| Posted | Nick | Remark | |
|---|---|---|---|
| #openstack-nova - 2024-02-27 | |||
| 16:10:29 | sean-k-mooney | otherwize we might need to fix it in the RC period | |
| 16:11:43 | bauzas | ack | |
| 16:11:56 | sean-k-mooney | https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/3c2c7955a4b34112a377a857623d6a73/log/job-output.txt#37642-37669 | |
| 16:12:14 | sean-k-mooney | the heal there looks like its broken | |
| 16:13:12 | sean-k-mooney | lets move on for now | |
| 16:13:32 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:13:41 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 70 new untriaged bugs (+4 since the last meeting) | |
| 16:13:54 | bauzas | #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster | |
| 16:14:04 | bauzas | #info bug baton is bauzas | |
| 16:14:10 | bauzas | moving on ? | |
| 16:14:56 | bauzas | #topic Gate status | |
| 16:15:00 | bauzas | #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs | |
| 16:15:05 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-ci-failures-minimal | |
| 16:15:09 | bauzas | #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status | |
| 16:15:15 | bauzas | #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag. | |
| 16:15:26 | bauzas | nothing here to report | |
| 16:15:29 | bauzas | anyone else ? | |
| 16:15:44 | dansmith | just rechecked a random timeout | |
| 16:16:45 | bauzas | cool | |
| 16:16:50 | bauzas | #topic Release Planning | |
| 16:16:55 | sean-k-mooney | was it the rbac jobs | |
| 16:16:56 | bauzas | #link https://releases.openstack.org/caracal/schedule.html#nova | |
| 16:17:07 | sean-k-mooney | they seam to be timing out more often then others | |
| 16:17:32 | sean-k-mooney | but it alwasy just seams like a slow node when i looked | |
| 16:20:31 | gibi | ddd | |
| 16:20:35 | bauzas | last but not * least (private joke) | |
| 16:20:36 | gibi | sorry | |
| 16:20:38 | bauzas | #info Caracal-3 (and feature freeze) milestone in 2 days | |
| 16:20:50 | bauzas | voila | |
| 16:21:01 | bauzas | #topic Review priorities | |
| 16:21:09 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-caracal-status | |
| 16:21:13 | bauzas | #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-caracal-status | |
| 16:21:20 | bauzas | #topic Stable Branches | |
| 16:21:23 | bauzas | elodilles: ? | |
| 16:21:26 | elodilles | o/ | |
| 16:21:39 | elodilles | #info stable gates seem to be OK | |
| 16:21:51 | elodilles | surprisingly, might be even zed is OK | |
| 16:22:18 | elodilles | as nova-grenade-multinode is just passing :-o | |
| 16:22:29 | elodilles | i don't know how | |
| 16:22:34 | elodilles | so maybe it's just a bug :D | |
| 16:22:51 | elodilles | it should be using unmaintained/yoga | |
| 16:23:04 | bauzas | ... | |
| 16:23:31 | elodilles | #info stable branch status / gate failures tracking etherpad: https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-stable-branch-ci | |
| 16:24:08 | elodilles | please add here any issue if you see one on stable branches ^^^ | |
| 16:24:30 | elodilles | that's all from me for now | |
| 16:25:47 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 16:25:57 | bauzas | #topic vmwareapi 3rd-party CI efforts Highlights | |
| 16:25:59 | bauzas | fwiesel: ? | |
| 16:26:02 | fwiesel | #info FIPS do work now, but not reliably (Pass 459 Failure 23 Skip 44) (previously Passed: 435, Failed: 41, Skipped: 42) | |
| 16:26:18 | fwiesel | #link http://openstack-ci-logs.global.cloud.sap/openstack/nova/1858cf18b940b3636e54eb5aafaf4050bdd02939/tempest.html | |
| 16:27:03 | fwiesel | Better, but not quite there yet. | |
| 16:27:23 | bauzas | kudos | |
| 16:27:35 | fwiesel | Serveral of the failures have simpler reasons. I'll probably get those down first before I dig into the FIP issue. | |
| 16:28:03 | fwiesel | Questions? | |
