauzas | okay, done for my item | |
| 16:25:15 | bauzas | next one then, Jay | |
| 16:25:17 | andrewbonney | One query on bugs if I could too after others | |
| 16:25:40 | sean-k-mooney | andrewbonney: sure. JayF do you want to summerise | |
| 16:25:51 | bauzas | JayF: I don't see anything controversial with reapproving https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/ironic-guest-metadata as specless | |
| 16:26:17 | JayF | thank! | |
| 16:26:20 | JayF | *thanks | |
| 16:26:21 | bauzas | most of my concerns come with testing this, but this is not related to the blueprint itself | |
| 16:26:50 | bauzas | anyone having concerns with reapproving ^ as specless ? | |
| 16:27:16 | bauzas | speak now or forever hold your peace | |
| 16:27:35 | bauzas | okay, I'll do the paperwork stamp | |
| 16:27:50 | bauzas | #agreed https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/ironic-guest-metadata reapproved as specless for Dalmatian | |
| 16:28:15 | bauzas | next one, who's this ? sean-k-mooney I think ? | |
| 16:28:18 | sean-k-mooney | so hopefully my item will be jsut as quick | |
| 16:28:20 | sean-k-mooney | https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/eventlet-removal-part-1 | |
| 16:28:25 | sean-k-mooney | can we appove that as specless | |
| 16:28:47 | sean-k-mooney | i mostly have it implmeneted | |
| 16:29:05 | dansmith | the critical bits are the implementation details, | |
| 16:29:07 | sean-k-mooney | there is some feedback form stephen on the implmentaion but i think it will be ready for review next week | |
| 16:29:22 | dansmith | so I think it's reasonable to call this cleanup/maintenance and focus on the actual code, IMHO | |
| 16:29:35 | dansmith | i.e. no API or RPC or DB changes, just internals | |
| 16:29:37 | bauzas | yeah I think we said it's just for tracking | |
| 16:29:50 | bauzas | tracking progress and adding it to our review eyes | |
| 16:29:56 | sean-k-mooney | cool well the patches are avaiable for review here https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:%22eventlet-removal-part-1%22 | |
| 16:30:12 | bauzas | I'm fine with approving it then as specless and I think we even agreed on that at the PTG | |
| 16:30:21 | sean-k-mooney | yep | |
| 16:30:27 | bauzas | okay, | |
| 16:30:44 | bauzas | #agreed https://blueprints.launchpad.net/nova/+spec/eventlet-removal-part-1 accepted as specless blueprint as agreed during the PTG | |
| 16:30:53 | sean-k-mooney | i belive andrewbonney had a question around a bug? | |
| 16:31:26 | sean-k-mooney | assuming there was nothign else on the adgenda | |
| 16:31:40 | andrewbonney | Thanks. Just a procedure thing really. I have a few reports since March and just wanted to check if I should be following up here generally or in meetings for feedback? | |
| 16:31:53 | andrewbonney | I appreciate you get a lot so just trying to do the right thing | |
| 16:32:36 | sean-k-mooney | as in you filed a number of bug reporst since march? | |
| 16:32:47 | andrewbonney | Yeah that's right, https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.bug_reporter=andrewbonney | |