Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2024-02-27
16:01:10 elodilles o/
16:01:29 fwiesel o/
16:01:32 kgube o/
16:02:07 bauzas okay, moving on
16:02:30 bauzas #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:02:34 dansmith o/
16:02:35 bauzas #info One Critical bug
16:02:39 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/2052937
16:02:51 bauzas sean-k-mooney: do you want to discuss it now?
16:04:09 auniyal o/
16:04:32 bauzas looks he's not around
16:05:15 bauzas I wonder what we need to do related to thaty
16:05:54 gibi o/
16:06:13 sean-k-mooney o/
16:06:19 sean-k-mooney sorry was double booked
16:06:38 sean-k-mooney am im not sure what there is to say really for that bug
16:06:55 sean-k-mooney im a littel concerned
16:07:05 sean-k-mooney that our heal allocation code might actully be broken by it
16:07:16 sean-k-mooney on the otehr hand with a quick look at the code
16:07:17 bauzas why is it in Critical state for nova ?
16:07:28 sean-k-mooney it was a gate blocker
16:07:35 sean-k-mooney that is what broke nova-next last week
16:08:15 sean-k-mooney when i looked at the nova manage code i belive its using a neutron client with both a service token and admin token
16:08:20 sean-k-mooney so it should be fine
16:08:44 sean-k-mooney but when i we removing the check in post it looks like heal allcoations was not properly healing the port resouce resuets
16:09:00 bauzas can we then move it to High ?
16:09:07 sean-k-mooney sure
16:09:26 bauzas ack
16:09:40 bauzas if you want, we can continue to discuss the bug next week
16:10:20 sean-k-mooney we should likely at least spotcheck that heal allcotions works
16:10:29 sean-k-mooney otherwize we might need to fix it in the RC period
16:11:43 bauzas ack
16:11:56 sean-k-mooney https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/3c2c7955a4b34112a377a857623d6a73/log/job-output.txt#37642-37669
16:12:14 sean-k-mooney the heal there looks like its broken
16:13:12 sean-k-mooney lets move on for now
16:13:32 bauzas cool
16:13:41 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 70 new untriaged bugs (+4 since the last meeting)
16:13:54 bauzas #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster
16:14:04 bauzas #info bug baton is bauzas
16:14:10 bauzas moving on ?
16:14:56 bauzas #topic Gate status
16:15:00 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs
16:15:05 bauzas #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal
16:15:09 bauzas #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status
16:15:15 bauzas #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag.
16:15:26 bauzas nothing here to report
16:15:29 bauzas anyone else ?
16:15:44 dansmith just rechecked a random timeout
16:16:45 bauzas cool
16:16:50 bauzas #topic Release Planning
16:16:55 sean-k-mooney was it the rbac jobs
16:16:56 bauzas #link https://releases.openstack.org/caracal/schedule.html#nova
16:17:07 sean-k-mooney they seam to be timing out more often then others
16:17:32 sean-k-mooney but it alwasy just seams like a slow node when i looked
16:20:31 gibi ddd
16:20:35 bauzas last but not * least (private joke)
16:20:36 gibi sorry
16:20:38 bauzas #info Caracal-3 (and feature freeze) milestone in 2 days
16:20:50 bauzas voila
16:21:01 bauzas #topic Review priorities
16:21:09 bauzas #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-caracal-status
16:21:13 bauzas #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-caracal-status
16:21:20 bauzas #topic Stable Branches
16:21:23 bauzas elodilles: ?
16:21:26 elodilles o/
16:21:39 elodilles #info stable gates seem to be OK
16:21:51 elodilles surprisingly, might be even zed is OK
16:22:18 elodilles as nova-grenade-multinode is just passing :-o
16:22:29 elodilles i don't know how
16:22:34 elodilles so maybe it's just a bug :D
16:22:51 elodilles it should be using unmaintained/yoga
16:23:04 bauzas ...
16:23:31 elodilles #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci
16:24:08 elodilles please add here any issue if you see one on stable branches ^^^
16:24:30 elodilles that's all from me for now
16:25:47 bauzas thanks
16:25:57 bauzas #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights
16:25:59 bauzas fwiesel: ?
16:26:02 fwiesel #info FIPS do work now, but not reliably (Pass 459 Failure 23 Skip 44) (previously Passed: 435, Failed: 41, Skipped: 42)
16:26:18 fwiesel #link http://openstack-ci-logs.global.cloud.sap/openstack/nova/1858cf18b940b3636e54eb5aafaf4050bdd02939/tempest.html
16:27:03 fwiesel Better, but not quite there yet.
16:27:23 bauzas kudos
16:27:35 fwiesel Serveral of the failures have simpler reasons. I'll probably get those down first before I dig into the FIP issue.
16:28:03 fwiesel Questions?
16:28:19 bauzas none from me, good luck for debugging
16:28:37 fwiesel Okay, then that's from my side. Back to you.
16:29:38 bauzas thanks
16:29:52 bauzas #topic Open discussion
16:29:57 bauzas anything anyone ?
16:30:26 kgube Hi, I wanted to ask a question on how to proceed with my feature: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873560
16:30:57 kgube It has a cinderclient dependency, so we need to bump the cinderclient version
16:31:23 bauzas good question
16:31:24 kgube the problem is that the needed change will only be in the comming cinderclient release
16:31:52 kgube wich happens together with the featurefreeze
16:31:54 bauzas kgube: have you seen my question about a Tempest test checking your patch ?
16:32:11 bauzas I wonder how Zuul can say +1 if nothing is changed
16:32:50 kgube bauzas, yes, none of the current tempest jobs are using the codepath that calls the new volume action
16:33:16 kgube so it just works with the previous version
16:33:37 bauzas kgube: do you have a follow-up patch for Tempest about it ?
16:33:47 bauzas like another attribute

Earlier   Later