| 16:28:19 | bauzas | none from me, good luck for debugging | |
| 16:28:37 | fwiesel | Okay, then that's from my side. Back to you. | |
| 16:29:38 | bauzas | thanks | |
| 16:29:52 | bauzas | #topic Open discussion | |
| 16:29:57 | bauzas | anything anyone ? | |
| 16:30:26 | kgube | Hi, I wanted to ask a question on how to proceed with my feature: https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/nova/+/873560 | |
| 16:30:57 | kgube | It has a cinderclient dependency, so we need to bump the cinderclient version | |
| 16:31:23 | bauzas | good question | |
| 16:31:24 | kgube | the problem is that the needed change will only be in the comming cinderclient release | |
| 16:31:52 | kgube | wich happens together with the featurefreeze | |
| 16:31:54 | bauzas | kgube: have you seen my question about a Tempest test checking your patch ? | |
| 16:32:11 | bauzas | I wonder how Zuul can say +1 if nothing is changed | |
| 16:32:50 | kgube | bauzas, yes, none of the current tempest jobs are using the codepath that calls the new volume action | |
| 16:33:16 | kgube | so it just works with the previous version | |
| 16:33:37 | bauzas | kgube: do you have a follow-up patch for Tempest about it ? | |
| 16:33:47 | bauzas | like another attribute | |
| 16:34:50 | kgube | so the only job that will be testing the new volume action is the devstack-plugin-nfs one | |
| 16:35:43 | kgube | I have a patch for this, but it also needs changing once the feature is merged | |
| 16:35:47 | kgube | https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/devstack-plugin-nfs/+/896196 | |
| 16:35:59 | kgube | so it's currently marked as WIP | |
| 16:36:50 | bauzas | okay, then we need to have a consensus for accepting your feature without Tempest scenarios | |
| 16:37:07 | bauzas | what people think about ^ ? | |
| 16:37:34 | bauzas | as kgube said, we only know it doesn't trample the other usages | |
| 16:39:24 | kgube | well, the second change I posted has successful tempest runs for nfs online extend, with all of the changes merged in | |
| 16:39:57 | kgube | it just isn't part of the nova tempest jobs | |
| 16:40:44 | bauzas | kgube: I'll ping other cores async | |
| 16:40:52 | bauzas | to see what they think | |
| 16:41:04 | kgube | thank you! | |
| 16:41:32 | bauzas | any other things before we close ? | |
| 16:42:34 | bauzas | looks not | |
| 16:42:36 | bauzas | thanks all | |
| 16:42:38 | opendevmeet | Meeting ended Tue Feb 27 16:42:38 2024 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . (v 0.1.4) | |
| 16:42:38 | opendevmeet | Minutes: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-02-27-16.00.html | |
| 16:42:38 | bauzas | #endmeeting | |
| 16:42:38 | opendevmeet | Minutes (text): https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-02-27-16.00.txt | |
| 16:42:38 | opendevmeet | Log: https://meetings.opendev.org/meetings/nova/2024/nova.2024-02-27-16.00.log.html | |
| 16:47:55 | sean-k-mooney | bauzas: the tempest test is not the issue we cant merge the patch without the client bump | |
| 16:48:06 | sean-k-mooney | so we should ask for an early cinder clinent release | |
| 16:48:13 | sean-k-mooney | and if they need to do another one they can | |
| 16:48:17 | sean-k-mooney | at ff | |
| 16:48:55 | sean-k-mooney | the release process is fully automated out sied of the patch review so that should be quick and simple to do | |
| 16:48:57 | bauzas | well, the depends-on is a cinderclient patch | |
| 16:49:11 | sean-k-mooney | right but the nova patch need a min version bump | |
| 16:49:13 | bauzas | once the patch is merged, then Zuul can accept | |
| 16:49:30 | sean-k-mooney | no because our unit/fucntional test will fail | |
| 16:49:32 | bauzas | sean-k-mooney: correct, we should target the required need | |