Earlier  
Later
New Search
Posted Nick Remark
#openstack-nova - 2023-10-31
16:03:14 bauzas well, okay
16:03:37 bauzas #topic Bugs (stuck/critical)
16:03:42 bauzas #info No Critical bug
16:03:46 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?search=Search&field.status=New 36 new untriaged bugs (-11 since the last meeting)
16:03:58 bauzas kudos to melwitt and gibi for triaging !
16:04:04 bauzas #info Add yourself in the team bug roster if you want to help https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-bug-triage-roster
16:04:19 bauzas Uggla: would you be happy with taking the baton this week ?
16:04:35 Uggla bauzas, yep it's ok.
16:05:16 bauzas cool thanks
16:05:21 bauzas #info bug baton is Uggla
16:05:25 bauzas #topic Gate status
16:05:29 bauzas #link https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bugs?field.tag=gate-failure Nova gate bugs
16:05:31 gmann o/
16:05:32 bauzas #link https://zuul.openstack.org/builds?project=openstack%2Fnova&project=openstack%2Fplacement&pipeline=periodic-weekly Nova&Placement periodic jobs status
16:05:42 bauzas all greens
16:05:52 elodilles \o/
16:05:53 bauzas #info Please look at the gate failures and file a bug report with the gate-failure tag.
16:06:06 bauzas I think I've seen some gate failures on my rpc series
16:06:29 bauzas but I need to verify which jobs were having problems
16:06:41 bauzas I hadn't time yet to recheck
16:07:50 bauzas moving on ?
16:08:16 bauzas #topic Release Planning
16:08:53 bauzas #link https://releases.openstack.org/caracal/schedule.html
16:08:57 bauzas #info Caracal-1 milestone in 2 weeks
16:09:23 bauzas we agreed last week on the fact today should be a spec review day but unfortunately I hadn't provided an email
16:09:35 bauzas so if you want, next week will be the first spec review day
16:09:37 bauzas fine ?
16:09:48 bauzas next tuesday*
16:09:53 sean-k-mooney the spec review day was not ment to be today
16:10:35 bauzas well, I will be on bank holiday tomorrow (+ Uggla + kashyap IIRC) and on Friday I'll be on PTO
16:10:51 kashyap *Yep)
16:10:59 bauzas https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-caracal-ptg#L175 said R-22 would be our spec review day
16:12:01 sean-k-mooney bauzas: i gues syou did say r-22
16:12:07 sean-k-mooney i feel like that was a mistak
16:12:37 sean-k-mooney i tought i suggested m1 for that bvut no worries
16:12:38 bauzas no, I remember we said 'the week after PTG'
16:12:41 sean-k-mooney we can do it next week
16:13:02 bauzas m-1 was for reviewing implementations
16:13:03 sean-k-mooney oh we are doing the implemation review day on m1
16:13:12 sean-k-mooney yep
16:13:25 sean-k-mooney so ya we missed the first sepc review day
16:13:34 bauzas yeah, my fault
16:13:37 sean-k-mooney honestly im still burnt out form ptg so next week woudl be better
16:13:39 bauzas -ETOOMANYTHINGS
16:13:49 bauzas okay, agreed
16:14:15 bauzas #info Next Tuesday (Nov 7) we will have a spec review day
16:14:24 bauzas #action bauzas to community on that review day
16:14:27 bauzas #unfo
16:14:31 bauzas #undo
16:14:31 opendevmeet Removing item from minutes: #action bauzas to community on that review day
16:14:39 bauzas #action bauzas to communicate on that review day
16:15:13 bauzas I'll also communicate the implementation review day in 2 weeks from now
16:15:35 bauzas moving on
16:15:38 bauzas #topic Caracal vPTG planning
16:15:42 bauzas #undo
16:15:42 opendevmeet Removing item from minutes: #topic Caracal vPTG planning
16:15:52 bauzas #topic Caracal vPTG wrapup
16:15:59 bauzas #link https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-caracal-ptg PTG etherpad
16:16:18 bauzas I have some draft in my emailbox that I need to eventually write
16:16:31 bauzas I just don't know when yet
16:16:42 bauzas for the moment, please look at the etherpad
16:16:53 elodilles ++
16:17:00 bauzas we had one single topic we were unable to talk
16:17:01 sean-k-mooney bauzas: wehn you send the eamil
16:17:11 sean-k-mooney please use the readonly link for the etherpad
16:17:27 bauzas like every cycle I do ? sure
16:17:46 bauzas I already did
16:17:46 sean-k-mooney ack not everyone does
16:17:53 bauzas + I downloaded a text file
16:18:01 gmann ++
16:18:15 bauzas and I tagged the latest rev
16:18:39 bauzas sean-k-mooney: look at summary emails I write for a long time now
16:18:58 bauzas you'll see what I provide
16:19:02 bauzas anyway
16:19:06 bauzas #topic Review priorities
16:19:27 bauzas we agreed on something last week, so I'll punt this topic for this week
16:19:40 bauzas #topic Stable Branches
16:19:43 bauzas elodilles: please
16:19:48 elodilles o7
16:19:55 elodilles stable/2023.2 branch was broken due to openstacksdk-functional-devstack job, but it is fixed -- https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/openstacksdk/+/899154
16:20:08 elodilles thanks gmann for pinging me about this ^^^
16:20:18 elodilles other stable gates state should be also OK
16:20:44 elodilles (or at least i'm not aware of any issue)
16:20:45 bauzas cool
16:20:49 elodilles stable release patches proposed: https://review.opendev.org/q/project:openstack/releases+is:open+intopic:nova
16:21:06 elodilles so release liaisons please review ^^^
16:21:10 bauzas yeah I need to review them
16:21:12 elodilles we might not need all of them
16:21:20 bauzas that said, I have some bugfix I'd like to backport :)
16:21:26 bauzas but let's not wait for it :)
16:21:30 bauzas or
16:21:33 bauzas as you want
16:21:34 gmann also, these hyperV and vmware driver deprecation backport to stable/2023.1 are ready for 2nd review https://review.opendev.org/q/topic:deprecate-virt-drivers+status:open
16:21:37 elodilles if you want to wait for any bugfix, then just -1 it
16:21:43 gmann thanks bauzas for reviews.
16:21:47 bauzas actually I have two series I want to backport
16:21:53 gmann maybe it will be good to include those in releases elodilles mentioned
16:22:03 bauzas the compute rpc fix and the sriov gpu fix
16:22:16 bauzas elodilles: could we then wait a little bit before releasing ?
16:22:26 elodilles bauzas: for sure

Earlier   Later